Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lebedenco, Anatoli
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Auad, Alexander Machado, Kronka, Sérgio do Nascimento
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/278
Resumo: Five methods for the control of caterpillars, which attack the culture of tomato, were analyzed: the conventional method of application of phytosanitary products; the integrated pest management (IPM); the IPM with the use of Azadirachta indica. extract at 5% (Neem); the sacking of the tomato fruit immediately after flowering, and the control plants (without any treatment against pest). The methods that used phytosanitary products (conventional and IPM) efficiently controlled the caterpillars on the tomato plants and, as a consequence, promoted an increase in the productivity of the culture of 156 and 165% respectively, if compared with the control plants. The number of pulverizations had a reduction of 66.7% when the IPM was used compared to the conventional. The performance of the IPMNeem treatment was significantly the same as the control, denoting poor efficiency in controlling the borer caterpillars. The method of sacking the tomato fruit consisted of a promising alternative in the production without the presence of insecticides.
id UEM-5_dc330c57c66838bd39ce98f035663d39
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/278
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278Métodos de controle de lepidópteros na cultura do tomateiro (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278controle fitossanitáriotomatemanejo integrado de pragasFive methods for the control of caterpillars, which attack the culture of tomato, were analyzed: the conventional method of application of phytosanitary products; the integrated pest management (IPM); the IPM with the use of Azadirachta indica. extract at 5% (Neem); the sacking of the tomato fruit immediately after flowering, and the control plants (without any treatment against pest). The methods that used phytosanitary products (conventional and IPM) efficiently controlled the caterpillars on the tomato plants and, as a consequence, promoted an increase in the productivity of the culture of 156 and 165% respectively, if compared with the control plants. The number of pulverizations had a reduction of 66.7% when the IPM was used compared to the conventional. The performance of the IPMNeem treatment was significantly the same as the control, denoting poor efficiency in controlling the borer caterpillars. The method of sacking the tomato fruit consisted of a promising alternative in the production without the presence of insecticides.Foram avaliados 5 métodos de controle das lagartas que atacam a cultura do tomateiro: método convencional de aplicação de produtos fitossanitários; manejo integrado de pragas (MIP) com produtos sintéticos; MIP com o emprego de extrato de Azadirachta indica (Nim) à 5%; ensacamento das pencas de tomate e testemunha. Os métodos que utilizaram produtos fitossanitários (convencional e MIP) foram eficientes no controle das lagartas do tomateiro e, em conseqüência, promoveram um aumento na produtividade da cultura em 156 e 165% respectivamente, em comparação à testemunha. O número de pulverizações foi reduzido em até 66,7%, quando se adotou o MIP comparado ao convencional. O tratamento MIP-Nim foi significativamente igual à testemunha, denotando não ser eficiente no controle das lagartas broqueadoras. O ensacamento das pencas de frutos de tomate consistiu em uma alternativa promissora na produção de frutos sem a presença de inseticidas.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2007-11-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/27810.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 29 No 3 (2007); 339-344Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 29 n. 3 (2007); 339-3441807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/278/201Lebedenco, AnatoliAuad, Alexander MachadoKronka, Sérgio do Nascimentoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:37:03Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/278Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:37:03Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
Métodos de controle de lepidópteros na cultura do tomateiro (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
title Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
spellingShingle Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
Lebedenco, Anatoli
controle fitossanitário
tomate
manejo integrado de pragas
title_short Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
title_full Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
title_fullStr Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
title_full_unstemmed Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
title_sort Methods for caterpillars’ control in the culture of tomato - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
author Lebedenco, Anatoli
author_facet Lebedenco, Anatoli
Auad, Alexander Machado
Kronka, Sérgio do Nascimento
author_role author
author2 Auad, Alexander Machado
Kronka, Sérgio do Nascimento
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lebedenco, Anatoli
Auad, Alexander Machado
Kronka, Sérgio do Nascimento
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv controle fitossanitário
tomate
manejo integrado de pragas
topic controle fitossanitário
tomate
manejo integrado de pragas
description Five methods for the control of caterpillars, which attack the culture of tomato, were analyzed: the conventional method of application of phytosanitary products; the integrated pest management (IPM); the IPM with the use of Azadirachta indica. extract at 5% (Neem); the sacking of the tomato fruit immediately after flowering, and the control plants (without any treatment against pest). The methods that used phytosanitary products (conventional and IPM) efficiently controlled the caterpillars on the tomato plants and, as a consequence, promoted an increase in the productivity of the culture of 156 and 165% respectively, if compared with the control plants. The number of pulverizations had a reduction of 66.7% when the IPM was used compared to the conventional. The performance of the IPMNeem treatment was significantly the same as the control, denoting poor efficiency in controlling the borer caterpillars. The method of sacking the tomato fruit consisted of a promising alternative in the production without the presence of insecticides.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-11-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/278
10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/278
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v29i3.278
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/278/201
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 29 No 3 (2007); 339-344
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 29 n. 3 (2007); 339-344
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305902085373952