Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582006000200002 |
Resumo: | This article seeks to identify the determinants of the existence and powers of upper legislative chambers. By analyzing their constitutionally established powers, including all of the minimally democratic bicameral countries, it was possible to reach conclusions not previously suggested in the literature. Using a two-step model whose calculation includes the possibility of a selection bias (Heckman model), the study evaluated both the factors leading to the existence of an upper chamber and those defining its powers. Federalism proved to be an important variable for explaining the difference between bicameral and unicameral countries, but not for explaining the political strength of upper chambers. The most relevant explanatory variable in this sense was the system of government: in Parliamentary systems, upper chambers have limited powers; in Presidential systems they exercise broad powers. |
id |
UERJ-23_962cbf74c7e1e18271503d512aca0161 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0011-52582006000200002 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-23 |
network_name_str |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo?Senatesupper chambersbicameralismFederalismPresidentialismLegislative Branchchecks and balancesThis article seeks to identify the determinants of the existence and powers of upper legislative chambers. By analyzing their constitutionally established powers, including all of the minimally democratic bicameral countries, it was possible to reach conclusions not previously suggested in the literature. Using a two-step model whose calculation includes the possibility of a selection bias (Heckman model), the study evaluated both the factors leading to the existence of an upper chamber and those defining its powers. Federalism proved to be an important variable for explaining the difference between bicameral and unicameral countries, but not for explaining the political strength of upper chambers. The most relevant explanatory variable in this sense was the system of government: in Parliamentary systems, upper chambers have limited powers; in Presidential systems they exercise broad powers.Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)2006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582006000200002Dados v.49 n.2 2006reponame:Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociaisinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJ10.1590/S0011-52582006000200002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeiva,Pedro Robson Pereirapor2008-03-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0011-52582006000200002Revistahttp://dados.iesp.uerj.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dados@iesp.uerj.br1678-45880011-5258opendoar:2008-03-07T00:00Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo? |
title |
Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo? |
spellingShingle |
Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo? Neiva,Pedro Robson Pereira Senates upper chambers bicameralism Federalism Presidentialism Legislative Branch checks and balances |
title_short |
Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo? |
title_full |
Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo? |
title_fullStr |
Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo? |
title_sort |
Os determinantes da existência e dos poderes das câmaras altas: federalismo ou presidencialismo? |
author |
Neiva,Pedro Robson Pereira |
author_facet |
Neiva,Pedro Robson Pereira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Neiva,Pedro Robson Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Senates upper chambers bicameralism Federalism Presidentialism Legislative Branch checks and balances |
topic |
Senates upper chambers bicameralism Federalism Presidentialism Legislative Branch checks and balances |
description |
This article seeks to identify the determinants of the existence and powers of upper legislative chambers. By analyzing their constitutionally established powers, including all of the minimally democratic bicameral countries, it was possible to reach conclusions not previously suggested in the literature. Using a two-step model whose calculation includes the possibility of a selection bias (Heckman model), the study evaluated both the factors leading to the existence of an upper chamber and those defining its powers. Federalism proved to be an important variable for explaining the difference between bicameral and unicameral countries, but not for explaining the political strength of upper chambers. The most relevant explanatory variable in this sense was the system of government: in Parliamentary systems, upper chambers have limited powers; in Presidential systems they exercise broad powers. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582006000200002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582006000200002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0011-52582006000200002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dados v.49 n.2 2006 reponame:Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
collection |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||dados@iesp.uerj.br |
_version_ |
1750312648201732096 |