Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Eduardo de Freitas
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Kich, Jalusa Deon, Miele, Marcelo, Morés, Nelson, Amaral, Armando, Coldebella, Arlei, Cardoso, Marisa, Corbellini, Luis Gustavo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36085
Resumo: To achieve control of Salmonella contamination in pig carcasses, on-farm measures need to be better understood. Complementary strategies require research not only on their effectiveness but also on their financial impact. In this study, we evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of two treatments for reducing Salmonella seroprevalence in commercial swine herds. Pigs treated with a prebiotic or a vaccine were studied and compared with pigs in an untreated control group. Each strategy was applied to three batches of pigs in a commercial integration system; the animals were followed from farrowing to the slaughterhouse, and their serologies upon arrival at finishing farms and before slaughter were evaluated. Additionally, carcass surface contamination was assessed for each strategy. The seroprevalence upon arrival at the finishing farm was lower than 3% in all groups. In the control and vaccine groups, the seroprevalence increased by more than 90 percentage points from the day of arrival at the finishing farm to four days before slaughter. Only the prebiotic treatment yielded a significant effect on preslaughter seroprevalence (a 49 percentage points reduction from that in the control). Carcass contamination was 0% in the prebiotic group, 18.33% in the control group and 29.16% in the vaccine group. Only prebiotics significantly reduced the seroprevalence of Salmonella in the studied herds, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with prebiotic use was 1.92 USD to reduce seroprevalence by 10 percentage points per carcass ton.
id UEL-11_d592aee2bbda05e9efc02659f5f49c39
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36085
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratiosAvaliação de duas estratégias para redução da infecção por Salmonella em rebanhos comerciais de suínos na fase de terminação e a razão incremental de custo efetividadeCost-effectivenessFinishing herdsPrebioticSalmonellaSwineVaccine.Custo-efetividadePrebióticoRebanhos de terminaçãoSalmonellaSuínosVacina.To achieve control of Salmonella contamination in pig carcasses, on-farm measures need to be better understood. Complementary strategies require research not only on their effectiveness but also on their financial impact. In this study, we evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of two treatments for reducing Salmonella seroprevalence in commercial swine herds. Pigs treated with a prebiotic or a vaccine were studied and compared with pigs in an untreated control group. Each strategy was applied to three batches of pigs in a commercial integration system; the animals were followed from farrowing to the slaughterhouse, and their serologies upon arrival at finishing farms and before slaughter were evaluated. Additionally, carcass surface contamination was assessed for each strategy. The seroprevalence upon arrival at the finishing farm was lower than 3% in all groups. In the control and vaccine groups, the seroprevalence increased by more than 90 percentage points from the day of arrival at the finishing farm to four days before slaughter. Only the prebiotic treatment yielded a significant effect on preslaughter seroprevalence (a 49 percentage points reduction from that in the control). Carcass contamination was 0% in the prebiotic group, 18.33% in the control group and 29.16% in the vaccine group. Only prebiotics significantly reduced the seroprevalence of Salmonella in the studied herds, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with prebiotic use was 1.92 USD to reduce seroprevalence by 10 percentage points per carcass ton.Para alcançar controle da contaminação por Salmonella em carcaças suínas, intervenções na produção primária precisam ser melhor compreendidas. Estratégias complementares requerem não só pesquisas acerca da sua efetividade, mas também dos custos implicados no uso de tais tecnologias. Para tanto, foi avaliada a razão de custo-efetividade incremental de dois tratamentos para reduzir a soroprevalência de Salmonella em rebanhos suínos comerciais. O uso de um prebiótico e de uma vacina foram comparados com um controle sem tratamento. Cada estratégia foi aplicada em três lotes de suínos em um sistema comercial de integração. Os animais foram acompanhados da maternidade até o abate e suas sorologias no dia do alojamento na terminação e quatro dias antes do abate foram avaliadas. Também, em cada estratégia, amostras de suabe de carcaça foram coletadas para avaliação da contaminação superficial. A soroprevalência no dia do alojamento na terminação foi menor do que 3% em todos os grupos, sendo que nos grupos controle e vacina a soroprevalência aumentou mais de 90 pontos percentuais quatro dias antes do abate. Apenas o uso do prebiótico levou a um efeito significativo na redução da soroprevalência pré-abate (49 pontos percentuais), quando comparado com o controle. A contaminação das carcaças no grupo prebiótico foi 0%, 18,33% no controle e 29,16 no grupo vacinado. Assim, apenas o prebiótico foi capaz de reduzir a soroprevalência nos rebanhos estudados com razão incremental de custo-efetividade de 1,92 USD para redução de 10 pontos percentuais na soroprevalência por tonelada de carcaça.UEL2020-03-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionField researchapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/3608510.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n2p505Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 2 (2020); 505-516Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 2 (2020); 505-5161679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36085/26867Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Eduardo de FreitasKich, Jalusa DeonMiele, MarceloMorés, NelsonAmaral, ArmandoColdebella, ArleiCardoso, MarisaCorbellini, Luis Gustavo2022-10-10T13:34:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36085Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-10T13:34:23Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
Avaliação de duas estratégias para redução da infecção por Salmonella em rebanhos comerciais de suínos na fase de terminação e a razão incremental de custo efetividade
title Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
spellingShingle Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
Costa, Eduardo de Freitas
Cost-effectiveness
Finishing herds
Prebiotic
Salmonella
Swine
Vaccine.
Custo-efetividade
Prebiótico
Rebanhos de terminação
Salmonella
Suínos
Vacina.
title_short Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
title_full Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
title_fullStr Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
title_sort Evaluation of two strategies for reducing the spread of Salmonella in commercial swine herds during the finishing phase and their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios
author Costa, Eduardo de Freitas
author_facet Costa, Eduardo de Freitas
Kich, Jalusa Deon
Miele, Marcelo
Morés, Nelson
Amaral, Armando
Coldebella, Arlei
Cardoso, Marisa
Corbellini, Luis Gustavo
author_role author
author2 Kich, Jalusa Deon
Miele, Marcelo
Morés, Nelson
Amaral, Armando
Coldebella, Arlei
Cardoso, Marisa
Corbellini, Luis Gustavo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Eduardo de Freitas
Kich, Jalusa Deon
Miele, Marcelo
Morés, Nelson
Amaral, Armando
Coldebella, Arlei
Cardoso, Marisa
Corbellini, Luis Gustavo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cost-effectiveness
Finishing herds
Prebiotic
Salmonella
Swine
Vaccine.
Custo-efetividade
Prebiótico
Rebanhos de terminação
Salmonella
Suínos
Vacina.
topic Cost-effectiveness
Finishing herds
Prebiotic
Salmonella
Swine
Vaccine.
Custo-efetividade
Prebiótico
Rebanhos de terminação
Salmonella
Suínos
Vacina.
description To achieve control of Salmonella contamination in pig carcasses, on-farm measures need to be better understood. Complementary strategies require research not only on their effectiveness but also on their financial impact. In this study, we evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of two treatments for reducing Salmonella seroprevalence in commercial swine herds. Pigs treated with a prebiotic or a vaccine were studied and compared with pigs in an untreated control group. Each strategy was applied to three batches of pigs in a commercial integration system; the animals were followed from farrowing to the slaughterhouse, and their serologies upon arrival at finishing farms and before slaughter were evaluated. Additionally, carcass surface contamination was assessed for each strategy. The seroprevalence upon arrival at the finishing farm was lower than 3% in all groups. In the control and vaccine groups, the seroprevalence increased by more than 90 percentage points from the day of arrival at the finishing farm to four days before slaughter. Only the prebiotic treatment yielded a significant effect on preslaughter seroprevalence (a 49 percentage points reduction from that in the control). Carcass contamination was 0% in the prebiotic group, 18.33% in the control group and 29.16% in the vaccine group. Only prebiotics significantly reduced the seroprevalence of Salmonella in the studied herds, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with prebiotic use was 1.92 USD to reduce seroprevalence by 10 percentage points per carcass ton.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Field research
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36085
10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n2p505
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36085
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n2p505
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/36085/26867
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 41 No. 2 (2020); 505-516
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 41 n. 2 (2020); 505-516
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306081454784512