Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
Download full: | https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898 |
Summary: | AbstractThe investments in wastewater treatment of swine systems (WTSS) search on safety, health and fulfillment of the requirements of environmental legislation to investigate to the possibilities of economically exploit properly treated effluent. This study analyzed the return on investment of different WTSS. Was being carried out between the months of October of 2013 to May of 2014. For data collection an electronic questionnaire applied through interviews on 37 farms in the State of São Paulo chosen randomly. To analyze the economic feasibility of different WTSS we used the technique of Capital Budget (PAYBACK and IRR). The farms were divided into four categories: GEEBC-generated electricity, biofertilizer and carbon credits; GEEBI-generated electricity and biofertilizer; GEEEL-generated electricity; NGVAP- no generating value-added products. The best economic result was observed in the category GEEBC with an average Payback time of nine years. It was observed that 73% of respondents do not exploit the economic value of the treated effluent, keeping your investments with a view to contemplate the environmental regulations.Keywords: swine farm, biogas, biofertilizer, carbon credits. |
id |
UFG-7_b759fbd9ccd30f37f74ce37cd99697c9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/32898 |
network_acronym_str |
UFG-7 |
network_name_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farmsRetorno de investimento de sistemas de tratamento de resíduos em granjas de suínosAbstractThe investments in wastewater treatment of swine systems (WTSS) search on safety, health and fulfillment of the requirements of environmental legislation to investigate to the possibilities of economically exploit properly treated effluent. This study analyzed the return on investment of different WTSS. Was being carried out between the months of October of 2013 to May of 2014. For data collection an electronic questionnaire applied through interviews on 37 farms in the State of São Paulo chosen randomly. To analyze the economic feasibility of different WTSS we used the technique of Capital Budget (PAYBACK and IRR). The farms were divided into four categories: GEEBC-generated electricity, biofertilizer and carbon credits; GEEBI-generated electricity and biofertilizer; GEEEL-generated electricity; NGVAP- no generating value-added products. The best economic result was observed in the category GEEBC with an average Payback time of nine years. It was observed that 73% of respondents do not exploit the economic value of the treated effluent, keeping your investments with a view to contemplate the environmental regulations.Keywords: swine farm, biogas, biofertilizer, carbon credits.ResumoOs investimentos em sistemas de tratamento de resíduos de suínos (STRS) buscam muito mais contemplar questões de segurança, sanidade e de atendimento a requisitos da legislação ambiental do que investigar possibilidades de explorar economicamente os resíduos devidamente tratados. Este estudo analisou o retorno de investimentos de diferentes STRS sendo realizado entre os meses de outubro de 2013 a maio de 2014. Para a coleta de dados, foi elaborado um questionário eletrônico aplicado por meio de entrevistas em 37 granjas do estado de São Paulo escolhidas aleatoriamente. Para análise de viabilidade econômica dos diferentes STRS, utilizou-se a técnica de orçamento de capital (PAYBACK e TIR). As granjas foram divididas em quatro categorias: GEEBC – Geração de energia elétrica, biofertilizante e créditos de carbono; GEEBI – Geração de energia elétrica e biofertilizante; GEEEL – Geração de energia elétrica; SGPVA – Sem geração de produtos de valor agregado. O melhor resultado econômico foi observado na categoria GEEBC com tempo médio de retorno financeiro de nove anos. Observou-se que 73% dos pesquisados não exploravam o valor econômico dos resíduos tratados, mantendo seus investimentos com intuito de contemplar a legislação ambiental vigente. Palavras chave: biofertilizante, biogás, créditos de carbono, suinocultura. Universidade Federal de Goiás2020-02-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publicationCiência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua1809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898/34298https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898/34264Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo e Sousa, Angelita Pereirade Carvalho, Bruno VieiraJunior, Waldemar HazoffSoto, Francisco Rafael Martins2023-03-23T18:46:38Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/32898Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:08.026906Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms Retorno de investimento de sistemas de tratamento de resíduos em granjas de suínos |
title |
Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms |
spellingShingle |
Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms Melo e Sousa, Angelita Pereira |
title_short |
Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms |
title_full |
Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms |
title_fullStr |
Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms |
title_sort |
Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms |
author |
Melo e Sousa, Angelita Pereira |
author_facet |
Melo e Sousa, Angelita Pereira de Carvalho, Bruno Vieira Junior, Waldemar Hazoff Soto, Francisco Rafael Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Carvalho, Bruno Vieira Junior, Waldemar Hazoff Soto, Francisco Rafael Martins |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo e Sousa, Angelita Pereira de Carvalho, Bruno Vieira Junior, Waldemar Hazoff Soto, Francisco Rafael Martins |
description |
AbstractThe investments in wastewater treatment of swine systems (WTSS) search on safety, health and fulfillment of the requirements of environmental legislation to investigate to the possibilities of economically exploit properly treated effluent. This study analyzed the return on investment of different WTSS. Was being carried out between the months of October of 2013 to May of 2014. For data collection an electronic questionnaire applied through interviews on 37 farms in the State of São Paulo chosen randomly. To analyze the economic feasibility of different WTSS we used the technique of Capital Budget (PAYBACK and IRR). The farms were divided into four categories: GEEBC-generated electricity, biofertilizer and carbon credits; GEEBI-generated electricity and biofertilizer; GEEEL-generated electricity; NGVAP- no generating value-added products. The best economic result was observed in the category GEEBC with an average Payback time of nine years. It was observed that 73% of respondents do not exploit the economic value of the treated effluent, keeping your investments with a view to contemplate the environmental regulations.Keywords: swine farm, biogas, biofertilizer, carbon credits. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898 |
url |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898/34298 https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898/34264 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Goiás |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publication Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua 1809-6891 1518-2797 reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) instacron:UFG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
instacron_str |
UFG |
institution |
UFG |
reponame_str |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacab@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799874788736368640 |