Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th century
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Antíteses |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/37436 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to reflect on the clash at the Universityof Paris between the secular masters and the begging masters. This quarrel occurred because the seculars felt threatened with the entrance of the beggars in the University. To carry out this reflection, we chose as sources for the study the writing of Guillherme de Santo Amor entitled Tractatus brevis de periculis novissimorum temporum (Brief treatise on the dangers of recent times) as a representative of the secular masters and three writings of Boaventura de Bagnoregio Cuestiones disputed on la Perfeccion Evangélica, The perfection of life and Itinerary of the Mind to God. At the epicenter of this dispute were begging and knowledge. From these two questions, the containers chose as a weapon to fight the penalty and the University became the liaison. We will try to explain that, through these writings, we will be able to understand the social and theoretical changes that occurred in the medieval West, placing on the agenda a new worldview, of which the beggars were its exhibitors. We also observed that our reflections consider the writings from the perspective of social history and we will have memory as our guiding thread. |
id |
UEL-13_d366ddd8c00b77fe036dfad8021210e8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37436 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-13 |
network_name_str |
Antíteses |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th centuryConhecimento e mendicância como epicentro do embate entre Boaventura de Bagnoregio e Guilherme de Santo Amor no século XIIIIntellectualsMemoryUniversityFranciscanismMendicancy.IntelectuaisMemóriaUniversidadeFranciscanismoMendicânciaThe purpose of this article is to reflect on the clash at the Universityof Paris between the secular masters and the begging masters. This quarrel occurred because the seculars felt threatened with the entrance of the beggars in the University. To carry out this reflection, we chose as sources for the study the writing of Guillherme de Santo Amor entitled Tractatus brevis de periculis novissimorum temporum (Brief treatise on the dangers of recent times) as a representative of the secular masters and three writings of Boaventura de Bagnoregio Cuestiones disputed on la Perfeccion Evangélica, The perfection of life and Itinerary of the Mind to God. At the epicenter of this dispute were begging and knowledge. From these two questions, the containers chose as a weapon to fight the penalty and the University became the liaison. We will try to explain that, through these writings, we will be able to understand the social and theoretical changes that occurred in the medieval West, placing on the agenda a new worldview, of which the beggars were its exhibitors. We also observed that our reflections consider the writings from the perspective of social history and we will have memory as our guiding thread.O objetivo desse artigo é refletir sobre o embate travado na Universidade de Paris entre os mestres seculares e os mestres mendicantes. Essa querela ocorreu porque os seculares sentiramse ameaçados com a entrada dos mendicantes na Universidade. Para realizar essa reflexão, elegemos como fontes para o estudo o escrito de Guillherme de Santo Amor intitulado Tractatus brevis de periculis novissimorum temporum (Breve tratado sobre os perigos dos últimos tempos) como representante dos mestres seculares e três escritos de Boaventura de Bagnoregio: Cuestiones disputadas sobre la Perfeccion Evangélica, A perfeição da vida e Itenerário da Mente para Deus. No epicentro dessa disputa estavam a mendicância e o conhecimento. A partir dessas duas questões, os contentadores escolheram como arma de combate a pena e a Universidade tornou-se a liça. Procuraremos explicitar que, por meio desses escritos, poderemos compreender as mudanças sociais e teóricas que ocorriam no Ocidente medieval, colocando na ordem do dia uma nova visão de mundo, da qual os mendicantes eram seus expositores. Observamos, também, que nossas reflexões consideram os escritos da perspectiva da história social e teremos a memória como nosso fio condutor.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/3743610.5433/1984-3356.2019v12n24p95Antíteses; Vol. 12 No. 24 (2019): V. 12, n. 24 (2019) - Dossiê: Francisco e o franciscanismo; 95-121Antíteses; v. 12 n. 24 (2019): V. 12, n. 24 (2019) - Dossiê: Francisco e o franciscanismo; 95-1211984-3356reponame:Antítesesinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/37436/26826Copyright (c) 2019 Antítesesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Terezinha2020-11-03T15:32:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/37436Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antitesesPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/oaiantiteses@uel.br||1984-33561984-3356opendoar:2020-11-03T15:32:47Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th century Conhecimento e mendicância como epicentro do embate entre Boaventura de Bagnoregio e Guilherme de Santo Amor no século XIII |
title |
Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th century |
spellingShingle |
Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th century Oliveira, Terezinha Intellectuals Memory University Franciscanism Mendicancy. Intelectuais Memória Universidade Franciscanismo Mendicância |
title_short |
Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th century |
title_full |
Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th century |
title_fullStr |
Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th century |
title_full_unstemmed |
Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th century |
title_sort |
Knowledge and mendicancy as epicenter of the clash between Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and William of Saint-Amour in the 13th century |
author |
Oliveira, Terezinha |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Terezinha |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Terezinha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Intellectuals Memory University Franciscanism Mendicancy. Intelectuais Memória Universidade Franciscanismo Mendicância |
topic |
Intellectuals Memory University Franciscanism Mendicancy. Intelectuais Memória Universidade Franciscanismo Mendicância |
description |
The purpose of this article is to reflect on the clash at the Universityof Paris between the secular masters and the begging masters. This quarrel occurred because the seculars felt threatened with the entrance of the beggars in the University. To carry out this reflection, we chose as sources for the study the writing of Guillherme de Santo Amor entitled Tractatus brevis de periculis novissimorum temporum (Brief treatise on the dangers of recent times) as a representative of the secular masters and three writings of Boaventura de Bagnoregio Cuestiones disputed on la Perfeccion Evangélica, The perfection of life and Itinerary of the Mind to God. At the epicenter of this dispute were begging and knowledge. From these two questions, the containers chose as a weapon to fight the penalty and the University became the liaison. We will try to explain that, through these writings, we will be able to understand the social and theoretical changes that occurred in the medieval West, placing on the agenda a new worldview, of which the beggars were its exhibitors. We also observed that our reflections consider the writings from the perspective of social history and we will have memory as our guiding thread. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/37436 10.5433/1984-3356.2019v12n24p95 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/37436 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1984-3356.2019v12n24p95 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/antiteses/article/view/37436/26826 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Antíteses info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Antíteses |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses; Vol. 12 No. 24 (2019): V. 12, n. 24 (2019) - Dossiê: Francisco e o franciscanismo; 95-121 Antíteses; v. 12 n. 24 (2019): V. 12, n. 24 (2019) - Dossiê: Francisco e o franciscanismo; 95-121 1984-3356 reponame:Antíteses instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Antíteses |
collection |
Antíteses |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Antíteses - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
antiteses@uel.br|| |
_version_ |
1797069048500977664 |