Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321 |
Resumo: | In emergency situations, possibilities are sought to relativize the principle of legality, considering labor relations as a good that deserves to be preserved. The proposed problem is how and to what extent the principle of legality should be observed, which guides government policies and the actions of public servants and those responsible for enforcing the law, resulting in an extraordinary situation. The objective of this research is to analyze which hermeneutical option is adequate to interpret the reality that arose with the pandemic (Covid-19) and to reflect on aspects involved in the weighting of very important principles for the law, which are beacons and also serve. as checks and balances for state action, avoiding arbitration. The method adopted is the analytical one, with bibliographic and documentary review, mainly of texts of laws and normative acts. It is expected to demonstrate the importance and timeliness of the issue, as well as to contribute to the proposal for a sustainable solution that responds to the proposed problem, pointing out the most important values to preserve. The conclusion is that the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection appears as a guideline, so the State considers its institutional mission to guarantee social coexistence and the enjoyment of fundamental rights for all citizens. |
id |
UEL-6_988f08b2854326d6b8fccbcf26b423a4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44321 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protectionDignidade humana e direitos sociais na pandemia: deveres prestacionais do Estado e proibição da proteção insuficientePrincípios ConstitucionaisDireitos sociaisPandemiaDeveres Prestacionais do Estado.Constitutional principles. Social rights. Pandemic. State Provincial Duties.In emergency situations, possibilities are sought to relativize the principle of legality, considering labor relations as a good that deserves to be preserved. The proposed problem is how and to what extent the principle of legality should be observed, which guides government policies and the actions of public servants and those responsible for enforcing the law, resulting in an extraordinary situation. The objective of this research is to analyze which hermeneutical option is adequate to interpret the reality that arose with the pandemic (Covid-19) and to reflect on aspects involved in the weighting of very important principles for the law, which are beacons and also serve. as checks and balances for state action, avoiding arbitration. The method adopted is the analytical one, with bibliographic and documentary review, mainly of texts of laws and normative acts. It is expected to demonstrate the importance and timeliness of the issue, as well as to contribute to the proposal for a sustainable solution that responds to the proposed problem, pointing out the most important values to preserve. The conclusion is that the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection appears as a guideline, so the State considers its institutional mission to guarantee social coexistence and the enjoyment of fundamental rights for all citizens.Em emergências buscam-se possibilidades de relativização do princípio da legalidade, considerando as relações de trabalho como um bem que merece ser preservado. O problema proposto é como e em qual medida deve-se observar o princípio da legalidade, orientador das políticas governamentais e do agir dos servidores públicos e aplicadores do direito, sobrevindo situação extraordinária. O objetivo desta pesquisa é analisar qual escolha hermenêutica é adequada para interpretar a realidade surgida com a pandemia (Covid-19) e refletir sobre aspectos implicados no caso do sopesamento de princípios importantíssimos para o direito, os quais são balizadores e servem de freios e contrapesos da ação estatal, evitando o arbítrio. O método adotado é o analítico, com revisão bibliográfica e documental, principalmente de textos de leis e de atos normativos. Espera-se demonstrar a importância e atualidade do tema, bem como contribuir para a proposta sustentável de solução, que responda ao problema proposto, apontando os valores mais importantes a serem preservados. A conclusão é que o princípio da proibição da proteção insuficiente desponta como baliza, para que seja considerada pelo Estado a sua missão institucional de garantir a convivência social e o gozo dos direitos fundamentais a todos os cidadãos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2022-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4432110.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n2p153-168Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 2 (2022); 153-1682178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321/47768Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIvo, JasielMontenegro Alencar, AmandaTorres Teixeira, Sergio2023-01-26T20:19:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44321Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T20:19:52Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection Dignidade humana e direitos sociais na pandemia: deveres prestacionais do Estado e proibição da proteção insuficiente |
title |
Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection |
spellingShingle |
Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection Ivo, Jasiel Princípios Constitucionais Direitos sociais Pandemia Deveres Prestacionais do Estado. Constitutional principles. Social rights. Pandemic. State Provincial Duties. |
title_short |
Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection |
title_full |
Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection |
title_fullStr |
Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection |
title_sort |
Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection |
author |
Ivo, Jasiel |
author_facet |
Ivo, Jasiel Montenegro Alencar, Amanda Torres Teixeira, Sergio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Montenegro Alencar, Amanda Torres Teixeira, Sergio |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ivo, Jasiel Montenegro Alencar, Amanda Torres Teixeira, Sergio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Princípios Constitucionais Direitos sociais Pandemia Deveres Prestacionais do Estado. Constitutional principles. Social rights. Pandemic. State Provincial Duties. |
topic |
Princípios Constitucionais Direitos sociais Pandemia Deveres Prestacionais do Estado. Constitutional principles. Social rights. Pandemic. State Provincial Duties. |
description |
In emergency situations, possibilities are sought to relativize the principle of legality, considering labor relations as a good that deserves to be preserved. The proposed problem is how and to what extent the principle of legality should be observed, which guides government policies and the actions of public servants and those responsible for enforcing the law, resulting in an extraordinary situation. The objective of this research is to analyze which hermeneutical option is adequate to interpret the reality that arose with the pandemic (Covid-19) and to reflect on aspects involved in the weighting of very important principles for the law, which are beacons and also serve. as checks and balances for state action, avoiding arbitration. The method adopted is the analytical one, with bibliographic and documentary review, mainly of texts of laws and normative acts. It is expected to demonstrate the importance and timeliness of the issue, as well as to contribute to the proposal for a sustainable solution that responds to the proposed problem, pointing out the most important values to preserve. The conclusion is that the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection appears as a guideline, so the State considers its institutional mission to guarantee social coexistence and the enjoyment of fundamental rights for all citizens. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321 10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n2p153-168 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n2p153-168 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321/47768 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 2 (2022); 153-168 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306016232308736 |