Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ivo, Jasiel
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Montenegro Alencar, Amanda, Torres Teixeira, Sergio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321
Resumo: In emergency situations, possibilities are sought to relativize the principle of legality, considering labor relations as a good that deserves to be preserved. The proposed problem is how and to what extent the principle of legality should be observed, which guides government policies and the actions of public servants and those responsible for enforcing the law, resulting in an extraordinary situation. The objective of this research is to analyze which hermeneutical option is adequate to interpret the reality that arose with the pandemic (Covid-19) and to reflect on aspects involved in the weighting of very important principles for the law, which are beacons and also serve. as checks and balances for state action, avoiding arbitration. The method adopted is the analytical one, with bibliographic and documentary review, mainly of texts of laws and normative acts. It is expected to demonstrate the importance and timeliness of the issue, as well as to contribute to the proposal for a sustainable solution that responds to the proposed problem, pointing out the most important values to preserve. The conclusion is that the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection appears as a guideline, so the State considers its institutional mission to guarantee social coexistence and the enjoyment of fundamental rights for all citizens.
id UEL-6_988f08b2854326d6b8fccbcf26b423a4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44321
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protectionDignidade humana e direitos sociais na pandemia: deveres prestacionais do Estado e proibição da proteção insuficientePrincípios ConstitucionaisDireitos sociaisPandemiaDeveres Prestacionais do Estado.Constitutional principles. Social rights. Pandemic. State Provincial Duties.In emergency situations, possibilities are sought to relativize the principle of legality, considering labor relations as a good that deserves to be preserved. The proposed problem is how and to what extent the principle of legality should be observed, which guides government policies and the actions of public servants and those responsible for enforcing the law, resulting in an extraordinary situation. The objective of this research is to analyze which hermeneutical option is adequate to interpret the reality that arose with the pandemic (Covid-19) and to reflect on aspects involved in the weighting of very important principles for the law, which are beacons and also serve. as checks and balances for state action, avoiding arbitration. The method adopted is the analytical one, with bibliographic and documentary review, mainly of texts of laws and normative acts. It is expected to demonstrate the importance and timeliness of the issue, as well as to contribute to the proposal for a sustainable solution that responds to the proposed problem, pointing out the most important values to preserve. The conclusion is that the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection appears as a guideline, so the State considers its institutional mission to guarantee social coexistence and the enjoyment of fundamental rights for all citizens.Em emergências buscam-se possibilidades de relativização do princípio da legalidade, considerando as relações de trabalho como um bem que merece ser preservado. O problema proposto é como e em qual medida deve-se observar o princípio da legalidade, orientador das políticas governamentais e do agir dos servidores públicos e aplicadores do direito, sobrevindo situação extraordinária. O objetivo desta pesquisa é analisar qual escolha hermenêutica é adequada para interpretar a realidade surgida com a pandemia (Covid-19) e refletir sobre aspectos implicados no caso do sopesamento de princípios importantíssimos para o direito, os quais são balizadores e servem de freios e contrapesos da ação estatal, evitando o arbítrio. O método adotado é o analítico, com revisão bibliográfica e documental, principalmente de textos de leis e de atos normativos. Espera-se demonstrar a importância e atualidade do tema, bem como contribuir para a proposta sustentável de solução, que responda ao problema proposto, apontando os valores mais importantes a serem preservados. A conclusão é que o princípio da proibição da proteção insuficiente desponta como baliza, para que seja considerada pelo Estado a sua missão institucional de garantir a convivência social e o gozo dos direitos fundamentais a todos os cidadãos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2022-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4432110.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n2p153-168Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 2 (2022); 153-1682178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321/47768Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIvo, JasielMontenegro Alencar, AmandaTorres Teixeira, Sergio2023-01-26T20:19:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44321Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-26T20:19:52Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection
Dignidade humana e direitos sociais na pandemia: deveres prestacionais do Estado e proibição da proteção insuficiente
title Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection
spellingShingle Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection
Ivo, Jasiel
Princípios Constitucionais
Direitos sociais
Pandemia
Deveres Prestacionais do Estado.
Constitutional principles. Social rights. Pandemic. State Provincial Duties.
title_short Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection
title_full Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection
title_fullStr Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection
title_full_unstemmed Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection
title_sort Human dignity and social rights in pandemic: the State's prestational duties and the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection
author Ivo, Jasiel
author_facet Ivo, Jasiel
Montenegro Alencar, Amanda
Torres Teixeira, Sergio
author_role author
author2 Montenegro Alencar, Amanda
Torres Teixeira, Sergio
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ivo, Jasiel
Montenegro Alencar, Amanda
Torres Teixeira, Sergio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Princípios Constitucionais
Direitos sociais
Pandemia
Deveres Prestacionais do Estado.
Constitutional principles. Social rights. Pandemic. State Provincial Duties.
topic Princípios Constitucionais
Direitos sociais
Pandemia
Deveres Prestacionais do Estado.
Constitutional principles. Social rights. Pandemic. State Provincial Duties.
description In emergency situations, possibilities are sought to relativize the principle of legality, considering labor relations as a good that deserves to be preserved. The proposed problem is how and to what extent the principle of legality should be observed, which guides government policies and the actions of public servants and those responsible for enforcing the law, resulting in an extraordinary situation. The objective of this research is to analyze which hermeneutical option is adequate to interpret the reality that arose with the pandemic (Covid-19) and to reflect on aspects involved in the weighting of very important principles for the law, which are beacons and also serve. as checks and balances for state action, avoiding arbitration. The method adopted is the analytical one, with bibliographic and documentary review, mainly of texts of laws and normative acts. It is expected to demonstrate the importance and timeliness of the issue, as well as to contribute to the proposal for a sustainable solution that responds to the proposed problem, pointing out the most important values to preserve. The conclusion is that the principle of prohibition of insufficient protection appears as a guideline, so the State considers its institutional mission to guarantee social coexistence and the enjoyment of fundamental rights for all citizens.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321
10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n2p153-168
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n2p153-168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44321/47768
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 2 (2022); 153-168
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306016232308736