Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Carlos Antônio dos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Carmo, Margarida Goréte Ferreira do, Bhering, Aline da Silva, Costa, Evandro Silva Pereira, Amaral Sobrinho, Nelson Moura Brasil do
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494
Resumo: The effects of the dose and application method of limestone - broadcast or in furrow - and of agricultural gypsum on soil fertility, the control of clubroot, and cauliflower development in mountain farming areas were evaluated. Initially, four doses of broadcast limestone (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 Mg ha-1) and two cauliflower cultivars (Sharon and Piracicaba Precoce) were analyzed. A second experiment evaluated limestone (4.0 Mg ha-1) application treatments: broadcast and in furrow, broadcast limestone + gypsum (3.0 + 1.0 Mg ha-1), and broadcast gypsum (1.0 Mg ha-1). Soil fertility was improved, and significant increases were observed in the total and healthy root volume with increasing doses of limestone. With 4.0 Mg ha-1, a 58 and 85% increase in yield was observed in Sharon and Piracicaba, respectively, compared to the control. Treatments with limestone and limestone + gypsum, regardless of the application method, elevated pH (≥ 10%), base saturation (V%) (≥ 37%), and calcium (Ca) contents (≥ 100%), and reduced the levels of aluminum ions (Al3+) (≥ 60%) and clubroot severity (≥ 64%) and favored biomass accumulation (≥ 27%) and yield (≥ 9.2%). The application of limestone in the furrow yielded results similar to the broadcast application.
id UEM-5_5effe454c821ff595a56690422491f4f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/42494
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.The effects of the dose and application method of limestone - broadcast or in furrow - and of agricultural gypsum on soil fertility, the control of clubroot, and cauliflower development in mountain farming areas were evaluated. Initially, four doses of broadcast limestone (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 Mg ha-1) and two cauliflower cultivars (Sharon and Piracicaba Precoce) were analyzed. A second experiment evaluated limestone (4.0 Mg ha-1) application treatments: broadcast and in furrow, broadcast limestone + gypsum (3.0 + 1.0 Mg ha-1), and broadcast gypsum (1.0 Mg ha-1). Soil fertility was improved, and significant increases were observed in the total and healthy root volume with increasing doses of limestone. With 4.0 Mg ha-1, a 58 and 85% increase in yield was observed in Sharon and Piracicaba, respectively, compared to the control. Treatments with limestone and limestone + gypsum, regardless of the application method, elevated pH (≥ 10%), base saturation (V%) (≥ 37%), and calcium (Ca) contents (≥ 100%), and reduced the levels of aluminum ions (Al3+) (≥ 60%) and clubroot severity (≥ 64%) and favored biomass accumulation (≥ 27%) and yield (≥ 9.2%). The application of limestone in the furrow yielded results similar to the broadcast application.The effects of the dose and application method of limestone - broadcast or in furrow - and of agricultural gypsum on soil fertility, the control of clubroot, and cauliflower development in mountain farming areas were evaluated. Initially, four doses of broadcast limestone (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 Mg ha-1) and two cauliflower cultivars (Sharon and Piracicaba Precoce) were analyzed. A second experiment evaluated limestone (4.0 Mg ha-1) application treatments: broadcast and in furrow, broadcast limestone + gypsum (3.0 + 1.0 Mg ha-1), and broadcast gypsum (1.0 Mg ha-1). Soil fertility was improved, and significant increases were observed in the total and healthy root volume with increasing doses of limestone. With 4.0 Mg ha-1, a 58 and 85% increase in yield was observed in Sharon and Piracicaba, respectively, compared to the control. Treatments with limestone and limestone + gypsum, regardless of the application method, elevated pH (≥ 10%), base saturation (V%) (≥ 37%), and calcium (Ca) contents (≥ 100%), and reduced the levels of aluminum ions (Al3+) (≥ 60%) and clubroot severity (≥ 64%) and favored biomass accumulation (≥ 27%) and yield (≥ 9.2%). The application of limestone in the furrow yielded results similar to the broadcast application.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2020-04-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/4249410.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42494Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e42494Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e424941807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494/751375149828Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Carlos Antônio dosCarmo, Margarida Goréte Ferreira do Bhering, Aline da Silva Costa, Evandro Silva Pereira Amaral Sobrinho, Nelson Moura Brasil do2020-11-16T18:51:03Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/42494Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2020-11-16T18:51:03Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
title Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
spellingShingle Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
Santos, Carlos Antônio dos
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.
title_short Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
title_full Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
title_fullStr Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
title_full_unstemmed Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
title_sort Use of limestone and agricultural gypsum in cauliflower crop management and clubroot control in mountain farming
author Santos, Carlos Antônio dos
author_facet Santos, Carlos Antônio dos
Carmo, Margarida Goréte Ferreira do
Bhering, Aline da Silva
Costa, Evandro Silva Pereira
Amaral Sobrinho, Nelson Moura Brasil do
author_role author
author2 Carmo, Margarida Goréte Ferreira do
Bhering, Aline da Silva
Costa, Evandro Silva Pereira
Amaral Sobrinho, Nelson Moura Brasil do
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Carlos Antônio dos
Carmo, Margarida Goréte Ferreira do
Bhering, Aline da Silva
Costa, Evandro Silva Pereira
Amaral Sobrinho, Nelson Moura Brasil do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.
topic Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis; Plasmodiophora brassicae; liming; slope; application method.
description The effects of the dose and application method of limestone - broadcast or in furrow - and of agricultural gypsum on soil fertility, the control of clubroot, and cauliflower development in mountain farming areas were evaluated. Initially, four doses of broadcast limestone (0.0, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 Mg ha-1) and two cauliflower cultivars (Sharon and Piracicaba Precoce) were analyzed. A second experiment evaluated limestone (4.0 Mg ha-1) application treatments: broadcast and in furrow, broadcast limestone + gypsum (3.0 + 1.0 Mg ha-1), and broadcast gypsum (1.0 Mg ha-1). Soil fertility was improved, and significant increases were observed in the total and healthy root volume with increasing doses of limestone. With 4.0 Mg ha-1, a 58 and 85% increase in yield was observed in Sharon and Piracicaba, respectively, compared to the control. Treatments with limestone and limestone + gypsum, regardless of the application method, elevated pH (≥ 10%), base saturation (V%) (≥ 37%), and calcium (Ca) contents (≥ 100%), and reduced the levels of aluminum ions (Al3+) (≥ 60%) and clubroot severity (≥ 64%) and favored biomass accumulation (≥ 27%) and yield (≥ 9.2%). The application of limestone in the furrow yielded results similar to the broadcast application.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494
10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42494
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42494
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/42494/751375149828
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e42494
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e42494
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305910627074048