POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Remedio, José Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Cardoso, Fernando Cerqueira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35636
Resumo: This research explores the legal nature of policequestioning in light of the Brazilian democraticconstitutional model. In this context, the principleof the supremacy of the Constitution prevails inthe national legal system. This means that allother laws must obey constitutional precepts.However, the principle of the supremacy of theConstitution is not always observed in relation toquestioning in police headquarters, which causessignificant damage to the fundamental rights ofthe accused in criminal proceedings. In academia,there is much debate as there is no uniformity ofthought. Moreover, the interrogation sometimeshas a legal evidential nature, sometimes adefensive nature in favor of the investigated, andsometimes a mixed nature, with both evidentialand defensive informative elements. Moreover,the practical implications for the criminallyinvestigated are quite varied, resulting from theadoption of any of the previous mentioned typesin relation to police questioning. Thehypothetical-deductive method is used, based onlegislation, doctrines, and jurisprudence. Thispaper concludes that, based on the Braziliandemocratic constitutional model, especially theconstitutional principles of ample defense andadversarial proceedings, police questioning hasthe legal nature of defense, and not evidential ormixed nature, thus enabling effective protectionof the fundamental rights of the criminallyinvestigated person.
id UEL-2_a28810ac869c5f67d1354e90dec9d00c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35636
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODELInterrogatório policial: natureza jurídica à luz do modelo constitucional democrático BrasilPolice InquiryPolice InterrogationPolice Interrogation in the Democratic ModelDemocratic Constitutional ModelLegal Nature of Police Interrogation.Inquérito PolicialInterrogatório PolicialInterrogatório Policial no Modelo DemocráticoModelo Constitucional DemocráticoNatureza Jurídica do Interrogatório Policial.This research explores the legal nature of policequestioning in light of the Brazilian democraticconstitutional model. In this context, the principleof the supremacy of the Constitution prevails inthe national legal system. This means that allother laws must obey constitutional precepts.However, the principle of the supremacy of theConstitution is not always observed in relation toquestioning in police headquarters, which causessignificant damage to the fundamental rights ofthe accused in criminal proceedings. In academia,there is much debate as there is no uniformity ofthought. Moreover, the interrogation sometimeshas a legal evidential nature, sometimes adefensive nature in favor of the investigated, andsometimes a mixed nature, with both evidentialand defensive informative elements. Moreover,the practical implications for the criminallyinvestigated are quite varied, resulting from theadoption of any of the previous mentioned typesin relation to police questioning. Thehypothetical-deductive method is used, based onlegislation, doctrines, and jurisprudence. Thispaper concludes that, based on the Braziliandemocratic constitutional model, especially theconstitutional principles of ample defense andadversarial proceedings, police questioning hasthe legal nature of defense, and not evidential ormixed nature, thus enabling effective protectionof the fundamental rights of the criminallyinvestigated person.A pesquisa tem por objeto analisar a natureza jurídica do interrogatório policial à luz do modelo constitucional democrático brasileiro. Vige no ordenamento jurídico nacional o princípio da supremacia da Constituição. Isto significa que todos os demais diplomas legislativos devem obediência aos preceitos constitucionais. Ocorre que o princípio da supremacia da Constituição nem sempre é observado em relação ao interrogatório realizado em sede policial, o que acarreta sensíveis prejuízos aos direitos fundamentais do investigado na esfera penal. Na doutrina, sem uniformidade de pensamento, o interrogatório ora possui natureza jurídica probatória, ora natureza defensiva em favor do investigado, e ora natureza mista, dotada ao mesmo tempo dos elementos informativos probatório e defensivo. Todavia, são bastante variadas as implicações práticas ao investigado criminalmente, decorrentes da adoção das diferentes espécies de natureza jurídica adotadas pela doutrina em relação ao interrogatório policial. O método utilizado é o hipotético-dedutivo, com base na legislação, doutrina e jurisprudência. Conclui que, com base no modelo constitucional democrático brasileiro, em especial aos princípios constitucionais da ampla defesa e do contraditório, o interrogatório policial possui natureza jurídica de defesa, e não natureza probatória ou mista, possibilitando, assim, efetiva proteção dos direitos fundamentais da pessoa investigada criminalmente.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2021-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3563610.5433/1980-511X.2021v16n1p48Revista do Direito Público; v. 16 n. 1 (2021); 48-691980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35636/29589Copyright (c) 2021 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRemedio, José AntonioCardoso, Fernando Cerqueira2022-01-19T19:08:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35636Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2022-01-19T19:08:01Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL
Interrogatório policial: natureza jurídica à luz do modelo constitucional democrático Brasil
title POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL
spellingShingle POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL
Remedio, José Antonio
Police Inquiry
Police Interrogation
Police Interrogation in the Democratic Model
Democratic Constitutional Model
Legal Nature of Police Interrogation.
Inquérito Policial
Interrogatório Policial
Interrogatório Policial no Modelo Democrático
Modelo Constitucional Democrático
Natureza Jurídica do Interrogatório Policial.
title_short POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL
title_full POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL
title_fullStr POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL
title_full_unstemmed POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL
title_sort POLICE INTERROGATION: JURIDICAL NATURE REGARDING THE BRAZILIAN DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL
author Remedio, José Antonio
author_facet Remedio, José Antonio
Cardoso, Fernando Cerqueira
author_role author
author2 Cardoso, Fernando Cerqueira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Remedio, José Antonio
Cardoso, Fernando Cerqueira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Police Inquiry
Police Interrogation
Police Interrogation in the Democratic Model
Democratic Constitutional Model
Legal Nature of Police Interrogation.
Inquérito Policial
Interrogatório Policial
Interrogatório Policial no Modelo Democrático
Modelo Constitucional Democrático
Natureza Jurídica do Interrogatório Policial.
topic Police Inquiry
Police Interrogation
Police Interrogation in the Democratic Model
Democratic Constitutional Model
Legal Nature of Police Interrogation.
Inquérito Policial
Interrogatório Policial
Interrogatório Policial no Modelo Democrático
Modelo Constitucional Democrático
Natureza Jurídica do Interrogatório Policial.
description This research explores the legal nature of policequestioning in light of the Brazilian democraticconstitutional model. In this context, the principleof the supremacy of the Constitution prevails inthe national legal system. This means that allother laws must obey constitutional precepts.However, the principle of the supremacy of theConstitution is not always observed in relation toquestioning in police headquarters, which causessignificant damage to the fundamental rights ofthe accused in criminal proceedings. In academia,there is much debate as there is no uniformity ofthought. Moreover, the interrogation sometimeshas a legal evidential nature, sometimes adefensive nature in favor of the investigated, andsometimes a mixed nature, with both evidentialand defensive informative elements. Moreover,the practical implications for the criminallyinvestigated are quite varied, resulting from theadoption of any of the previous mentioned typesin relation to police questioning. Thehypothetical-deductive method is used, based onlegislation, doctrines, and jurisprudence. Thispaper concludes that, based on the Braziliandemocratic constitutional model, especially theconstitutional principles of ample defense andadversarial proceedings, police questioning hasthe legal nature of defense, and not evidential ormixed nature, thus enabling effective protectionof the fundamental rights of the criminallyinvestigated person.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35636
10.5433/1980-511X.2021v16n1p48
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35636
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2021v16n1p48
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/35636/29589
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista do Direito Público
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista do Direito Público
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 16 n. 1 (2021); 48-69
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1750315355144716288