Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of pets

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bordin, Jéssica Tainá
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Sfaciote, Ricardo Antônio Pilegi, Coronel, Lincoln Garcia, Vignoto, Vanessa Kelly Capoia, D'Conti, Juliano Bortolo, Pachaly, José Ricardo, Osaki, Sílvia Cristina, Wosiacki, Sheila Rezler
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevCiVet/article/view/Bordin
Resumo: The objective of this study was to identify the bacteria present in wounds of dogs and cats, monitor the resistance profile of the main groups of antimicrobials and identify multidrug-resistant strains of interest in public health. 54 bacterial isolates from 38 wounds were evaluated in 48 dogs and 6 cats from the Veterinary Hospital (HV) of the State University of Maringá (UEM), Umuarama Regional Campus (CAU) from March 2012 until February 2014. The evaluation of the isolates, performed in the Laboratory of Veterinary Microbiology of HV-UEM-CAU, consisted of bacterial identification by morpho-tinturials and biochemical characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility by disk diffusion method with 32 antimicrobial and phenotypic research of MRS, MRS-MLSB, ESBL and VRE strains. Multiple antimicrobial resistance (MAR) was calculated by the MAR index. The results were submitted to descriptive analysis in order to calculate the absolute and relative frequencies. 55.5% (30/54) of the strains tested were identified as gram-positive cocci, 35.2% (19/54) as fermenting gram-negative bacilli and 9.3% (5/54) as non-fermenters. The highest prevalence of strains identified was Staphlococcus spp. (48.1%), followed by Escherichia coli (11.1%), Citrobacter spp. (7.4%), Pseudomonas spp. (7.4%) and Providencia spp. (5.5%), others were found in small percentages.  A total of 1433 reviews of antimicrobial drugs were conducted where the percentage of drug resistance in vitro considered by CLSI was 42.3 % (n=606) and with intermediate resistance was 7.4% (n=106), totaling 49.7% (n=712) rating with partial or total resistance. The average MAR index was 0.42, where 83.3% (45/54) of the isolates were multiresistant (≥ 0.2). The drugs regarded as the most susceptible to resistance were penicillin (R=87.5%), ampicillin (R=79.2%), amoxicillin (R=71.7%), clindamycin (R=80%), oxacillin (R=63 %) (only  tested in Gram-positives), cefoxitin (R=63.3%), tetracycline (R=61%), erythromycin (R=61%) and rifampin (R=52%). Drugs considered to be less susceptible to bacteria resistance were imipenem (R=0%), meropenem (R=4.5%), polymyxin (R=9.5%) (only tested in Gram-negative), gentamicin (R=17%), tobramycin (R=19%), amikacin (R=21%) and neomycin (R=26%). There were found 16 samples phenotypically characterized as MRS, 12 as MRS-MLSB, one as VRE and 5 as ESBL strains.
id UEM-8_4ac7c064b677b60d11be7cca691ff7c0
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/22918
network_acronym_str UEM-8
network_name_str Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of petsanimalantimicrobial resistanceMRSESBLThe objective of this study was to identify the bacteria present in wounds of dogs and cats, monitor the resistance profile of the main groups of antimicrobials and identify multidrug-resistant strains of interest in public health. 54 bacterial isolates from 38 wounds were evaluated in 48 dogs and 6 cats from the Veterinary Hospital (HV) of the State University of Maringá (UEM), Umuarama Regional Campus (CAU) from March 2012 until February 2014. The evaluation of the isolates, performed in the Laboratory of Veterinary Microbiology of HV-UEM-CAU, consisted of bacterial identification by morpho-tinturials and biochemical characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility by disk diffusion method with 32 antimicrobial and phenotypic research of MRS, MRS-MLSB, ESBL and VRE strains. Multiple antimicrobial resistance (MAR) was calculated by the MAR index. The results were submitted to descriptive analysis in order to calculate the absolute and relative frequencies. 55.5% (30/54) of the strains tested were identified as gram-positive cocci, 35.2% (19/54) as fermenting gram-negative bacilli and 9.3% (5/54) as non-fermenters. The highest prevalence of strains identified was Staphlococcus spp. (48.1%), followed by Escherichia coli (11.1%), Citrobacter spp. (7.4%), Pseudomonas spp. (7.4%) and Providencia spp. (5.5%), others were found in small percentages.  A total of 1433 reviews of antimicrobial drugs were conducted where the percentage of drug resistance in vitro considered by CLSI was 42.3 % (n=606) and with intermediate resistance was 7.4% (n=106), totaling 49.7% (n=712) rating with partial or total resistance. The average MAR index was 0.42, where 83.3% (45/54) of the isolates were multiresistant (≥ 0.2). The drugs regarded as the most susceptible to resistance were penicillin (R=87.5%), ampicillin (R=79.2%), amoxicillin (R=71.7%), clindamycin (R=80%), oxacillin (R=63 %) (only  tested in Gram-positives), cefoxitin (R=63.3%), tetracycline (R=61%), erythromycin (R=61%) and rifampin (R=52%). Drugs considered to be less susceptible to bacteria resistance were imipenem (R=0%), meropenem (R=4.5%), polymyxin (R=9.5%) (only tested in Gram-negative), gentamicin (R=17%), tobramycin (R=19%), amikacin (R=21%) and neomycin (R=26%). There were found 16 samples phenotypically characterized as MRS, 12 as MRS-MLSB, one as VRE and 5 as ESBL strains.EDUEM - Universidade Estadual de Maringá2015-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevCiVet/article/view/Bordin10.4025/revcivet.v2i1.22918Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública; v. 2 n. 1 (2015); 04-192358-4610reponame:Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevCiVet/article/view/Bordin/pdf_50Bordin, Jéssica TaináSfaciote, Ricardo Antônio PilegiCoronel, Lincoln GarciaVignoto, Vanessa Kelly CapoiaD'Conti, Juliano BortoloPachaly, José RicardoOsaki, Sílvia CristinaWosiacki, Sheila Rezlerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-07-05T16:28:27Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/22918Revistahttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevCiVet/PUBhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevCiVet/oaipaulomarcusso@gmail.com || periodicos@uem.br2358-46102358-4610opendoar:2015-07-05T16:28:27Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of pets
title Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of pets
spellingShingle Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of pets
Bordin, Jéssica Tainá
animal
antimicrobial resistance
MRS
ESBL
title_short Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of pets
title_full Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of pets
title_fullStr Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of pets
title_full_unstemmed Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of pets
title_sort Identification of bacterial multidrug resistance in wounds of pets
author Bordin, Jéssica Tainá
author_facet Bordin, Jéssica Tainá
Sfaciote, Ricardo Antônio Pilegi
Coronel, Lincoln Garcia
Vignoto, Vanessa Kelly Capoia
D'Conti, Juliano Bortolo
Pachaly, José Ricardo
Osaki, Sílvia Cristina
Wosiacki, Sheila Rezler
author_role author
author2 Sfaciote, Ricardo Antônio Pilegi
Coronel, Lincoln Garcia
Vignoto, Vanessa Kelly Capoia
D'Conti, Juliano Bortolo
Pachaly, José Ricardo
Osaki, Sílvia Cristina
Wosiacki, Sheila Rezler
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bordin, Jéssica Tainá
Sfaciote, Ricardo Antônio Pilegi
Coronel, Lincoln Garcia
Vignoto, Vanessa Kelly Capoia
D'Conti, Juliano Bortolo
Pachaly, José Ricardo
Osaki, Sílvia Cristina
Wosiacki, Sheila Rezler
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv animal
antimicrobial resistance
MRS
ESBL
topic animal
antimicrobial resistance
MRS
ESBL
description The objective of this study was to identify the bacteria present in wounds of dogs and cats, monitor the resistance profile of the main groups of antimicrobials and identify multidrug-resistant strains of interest in public health. 54 bacterial isolates from 38 wounds were evaluated in 48 dogs and 6 cats from the Veterinary Hospital (HV) of the State University of Maringá (UEM), Umuarama Regional Campus (CAU) from March 2012 until February 2014. The evaluation of the isolates, performed in the Laboratory of Veterinary Microbiology of HV-UEM-CAU, consisted of bacterial identification by morpho-tinturials and biochemical characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility by disk diffusion method with 32 antimicrobial and phenotypic research of MRS, MRS-MLSB, ESBL and VRE strains. Multiple antimicrobial resistance (MAR) was calculated by the MAR index. The results were submitted to descriptive analysis in order to calculate the absolute and relative frequencies. 55.5% (30/54) of the strains tested were identified as gram-positive cocci, 35.2% (19/54) as fermenting gram-negative bacilli and 9.3% (5/54) as non-fermenters. The highest prevalence of strains identified was Staphlococcus spp. (48.1%), followed by Escherichia coli (11.1%), Citrobacter spp. (7.4%), Pseudomonas spp. (7.4%) and Providencia spp. (5.5%), others were found in small percentages.  A total of 1433 reviews of antimicrobial drugs were conducted where the percentage of drug resistance in vitro considered by CLSI was 42.3 % (n=606) and with intermediate resistance was 7.4% (n=106), totaling 49.7% (n=712) rating with partial or total resistance. The average MAR index was 0.42, where 83.3% (45/54) of the isolates were multiresistant (≥ 0.2). The drugs regarded as the most susceptible to resistance were penicillin (R=87.5%), ampicillin (R=79.2%), amoxicillin (R=71.7%), clindamycin (R=80%), oxacillin (R=63 %) (only  tested in Gram-positives), cefoxitin (R=63.3%), tetracycline (R=61%), erythromycin (R=61%) and rifampin (R=52%). Drugs considered to be less susceptible to bacteria resistance were imipenem (R=0%), meropenem (R=4.5%), polymyxin (R=9.5%) (only tested in Gram-negative), gentamicin (R=17%), tobramycin (R=19%), amikacin (R=21%) and neomycin (R=26%). There were found 16 samples phenotypically characterized as MRS, 12 as MRS-MLSB, one as VRE and 5 as ESBL strains.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevCiVet/article/view/Bordin
10.4025/revcivet.v2i1.22918
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevCiVet/article/view/Bordin
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/revcivet.v2i1.22918
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevCiVet/article/view/Bordin/pdf_50
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUEM - Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUEM - Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública; v. 2 n. 1 (2015); 04-19
2358-4610
reponame:Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciência Veterinária e Saúde Pública - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv paulomarcusso@gmail.com || periodicos@uem.br
_version_ 1754650112300154880