EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Agricultura Neotropical |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/7235 |
Resumo: | Acidification of animal manure has been one of the approaches used to combat the proliferation of bacteria and high volatilization of ammonia (NH3). Conversely, alkalinization is performed with basic oxides in Brazil, which raises the pH of the litter and soil from floors of chicken facility, creating a constant source of contamination in them. In this context, this study was undertaken to examine the effect of sodium bisulfate (SB) and elemental sulfur (ES) on the acidification of different soils from floor of chicken housing facilities, considering their efficiency and reaction time. The experiment involved tree soils collected inside chicken facilities (at six, 36, and 60 months of occupation), as well as soil that was collected outside the facilities, totaling four sampling sites. Both acidifier sources—SB and ES—were applied at six increasing doses (0, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 cmolc kg-1 of H+ in the 3-cm soil layer), and incubated for up to 53 days. At the end of each incubation period, the pH of the soil was measured. The results suggest that SB is efficient in reducing the pH of chicken soil, with an immediate reaction occurring after its application. Under the conditions adopted in the present study, the recommended dose of SB to reduce the pH to 5.0 was 6 cmolc kg-1 of H+, which corresponded to the application of 7.2 g of the product in 500 g of soil. Elemental sulfur showed a slow reaction and low efficiency. The use of SB quickly and efficiently provides the acidification of soil from floor of chicken housing facilities. |
id |
UEMS_ca964495b5cdadceadc6c8be08d84d96 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7235 |
network_acronym_str |
UEMS |
network_name_str |
Revista de Agricultura Neotropical |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIESEfeito de fontes e doses de acidificantes no pH do solo coletado do piso de galinheirosAcidificaçãoCama de frangoProdução de frangos de corteManejo de aviárioAcidificationBroiler productionChicken litterPoultry house managementAcidification of animal manure has been one of the approaches used to combat the proliferation of bacteria and high volatilization of ammonia (NH3). Conversely, alkalinization is performed with basic oxides in Brazil, which raises the pH of the litter and soil from floors of chicken facility, creating a constant source of contamination in them. In this context, this study was undertaken to examine the effect of sodium bisulfate (SB) and elemental sulfur (ES) on the acidification of different soils from floor of chicken housing facilities, considering their efficiency and reaction time. The experiment involved tree soils collected inside chicken facilities (at six, 36, and 60 months of occupation), as well as soil that was collected outside the facilities, totaling four sampling sites. Both acidifier sources—SB and ES—were applied at six increasing doses (0, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 cmolc kg-1 of H+ in the 3-cm soil layer), and incubated for up to 53 days. At the end of each incubation period, the pH of the soil was measured. The results suggest that SB is efficient in reducing the pH of chicken soil, with an immediate reaction occurring after its application. Under the conditions adopted in the present study, the recommended dose of SB to reduce the pH to 5.0 was 6 cmolc kg-1 of H+, which corresponded to the application of 7.2 g of the product in 500 g of soil. Elemental sulfur showed a slow reaction and low efficiency. The use of SB quickly and efficiently provides the acidification of soil from floor of chicken housing facilities.A acidificação de resíduo de animais vem sendo uma das maneiras de combater proliferação de bactérias e a alta volatilização de amônia (NH3). No Brazil, contrariamente, procede a alcalinização com óxidos básicos com elevação do pH da cama e solo do piso dos aviários, criando neste último uma fonte constante de contaminação. Neste sentido, este estudo teve como objetivo verificar o efeito de Bissulfato de sódio (SB) e enxofre elementar (ES) na acidificação de diferentes solos de aviário, quanto a eficiência e tempo de reação. Utilizou-se três solos coletados dentro de galpões de criação de frango (6, 36 e 60 meses de ocupação), além da coleta do solo externo ao aviário, totalizando quatro locais de amostragens. As duas fontes de acidificantes, o SB e o ES foram aplicadas em 6 doses crescentes (0, 2, 3, 6, 12 e 24 cmolc/kg de H+ na camada de 3 cm de solo), incubados até 53 dias. Ao final de cada período de incubação determinou-se o pH do solo. Os resultados do presente estudo permitiram concluir que o SB é eficiente na redução do pH do solo de aviário com reação imediata após sua aplicação. Nas condições do presente estudo a dose indicada de SB para reduzir o pH para 5,0 foi de 6 cmolc kg-1 H+ que correspondeu a aplicação de 7,2 g do produto em 500 g de solo. O ES elementar mostrou reação lenta e baixa eficiência. Acidificação do solo do aviário pode ser obtido rapidamente e eficientemente com uso de SB.Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Cassilândia2023-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/723510.32404/rean.v10i2.7235Revista de Agricultura Neotropical; v. 10 n. 2 (2023): REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; e7235REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023): REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; e72352358-6303reponame:Revista de Agricultura Neotropicalinstname:Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)instacron:UEMSenghttps://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/7235/5530https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDeus, Angélica Vargas Motta, Antônio CarlosKieras Gugelmin, EduardoDal Pizzol, RodrigoMalinoski, Simonede Oliveira, Cibelle2023-06-22T15:11:13Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7235Revistahttps://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineoPUBhttps://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/oaiagriculturaneotropical@uems.br || wellingthon.junnyor@uems.br2358-63032358-6303opendoar:2023-06-22T15:11:13Revista de Agricultura Neotropical - Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES Efeito de fontes e doses de acidificantes no pH do solo coletado do piso de galinheiros |
title |
EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES |
spellingShingle |
EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES Deus, Angélica Acidificação Cama de frango Produção de frangos de corte Manejo de aviário Acidification Broiler production Chicken litter Poultry house management |
title_short |
EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES |
title_full |
EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES |
title_fullStr |
EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES |
title_full_unstemmed |
EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES |
title_sort |
EFFECT OF SOURCES AND DOSES OF ACIDIFIERS ON pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM FLOOR OF CHICKEN HOUSING FACILITIES |
author |
Deus, Angélica |
author_facet |
Deus, Angélica Vargas Motta, Antônio Carlos Kieras Gugelmin, Eduardo Dal Pizzol, Rodrigo Malinoski, Simone de Oliveira, Cibelle |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vargas Motta, Antônio Carlos Kieras Gugelmin, Eduardo Dal Pizzol, Rodrigo Malinoski, Simone de Oliveira, Cibelle |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Deus, Angélica Vargas Motta, Antônio Carlos Kieras Gugelmin, Eduardo Dal Pizzol, Rodrigo Malinoski, Simone de Oliveira, Cibelle |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acidificação Cama de frango Produção de frangos de corte Manejo de aviário Acidification Broiler production Chicken litter Poultry house management |
topic |
Acidificação Cama de frango Produção de frangos de corte Manejo de aviário Acidification Broiler production Chicken litter Poultry house management |
description |
Acidification of animal manure has been one of the approaches used to combat the proliferation of bacteria and high volatilization of ammonia (NH3). Conversely, alkalinization is performed with basic oxides in Brazil, which raises the pH of the litter and soil from floors of chicken facility, creating a constant source of contamination in them. In this context, this study was undertaken to examine the effect of sodium bisulfate (SB) and elemental sulfur (ES) on the acidification of different soils from floor of chicken housing facilities, considering their efficiency and reaction time. The experiment involved tree soils collected inside chicken facilities (at six, 36, and 60 months of occupation), as well as soil that was collected outside the facilities, totaling four sampling sites. Both acidifier sources—SB and ES—were applied at six increasing doses (0, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 cmolc kg-1 of H+ in the 3-cm soil layer), and incubated for up to 53 days. At the end of each incubation period, the pH of the soil was measured. The results suggest that SB is efficient in reducing the pH of chicken soil, with an immediate reaction occurring after its application. Under the conditions adopted in the present study, the recommended dose of SB to reduce the pH to 5.0 was 6 cmolc kg-1 of H+, which corresponded to the application of 7.2 g of the product in 500 g of soil. Elemental sulfur showed a slow reaction and low efficiency. The use of SB quickly and efficiently provides the acidification of soil from floor of chicken housing facilities. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-06-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/7235 10.32404/rean.v10i2.7235 |
url |
https://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/7235 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32404/rean.v10i2.7235 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/7235/5530 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Cassilândia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Cassilândia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Agricultura Neotropical; v. 10 n. 2 (2023): REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; e7235 REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023): REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; e7235 2358-6303 reponame:Revista de Agricultura Neotropical instname:Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS) instacron:UEMS |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS) |
instacron_str |
UEMS |
institution |
UEMS |
reponame_str |
Revista de Agricultura Neotropical |
collection |
Revista de Agricultura Neotropical |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Agricultura Neotropical - Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
agriculturaneotropical@uems.br || wellingthon.junnyor@uems.br |
_version_ |
1797051249964613632 |