Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494 |
Resumo: | The effects of the dose and application method of limestone - broadcast or in furrow - and of agricultural gypsum on soil fertility, the control of clubroot, and cauliflower development in mountain farming areas were evaluated. Initially, four doses of broadcast limestone (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 Mg ha-1) and two cauliflower cultivars (Sharon and Piracicaba Precoce) were analyzed. A second experiment evaluated limestone (4.0 Mg ha-1) application treatments: broadcast and in furrow, broadcast limestone + gypsum (3.0 + 1.0 Mg ha-1), and broadcast gypsum (1.0 Mg ha-1). Soil fertility was improved, and significant increases were observed in the total and healthy root volume with increasing doses of limestone. With 4.0 Mg ha-1, a 58 and 85% increase in yield was observed in Sharon and Piracicaba, respectively, compared to the control. Treatments with limestone and limestone + gypsum, regardless of the application method, elevated pH (≥ 10%), base saturation (V%) (≥ 37%), and calcium (Ca) contents (≥ 100%), and reduced the levels of aluminum ions (Al3+) (≥ 60%) and clubroot severity (≥ 64%) and favored biomass accumulation (≥ 27%) and yield (≥ 9.2%). The application of limestone in the furrow yielded results similar to the broadcast application. |
id |
UEM-5_5effe454c821ff595a56690422491f4f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/42494 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-5 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.The effects of the dose and application method of limestone - broadcast or in furrow - and of agricultural gypsum on soil fertility, the control of clubroot, and cauliflower development in mountain farming areas were evaluated. Initially, four doses of broadcast limestone (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 Mg ha-1) and two cauliflower cultivars (Sharon and Piracicaba Precoce) were analyzed. A second experiment evaluated limestone (4.0 Mg ha-1) application treatments: broadcast and in furrow, broadcast limestone + gypsum (3.0 + 1.0 Mg ha-1), and broadcast gypsum (1.0 Mg ha-1). Soil fertility was improved, and significant increases were observed in the total and healthy root volume with increasing doses of limestone. With 4.0 Mg ha-1, a 58 and 85% increase in yield was observed in Sharon and Piracicaba, respectively, compared to the control. Treatments with limestone and limestone + gypsum, regardless of the application method, elevated pH (≥ 10%), base saturation (V%) (≥ 37%), and calcium (Ca) contents (≥ 100%), and reduced the levels of aluminum ions (Al3+) (≥ 60%) and clubroot severity (≥ 64%) and favored biomass accumulation (≥ 27%) and yield (≥ 9.2%). The application of limestone in the furrow yielded results similar to the broadcast application.The effects of the dose and application method of limestone - broadcast or in furrow - and of agricultural gypsum on soil fertility, the control of clubroot, and cauliflower development in mountain farming areas were evaluated. Initially, four doses of broadcast limestone (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 Mg ha-1) and two cauliflower cultivars (Sharon and Piracicaba Precoce) were analyzed. A second experiment evaluated limestone (4.0 Mg ha-1) application treatments: broadcast and in furrow, broadcast limestone + gypsum (3.0 + 1.0 Mg ha-1), and broadcast gypsum (1.0 Mg ha-1). Soil fertility was improved, and significant increases were observed in the total and healthy root volume with increasing doses of limestone. With 4.0 Mg ha-1, a 58 and 85% increase in yield was observed in Sharon and Piracicaba, respectively, compared to the control. Treatments with limestone and limestone + gypsum, regardless of the application method, elevated pH (≥ 10%), base saturation (V%) (≥ 37%), and calcium (Ca) contents (≥ 100%), and reduced the levels of aluminum ions (Al3+) (≥ 60%) and clubroot severity (≥ 64%) and favored biomass accumulation (≥ 27%) and yield (≥ 9.2%). The application of limestone in the furrow yielded results similar to the broadcast application.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2020-04-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/4249410.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42494Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e42494Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e424941807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494/751375149828Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Carlos Antônio dosCarmo, Margarida Goréte Ferreira do Bhering, Aline da Silva Costa, Evandro Silva Pereira Amaral Sobrinho, Nelson Moura Brasil do2020-11-16T18:51:03Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/42494Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2020-11-16T18:51:03Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming |
title |
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming |
spellingShingle |
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming Santos, Carlos Antônio dos Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method. Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method. |
title_short |
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming |
title_full |
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming |
title_fullStr |
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming |
title_sort |
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming |
author |
Santos, Carlos Antônio dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Carlos Antônio dos Carmo, Margarida Goréte Ferreira do Bhering, Aline da Silva Costa, Evandro Silva Pereira Amaral Sobrinho, Nelson Moura Brasil do |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carmo, Margarida Goréte Ferreira do Bhering, Aline da Silva Costa, Evandro Silva Pereira Amaral Sobrinho, Nelson Moura Brasil do |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Carlos Antônio dos Carmo, Margarida Goréte Ferreira do Bhering, Aline da Silva Costa, Evandro Silva Pereira Amaral Sobrinho, Nelson Moura Brasil do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method. Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method. |
topic |
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method. Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method. |
description |
The effects of the dose and application method of limestone - broadcast or in furrow - and of agricultural gypsum on soil fertility, the control of clubroot, and cauliflower development in mountain farming areas were evaluated. Initially, four doses of broadcast limestone (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 Mg ha-1) and two cauliflower cultivars (Sharon and Piracicaba Precoce) were analyzed. A second experiment evaluated limestone (4.0 Mg ha-1) application treatments: broadcast and in furrow, broadcast limestone + gypsum (3.0 + 1.0 Mg ha-1), and broadcast gypsum (1.0 Mg ha-1). Soil fertility was improved, and significant increases were observed in the total and healthy root volume with increasing doses of limestone. With 4.0 Mg ha-1, a 58 and 85% increase in yield was observed in Sharon and Piracicaba, respectively, compared to the control. Treatments with limestone and limestone + gypsum, regardless of the application method, elevated pH (≥ 10%), base saturation (V%) (≥ 37%), and calcium (Ca) contents (≥ 100%), and reduced the levels of aluminum ions (Al3+) (≥ 60%) and clubroot severity (≥ 64%) and favored biomass accumulation (≥ 27%) and yield (≥ 9.2%). The application of limestone in the furrow yielded results similar to the broadcast application. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494 10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42494 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42494 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494/751375149828 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e42494 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e42494 1807-8621 1679-9275 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799305910627074048 |