Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kirchner, Luziane Fatima
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Marinho-Casanova, Maria Luiza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/17397
Resumo: This work aimed to identify methods, objectives and type of studies that assessed adherence to the treatment of type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, published from 2000 to 2013. We analyzed 111 articles, collected in the survey by the Web of Science database. The results indicated that 95 studies are descriptive, with prevalence of adolescents (74 studies) and children (34 studies). It was also found that those studies that have prevailed: Used an informer (67 studies), the carrier of the disease who reported more data (72 studies), evaluated one (35 studies) or five (25 studies) treatment medical, by means of an instrument (68 studies), being standardized instruments the most used procedures in this assessment (40 studies). Data leaded to the conclusion that the methods used to assess adherence, in the studies analyzed, do not comply with the suggestions made in Literature to make the results in adherence more reliable. Discussions about this subject need to be further developed.
id UEL-9_e32658b8db73be348c9ddac951b5a822
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17397
network_acronym_str UEL-9
network_name_str Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature reviewEvaluación de la adherencia al tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus tipo 1: Revisión de la literaturaAvaliação da adesão ao tratamento do diabetes mellitus tipo 1: Revisão de literaturaadherence to treatmentliterature reviewtype 1 diabetes mellitusadherencia al tratamientorevisión de la literaturadiabetes mellitus tipo 1adesão ao tratamentorevisão de literaturadiabetes mellitus tipo 1This work aimed to identify methods, objectives and type of studies that assessed adherence to the treatment of type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, published from 2000 to 2013. We analyzed 111 articles, collected in the survey by the Web of Science database. The results indicated that 95 studies are descriptive, with prevalence of adolescents (74 studies) and children (34 studies). It was also found that those studies that have prevailed: Used an informer (67 studies), the carrier of the disease who reported more data (72 studies), evaluated one (35 studies) or five (25 studies) treatment medical, by means of an instrument (68 studies), being standardized instruments the most used procedures in this assessment (40 studies). Data leaded to the conclusion that the methods used to assess adherence, in the studies analyzed, do not comply with the suggestions made in Literature to make the results in adherence more reliable. Discussions about this subject need to be further developed.Este estudio trata de identificar los métodos, los objetivos y el tipo de estudios que evaluaron la adherencia al tratamiento de la Diabetes Mellitus tipo 1, publicados entre 2000-2013. Se analizaron los artículos 111, planteada por la bases de datos Web of Science. Los resultados indicaron que 95 estudios son descriptivos, con participantes predominantemente adolescentes (74 estudios) y los niños (34 estudios). También había prevalecido esos estudios que utilizan un informante (67 estudios), siendo el portador de la enfermedad que los datos más informo (72 estudios); evaluado una (35 estudios) o cinco (25 estudios) los componentes de los tratamientos médicos, a través de un instrumento de evaluación (68 estudios), siendo los instrumentos estandarizados más comúnmente utilizados (40 estudios). Los datos conducen el cuestionamiento que los métodos utilizados para evaluar la adherencia, en los estudios examinados, no están de acuerdo con las sugerencias hechas en la literatura para hacer que los resultados de evaluación de la adherencia sean más fiables. Las discusiones sobre este tema es necesario desarrollar aún más.Esse trabalho buscou identificar os métodos, objetivos e tipo de estudos que avaliaram a adesão ao tratamento do Diabetes Mellitus tipo 1, publicados entre 2000 e 2013. Foram analisados 111 artigos, levantados na base de dados Web of Science. Os resultados indicaram que 95 pesquisas são descritivas, com participantes predominantemente adolescentes (74 estudos) e crianças (34 estudos). Verificou-se também que prevaleceram aqueles estudos que: utilizaram apenas um informante (67 estudos), sendo o portador da doença quem mais informou os dados (72 estudos); foram avaliados de um (35 estudos) ou cinco (25 estudos) componentes do tratamento médico, por meio de um único instrumento de avaliação (68 estudos), sendo os instrumentos padronizados a medida de avaliação mais utilizada (40 estudos). Os dados levam ao questionamento de que os métodos utilizados para avaliar a adesão, nos estudos levantados, não estão de acordo com sugestões apresentadas na literatura para tornar resultados da avaliação da adesão mais confiáveis. Discussões a respeito desta temática precisam ser mais desenvolvidas.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2014-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/1739710.5433/2236-6407.2014v5n1p45Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 5 n. 1 (2014); 45-632236-6407reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiainstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/17397/15054Copyright (c) 2014 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKirchner, Luziane FatimaMarinho-Casanova, Maria Luiza2020-07-29T23:28:27Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17397Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eipPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/oai||revistaeip@uel.br2236-64072236-6407opendoar:2020-07-29T23:28:27Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature review
Evaluación de la adherencia al tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus tipo 1: Revisión de la literatura
Avaliação da adesão ao tratamento do diabetes mellitus tipo 1: Revisão de literatura
title Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature review
spellingShingle Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature review
Kirchner, Luziane Fatima
adherence to treatment
literature review
type 1 diabetes mellitus
adherencia al tratamiento
revisión de la literatura
diabetes mellitus tipo 1
adesão ao tratamento
revisão de literatura
diabetes mellitus tipo 1
title_short Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature review
title_full Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature review
title_fullStr Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature review
title_sort Evaluation of adherence to the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: Literature review
author Kirchner, Luziane Fatima
author_facet Kirchner, Luziane Fatima
Marinho-Casanova, Maria Luiza
author_role author
author2 Marinho-Casanova, Maria Luiza
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kirchner, Luziane Fatima
Marinho-Casanova, Maria Luiza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv adherence to treatment
literature review
type 1 diabetes mellitus
adherencia al tratamiento
revisión de la literatura
diabetes mellitus tipo 1
adesão ao tratamento
revisão de literatura
diabetes mellitus tipo 1
topic adherence to treatment
literature review
type 1 diabetes mellitus
adherencia al tratamiento
revisión de la literatura
diabetes mellitus tipo 1
adesão ao tratamento
revisão de literatura
diabetes mellitus tipo 1
description This work aimed to identify methods, objectives and type of studies that assessed adherence to the treatment of type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, published from 2000 to 2013. We analyzed 111 articles, collected in the survey by the Web of Science database. The results indicated that 95 studies are descriptive, with prevalence of adolescents (74 studies) and children (34 studies). It was also found that those studies that have prevailed: Used an informer (67 studies), the carrier of the disease who reported more data (72 studies), evaluated one (35 studies) or five (25 studies) treatment medical, by means of an instrument (68 studies), being standardized instruments the most used procedures in this assessment (40 studies). Data leaded to the conclusion that the methods used to assess adherence, in the studies analyzed, do not comply with the suggestions made in Literature to make the results in adherence more reliable. Discussions about this subject need to be further developed.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/17397
10.5433/2236-6407.2014v5n1p45
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/17397
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2236-6407.2014v5n1p45
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/17397/15054
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 5 n. 1 (2014); 45-63
2236-6407
reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
collection Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaeip@uel.br
_version_ 1799306107774042112

Registros relacionados