Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tavares,Rose Luiza Moraes
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Spokas,Kurt, Hall,Kate, Colosky,Edward, Souza,Zigomar Menezes de, Scala,Newton La
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000200195
Resumo: ABSTRACT Mechanized sugarcane harvest is replacing the historic practice of field burning, due to environmental concerns of the particulate and emissions during burning. However, the impact of these practices on soil greenhouse gas (GHG) production potential is not fully known. Thus, the present work quantified the potential production, in 1 g of soil, of greenhouse gases (GHG) in three systems of sugarcane management. The systems were: area with a history of burning sugarcane before harvest (B) and another with two systems of management of “green sugarcane” in two periods of implantation - 5 (G-5) and 10 years (G-10). A laboratory incubation experiment was used to assess the production potentials of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) in 1g of soil samples by the different sugarcane management systems. The results of this study demonstrate that the sugarcane management systems had an impact on the potential production of CO2 in the soil. In addition, when the results of gases were divided from convex and concave areas, differences in CO2 patterns between areas B and G-10 were observed, with greater emission in the G-10 area, probably due the residue on the soil surface.
id UFLA-2_1654faf3bced93608c9934795c612b78
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-70542018000200195
network_acronym_str UFLA-2
network_name_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gasSacharium officinariumslopeCO2N2OCH4.ABSTRACT Mechanized sugarcane harvest is replacing the historic practice of field burning, due to environmental concerns of the particulate and emissions during burning. However, the impact of these practices on soil greenhouse gas (GHG) production potential is not fully known. Thus, the present work quantified the potential production, in 1 g of soil, of greenhouse gases (GHG) in three systems of sugarcane management. The systems were: area with a history of burning sugarcane before harvest (B) and another with two systems of management of “green sugarcane” in two periods of implantation - 5 (G-5) and 10 years (G-10). A laboratory incubation experiment was used to assess the production potentials of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) in 1g of soil samples by the different sugarcane management systems. The results of this study demonstrate that the sugarcane management systems had an impact on the potential production of CO2 in the soil. In addition, when the results of gases were divided from convex and concave areas, differences in CO2 patterns between areas B and G-10 were observed, with greater emission in the G-10 area, probably due the residue on the soil surface.Editora da UFLA2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000200195Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.42 n.2 2018reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLA10.1590/1413-70542018422019817info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTavares,Rose Luiza MoraesSpokas,KurtHall,KateColosky,EdwardSouza,Zigomar Menezes deScala,Newton Laeng2018-06-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-70542018000200195Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/cagroPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br1981-18291413-7054opendoar:2022-11-22T16:31:34.709008Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas
title Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas
spellingShingle Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas
Tavares,Rose Luiza Moraes
Sacharium officinarium
slope
CO2
N2O
CH4.
title_short Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas
title_full Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas
title_fullStr Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas
title_full_unstemmed Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas
title_sort Sugarcane residue management impact soil greenhouse gas
author Tavares,Rose Luiza Moraes
author_facet Tavares,Rose Luiza Moraes
Spokas,Kurt
Hall,Kate
Colosky,Edward
Souza,Zigomar Menezes de
Scala,Newton La
author_role author
author2 Spokas,Kurt
Hall,Kate
Colosky,Edward
Souza,Zigomar Menezes de
Scala,Newton La
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tavares,Rose Luiza Moraes
Spokas,Kurt
Hall,Kate
Colosky,Edward
Souza,Zigomar Menezes de
Scala,Newton La
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sacharium officinarium
slope
CO2
N2O
CH4.
topic Sacharium officinarium
slope
CO2
N2O
CH4.
description ABSTRACT Mechanized sugarcane harvest is replacing the historic practice of field burning, due to environmental concerns of the particulate and emissions during burning. However, the impact of these practices on soil greenhouse gas (GHG) production potential is not fully known. Thus, the present work quantified the potential production, in 1 g of soil, of greenhouse gases (GHG) in three systems of sugarcane management. The systems were: area with a history of burning sugarcane before harvest (B) and another with two systems of management of “green sugarcane” in two periods of implantation - 5 (G-5) and 10 years (G-10). A laboratory incubation experiment was used to assess the production potentials of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) in 1g of soil samples by the different sugarcane management systems. The results of this study demonstrate that the sugarcane management systems had an impact on the potential production of CO2 in the soil. In addition, when the results of gases were divided from convex and concave areas, differences in CO2 patterns between areas B and G-10 were observed, with greater emission in the G-10 area, probably due the residue on the soil surface.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000200195
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542018000200195
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-70542018422019817
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da UFLA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia v.42 n.2 2018
reponame:Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
collection Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência e Agrotecnologia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||renpaiva@dbi.ufla.br|| editora@editora.ufla.br
_version_ 1799874970730364928