Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Batista, Karina
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Giacomini, Alessandra Aparecida, Gerdes, Luciana, Mattos, Waldssimiler Teixeira de, Otsuk, Ivani Pozar
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/62944
Resumo: Combinations between crop intercropping and forage production in a no-tillage system are not well established for environments under low water retention and soil fertility conditions. Our study aimed to evaluate the potential interactions between soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen in a no-tillage system. The experimental design was a randomized block with four replications in a subdivided plot scheme. The main plots in the summer season were: 1) soybean monoculture; 2) soybean - Aruana Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana) intercropping, and 3) soybean - Congo grass (Urochloa ruziziensis cv. Comum) intercropping. The subplots were the nitrogen rates of 0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha-1, applied as side-dressing in maize and grasses during the autumn-winter season. Here, the results of the summer seasons are shown. To do so, the parameters evaluated were soybean agronomic traits, dry biomass production, and macronutrient concentrations of plants intercropped. The main effects and interactions were studied. Our findings showed that soybean-Aruana Guinea grass intercropping is an alternative to no-tillage system implementation. Moreover, residual nitrogen from the autumn-winter season directly interfered with the dry biomass production of grasses intercropped with soybeans in the summer season. In short, the systems studied seem suitable for implementing a no-tillage system, which aims to neutralize degraded pastures and produce forage for ensilage. Despite the changes in macronutrient concentrations within the intercropping system and residual nitrogen, and among intercropped crops over the years, Congo grass intercropped with soybeans in the summer season showed great capacity for phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium cycling.
id UEM-5_6cb7f840f985f5b9d0cb6f844c05656c
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/62944
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementationPotential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementationmacronutrients in an intercropping system; Megathyrsus; soybean crop system; sustainable agricultural systems; Urochloa.macronutrients in an intercropping system; Megathyrsus; soybean crop system; sustainable agricultural systems; Urochloa.Combinations between crop intercropping and forage production in a no-tillage system are not well established for environments under low water retention and soil fertility conditions. Our study aimed to evaluate the potential interactions between soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen in a no-tillage system. The experimental design was a randomized block with four replications in a subdivided plot scheme. The main plots in the summer season were: 1) soybean monoculture; 2) soybean - Aruana Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana) intercropping, and 3) soybean - Congo grass (Urochloa ruziziensis cv. Comum) intercropping. The subplots were the nitrogen rates of 0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha-1, applied as side-dressing in maize and grasses during the autumn-winter season. Here, the results of the summer seasons are shown. To do so, the parameters evaluated were soybean agronomic traits, dry biomass production, and macronutrient concentrations of plants intercropped. The main effects and interactions were studied. Our findings showed that soybean-Aruana Guinea grass intercropping is an alternative to no-tillage system implementation. Moreover, residual nitrogen from the autumn-winter season directly interfered with the dry biomass production of grasses intercropped with soybeans in the summer season. In short, the systems studied seem suitable for implementing a no-tillage system, which aims to neutralize degraded pastures and produce forage for ensilage. Despite the changes in macronutrient concentrations within the intercropping system and residual nitrogen, and among intercropped crops over the years, Congo grass intercropped with soybeans in the summer season showed great capacity for phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium cycling.Combinations between crop intercropping and forage production in a no-tillage system are not well established for environments under low water retention and soil fertility conditions. Our study aimed to evaluate the potential interactions between soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen in a no-tillage system. The experimental design was a randomized block with four replications in a subdivided plot scheme. The main plots in the summer season were: 1) soybean monoculture; 2) soybean - Aruana Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana) intercropping, and 3) soybean - Congo grass (Urochloa ruziziensis cv. Comum) intercropping. The subplots were the nitrogen rates of 0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha-1, applied as side-dressing in maize and grasses during the autumn-winter season. Here, the results of the summer seasons are shown. To do so, the parameters evaluated were soybean agronomic traits, dry biomass production, and macronutrient concentrations of plants intercropped. The main effects and interactions were studied. Our findings showed that soybean-Aruana Guinea grass intercropping is an alternative to no-tillage system implementation. Moreover, residual nitrogen from the autumn-winter season directly interfered with the dry biomass production of grasses intercropped with soybeans in the summer season. In short, the systems studied seem suitable for implementing a no-tillage system, which aims to neutralize degraded pastures and produce forage for ensilage. Despite the changes in macronutrient concentrations within the intercropping system and residual nitrogen, and among intercropped crops over the years, Congo grass intercropped with soybeans in the summer season showed great capacity for phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium cycling.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2023-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/6294410.4025/actasciagron.v46i1.62944Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 46 No 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e62944Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 46 n. 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e629441807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/62944/751375156531Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBatista, KarinaGiacomini, Alessandra Aparecida Gerdes, Luciana Mattos, Waldssimiler Teixeira de Otsuk, Ivani Pozar 2024-02-08T19:39:51Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/62944Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2024-02-08T19:39:51Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation
Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation
title Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation
spellingShingle Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation
Batista, Karina
macronutrients in an intercropping system; Megathyrsus; soybean crop system; sustainable agricultural systems; Urochloa.
macronutrients in an intercropping system; Megathyrsus; soybean crop system; sustainable agricultural systems; Urochloa.
title_short Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation
title_full Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation
title_fullStr Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation
title_full_unstemmed Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation
title_sort Potential interaction of soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen for a no-tillage system implementation
author Batista, Karina
author_facet Batista, Karina
Giacomini, Alessandra Aparecida
Gerdes, Luciana
Mattos, Waldssimiler Teixeira de
Otsuk, Ivani Pozar
author_role author
author2 Giacomini, Alessandra Aparecida
Gerdes, Luciana
Mattos, Waldssimiler Teixeira de
Otsuk, Ivani Pozar
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Batista, Karina
Giacomini, Alessandra Aparecida
Gerdes, Luciana
Mattos, Waldssimiler Teixeira de
Otsuk, Ivani Pozar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv macronutrients in an intercropping system; Megathyrsus; soybean crop system; sustainable agricultural systems; Urochloa.
macronutrients in an intercropping system; Megathyrsus; soybean crop system; sustainable agricultural systems; Urochloa.
topic macronutrients in an intercropping system; Megathyrsus; soybean crop system; sustainable agricultural systems; Urochloa.
macronutrients in an intercropping system; Megathyrsus; soybean crop system; sustainable agricultural systems; Urochloa.
description Combinations between crop intercropping and forage production in a no-tillage system are not well established for environments under low water retention and soil fertility conditions. Our study aimed to evaluate the potential interactions between soybean-grass intercropping with residual nitrogen in a no-tillage system. The experimental design was a randomized block with four replications in a subdivided plot scheme. The main plots in the summer season were: 1) soybean monoculture; 2) soybean - Aruana Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus cv. Aruana) intercropping, and 3) soybean - Congo grass (Urochloa ruziziensis cv. Comum) intercropping. The subplots were the nitrogen rates of 0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha-1, applied as side-dressing in maize and grasses during the autumn-winter season. Here, the results of the summer seasons are shown. To do so, the parameters evaluated were soybean agronomic traits, dry biomass production, and macronutrient concentrations of plants intercropped. The main effects and interactions were studied. Our findings showed that soybean-Aruana Guinea grass intercropping is an alternative to no-tillage system implementation. Moreover, residual nitrogen from the autumn-winter season directly interfered with the dry biomass production of grasses intercropped with soybeans in the summer season. In short, the systems studied seem suitable for implementing a no-tillage system, which aims to neutralize degraded pastures and produce forage for ensilage. Despite the changes in macronutrient concentrations within the intercropping system and residual nitrogen, and among intercropped crops over the years, Congo grass intercropped with soybeans in the summer season showed great capacity for phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium cycling.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/62944
10.4025/actasciagron.v46i1.62944
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/62944
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v46i1.62944
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/62944/751375156531
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 46 No 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e62944
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 46 n. 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e62944
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305901304184832