The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular action

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Remedio, José Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Aranjues, Gabriel Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34387
Resumo: The objective of this research is to analyze the concept of citizenship for the purpose of filing popular action lawsuits. As an instrument of control of the Public Administration, the popular action lawsuit can be proposed by any citizen, which is legitimized by LXXIII of article 5 of the Brazilian Federal Constitution and is disciplined by Law n. 4717/65. Moreover, paragraph 3 of article 1 of Law n. 4717/65 states that the plaintiff must prove his status as a citizen in order to file the popular action lawsuit, by means of his voter registration or equivalent document. The requirement set forth by Law 4717/65 restricts the concept of citizen, by limiting its use exclusively to people with demonstrable political rights through their voter ID or equivalent documents. This study concludes that the concept of citizenship currently covers not only political rights, but also social and civil rights, which is why the term citizen, for purposes of filing the popular action lawsuit, must be broad, not limited to the contours established by Law 4.717/65, which in this aspect is not included in the Federal Constitution. This paper utilized the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review.
id UEL-2_56840674408264735ce20b5f0c267a62
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34387
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular actionA amplitude do conceito de cidadania para efeito de propositura da ação popularPopular action lawsuitExtent of the concept of citizenshipCitizenshipCitizenLegal capacity to sue.Popular actionExtent of citizenship conceptCitizenshipCitizenLegal capacity to sue.The objective of this research is to analyze the concept of citizenship for the purpose of filing popular action lawsuits. As an instrument of control of the Public Administration, the popular action lawsuit can be proposed by any citizen, which is legitimized by LXXIII of article 5 of the Brazilian Federal Constitution and is disciplined by Law n. 4717/65. Moreover, paragraph 3 of article 1 of Law n. 4717/65 states that the plaintiff must prove his status as a citizen in order to file the popular action lawsuit, by means of his voter registration or equivalent document. The requirement set forth by Law 4717/65 restricts the concept of citizen, by limiting its use exclusively to people with demonstrable political rights through their voter ID or equivalent documents. This study concludes that the concept of citizenship currently covers not only political rights, but also social and civil rights, which is why the term citizen, for purposes of filing the popular action lawsuit, must be broad, not limited to the contours established by Law 4.717/65, which in this aspect is not included in the Federal Constitution. This paper utilized the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review.A pesquisa tem por objeto analisar o conceito de cidadania para fins de ajuizamento da ação popular. Como instrumento de controle da Administração Pública, a ação popular pode ser proposta por qualquer cidadão. A ação encontra-se prevista no inciso LXXIII do artigo 5º da Constituição Federal e está disciplinada pela Lei 4.717/65. O § 3º do artigo 1º da Lei 4.717/65 estatui que o autor precisa comprovar sua condição de cidadão para ajuizar a ação popular, por meio de seu título de eleitor ou de documento equivalente. A exigência prevista na Lei 4.717/65 restringe o conceito de cidadão, ao limitar o uso da ação popular exclusivamente às pessoas detentoras de direitos políticos demonstráveis através do título de eleitor ou de documento equivalente. Conclui a pesquisa que o conceito de cidadania abrange na atualidade não só os direitos políticos, mas também os direitos sociais e civis, motivo por que o termo cidadão, para fins de ajuizamento da ação popular, deve ser amplo, não se limitando aos contornos estabelecidos pela Lei 4.717/65, que nesse aspecto não foi recepcionada pela Constituição Federal. O método utilizado é o hipotético-dedutivo, com base em pesquisa doutrinária e jurisprudencial.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3438710.5433/1980-511X.2019v14n3p184Revista do Direito Público; v. 14 n. 3 (2019); 184-2001980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34387/26694Copyright (c) 2019 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRemedio, José AntonioAranjues, Gabriel Silva2020-01-20T14:08:27Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34387Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2020-01-20T14:08:27Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular action
A amplitude do conceito de cidadania para efeito de propositura da ação popular
title The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular action
spellingShingle The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular action
Remedio, José Antonio
Popular action lawsuit
Extent of the concept of citizenship
Citizenship
Citizen
Legal capacity to sue.
Popular action
Extent of citizenship concept
Citizenship
Citizen
Legal capacity to sue.
title_short The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular action
title_full The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular action
title_fullStr The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular action
title_full_unstemmed The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular action
title_sort The extent of the citizenship concept regarding the proposition of popular action
author Remedio, José Antonio
author_facet Remedio, José Antonio
Aranjues, Gabriel Silva
author_role author
author2 Aranjues, Gabriel Silva
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Remedio, José Antonio
Aranjues, Gabriel Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Popular action lawsuit
Extent of the concept of citizenship
Citizenship
Citizen
Legal capacity to sue.
Popular action
Extent of citizenship concept
Citizenship
Citizen
Legal capacity to sue.
topic Popular action lawsuit
Extent of the concept of citizenship
Citizenship
Citizen
Legal capacity to sue.
Popular action
Extent of citizenship concept
Citizenship
Citizen
Legal capacity to sue.
description The objective of this research is to analyze the concept of citizenship for the purpose of filing popular action lawsuits. As an instrument of control of the Public Administration, the popular action lawsuit can be proposed by any citizen, which is legitimized by LXXIII of article 5 of the Brazilian Federal Constitution and is disciplined by Law n. 4717/65. Moreover, paragraph 3 of article 1 of Law n. 4717/65 states that the plaintiff must prove his status as a citizen in order to file the popular action lawsuit, by means of his voter registration or equivalent document. The requirement set forth by Law 4717/65 restricts the concept of citizen, by limiting its use exclusively to people with demonstrable political rights through their voter ID or equivalent documents. This study concludes that the concept of citizenship currently covers not only political rights, but also social and civil rights, which is why the term citizen, for purposes of filing the popular action lawsuit, must be broad, not limited to the contours established by Law 4.717/65, which in this aspect is not included in the Federal Constitution. This paper utilized the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34387
10.5433/1980-511X.2019v14n3p184
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34387
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2019v14n3p184
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/34387/26694
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista do Direito Público
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista do Direito Público
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 14 n. 3 (2019); 184-200
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1750315355126890496