Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Broch, Jomara
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nunes, Ricardo Vianna, Alhotan, Rashed Abdullah, Pesti, Gene Michael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858
Resumo: The objective of this study was to determine the influence of using dLys:TP instead of crude protein recommendations of commercial poultry breeding companies to meet the chicken's need for dietary essential and non-essential amino acids. The ingredient composition matrix used in the feed formulation was compiled from Feedstuffs Magazine. The rations were formulated using a linear feed formulation program to meet the minimum cost, with crude protein or dLys: TP of 5.58%. Using the dLys to TP ratio versus CP minimums for the model diets chosen, formula costs were changed from +$10.96 to -$4.26 per ton of feed. The magnitude of the changes was dependent on the imbalance present in the feeds from using the breeder management guide recommendations and ingredient prices. Through the use of dLys: TP, it is possible to improve the feed formulation process, assuring the birds get adequate EAA and NEAA without being wasteful and reducing environmental pollution.Key Words: amino acids; concentration; digestibility.
id UFG-7_51ac2ad7ab44638fc28525aefdce5f17
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/58858
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratioComparação dos custos de formulação para aves baseados na proteína bruta versus relação lisina digestível proteínaThe objective of this study was to determine the influence of using dLys:TP instead of crude protein recommendations of commercial poultry breeding companies to meet the chicken's need for dietary essential and non-essential amino acids. The ingredient composition matrix used in the feed formulation was compiled from Feedstuffs Magazine. The rations were formulated using a linear feed formulation program to meet the minimum cost, with crude protein or dLys: TP of 5.58%. Using the dLys to TP ratio versus CP minimums for the model diets chosen, formula costs were changed from +$10.96 to -$4.26 per ton of feed. The magnitude of the changes was dependent on the imbalance present in the feeds from using the breeder management guide recommendations and ingredient prices. Through the use of dLys: TP, it is possible to improve the feed formulation process, assuring the birds get adequate EAA and NEAA without being wasteful and reducing environmental pollution.Key Words: amino acids; concentration; digestibility.O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a influência do uso de lisina digestível: proteína verdadeira (LISd: PV) em vez de recomendações de proteína bruta de empresas de criação de aves comerciais para atender à necessidade de aminoácidos essenciais e não essenciais. A matriz de composição de ingredientes utilizada na formulação de alimentação foi compilada a partir da Revista de Ingredientes. As rações foram formuladas utilizando um programa de formulação de ração linear para suprir o custo mínimo, com proteína bruta ou dLis: PV de 5,58%. Usando a relação LISd para PV versus os mínimos PB para as dietas de modelo escolhidas, os custos de fórmula foram alterados de + $10,96 para - $4,26 por tonelada de alimento. A magnitude das mudanças depende do desequilíbrio presente nos ingredientes usando as recomendações do guia de manejo do reprodutor e os preços dos ingredientes. Por meio do uso de dLis: PV, é possível melhorar o processo de formulação de rações, assegurando que as aves obtenham adequados níveis de aminoácidos essenciais (AAE) e aminoácidos não essenciais (AANE) sem desperdício e reduzindo a poluição ambiental.Palavras-chave: Aminoácidos. Concentração. Digestibilidade.Universidade Federal de Goiás2020-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publicationCiência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua1809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporenghttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858/35227https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858/35228https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858/35229https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858/35230Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBroch, JomaraNunes, Ricardo ViannaAlhotan, Rashed AbdullahPesti, Gene Michael2023-03-23T18:46:38Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/58858Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:25.393245Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio
Comparação dos custos de formulação para aves baseados na proteína bruta versus relação lisina digestível proteína
title Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio
spellingShingle Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio
Broch, Jomara
title_short Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio
title_full Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio
title_fullStr Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio
title_sort Comparison of formulation costs for poultry feeds based on crude protein versus the digestible lysine to protein ratio
author Broch, Jomara
author_facet Broch, Jomara
Nunes, Ricardo Vianna
Alhotan, Rashed Abdullah
Pesti, Gene Michael
author_role author
author2 Nunes, Ricardo Vianna
Alhotan, Rashed Abdullah
Pesti, Gene Michael
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Broch, Jomara
Nunes, Ricardo Vianna
Alhotan, Rashed Abdullah
Pesti, Gene Michael
description The objective of this study was to determine the influence of using dLys:TP instead of crude protein recommendations of commercial poultry breeding companies to meet the chicken's need for dietary essential and non-essential amino acids. The ingredient composition matrix used in the feed formulation was compiled from Feedstuffs Magazine. The rations were formulated using a linear feed formulation program to meet the minimum cost, with crude protein or dLys: TP of 5.58%. Using the dLys to TP ratio versus CP minimums for the model diets chosen, formula costs were changed from +$10.96 to -$4.26 per ton of feed. The magnitude of the changes was dependent on the imbalance present in the feeds from using the breeder management guide recommendations and ingredient prices. Through the use of dLys: TP, it is possible to improve the feed formulation process, assuring the birds get adequate EAA and NEAA without being wasteful and reducing environmental pollution.Key Words: amino acids; concentration; digestibility.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858/35227
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858/35228
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858/35229
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/58858/35230
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publication
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874790430867456

Registros relacionados