Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cano,Nicolas D.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Camargo,Antonio P. de, Muniz,Gustavo L., Oliveira,Jonesmar de, Dalfré Filho,José G., Frizzone,José A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662021000100010
Resumo: ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate three methodologies for orifice-plate water-flow estimation by quantifying errors in the flow determinations to propose an appropriate measurement range for each evaluated condition. Two orifice-plate models (nominal diameters of 100 and 150 mm) with 50% restriction in the flow section were evaluated. In the theoretical equations, the discharge coefficient was obtained using the Reader-Harris/Gallagher equation (Method 1) and approximated from experimental data using the angular coefficient of a zero-intercept straight line (Method 2). The recommended measurement ranges for errors that were lower than 5% for the 100 and 150 mm plates were 30 to 65 m3 h-1 and 70 to 130 m3 h-1 using the theoretical equation and 20 to 65 m3 h-1 and 40 to 130 m3 h-1 using the empirical equation, respectively. The Reader-Harris/Gallagher equation (Method 1) adequately estimated the discharge coefficient of the orifice plates; however, the use of empirical equations (Method 3) demonstrated smaller measurement errors and greater rangeability of the evaluated flow meters.
id UFCG-1_d7ff972d8b2f41e6b4bea03791b91b73
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-43662021000100010
network_acronym_str UFCG-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plateshydrometrydiaphragmhydraulicsABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate three methodologies for orifice-plate water-flow estimation by quantifying errors in the flow determinations to propose an appropriate measurement range for each evaluated condition. Two orifice-plate models (nominal diameters of 100 and 150 mm) with 50% restriction in the flow section were evaluated. In the theoretical equations, the discharge coefficient was obtained using the Reader-Harris/Gallagher equation (Method 1) and approximated from experimental data using the angular coefficient of a zero-intercept straight line (Method 2). The recommended measurement ranges for errors that were lower than 5% for the 100 and 150 mm plates were 30 to 65 m3 h-1 and 70 to 130 m3 h-1 using the theoretical equation and 20 to 65 m3 h-1 and 40 to 130 m3 h-1 using the empirical equation, respectively. The Reader-Harris/Gallagher equation (Method 1) adequately estimated the discharge coefficient of the orifice plates; however, the use of empirical equations (Method 3) demonstrated smaller measurement errors and greater rangeability of the evaluated flow meters.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662021000100010Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.25 n.1 2021reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v25n1p10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCano,Nicolas D.Camargo,Antonio P. deMuniz,Gustavo L.Oliveira,Jonesmar deDalfré Filho,José G.Frizzone,José A.eng2020-11-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662021000100010Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2020-11-26T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plates
title Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plates
spellingShingle Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plates
Cano,Nicolas D.
hydrometry
diaphragm
hydraulics
title_short Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plates
title_full Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plates
title_fullStr Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plates
title_full_unstemmed Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plates
title_sort Performance of models to determine flow rate using orifice plates
author Cano,Nicolas D.
author_facet Cano,Nicolas D.
Camargo,Antonio P. de
Muniz,Gustavo L.
Oliveira,Jonesmar de
Dalfré Filho,José G.
Frizzone,José A.
author_role author
author2 Camargo,Antonio P. de
Muniz,Gustavo L.
Oliveira,Jonesmar de
Dalfré Filho,José G.
Frizzone,José A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cano,Nicolas D.
Camargo,Antonio P. de
Muniz,Gustavo L.
Oliveira,Jonesmar de
Dalfré Filho,José G.
Frizzone,José A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv hydrometry
diaphragm
hydraulics
topic hydrometry
diaphragm
hydraulics
description ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate three methodologies for orifice-plate water-flow estimation by quantifying errors in the flow determinations to propose an appropriate measurement range for each evaluated condition. Two orifice-plate models (nominal diameters of 100 and 150 mm) with 50% restriction in the flow section were evaluated. In the theoretical equations, the discharge coefficient was obtained using the Reader-Harris/Gallagher equation (Method 1) and approximated from experimental data using the angular coefficient of a zero-intercept straight line (Method 2). The recommended measurement ranges for errors that were lower than 5% for the 100 and 150 mm plates were 30 to 65 m3 h-1 and 70 to 130 m3 h-1 using the theoretical equation and 20 to 65 m3 h-1 and 40 to 130 m3 h-1 using the empirical equation, respectively. The Reader-Harris/Gallagher equation (Method 1) adequately estimated the discharge coefficient of the orifice plates; however, the use of empirical equations (Method 3) demonstrated smaller measurement errors and greater rangeability of the evaluated flow meters.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662021000100010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662021000100010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v25n1p10-16
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.25 n.1 2021
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron:UFCG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron_str UFCG
institution UFCG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||agriambi@agriambi.com.br
_version_ 1750297687773675520