Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Melo e Sousa, Angelita Pereira
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: de Carvalho, Bruno Vieira, Junior, Waldemar Hazoff, Soto, Francisco Rafael Martins
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
Download full: https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898
Summary: AbstractThe investments in wastewater treatment of swine systems (WTSS) search on safety, health and fulfillment of the requirements of environmental legislation to investigate to the possibilities of economically exploit properly treated effluent. This study analyzed the return on investment of different WTSS. Was being carried out between the months of October of 2013 to May of 2014. For data collection an electronic questionnaire applied through interviews on 37 farms in the State of São Paulo chosen randomly. To analyze the economic feasibility of different WTSS we used the technique of Capital Budget (PAYBACK and IRR). The farms were divided into four categories: GEEBC-generated electricity, biofertilizer and carbon credits; GEEBI-generated electricity and biofertilizer; GEEEL-generated electricity; NGVAP- no generating value-added products. The best economic result was observed in the category GEEBC with an average Payback time of nine years. It was observed that 73% of respondents do not exploit the economic value of the treated effluent, keeping your investments with a view to contemplate the environmental regulations.Keywords: swine farm, biogas, biofertilizer, carbon credits.
id UFG-7_b759fbd9ccd30f37f74ce37cd99697c9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/32898
network_acronym_str UFG-7
network_name_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farmsRetorno de investimento de sistemas de tratamento de resíduos em granjas de suínosAbstractThe investments in wastewater treatment of swine systems (WTSS) search on safety, health and fulfillment of the requirements of environmental legislation to investigate to the possibilities of economically exploit properly treated effluent. This study analyzed the return on investment of different WTSS. Was being carried out between the months of October of 2013 to May of 2014. For data collection an electronic questionnaire applied through interviews on 37 farms in the State of São Paulo chosen randomly. To analyze the economic feasibility of different WTSS we used the technique of Capital Budget (PAYBACK and IRR). The farms were divided into four categories: GEEBC-generated electricity, biofertilizer and carbon credits; GEEBI-generated electricity and biofertilizer; GEEEL-generated electricity; NGVAP- no generating value-added products. The best economic result was observed in the category GEEBC with an average Payback time of nine years. It was observed that 73% of respondents do not exploit the economic value of the treated effluent, keeping your investments with a view to contemplate the environmental regulations.Keywords: swine farm, biogas, biofertilizer, carbon credits.ResumoOs investimentos em sistemas de tratamento de resíduos de suínos (STRS) buscam muito mais contemplar questões de segurança, sanidade e de atendimento a requisitos da legislação ambiental do que investigar possibilidades de explorar economicamente os resíduos devidamente tratados. Este estudo analisou o retorno de investimentos de diferentes STRS sendo realizado entre os meses de outubro de 2013 a maio de 2014. Para a coleta de dados, foi elaborado um questionário eletrônico aplicado por meio de entrevistas em 37 granjas do estado de São Paulo escolhidas aleatoriamente. Para análise de viabilidade econômica dos diferentes STRS, utilizou-se a técnica de orçamento de capital (PAYBACK e TIR). As granjas foram divididas em quatro categorias: GEEBC – Geração de energia elétrica, biofertilizante e créditos de carbono; GEEBI – Geração de energia elétrica e biofertilizante; GEEEL – Geração de energia elétrica; SGPVA – Sem geração de produtos de valor agregado. O melhor resultado econômico foi observado na categoria GEEBC com tempo médio de retorno financeiro de nove anos. Observou-se que 73% dos pesquisados não exploravam o valor econômico dos resíduos tratados, mantendo seus investimentos com intuito de contemplar a legislação ambiental vigente. Palavras chave: biofertilizante, biogás, créditos de carbono, suinocultura.  Universidade Federal de Goiás2020-02-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publicationCiência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua1809-68911518-2797reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)instacron:UFGporhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898/34298https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898/34264Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo e Sousa, Angelita Pereirade Carvalho, Bruno VieiraJunior, Waldemar HazoffSoto, Francisco Rafael Martins2023-03-23T18:46:38Zoai:ojs.revistas.ufg.br:article/32898Revistahttps://revistas.ufg.br/vetPUBhttps://revistas.ufg.br/vet/oai||revistacab@gmail.com1809-68911518-2797opendoar:2024-05-21T19:56:08.026906Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms
Retorno de investimento de sistemas de tratamento de resíduos em granjas de suínos
title Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms
spellingShingle Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms
Melo e Sousa, Angelita Pereira
title_short Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms
title_full Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms
title_fullStr Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms
title_full_unstemmed Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms
title_sort Return on investment of wastewater treatment systems in swine farms
author Melo e Sousa, Angelita Pereira
author_facet Melo e Sousa, Angelita Pereira
de Carvalho, Bruno Vieira
Junior, Waldemar Hazoff
Soto, Francisco Rafael Martins
author_role author
author2 de Carvalho, Bruno Vieira
Junior, Waldemar Hazoff
Soto, Francisco Rafael Martins
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo e Sousa, Angelita Pereira
de Carvalho, Bruno Vieira
Junior, Waldemar Hazoff
Soto, Francisco Rafael Martins
description AbstractThe investments in wastewater treatment of swine systems (WTSS) search on safety, health and fulfillment of the requirements of environmental legislation to investigate to the possibilities of economically exploit properly treated effluent. This study analyzed the return on investment of different WTSS. Was being carried out between the months of October of 2013 to May of 2014. For data collection an electronic questionnaire applied through interviews on 37 farms in the State of São Paulo chosen randomly. To analyze the economic feasibility of different WTSS we used the technique of Capital Budget (PAYBACK and IRR). The farms were divided into four categories: GEEBC-generated electricity, biofertilizer and carbon credits; GEEBI-generated electricity and biofertilizer; GEEEL-generated electricity; NGVAP- no generating value-added products. The best economic result was observed in the category GEEBC with an average Payback time of nine years. It was observed that 73% of respondents do not exploit the economic value of the treated effluent, keeping your investments with a view to contemplate the environmental regulations.Keywords: swine farm, biogas, biofertilizer, carbon credits.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898
url https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898/34298
https://revistas.ufg.br/vet/article/view/32898/34264
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência Animal Brasileira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Animal Science/ Ciência Animal Brasileira; Vol. 21 (2020): Continuous publication
Ciência Animal Brasileira / Brazilian Animal Science; v. 21 (2020): Publicação contínua
1809-6891
1518-2797
reponame:Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron:UFG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
instacron_str UFG
institution UFG
reponame_str Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
collection Ciência animal brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência animal brasileira (Online) - Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistacab@gmail.com
_version_ 1799874788736368640