Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nascimento, João Francisco Machado do
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFG
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2980
Resumo: For patients poorly adapted to conventional dentures, the single-implant mandibular overdenture has been proposed as a simplified alternative for the two-implant treatment, together with the use of immediate loading of the implant. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the photoelastic characteristics of stress transfer to the implant in a single-implant mandibular overdenture using different types of attachments. A photoelastic model of an edentulous mandible with a resilient edentulous ridge and a unique implant located at the symphyseal region was obtained to reproduce a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture. Six 2.0 mm height attachments were selected and inserted in the same photoelastic model in a random order. A universal material testing machine was used to induce axial vertical loads of 70 N applied in the central incisor and in the central region of the first right molar without contact on the contralateral side. The photoelastic analysis was performed using a polariscope integrated into the testing machine. Standard separate views were photographed and evaluated visually for stress-induced fringes, to comparatively rank the different attachment systems. All attachments showed a similar tension distribution concentrated in the apical third, and the highest stress concentration at the apical level. There was a low stress concentration at the coronal third of the implant, with no discernible stress in the first threads of the implants, except for Dalla Bona which showed low stress at the coronal part of the implant (one fringe). No identifiable fringes were observed when the load was applied in the molar region, which resulted from the low amount of stress transmitted by the implant for all attachments. It was concluded that the load transferred to a single mandibular implant is low and within the limits of functional loading, irrespective of the type of retention system.
id UFG-2_37df5dbef984ff813adc8159bdf1856c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tde/2980
network_acronym_str UFG-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
repository_id_str
spelling Leles, Cláudio Rodrigueshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6740286066154410http://lattes.cnpq.br/0058867283070284Nascimento, João Francisco Machado do2014-09-02T11:26:28Z2013-08-14NASCIMENTO, João Francisco Machado do. Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão. 2013. 54 f. Dissertação(Mestrado em Ciências da Saúde (FM)) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2013.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2980For patients poorly adapted to conventional dentures, the single-implant mandibular overdenture has been proposed as a simplified alternative for the two-implant treatment, together with the use of immediate loading of the implant. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the photoelastic characteristics of stress transfer to the implant in a single-implant mandibular overdenture using different types of attachments. A photoelastic model of an edentulous mandible with a resilient edentulous ridge and a unique implant located at the symphyseal region was obtained to reproduce a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture. Six 2.0 mm height attachments were selected and inserted in the same photoelastic model in a random order. A universal material testing machine was used to induce axial vertical loads of 70 N applied in the central incisor and in the central region of the first right molar without contact on the contralateral side. The photoelastic analysis was performed using a polariscope integrated into the testing machine. Standard separate views were photographed and evaluated visually for stress-induced fringes, to comparatively rank the different attachment systems. All attachments showed a similar tension distribution concentrated in the apical third, and the highest stress concentration at the apical level. There was a low stress concentration at the coronal third of the implant, with no discernible stress in the first threads of the implants, except for Dalla Bona which showed low stress at the coronal part of the implant (one fringe). No identifiable fringes were observed when the load was applied in the molar region, which resulted from the low amount of stress transmitted by the implant for all attachments. It was concluded that the load transferred to a single mandibular implant is low and within the limits of functional loading, irrespective of the type of retention system.Implantes osseointegrados vêm sendo utilizados com sucesso para restaurar a função e a estética de pacientes desdentados totais e parciais. No entanto há necessidade de tornar o tratamento de pessoas com necessidade de overdenture retida com implante menos oneroso e mais eficiente. O objetivo deste trabalho foi verificar pela técnica fotoelástica (Qualitativa) as tensões geradas ao redor do implante pela aplicação de carga sobre overdenture mandibular retida por um implante unitário na sínfise da mandibular. Foi confeccionado um modelo de resina fotoelástica Araldite, reproduzido de uma mandibular anatômica, onde foi fixado na região sínfise um implante 3.75x11mm (Titamax Ti Cortical, Neodent, Curitiba, Brasil). Com um modelo foi confeccionada uma prótese total e gingival artificial. Todos os pilares foram posicionados sobre o implante e apertado com 10 Ncm, a fêmea foi capturada de forma direta à prótese, com a réplica da mucosa em posição. Todos foram sucessivamente capturados e levados ‘à máquina de ensaio universal. Com uma carga axial de 70 Ncm na fossa central do 46 e incisal do 41. Foram fotografados em um polariscópio as franjas resultantes das tensões. Foram feitas análises qualitativa dos resultados das tensões sobre o attachment. De acordo com os resultados obtidos pode-se concluir que a carga transferida para o implante, é baixo, independente do sistema de retenção.Submitted by Cássia Santos (cassia.bcufg@gmail.com) on 2014-09-02T11:26:28Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Dissertação Joao Francisco Machado do Nascimento.pdf: 721039 bytes, checksum: 2a145e907cf0cfc7e15f26459ae30aff (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2014-09-02T11:26:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Dissertação Joao Francisco Machado do Nascimento.pdf: 721039 bytes, checksum: 2a145e907cf0cfc7e15f26459ae30aff (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-08-14Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/retrieve/6937/Disserta%c3%a7%c3%a3o%20Joao%20Francisco%20Machado%20do%20Nascimento.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde (FM)UFGBrasilFaculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)Alsabeeha N, Atieh M, Swain MV, Payne AG. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):160-6. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, De Silva RK, Thomson WM. Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Mar;22(3):330-7. Alsabeeha NHM, Swain MV, Payne AGT. Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2011;24:247–54. Brasil, Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica (BR).Projeto SBBrasil 2010: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal: resultados principais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2011. 92 p. Carlsson G, Kronstrom M, de Baat C, Cune M, Davis D, Garefis P, Heo SJ, Jokstad A, Matsuura M, Narhi T, Ow R, Pissiotis A, Sato H & Zarb G. A survey of the use of mandibular implant overdentures in 10 countries. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17: 211-7. Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Feb;37(2):143-56. Cheng T, Sun G, Huo J, He X, Wang Y, Ren YF. Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments. J Dent 2012 Nov;40(11):1018-23. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Castagna S. Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: A five-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:159-65. Critchlow SB, Ellis JS. Prognostic indicators for conventional complete denture therapy: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2010 Jan;38(1):2-9. Dudic A, Mericske-Stern R. Retention mechanisms and prosthetic complications of implant-supported mandibular overdentures: Long-term results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;4:212-9. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT Jr, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jul-Aug;15(4):413-4. Fiske J, Davis DM, Frances C, Gelbier S. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. British Dental Journal 1998;184:90-3. Fitzpatrick B. Standard of care for the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jan;95(1):71-8. Freeman C, Brook I, Joshi R. Long-term follow-up of implantstabilised overdentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 2001;9:147-50. Gonda T, Maeda Y, Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Fracture incidence in mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:178-81. Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: A randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:125-30. Grover M, Vaidyanathan AK, Veeravalli PT. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013 Jan 21. doi: 10.1111/clr.12111. [Epub ahead of print] Harder S, Wolfart S, Egert C, Kern M. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures--results of preliminary prospective study. J Dent. 2011 Oct;39(10):656-61. Hugo FN, Hilgert JB, de Sousa Mda L, da Silva DD, Pucca GA Jr. Correlates of partial tooth loss and edentulism in the Brazilian elderly. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):224-32. Hyland R, Ellis J, Thomason M, El-Feky A, Moynihan P. A qualitative study on patient perspectives of how conventional and implant-supported dentures affect eating. Journal of Dentistry 2009;37:718–23. Krennmair G, Ulm C. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2001;16:98-104. Kronstrom M, Davis B, Loney R, Gerrow J, Hollender L. A prospective randomized study on the immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one or two implants: a 12emonth follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:181-8. Liddelow GJ, Henry PJ. A prospective study of immediately loaded single implantretained mandibular overdentures: preliminary one-year results. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2007;97:S126–37. Maeda Y, Horisaka M, Yagi K. Biomechanical rationale for a single implantretained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2008;19:271–5. Medeiros JJ, Rodrigues LV, Azevedo AC, Lima Neto EA, Machado LS, Valença AMG. Edentulismo, uso e necessidade de prótese e fatores associados em município do nordeste brasileiro. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr. 2012 Out-Dez;12(4):573-78. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Visser A. & Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009;20: 722-8. Mericske-Stern R, Zarb GA. Overdentures: an alternative implant methodology for edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:203-8. Musacchio E, Perissinotto E, Binotto P, Sartori L, Silva-Netto F, Zambon S, Manzato E, Corti MC, Baggio G, Crepaldi G. Tooth loss in the elderly and its association with nutritional status, socio-economic and lifestyle factors. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007 Apr;65(2):78-86. Naert I, Alsaadi G & Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implantretained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:401-10. Oliveira AGRC. Edentulismo. In: Antunes JLF, Perez MA, editores. Epidemiologia da Saúde Bucal. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2006. p. 205-18. Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van’t Hof MA, van Oort RP, Vissink A. Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A fiveyear randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:195–201. Rich B, Goldstein GR. New paradigms in prosthodontic treatment planning: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Aug;88(2):208-14. Slade GD, Nuttall N, Sanders AE, Steele JG, Allen PF, Lahti S. Impacts of oral disorders in the United Kingdom and Australia. Br Dent J. 2005 Apr 23;198(8):489-93. Smith B, Baysan A, Fenlon M. Association between oral health impact profile and general health scores for patients seeking dental implants. Journal of Dentistry 2009;37:357–9. Steele JG, Sanders AE, Slade GD, Allen PF, Lahti S, Nuttall N, Spencer AJ. How do age and tooth loss affect oral health impacts and quality of life? A study comparing two national samples. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004. Apr;32(2):107-14. Stoker G, Wismeijer D & van Waas M. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant retained overdentures. Journal of Dental Research 2007;86: 276-80. Takanashi Y, Penrod JR, Lund JP, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:181-6. Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Müller F, Naert I, Ellis JS, Barclay C, Butterworth C, Scott B, Lynch C, Stewardson D, Smith P, Welfare R, Hyde P, McAndrew R, Fenlon M, Barclay S, Barker D. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients – the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009 Aug 22;207(4):185-6. Timmerman R, Stoker GT, Wismeijer D, Oosterveld P, Vermeeren JIJF, van Waas MAJ. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res 2004;83:630-3. Vargas AMD, Paixão HH. Perda dentária e seu significado na qualidade de vida de adultos usuários de serviço público de saúde bucal do Centro de Saúde Boa Vista em Belo Horizonte. Cien Saude Colet. 2006 Out-Dez;10(4):1015-24. Visser A, Meijer H, Raghoebar G & Vissink A. Implant-retainedmandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: a 10 years of care and aftercare. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2006;19:271-8. Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2009;22:331-9. Wolfart S, Braasch K, Brunzel S, Kern M. The central single implant in the edentulous mandible: improvement of function and quality of life. A report of 2 cases. Quintessence Int 2008; 39:541-8. Zarb, G. & Bolender, C. (2004) Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients. Complete Dentures and Implant-Supported Prostheses. 12th edition. St Louis: Mosby.-10068643126177453106006006006001545772475950486338-2070498469879244349-2555911436985713659http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEdentulismosobredentadura mandibularanálise fotoelásticaEdentulismmandibular overdenturephotoelastic stress analysisCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIAAnálise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexãoPhotoelastic stress distribution produced by different retention systems for a single-implant mandibular overdentureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82142http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/9ec0761a-ba2c-4832-9261-d08ce758483c/download232e528055260031f4e2af4136033daaMD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/7eff1da2-378e-47cd-bf86-74f160935d2f/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-822117http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/99df85d3-1cce-4177-99e1-4d6b3d9735f1/downloaddd6580d2d5007383f0e67b904850adc9MD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-823148http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/02c6939c-0e0b-4be0-b982-5caea51bf99b/download9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306MD54ORIGINALDissertação Joao Francisco Machado do Nascimento.pdfDissertação Joao Francisco Machado do Nascimento.pdfDissertação - PPGCSAU/RG - João Francisco Machado do Nascimentoapplication/pdf721039http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/584ea4bd-eb5d-4699-98cf-1c35d633250e/download2a145e907cf0cfc7e15f26459ae30affMD55TEXTDissertação Joao Francisco Machado do Nascimento.pdf.txtDissertação Joao Francisco Machado do Nascimento.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain68151http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/f83a1d36-d08e-4fc0-bb0c-396ace186ede/downloada03cca3a3e30242ba91a134272585b69MD56THUMBNAILDissertação Joao Francisco Machado do Nascimento.pdf.jpgDissertação Joao Francisco Machado do Nascimento.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2763http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/c21d11dc-8360-4854-bda7-64cde35b84f6/download106d65473445dc0e35091623e90b8b09MD57tde/29802014-09-03 03:01:50.469http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acesso abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tde/2980http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2014-09-03T06:01:50Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Photoelastic stress distribution produced by different retention systems for a single-implant mandibular overdenture
title Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão
spellingShingle Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão
Nascimento, João Francisco Machado do
Edentulismo
sobredentadura mandibular
análise fotoelástica
Edentulism
mandibular overdenture
photoelastic stress analysis
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA
title_short Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão
title_full Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão
title_fullStr Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão
title_full_unstemmed Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão
title_sort Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão
author Nascimento, João Francisco Machado do
author_facet Nascimento, João Francisco Machado do
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6740286066154410
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0058867283070284
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nascimento, João Francisco Machado do
contributor_str_mv Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Edentulismo
sobredentadura mandibular
análise fotoelástica
topic Edentulismo
sobredentadura mandibular
análise fotoelástica
Edentulism
mandibular overdenture
photoelastic stress analysis
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Edentulism
mandibular overdenture
photoelastic stress analysis
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA
description For patients poorly adapted to conventional dentures, the single-implant mandibular overdenture has been proposed as a simplified alternative for the two-implant treatment, together with the use of immediate loading of the implant. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the photoelastic characteristics of stress transfer to the implant in a single-implant mandibular overdenture using different types of attachments. A photoelastic model of an edentulous mandible with a resilient edentulous ridge and a unique implant located at the symphyseal region was obtained to reproduce a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture. Six 2.0 mm height attachments were selected and inserted in the same photoelastic model in a random order. A universal material testing machine was used to induce axial vertical loads of 70 N applied in the central incisor and in the central region of the first right molar without contact on the contralateral side. The photoelastic analysis was performed using a polariscope integrated into the testing machine. Standard separate views were photographed and evaluated visually for stress-induced fringes, to comparatively rank the different attachment systems. All attachments showed a similar tension distribution concentrated in the apical third, and the highest stress concentration at the apical level. There was a low stress concentration at the coronal third of the implant, with no discernible stress in the first threads of the implants, except for Dalla Bona which showed low stress at the coronal part of the implant (one fringe). No identifiable fringes were observed when the load was applied in the molar region, which resulted from the low amount of stress transmitted by the implant for all attachments. It was concluded that the load transferred to a single mandibular implant is low and within the limits of functional loading, irrespective of the type of retention system.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013-08-14
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-09-02T11:26:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv NASCIMENTO, João Francisco Machado do. Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão. 2013. 54 f. Dissertação(Mestrado em Ciências da Saúde (FM)) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2013.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2980
identifier_str_mv NASCIMENTO, João Francisco Machado do. Análise fotoelástica da distribuição de tensões peri-implantares em overdenture mandibular retida por implante unitário com diferentes tipos de conexão. 2013. 54 f. Dissertação(Mestrado em Ciências da Saúde (FM)) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2013.
url http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2980
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -1006864312617745310
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 1545772475950486338
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -2070498469879244349
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv -2555911436985713659
dc.relation.references.por.fl_str_mv Alsabeeha N, Atieh M, Swain MV, Payne AG. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):160-6. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, De Silva RK, Thomson WM. Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Mar;22(3):330-7. Alsabeeha NHM, Swain MV, Payne AGT. Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2011;24:247–54. Brasil, Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica (BR).Projeto SBBrasil 2010: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal: resultados principais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2011. 92 p. Carlsson G, Kronstrom M, de Baat C, Cune M, Davis D, Garefis P, Heo SJ, Jokstad A, Matsuura M, Narhi T, Ow R, Pissiotis A, Sato H & Zarb G. A survey of the use of mandibular implant overdentures in 10 countries. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17: 211-7. Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Feb;37(2):143-56. Cheng T, Sun G, Huo J, He X, Wang Y, Ren YF. Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments. J Dent 2012 Nov;40(11):1018-23. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Castagna S. Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: A five-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:159-65. Critchlow SB, Ellis JS. Prognostic indicators for conventional complete denture therapy: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2010 Jan;38(1):2-9. Dudic A, Mericske-Stern R. Retention mechanisms and prosthetic complications of implant-supported mandibular overdentures: Long-term results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;4:212-9. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT Jr, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jul-Aug;15(4):413-4. Fiske J, Davis DM, Frances C, Gelbier S. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. British Dental Journal 1998;184:90-3. Fitzpatrick B. Standard of care for the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jan;95(1):71-8. Freeman C, Brook I, Joshi R. Long-term follow-up of implantstabilised overdentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 2001;9:147-50. Gonda T, Maeda Y, Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Fracture incidence in mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:178-81. Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: A randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:125-30. Grover M, Vaidyanathan AK, Veeravalli PT. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013 Jan 21. doi: 10.1111/clr.12111. [Epub ahead of print] Harder S, Wolfart S, Egert C, Kern M. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures--results of preliminary prospective study. J Dent. 2011 Oct;39(10):656-61. Hugo FN, Hilgert JB, de Sousa Mda L, da Silva DD, Pucca GA Jr. Correlates of partial tooth loss and edentulism in the Brazilian elderly. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):224-32. Hyland R, Ellis J, Thomason M, El-Feky A, Moynihan P. A qualitative study on patient perspectives of how conventional and implant-supported dentures affect eating. Journal of Dentistry 2009;37:718–23. Krennmair G, Ulm C. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2001;16:98-104. Kronstrom M, Davis B, Loney R, Gerrow J, Hollender L. A prospective randomized study on the immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one or two implants: a 12emonth follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:181-8. Liddelow GJ, Henry PJ. A prospective study of immediately loaded single implantretained mandibular overdentures: preliminary one-year results. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2007;97:S126–37. Maeda Y, Horisaka M, Yagi K. Biomechanical rationale for a single implantretained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2008;19:271–5. Medeiros JJ, Rodrigues LV, Azevedo AC, Lima Neto EA, Machado LS, Valença AMG. Edentulismo, uso e necessidade de prótese e fatores associados em município do nordeste brasileiro. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr. 2012 Out-Dez;12(4):573-78. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Visser A. & Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009;20: 722-8. Mericske-Stern R, Zarb GA. Overdentures: an alternative implant methodology for edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:203-8. Musacchio E, Perissinotto E, Binotto P, Sartori L, Silva-Netto F, Zambon S, Manzato E, Corti MC, Baggio G, Crepaldi G. Tooth loss in the elderly and its association with nutritional status, socio-economic and lifestyle factors. Acta Odontol Scand. 2007 Apr;65(2):78-86. Naert I, Alsaadi G & Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implantretained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:401-10. Oliveira AGRC. Edentulismo. In: Antunes JLF, Perez MA, editores. Epidemiologia da Saúde Bucal. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2006. p. 205-18. Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van’t Hof MA, van Oort RP, Vissink A. Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A fiveyear randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:195–201. Rich B, Goldstein GR. New paradigms in prosthodontic treatment planning: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Aug;88(2):208-14. Slade GD, Nuttall N, Sanders AE, Steele JG, Allen PF, Lahti S. Impacts of oral disorders in the United Kingdom and Australia. Br Dent J. 2005 Apr 23;198(8):489-93. Smith B, Baysan A, Fenlon M. Association between oral health impact profile and general health scores for patients seeking dental implants. Journal of Dentistry 2009;37:357–9. Steele JG, Sanders AE, Slade GD, Allen PF, Lahti S, Nuttall N, Spencer AJ. How do age and tooth loss affect oral health impacts and quality of life? A study comparing two national samples. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004. Apr;32(2):107-14. Stoker G, Wismeijer D & van Waas M. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant retained overdentures. Journal of Dental Research 2007;86: 276-80. Takanashi Y, Penrod JR, Lund JP, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:181-6. Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Müller F, Naert I, Ellis JS, Barclay C, Butterworth C, Scott B, Lynch C, Stewardson D, Smith P, Welfare R, Hyde P, McAndrew R, Fenlon M, Barclay S, Barker D. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients – the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009 Aug 22;207(4):185-6. Timmerman R, Stoker GT, Wismeijer D, Oosterveld P, Vermeeren JIJF, van Waas MAJ. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res 2004;83:630-3. Vargas AMD, Paixão HH. Perda dentária e seu significado na qualidade de vida de adultos usuários de serviço público de saúde bucal do Centro de Saúde Boa Vista em Belo Horizonte. Cien Saude Colet. 2006 Out-Dez;10(4):1015-24. Visser A, Meijer H, Raghoebar G & Vissink A. Implant-retainedmandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: a 10 years of care and aftercare. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2006;19:271-8. Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2009;22:331-9. Wolfart S, Braasch K, Brunzel S, Kern M. The central single implant in the edentulous mandible: improvement of function and quality of life. A report of 2 cases. Quintessence Int 2008; 39:541-8. Zarb, G. & Bolender, C. (2004) Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients. Complete Dentures and Implant-Supported Prostheses. 12th edition. St Louis: Mosby.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde (FM)
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/9ec0761a-ba2c-4832-9261-d08ce758483c/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/7eff1da2-378e-47cd-bf86-74f160935d2f/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/99df85d3-1cce-4177-99e1-4d6b3d9735f1/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/02c6939c-0e0b-4be0-b982-5caea51bf99b/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/584ea4bd-eb5d-4699-98cf-1c35d633250e/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/f83a1d36-d08e-4fc0-bb0c-396ace186ede/download
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/c21d11dc-8360-4854-bda7-64cde35b84f6/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 232e528055260031f4e2af4136033daa
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
dd6580d2d5007383f0e67b904850adc9
9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306
2a145e907cf0cfc7e15f26459ae30aff
a03cca3a3e30242ba91a134272585b69
106d65473445dc0e35091623e90b8b09
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br
_version_ 1798044390803898368