THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maia, Mauricio
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Reis Augusto Rigamonti, Thiago
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43674
Resumo: Popular action and public civil action are embodied in the main procedural instruments for the satisfaction of meta-individual legal rights, understood as those that go beyond the legal sphere of only the plaintiff, who so does it in a skillful way to satisfy diffuseor coletive desires society. In addition to instruments of popular participation and institutions organized in the exercise of state power and management of public competences, they are characterized by the nobility of spirit through which a certain subject, notably when disassociated from the state structure, takes responsibility for proposing action seeking interest that is not only yours, but, on the contrary, is an indeterminacy of individuals, with no possibilityof obtaining a singular benefit. The gratuity of these actions is therule and their exceptional cases must merit strict interpretation,so as not to subvert the constitutional order. The present work seeks to evaluate the unconstitutionality of the infraconstitucional normative that provide for the cost of ten times the legal costs to popular authors or directors of associations that promote public civil actions, through doctrinal analysis and jurisprudence, under the deductive method.
id UEL-2_63aad5e23f61a86fc84b4da558a89d96
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43674
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONSDa inconstitucionalidade da condenação ao décuplo de custas processuais a autores populares e diretores de associações em ações civis públicasAção PopularAção Civil PúblicaParticipação PopularCustas ProcessuaisInconstitucionalidade.Popular action and public civil action are embodied in the main procedural instruments for the satisfaction of meta-individual legal rights, understood as those that go beyond the legal sphere of only the plaintiff, who so does it in a skillful way to satisfy diffuseor coletive desires society. In addition to instruments of popular participation and institutions organized in the exercise of state power and management of public competences, they are characterized by the nobility of spirit through which a certain subject, notably when disassociated from the state structure, takes responsibility for proposing action seeking interest that is not only yours, but, on the contrary, is an indeterminacy of individuals, with no possibilityof obtaining a singular benefit. The gratuity of these actions is therule and their exceptional cases must merit strict interpretation,so as not to subvert the constitutional order. The present work seeks to evaluate the unconstitutionality of the infraconstitucional normative that provide for the cost of ten times the legal costs to popular authors or directors of associations that promote public civil actions, through doctrinal analysis and jurisprudence, under the deductive method.A ação popular e a ação civil pública se consubstanciam nos principais instrumentos processuais para satisfação de interesses jurídicos metaindividuais, compreendidos como aqueles que extravasam a esfera jurídica do autor da ação, que o faz, então, de maneira hábil a satisfazer anseios difusos ou coletivos da sociedade. Além de instrumentos de participação popular e de instituições organizadas no exercício do poder estatal e gestão das competências públicas, caracterizam-se pela nobreza de espírito através da qual um determinado sujeito, notadamente quando desassociado da estrutura estatal, assume a responsabilidade de propositura de ação judicial buscando interesse que não é só seu, mas, ao contrário, é de uma indeterminação de indivíduos, sem possibilidade de obter singular benefício. A gratuidade destas ações é a regra e as suas hipóteses de exceção devem merecer interpretação restrita, de molde a não subverter a ordem constitucional. O presente trabalho busca avaliar a inconstitucionalidade das previsões normativas que prevejam custeio de décuplo de custas judiciais a autores populares ou diretores de associações que promovem ações civis públicas, mediante análise de doutrina e jurisprudência, sob o método dedutivo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/4367410.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n1p169Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 1 (2023); 169-1901980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43674/48910Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaia, MauricioReis Augusto Rigamonti, Thiago2023-08-15T15:02:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43674Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2023-08-15T15:02:46Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS
Da inconstitucionalidade da condenação ao décuplo de custas processuais a autores populares e diretores de associações em ações civis públicas
title THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS
spellingShingle THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS
Maia, Mauricio
Ação Popular
Ação Civil Pública
Participação Popular
Custas Processuais
Inconstitucionalidade.
title_short THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS
title_full THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS
title_fullStr THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS
title_full_unstemmed THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS
title_sort THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONDEMNATION TO THE TEN OF PROCEDURAL COSTS TO POPULAR AUTHORS AND DIRECTORS OF ASSOCIATIONS IN PUBLIC CIVIL ACTIONS
author Maia, Mauricio
author_facet Maia, Mauricio
Reis Augusto Rigamonti, Thiago
author_role author
author2 Reis Augusto Rigamonti, Thiago
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maia, Mauricio
Reis Augusto Rigamonti, Thiago
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ação Popular
Ação Civil Pública
Participação Popular
Custas Processuais
Inconstitucionalidade.
topic Ação Popular
Ação Civil Pública
Participação Popular
Custas Processuais
Inconstitucionalidade.
description Popular action and public civil action are embodied in the main procedural instruments for the satisfaction of meta-individual legal rights, understood as those that go beyond the legal sphere of only the plaintiff, who so does it in a skillful way to satisfy diffuseor coletive desires society. In addition to instruments of popular participation and institutions organized in the exercise of state power and management of public competences, they are characterized by the nobility of spirit through which a certain subject, notably when disassociated from the state structure, takes responsibility for proposing action seeking interest that is not only yours, but, on the contrary, is an indeterminacy of individuals, with no possibilityof obtaining a singular benefit. The gratuity of these actions is therule and their exceptional cases must merit strict interpretation,so as not to subvert the constitutional order. The present work seeks to evaluate the unconstitutionality of the infraconstitucional normative that provide for the cost of ten times the legal costs to popular authors or directors of associations that promote public civil actions, through doctrinal analysis and jurisprudence, under the deductive method.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43674
10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n1p169
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43674
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n1p169
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/43674/48910
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 1 (2023); 169-190
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305933545799680

Registros relacionados