Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFG |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7765 |
Resumo: | Objectives: To compare the accuracy and concordance of SONOBREAST with the BI-RADS system for predicting malignancy in solid breast masses observed on ultrasound; and application the SONOBREAST in women with breast lumps. Methods: 274 women were included prospectively, with the assessment of 500 breast masses observed on ultrasound and that presented any surgical indication. Sonographic features were assessed, the patients' age and family history of first degree. The likelihood of malignancy according to SONOBREAST model was calculated through the webpage <www.sonobreast.com.br>, and the BI-RADS system. The result was compared to anatomopathological examination. Results: The average age of patients was 41.92 (± 14.40) years. There were 87 (17.40%) malignant tumors; and 382 (76.40%) nonpalpable lesions. For the cutoff of 2%, the lesions were regarded as suspicious in 171 cases (34.20%) by both SONOBREAST and BI-RADS. The Kappa coefficient of concordance between the methods was 1 (p <0.001). SONOBREAST was identical to the BI-RADS system for sensitivity (95.40)%, specificity (78.69%), positive predictive value (48.54%), negative predictive value (98.78%) and accuracy (81.60 %). Compared to categorical variables (3, 4 and 5) classified by BIRADS, the area under the ROC curve by SONOBREAST was of 94.41 (92.20 to 96.62) and by BI-RADS of 89.99 (86.60 to 93.37). Conclusion: The SONOBREAST model presents identical accuracy compared to the BIRADS system, when using the same parameters for the cutoff for malignancy suspicion. Considering the increasing likelihood of malignancy for categories 3, 4 and 5 of the BI-RADS system, SONOBREAST model allowed a more precise and individualized assessment. |
id |
UFG-2_db3cd3fd13ed6515ceefa17a26164e7c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/7765 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Freitas Junior, Ruffo dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7343840830786566Freitas Junior, Ruffo dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7343840830786566Lucena, Clécio Enio MurtaPaulinelli, Régis ResendeRahal, Rosemar Macedo SousaFerreira, Rui Gilbertohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4800212608474118Oliveira, Luís Fernando Pádua2017-09-19T13:56:14Z2014-12-18OLIVEIRA, L. F. P. Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia. 2014. 67 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências da Saúde) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2014.http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7765Objectives: To compare the accuracy and concordance of SONOBREAST with the BI-RADS system for predicting malignancy in solid breast masses observed on ultrasound; and application the SONOBREAST in women with breast lumps. Methods: 274 women were included prospectively, with the assessment of 500 breast masses observed on ultrasound and that presented any surgical indication. Sonographic features were assessed, the patients' age and family history of first degree. The likelihood of malignancy according to SONOBREAST model was calculated through the webpage <www.sonobreast.com.br>, and the BI-RADS system. The result was compared to anatomopathological examination. Results: The average age of patients was 41.92 (± 14.40) years. There were 87 (17.40%) malignant tumors; and 382 (76.40%) nonpalpable lesions. For the cutoff of 2%, the lesions were regarded as suspicious in 171 cases (34.20%) by both SONOBREAST and BI-RADS. The Kappa coefficient of concordance between the methods was 1 (p <0.001). SONOBREAST was identical to the BI-RADS system for sensitivity (95.40)%, specificity (78.69%), positive predictive value (48.54%), negative predictive value (98.78%) and accuracy (81.60 %). Compared to categorical variables (3, 4 and 5) classified by BIRADS, the area under the ROC curve by SONOBREAST was of 94.41 (92.20 to 96.62) and by BI-RADS of 89.99 (86.60 to 93.37). Conclusion: The SONOBREAST model presents identical accuracy compared to the BIRADS system, when using the same parameters for the cutoff for malignancy suspicion. Considering the increasing likelihood of malignancy for categories 3, 4 and 5 of the BI-RADS system, SONOBREAST model allowed a more precise and individualized assessment.Objetivos: Comparar a acurácia e a concordância do SONOBREAST com o sistema BI-RADS, na predição de malignidade em nódulos sólidos da mama vistos à ultrassonografia; e aplicar o SONOBREAST em mulheres com nódulos mamários. Metodologia: Foram incluídas 274 mulheres, de forma prospectiva, com avaliação de 500 nódulos mamários vistos à ultrassonografia e que apresentavam alguma indicação cirúrgica. Foram avaliadas as características ultrassonográficas, a idade das pacientes e o histórico familiar de primeiro grau. Foi calculada a probabilidade de malignidade de acordo com o modelo SONOBREAST, através da página de internet, <www.sonobreast.com.br>, e pelo sistema BI-RADS. O resultado foi comparado com o exame anatomopatológico. Resultados: A média de idade das pacientes foi de 41,92 (±14,40) anos. Havia 87 (17,40%) tumores malignos; e 382 (76,40%) nódulos não palpáveis. Para o ponto de corte de 2%, as lesões foram consideradas suspeitas em 171 casos (34,20%) tanto pelo SONOBREAST quanto pelo BI-RADS. O índice de concordância Kappa entre os métodos foi de 1 (p<0,001). O SONOBREAST foi idêntico ao sistema BI-RADS quanto à sensibilidade (95,40)%, especificidade (78,69%), valor preditivo positivo (48,54%), valor preditivo negativo (98,78%) e acurácia (81,60%). Em comparação com as variáveis categóricas (3, 4 e 5) classificadas pelo BI-RADS, a área sob a curva ROC foi, pelo SONOBREAST, de 94,41 (92,20-96,62) e, pelo BI-RADS, de 89,99 (86,60- 93,37). Conclusão: O modelo SONOBREAST possui acurácia idêntica ao do sistema BI-RADS, quando se usam os mesmos parâmetros para o ponto de corte da suspeição de malignidade. Considerando a probabilidade contínua de malignidade para as categorias 3, 4 e 5 do sistema BI-RADS, o modelo SONOBREAST permitiu uma avaliação mais precisa e individualizada.Submitted by JÚLIO HEBER SILVA (julioheber@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-09-12T19:30:28Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Luís Fernando Pádua Oliveira - 2014.pdf: 1592628 bytes, checksum: 36eb6ae0c7aaec37028cc39dc69c9a78 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2017-09-19T13:56:14Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Luís Fernando Pádua Oliveira - 2014.pdf: 1592628 bytes, checksum: 36eb6ae0c7aaec37028cc39dc69c9a78 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-19T13:56:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Tese - Luís Fernando Pádua Oliveira - 2014.pdf: 1592628 bytes, checksum: 36eb6ae0c7aaec37028cc39dc69c9a78 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-12-18application/pdfporUniversidade Federal de GoiásPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde (FM)UFGBrasilFaculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCâncer de mamaUltrassonografiaDiagnósticoSonobreastDiagnosisSonobreastBreast cancerUltrasoundMEDICINA::ANATOMIA PATOLOGICA E PATOLOGIA CLINICAAplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografiaSonobreast application and comparison of Acuracia and concordance with the BI-RADS system in ultrasonography solid momary nodulesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-100686431261774531060060060015457724759504863387337577453819502453reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFGinstname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/4687b693-73ee-40a6-b32f-bf799f4a4af7/downloadbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/cf327aa6-9d82-4faa-9fc3-9f1e96bccbd8/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/bcbd2f0a-3208-46b3-8f08-9fe7977c4f85/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/1b174375-ca18-4bc4-bbed-f3df89bf0a97/downloadd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54ORIGINALTese - Luís Fernando Pádua Oliveira - 2014.pdfTese - Luís Fernando Pádua Oliveira - 2014.pdfapplication/pdf1592628http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/19a2c666-d60a-4cd1-add8-b7990bb4ff05/download36eb6ae0c7aaec37028cc39dc69c9a78MD55tede/77652017-09-19 10:56:14.136http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acesso Abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.bc.ufg.br:tede/7765http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tedeRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/oai/requesttasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.bropendoar:2017-09-19T13:56:14Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)falseTk9UQTogQ09MT1FVRSBBUVVJIEEgU1VBIFBSw5NQUklBIExJQ0VOw4dBCkVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EgZGUgZXhlbXBsbyDDqSBmb3JuZWNpZGEgYXBlbmFzIHBhcmEgZmlucyBpbmZvcm1hdGl2b3MuCgpMSUNFTsOHQSBERSBESVNUUklCVUnDh8ODTyBOw4NPLUVYQ0xVU0lWQQoKQ29tIGEgYXByZXNlbnRhw6fDo28gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIHZvY8OqIChvIGF1dG9yIChlcykgb3UgbyB0aXR1bGFyIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBkZSBhdXRvcikgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgClhYWCAoU2lnbGEgZGEgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBwb2RlLCBzZW0gYWx0ZXJhciBvIGNvbnRlw7pkbywgdHJhbnNwb3IgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIApwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgU2lnbGEgZGUgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPDs3BpYSBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIAppZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250ZcO6ZG8gZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFRFU0UgT1UgRElTU0VSVEHDh8ODTyBPUkEgREVQT1NJVEFEQSBURU5IQSBTSURPIFJFU1VMVEFETyBERSBVTSBQQVRST0PDjU5JTyBPVSAKQVBPSU8gREUgVU1BIEFHw4pOQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PIFFVRSBOw4NPIFNFSkEgQSBTSUdMQSBERSAKVU5JVkVSU0lEQURFLCBWT0PDiiBERUNMQVJBIFFVRSBSRVNQRUlUT1UgVE9ET1MgRSBRVUFJU1FVRVIgRElSRUlUT1MgREUgUkVWSVPDg08gQ09NTyAKVEFNQsOJTSBBUyBERU1BSVMgT0JSSUdBw4fDlUVTIEVYSUdJREFTIFBPUiBDT05UUkFUTyBPVSBBQ09SRE8uCgpBIFNpZ2xhIGRlIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo= |
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Sonobreast application and comparison of Acuracia and concordance with the BI-RADS system in ultrasonography solid momary nodules |
title |
Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia |
spellingShingle |
Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia Oliveira, Luís Fernando Pádua Câncer de mama Ultrassonografia Diagnóstico Sonobreast Diagnosis Sonobreast Breast cancer Ultrasound MEDICINA::ANATOMIA PATOLOGICA E PATOLOGIA CLINICA |
title_short |
Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia |
title_full |
Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia |
title_fullStr |
Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia |
title_sort |
Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia |
author |
Oliveira, Luís Fernando Pádua |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Luís Fernando Pádua |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Freitas Junior, Ruffo de |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7343840830786566 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Freitas Junior, Ruffo de |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7343840830786566 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Lucena, Clécio Enio Murta |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Paulinelli, Régis Resende |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Rahal, Rosemar Macedo Sousa |
dc.contributor.referee5.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Rui Gilberto |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4800212608474118 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Luís Fernando Pádua |
contributor_str_mv |
Freitas Junior, Ruffo de Freitas Junior, Ruffo de Lucena, Clécio Enio Murta Paulinelli, Régis Resende Rahal, Rosemar Macedo Sousa Ferreira, Rui Gilberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Câncer de mama Ultrassonografia Diagnóstico Sonobreast Diagnosis Sonobreast |
topic |
Câncer de mama Ultrassonografia Diagnóstico Sonobreast Diagnosis Sonobreast Breast cancer Ultrasound MEDICINA::ANATOMIA PATOLOGICA E PATOLOGIA CLINICA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Breast cancer Ultrasound |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
MEDICINA::ANATOMIA PATOLOGICA E PATOLOGIA CLINICA |
description |
Objectives: To compare the accuracy and concordance of SONOBREAST with the BI-RADS system for predicting malignancy in solid breast masses observed on ultrasound; and application the SONOBREAST in women with breast lumps. Methods: 274 women were included prospectively, with the assessment of 500 breast masses observed on ultrasound and that presented any surgical indication. Sonographic features were assessed, the patients' age and family history of first degree. The likelihood of malignancy according to SONOBREAST model was calculated through the webpage <www.sonobreast.com.br>, and the BI-RADS system. The result was compared to anatomopathological examination. Results: The average age of patients was 41.92 (± 14.40) years. There were 87 (17.40%) malignant tumors; and 382 (76.40%) nonpalpable lesions. For the cutoff of 2%, the lesions were regarded as suspicious in 171 cases (34.20%) by both SONOBREAST and BI-RADS. The Kappa coefficient of concordance between the methods was 1 (p <0.001). SONOBREAST was identical to the BI-RADS system for sensitivity (95.40)%, specificity (78.69%), positive predictive value (48.54%), negative predictive value (98.78%) and accuracy (81.60 %). Compared to categorical variables (3, 4 and 5) classified by BIRADS, the area under the ROC curve by SONOBREAST was of 94.41 (92.20 to 96.62) and by BI-RADS of 89.99 (86.60 to 93.37). Conclusion: The SONOBREAST model presents identical accuracy compared to the BIRADS system, when using the same parameters for the cutoff for malignancy suspicion. Considering the increasing likelihood of malignancy for categories 3, 4 and 5 of the BI-RADS system, SONOBREAST model allowed a more precise and individualized assessment. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-18 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-19T13:56:14Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
OLIVEIRA, L. F. P. Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia. 2014. 67 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências da Saúde) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2014. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7765 |
identifier_str_mv |
OLIVEIRA, L. F. P. Aplicação do Sonobreast e comparação de Acurácia e concordância com o sistema BI-RADS em nódulos mamários sólidos ao ultrassonografia. 2014. 67 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências da Saúde) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, 2014. |
url |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7765 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-1006864312617745310 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
1545772475950486338 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
7337577453819502453 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde (FM) |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFG |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Medicina - FM (RG) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFG instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFG |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/4687b693-73ee-40a6-b32f-bf799f4a4af7/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/cf327aa6-9d82-4faa-9fc3-9f1e96bccbd8/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/bcbd2f0a-3208-46b3-8f08-9fe7977c4f85/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/1b174375-ca18-4bc4-bbed-f3df89bf0a97/download http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/bitstreams/19a2c666-d60a-4cd1-add8-b7990bb4ff05/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 36eb6ae0c7aaec37028cc39dc69c9a78 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFG - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tasesdissertacoes.bc@ufg.br |
_version_ |
1798044376049385472 |