Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baretta,Dilmar
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Bartz,Marie Luise Carolina, Fachini,Ivandro, Anselmi,Rafael, Zortéa,Talyta, Baretta,Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902014000500002
Resumo: The present study aims to generate knowledge about the soil fauna, its relation to other explanatory environmental variables, and, besides it, to select edaphic indicators that more contribute to separate the land use systems (LUS). Five different LUS were chosen: conventional tillage with crop rotation (CTCR); no-tillage with crop rotation (NTCR); conventional tillage with crop succession (CTCS); no-tillage with crop succession (NTCS) and minimum tillage with crop succession (MTCS). The samples were made in the counties Chapecó, Xanxerê and Ouro Verde located in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil, and were considered the true replicates of the LUS. In each site, nine points were sampled in a sampling grid of 3 x 3. At the same points, soil was sampled for the physical, chemical and biological attributes (environmental variables). Pitfall traps were used to evaluate the soil fauna. Data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA). The soil fauna presented potential to be used as indictors of soil quality, since some groups proved to be sensible to changes of the environmental variables and to soil management and tillage. The soil management using crop rotation (NTCR and CTCR) presented higher diversity, compared to the systems using crop succession (NTCS, MTCS and NTCS), evidencing the importance of the soil tillage, independent of the season (summer or winter). The variable that better contributed to explain these changes were the chemical variables (potassium, pH, calcium, organic matter, available phosphorus, potential acidity), and biological variables (Shannon diversity index, Collembola, Pielou equitability index and microbial biomass carbon), respectively.
id UFC-2_90e07acd87d51c8e22d4efd756acc884
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-66902014000500002
network_acronym_str UFC-2
network_name_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systemsSustainabilitySoil quality indicatorsNo-tillageConventional tillageThe present study aims to generate knowledge about the soil fauna, its relation to other explanatory environmental variables, and, besides it, to select edaphic indicators that more contribute to separate the land use systems (LUS). Five different LUS were chosen: conventional tillage with crop rotation (CTCR); no-tillage with crop rotation (NTCR); conventional tillage with crop succession (CTCS); no-tillage with crop succession (NTCS) and minimum tillage with crop succession (MTCS). The samples were made in the counties Chapecó, Xanxerê and Ouro Verde located in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil, and were considered the true replicates of the LUS. In each site, nine points were sampled in a sampling grid of 3 x 3. At the same points, soil was sampled for the physical, chemical and biological attributes (environmental variables). Pitfall traps were used to evaluate the soil fauna. Data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA). The soil fauna presented potential to be used as indictors of soil quality, since some groups proved to be sensible to changes of the environmental variables and to soil management and tillage. The soil management using crop rotation (NTCR and CTCR) presented higher diversity, compared to the systems using crop succession (NTCS, MTCS and NTCS), evidencing the importance of the soil tillage, independent of the season (summer or winter). The variable that better contributed to explain these changes were the chemical variables (potassium, pH, calcium, organic matter, available phosphorus, potential acidity), and biological variables (Shannon diversity index, Collembola, Pielou equitability index and microbial biomass carbon), respectively.Universidade Federal do Ceará2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902014000500002Revista Ciência Agronômica v.45 n.5spe 2014reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFC10.1590/S1806-66902014000500002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaretta,DilmarBartz,Marie Luise CarolinaFachini,IvandroAnselmi,RafaelZortéa,TalytaBaretta,Carolina Riviera Duarte Malucheeng2014-10-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-66902014000500002Revistahttp://www.ccarevista.ufc.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br1806-66900045-6888opendoar:2014-10-28T00:00Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
spellingShingle Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
Baretta,Dilmar
Sustainability
Soil quality indicators
No-tillage
Conventional tillage
title_short Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title_full Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title_fullStr Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title_full_unstemmed Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title_sort Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
author Baretta,Dilmar
author_facet Baretta,Dilmar
Bartz,Marie Luise Carolina
Fachini,Ivandro
Anselmi,Rafael
Zortéa,Talyta
Baretta,Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche
author_role author
author2 Bartz,Marie Luise Carolina
Fachini,Ivandro
Anselmi,Rafael
Zortéa,Talyta
Baretta,Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baretta,Dilmar
Bartz,Marie Luise Carolina
Fachini,Ivandro
Anselmi,Rafael
Zortéa,Talyta
Baretta,Carolina Riviera Duarte Maluche
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sustainability
Soil quality indicators
No-tillage
Conventional tillage
topic Sustainability
Soil quality indicators
No-tillage
Conventional tillage
description The present study aims to generate knowledge about the soil fauna, its relation to other explanatory environmental variables, and, besides it, to select edaphic indicators that more contribute to separate the land use systems (LUS). Five different LUS were chosen: conventional tillage with crop rotation (CTCR); no-tillage with crop rotation (NTCR); conventional tillage with crop succession (CTCS); no-tillage with crop succession (NTCS) and minimum tillage with crop succession (MTCS). The samples were made in the counties Chapecó, Xanxerê and Ouro Verde located in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil, and were considered the true replicates of the LUS. In each site, nine points were sampled in a sampling grid of 3 x 3. At the same points, soil was sampled for the physical, chemical and biological attributes (environmental variables). Pitfall traps were used to evaluate the soil fauna. Data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA). The soil fauna presented potential to be used as indictors of soil quality, since some groups proved to be sensible to changes of the environmental variables and to soil management and tillage. The soil management using crop rotation (NTCR and CTCR) presented higher diversity, compared to the systems using crop succession (NTCS, MTCS and NTCS), evidencing the importance of the soil tillage, independent of the season (summer or winter). The variable that better contributed to explain these changes were the chemical variables (potassium, pH, calcium, organic matter, available phosphorus, potential acidity), and biological variables (Shannon diversity index, Collembola, Pielou equitability index and microbial biomass carbon), respectively.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902014000500002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-66902014000500002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1806-66902014000500002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica v.45 n.5spe 2014
reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
collection Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br
_version_ 1750297487504048128