Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESP

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Perdomo, Bexi
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Morales, Oscar, Cassany, Daniel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/16410
Resumo: Abstract: Systematic reviews (SRs) are relevant for the dentistry community; however, a multidisciplinary literature review suggests that, to date, no linguistic study on the rhetorical structure of dental SRs in English has been carried out, a gap the present study hopes to partly fill. Integrating Swales’ and Bhatia’s models and the New Rhetoric approach to genre studies, we analyzed the rhetorical organization of 100 SRs in the field of dentistry. The results indicate that SRs follow a prototypical structure: Introduction–Method–Results–Discussion–Conclusion (IMRDC). It can be broken down into 18 moves, 14 of which could be considered obligatory. The template proposed could be a practical resource for oral health scholars, clinicians and students to not only raise genre-consciousness but also effectively write and publish SRs in international dentistry journals. Keywords: Systematic review; rhetorical structure; academic writing; dentistryResumo: Embora as revisões sistemáticas (SRs) sejam importantes para a comunidade odontológica, uma revisão bibliográfica sugere que, até o momento, não foram realizados estudos linguísticos sobre a estrutura retórica das SRs odontológicas, em inglês. Este estudo contribui para preencher esta lacuna, seguindo uma abordagem integrada dos modelos de Swales e Bhatia e a abordagem da Nova Retórica. Para isso, coletamos e analisamos a organização retórica de 100 SRs no campo da odontologia. Os resultados indicam que os SRs seguem uma estrutura protótipo de Introdução-Método-Resultados-Discussão-Discussão-Conclusão (IMRDC). Isto pode ser dividido em 18 movimentos, dos quais 14 podem ser considerados obrigatórios. Esta proposta constitui um recurso empírico para acadêmicos, clínicos e estudantes de odontologia, aumentando a consciência do gênero discursivo, escrevendo e publicando efetivamente as SRs em revistas odontológicas internacionais.Palavras-chave: Revisão sistemática; estrutura retórica; redação acadêmica; odontologia.
id UFMG-7_be8ae1891fd1719abc2fca05e90c56d4
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.letras.ufmg.br:article/16410
network_acronym_str UFMG-7
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESPSystematic review; rhetorical structure; academic writing; dentistry; Revisão sistemática; estrutura retórica; redação acadêmica; odontologiaAbstract: Systematic reviews (SRs) are relevant for the dentistry community; however, a multidisciplinary literature review suggests that, to date, no linguistic study on the rhetorical structure of dental SRs in English has been carried out, a gap the present study hopes to partly fill. Integrating Swales’ and Bhatia’s models and the New Rhetoric approach to genre studies, we analyzed the rhetorical organization of 100 SRs in the field of dentistry. The results indicate that SRs follow a prototypical structure: Introduction–Method–Results–Discussion–Conclusion (IMRDC). It can be broken down into 18 moves, 14 of which could be considered obligatory. The template proposed could be a practical resource for oral health scholars, clinicians and students to not only raise genre-consciousness but also effectively write and publish SRs in international dentistry journals. Keywords: Systematic review; rhetorical structure; academic writing; dentistryResumo: Embora as revisões sistemáticas (SRs) sejam importantes para a comunidade odontológica, uma revisão bibliográfica sugere que, até o momento, não foram realizados estudos linguísticos sobre a estrutura retórica das SRs odontológicas, em inglês. Este estudo contribui para preencher esta lacuna, seguindo uma abordagem integrada dos modelos de Swales e Bhatia e a abordagem da Nova Retórica. Para isso, coletamos e analisamos a organização retórica de 100 SRs no campo da odontologia. Os resultados indicam que os SRs seguem uma estrutura protótipo de Introdução-Método-Resultados-Discussão-Discussão-Conclusão (IMRDC). Isto pode ser dividido em 18 movimentos, dos quais 14 podem ser considerados obrigatórios. Esta proposta constitui um recurso empírico para acadêmicos, clínicos e estudantes de odontologia, aumentando a consciência do gênero discursivo, escrevendo e publicando efetivamente as SRs em revistas odontológicas internacionais.Palavras-chave: Revisão sistemática; estrutura retórica; redação acadêmica; odontologia.Faculdade de Letras - Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisConsejo de Desarrollo Científico, Humanístico, Tecnológico y de las Artes (CDCHTA) de la Universidad de Los Andes, VenezuelaJhon Rangel, Karolinska Institutet (Stockholm, Sweden)Perdomo, BexiMorales, OscarCassany, Daniel2021-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/16410Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 21, No 3 (2021); 699-731Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 21, No 3 (2021); 699-731Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 21, No 3 (2021); 699-7311984-63981676-0786reponame:Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/16410/1125614212http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/downloadSuppFile/16410/2604/*ref*/AL-RAMADHAN, N. Do systematic reviews and meta-analyses, published in the dental literature, comply with the QUOROM and PRISMA statements?. 2011. Dissertation (Doctorate in Dental Sciences) – School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, 2011./*ref*/AZAR, A.; HASHIM, A. Analysing the macroorganisational structure of the review article genre in applied linguistics. Issues in Language Studies, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-28, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.471.2017./*ref*/BASSANI, R. et al. Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics. Journal of Dentistry, [s. l.], v. 82, p. 71-84, Mar. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.014./*ref*/BASTURKMEN, H. A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 134-144, June 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004./*ref*/BERKENKOTTER, C.; HUCKIN, T. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995./*ref*/BETTANY-SALTIKOV, J. Learning how to undertake a systematic review: Part 1. Nursing Standard, v. 24, n. 50, p. 47-55. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2010.08.24.50.47.c7939./*ref*/BHATIA, V. A generic view of academic discourse. In: FLOWERDEW, J. (Ed.). Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002a. p. 21-39./*ref*/BHATIA, V. Analysing Genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman, 1993./*ref*/BHATIA, V. Applied genre analysis: a multiperspective model. Ibérica, v. 4, p. 3-19, 2002c./*ref*/BHATIA, V. Applied genre analysis: Analytical advances and pedagogical procedures. In: JOHNS, A. (Ed.). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002b. p. 279-283./*ref*/BHATIA, V. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Gender View. London: Continuum, 2004./*ref*/BOELL, S.; CECEZ-KECMANOVIC, D. On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews. In: WILLCOCKS, L.; SAUER, C.; LACITY, M. (Ed.). Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. p. 48-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509888_3./*ref*/BOTH, A.; SUTTON, A.; PAPAIOANNOU, D. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2016./*ref*/CONRAD, S. The Use of Passives and Impersonal Style in Civil Engineering Writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, v. 32, n. 1, p. 38-76, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917729864./*ref*/DE CRAEN, A.; VAN VLIET, H.; HELMERHORST, F. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorporation of results from clinical trial quality assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [s. l.], v. 58, n. 3, p. 311-313, Mar. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.07.002./*ref*/ENTRALGO, J.; SALAGER, F.; LUZARDO, M. Títulos de artículos de investigación científica escritos en inglés: un estudio interdisciplinario. Núcleo, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 31, p. 75-100, 2014./*ref*/FOX, R. The Social Identity of Management Ergolect. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 261-278, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00057-4. Disponível em: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00057-4. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2019./*ref*/GARCÍA, M. Importancia y limitaciones de las revisiones sistemáticas en Odontología. 2017. Dissertation (Doctorate of Dental Science) – School of Dentistry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 2017./*ref*/GARDNER, S.; NESI, H.; BIBER, D. Discipline, level, genre: integrating situational perspectives in a new ND analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 4, p. 646-674, Aug. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005./*ref*/GRANT, M.; BOOTH, A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 2, p. 91-108, May 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x./*ref*/HADDAWAY, N.; MACURA, B.; WHALEY, P.; PULLIN, A. ROSES Reporting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 1, Mar. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7./*ref*/HIGGINS, J.; GREEN, S. (Ed.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. [S. l.]: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Disponível em: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2019./*ref*/HYLAND, K. Dissertation acknowledgements: The anatomy of a Cinderella genre. Written Communication, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 3, p. 242-268, July 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303257276./*ref*/HYLAND, K.; DIANI, G. Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres. In: HYLAND, K.; DIANI, G. (Ed.). Academic Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. p. 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244290_1./*ref*/HYON, S. Using genre analysis to teach in the disciplines. In: FLOWERDEW, J.; COSTLEY, T. (Ed.). Discipline-Specific Writing: Theory into practice. London: Taylor & Francis, 2016, p. 77-94./*ref*/IOANNIDIS, J. P. A. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The Milbank Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 94, n. 3, p. 485–514, Sep. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210./*ref*/JIA, J.; LIU, X. Improving Systematic Literature Review Based on Text Similarity Analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, [s. l.], v. 1069, p. 1-5, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1069/1/012059./*ref*/KARAPETJANA, I.; ROZINA, G. Rhetorical structure of the research article in Dentistry. Russian Linguistic Bulleting, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 7, p. 10-14, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.7.40./*ref*/KHANI, R.; TAZIK, K. Macro-structuring patterns in applied linguistics research articles; evidence of genre awareness. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 1, 139-147, 2017./*ref*/KNOLL, T. et al. Key Steps in Conducting Systematic Reviews for Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines: Methodology of the European Association of Urology. European Urology, [s. l.], v. 73, n. 2, p. 290–300, Feb. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.016./*ref*/KOFFEL, J. Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PloS one, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 5, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125931./*ref*/KUNG, J. et al. From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance. Open Dental Journal, [s. l.], v. 4, p. 84-91, July 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601004010084./*ref*/KWAN, B. A cross-paradigm macro-structure analysis of research articles in Information Systems. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 45, p. 14-30, Jan. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.002./*ref*/LAVIS, J. et al. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 11, p. 35-48, July 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308549./*ref*/MAJOR, M. P.; MAJOR, P. W.; FLORES-MIR, C. Benchmarking of reported search and selection methods of systematic reviews by dental speciality. Evidence-based Dentistry, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 66-70, Sep. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400504./*ref*/MASWANA, S.; KANAMARU, T.; TAJINO, A. Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, [s. l.], v. 2, p. 1-11, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2014.12.002./*ref*/MOHAMMAD, H.; GOHARI, I. A Mixed Methods Genre Analysis of the Discussion Section of MMR Articles in Applied Linguistics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 242-260, Nov. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816674626./*ref*/MOHER, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Review, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135./*ref*/MOHER, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, v. 151, n. 4, p. 264-269, 2009./*ref*/MORALES, O. A. Enseñanza de la escritura académica con base en el análisis del género del resumen de la tesis. Legenda, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 18, p. 35-65, 2014./*ref*/MORALES, O. A. Los géneros escritos de la odontología hispanoamericana: estructura retórica y estrategias de atenuación en artículos de investigación, casos clínicos y artículos de revisión. 2010. Dissertation (Doctorate in Multilingual Communication) – Department of Philogy, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 2010./*ref*/MORALES, O. A.; CASSANY, D.; DÍAZ, N. A. Propuesta para la escritura de resúmenes y artículos científicos odontológicos. Acta Bioclínica, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 8, p. 34-53, 2014./*ref*/MORALES, O. et al. The Rhetorical Structure of Theses and Dissertations in Dentistry: A study in Hispano-America and Spain. Revista Ikala: Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 2, p. 373-93, May 2020. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n02a06./*ref*/MULIMANI, P. Evidence-based practice and the evidence pyramid: A 21st century orthodontic odyssey. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, [s. l.], v. 152, n. 1, p. 1-8, July 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.020./*ref*/MULROW, C. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ, [s. l.], v. 309, n. 6954, p. 597-599, Sep. 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597./*ref*/MUNGRA, P. Macrostructures and Rhetorical Moves in Secondary Research Articles. In: GOTTI, M.; SALAGER-MEYER, F. (Ed.). Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts. Bern: Peter Lang, 2006, p. 331-355./*ref*/PALMATIER, B.; HOUSTON, W.; HULLAND, J. Review articles: purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, [s. l.], v. 46, n. 1, p. 1-5, Oct. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4./*ref*/PERDOMO, B. Enseñanza basada en el género y comprensión lectora en inglés con propósitos específicos: revisión sistemática. Redine, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 29-41, 2018./*ref*/PHO, P. Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 231-250, Apr. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087010./*ref*/POLLOCK, M.; FERNANDES, R.; HARTLING, L. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 48, Mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0325-5./*ref*/PRINSEN, C. et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 5, p. 1147-1157, Feb. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3./*ref*/RAHIMI, S.; FARNIA, M. Comparative Generic Analysis of Introductions of English and Persian Dentistry Research Articles. RELP, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 27-40, 2017./*ref*/RUIYING, Y.; ALLISON, D. Research articles in applied linguistics: Structures from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 3, p. 264-279, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00005-X./*ref*/SALAGER-MEYER, F.; ARIZA, M. Academic criticism in Spanish medical discourse: A cross-generic approach (1930-1999). International Journal of Applied Linguistics, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 1, p. 96-114, Apr. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00039./*ref*/SALAGER-MEYER, F.; LEWIN, B.; LUZARDO, M. Neutral, risky or provocative? Trends in titling practices in complementary and alternative medicine articles (1995–2016). Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 263-289, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20420/rlfe.2017.346./*ref*/SAMRAJ, B. Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v. 12, n. 4, p. 299-310, Dec. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001./*ref*/SANTULLI, F.; AGOSTINI, C. The Case against Homeopathy: A Study of the Rhetoric of Meta-Analysis. In: MACI, S.; SALA, M. (Ed.). Genre Variation in Academic Communication. Emerging Disciplinary Trends. Bergamo: CERLIS, 2012. p. 175-198./*ref*/SKELTON, J. Analysis of the structure of original research papers: an aid to writing original papers for publication. British Journal of General Practice, [s. l.], v. 44, n. 387, p. 455-459, 1994./*ref*/SWALES, J. Genre analysis: English in academic research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990./*ref*/SWALES, J. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827./*ref*/TANKÓ, G. Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, [s. l.], v.27, p. 42-55, May 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.003./*ref*/TEJADA, H.; CASTELLANOS, M.; ROBAYO, F. Genre Analysis Applied to Two Textual Patterns for an English for Specific Purposes Course ESP. Folios, [s. l.], v. 46, n. 2, p. 145-162, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/01234870.46folios145.162 ./*ref*/TESSUTO, G. Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 37, p. 13-26, Jan. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.002./*ref*/VAN TULDER, M. et al. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for spinal disorders. Spine, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 20, p. 2323-2330, Oct. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199710150-00001./*ref*/VAN TULDER, M. et al. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 12, p. 1290-1299, July 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000065484.95996.AF./*ref*/VATHANALAOHA, K.; TANGKIENGSIRISIN, S. Genre Analysis of Experiment-based Dental Research Article Abstracts: Thai and International Journals. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 1-14, 2018./*ref*/WHITING, P. et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [s. l.], v. 69, p. 225-234, June 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005./*ref*/WRIGHT, H. R. Lexical bundles in stand-alone literature reviews: Sections, frequencies, and functions. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 54, p. 1-14, Apr. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.09.001./*ref*/ZENG, X. et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, [s. l.], v. 8, p. 2-10, Jan. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12141.Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicadahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-09-22T02:34:39Zoai:periodicos.letras.ufmg.br:article/16410Revistahttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/oairblasecretaria@gmail.com||periodicosfaleufmg@gmail.com1984-63981676-0786opendoar:2021-09-22T02:34:39Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESP
title Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESP
spellingShingle Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESP
Perdomo, Bexi
Systematic review; rhetorical structure; academic writing; dentistry; Revisão sistemática; estrutura retórica; redação acadêmica; odontologia
title_short Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESP
title_full Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESP
title_fullStr Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESP
title_full_unstemmed Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESP
title_sort Rhetorical structure of systematic reviews published in dental journals: implications for teaching reading and writing in ESP courses / Estrutura retórica das revisões sistemáticas publicadas em revistas odontológicas: implicações para o ensino da leitura e da escrita em cursos de ESP
author Perdomo, Bexi
author_facet Perdomo, Bexi
Morales, Oscar
Cassany, Daniel
author_role author
author2 Morales, Oscar
Cassany, Daniel
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Consejo de Desarrollo Científico, Humanístico, Tecnológico y de las Artes (CDCHTA) de la Universidad de Los Andes, Venezuela
Jhon Rangel, Karolinska Institutet (Stockholm, Sweden)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Perdomo, Bexi
Morales, Oscar
Cassany, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Systematic review; rhetorical structure; academic writing; dentistry; Revisão sistemática; estrutura retórica; redação acadêmica; odontologia
topic Systematic review; rhetorical structure; academic writing; dentistry; Revisão sistemática; estrutura retórica; redação acadêmica; odontologia
description Abstract: Systematic reviews (SRs) are relevant for the dentistry community; however, a multidisciplinary literature review suggests that, to date, no linguistic study on the rhetorical structure of dental SRs in English has been carried out, a gap the present study hopes to partly fill. Integrating Swales’ and Bhatia’s models and the New Rhetoric approach to genre studies, we analyzed the rhetorical organization of 100 SRs in the field of dentistry. The results indicate that SRs follow a prototypical structure: Introduction–Method–Results–Discussion–Conclusion (IMRDC). It can be broken down into 18 moves, 14 of which could be considered obligatory. The template proposed could be a practical resource for oral health scholars, clinicians and students to not only raise genre-consciousness but also effectively write and publish SRs in international dentistry journals. Keywords: Systematic review; rhetorical structure; academic writing; dentistryResumo: Embora as revisões sistemáticas (SRs) sejam importantes para a comunidade odontológica, uma revisão bibliográfica sugere que, até o momento, não foram realizados estudos linguísticos sobre a estrutura retórica das SRs odontológicas, em inglês. Este estudo contribui para preencher esta lacuna, seguindo uma abordagem integrada dos modelos de Swales e Bhatia e a abordagem da Nova Retórica. Para isso, coletamos e analisamos a organização retórica de 100 SRs no campo da odontologia. Os resultados indicam que os SRs seguem uma estrutura protótipo de Introdução-Método-Resultados-Discussão-Discussão-Conclusão (IMRDC). Isto pode ser dividido em 18 movimentos, dos quais 14 podem ser considerados obrigatórios. Esta proposta constitui um recurso empírico para acadêmicos, clínicos e estudantes de odontologia, aumentando a consciência do gênero discursivo, escrevendo e publicando efetivamente as SRs em revistas odontológicas internacionais.Palavras-chave: Revisão sistemática; estrutura retórica; redação acadêmica; odontologia.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-21
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/16410
url http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/16410
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/16410/1125614212
http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/downloadSuppFile/16410/2604
/*ref*/AL-RAMADHAN, N. Do systematic reviews and meta-analyses, published in the dental literature, comply with the QUOROM and PRISMA statements?. 2011. Dissertation (Doctorate in Dental Sciences) – School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, 2011.
/*ref*/AZAR, A.; HASHIM, A. Analysing the macroorganisational structure of the review article genre in applied linguistics. Issues in Language Studies, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-28, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.471.2017.
/*ref*/BASSANI, R. et al. Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics. Journal of Dentistry, [s. l.], v. 82, p. 71-84, Mar. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.014.
/*ref*/BASTURKMEN, H. A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 134-144, June 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004.
/*ref*/BERKENKOTTER, C.; HUCKIN, T. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.
/*ref*/BETTANY-SALTIKOV, J. Learning how to undertake a systematic review: Part 1. Nursing Standard, v. 24, n. 50, p. 47-55. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2010.08.24.50.47.c7939.
/*ref*/BHATIA, V. A generic view of academic discourse. In: FLOWERDEW, J. (Ed.). Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002a. p. 21-39.
/*ref*/BHATIA, V. Analysing Genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman, 1993.
/*ref*/BHATIA, V. Applied genre analysis: a multiperspective model. Ibérica, v. 4, p. 3-19, 2002c.
/*ref*/BHATIA, V. Applied genre analysis: Analytical advances and pedagogical procedures. In: JOHNS, A. (Ed.). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002b. p. 279-283.
/*ref*/BHATIA, V. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Gender View. London: Continuum, 2004.
/*ref*/BOELL, S.; CECEZ-KECMANOVIC, D. On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews. In: WILLCOCKS, L.; SAUER, C.; LACITY, M. (Ed.). Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. p. 48-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509888_3.
/*ref*/BOTH, A.; SUTTON, A.; PAPAIOANNOU, D. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2016.
/*ref*/CONRAD, S. The Use of Passives and Impersonal Style in Civil Engineering Writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, v. 32, n. 1, p. 38-76, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917729864.
/*ref*/DE CRAEN, A.; VAN VLIET, H.; HELMERHORST, F. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorporation of results from clinical trial quality assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [s. l.], v. 58, n. 3, p. 311-313, Mar. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.07.002.
/*ref*/ENTRALGO, J.; SALAGER, F.; LUZARDO, M. Títulos de artículos de investigación científica escritos en inglés: un estudio interdisciplinario. Núcleo, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 31, p. 75-100, 2014.
/*ref*/FOX, R. The Social Identity of Management Ergolect. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 261-278, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00057-4. Disponível em: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00057-4. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2019.
/*ref*/GARCÍA, M. Importancia y limitaciones de las revisiones sistemáticas en Odontología. 2017. Dissertation (Doctorate of Dental Science) – School of Dentistry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, 2017.
/*ref*/GARDNER, S.; NESI, H.; BIBER, D. Discipline, level, genre: integrating situational perspectives in a new ND analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 4, p. 646-674, Aug. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005.
/*ref*/GRANT, M.; BOOTH, A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 2, p. 91-108, May 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
/*ref*/HADDAWAY, N.; MACURA, B.; WHALEY, P.; PULLIN, A. ROSES Reporting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 1, Mar. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7.
/*ref*/HIGGINS, J.; GREEN, S. (Ed.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. [S. l.]: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Disponível em: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2019.
/*ref*/HYLAND, K. Dissertation acknowledgements: The anatomy of a Cinderella genre. Written Communication, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 3, p. 242-268, July 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303257276.
/*ref*/HYLAND, K.; DIANI, G. Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres. In: HYLAND, K.; DIANI, G. (Ed.). Academic Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. p. 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244290_1.
/*ref*/HYON, S. Using genre analysis to teach in the disciplines. In: FLOWERDEW, J.; COSTLEY, T. (Ed.). Discipline-Specific Writing: Theory into practice. London: Taylor & Francis, 2016, p. 77-94.
/*ref*/IOANNIDIS, J. P. A. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The Milbank Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 94, n. 3, p. 485–514, Sep. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210.
/*ref*/JIA, J.; LIU, X. Improving Systematic Literature Review Based on Text Similarity Analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, [s. l.], v. 1069, p. 1-5, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1069/1/012059.
/*ref*/KARAPETJANA, I.; ROZINA, G. Rhetorical structure of the research article in Dentistry. Russian Linguistic Bulleting, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 7, p. 10-14, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.7.40.
/*ref*/KHANI, R.; TAZIK, K. Macro-structuring patterns in applied linguistics research articles; evidence of genre awareness. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 1, 139-147, 2017.
/*ref*/KNOLL, T. et al. Key Steps in Conducting Systematic Reviews for Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines: Methodology of the European Association of Urology. European Urology, [s. l.], v. 73, n. 2, p. 290–300, Feb. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.016.
/*ref*/KOFFEL, J. Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PloS one, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 5, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125931.
/*ref*/KUNG, J. et al. From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance. Open Dental Journal, [s. l.], v. 4, p. 84-91, July 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601004010084.
/*ref*/KWAN, B. A cross-paradigm macro-structure analysis of research articles in Information Systems. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 45, p. 14-30, Jan. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.002.
/*ref*/LAVIS, J. et al. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 11, p. 35-48, July 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308549.
/*ref*/MAJOR, M. P.; MAJOR, P. W.; FLORES-MIR, C. Benchmarking of reported search and selection methods of systematic reviews by dental speciality. Evidence-based Dentistry, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 66-70, Sep. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400504.
/*ref*/MASWANA, S.; KANAMARU, T.; TAJINO, A. Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, [s. l.], v. 2, p. 1-11, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2014.12.002.
/*ref*/MOHAMMAD, H.; GOHARI, I. A Mixed Methods Genre Analysis of the Discussion Section of MMR Articles in Applied Linguistics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 242-260, Nov. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816674626.
/*ref*/MOHER, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Review, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
/*ref*/MOHER, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, v. 151, n. 4, p. 264-269, 2009.
/*ref*/MORALES, O. A. Enseñanza de la escritura académica con base en el análisis del género del resumen de la tesis. Legenda, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 18, p. 35-65, 2014.
/*ref*/MORALES, O. A. Los géneros escritos de la odontología hispanoamericana: estructura retórica y estrategias de atenuación en artículos de investigación, casos clínicos y artículos de revisión. 2010. Dissertation (Doctorate in Multilingual Communication) – Department of Philogy, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 2010.
/*ref*/MORALES, O. A.; CASSANY, D.; DÍAZ, N. A. Propuesta para la escritura de resúmenes y artículos científicos odontológicos. Acta Bioclínica, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 8, p. 34-53, 2014.
/*ref*/MORALES, O. et al. The Rhetorical Structure of Theses and Dissertations in Dentistry: A study in Hispano-America and Spain. Revista Ikala: Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 2, p. 373-93, May 2020. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n02a06.
/*ref*/MULIMANI, P. Evidence-based practice and the evidence pyramid: A 21st century orthodontic odyssey. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, [s. l.], v. 152, n. 1, p. 1-8, July 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.020.
/*ref*/MULROW, C. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ, [s. l.], v. 309, n. 6954, p. 597-599, Sep. 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597.
/*ref*/MUNGRA, P. Macrostructures and Rhetorical Moves in Secondary Research Articles. In: GOTTI, M.; SALAGER-MEYER, F. (Ed.). Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts. Bern: Peter Lang, 2006, p. 331-355.
/*ref*/PALMATIER, B.; HOUSTON, W.; HULLAND, J. Review articles: purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, [s. l.], v. 46, n. 1, p. 1-5, Oct. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4.
/*ref*/PERDOMO, B. Enseñanza basada en el género y comprensión lectora en inglés con propósitos específicos: revisión sistemática. Redine, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 29-41, 2018.
/*ref*/PHO, P. Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 231-250, Apr. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087010.
/*ref*/POLLOCK, M.; FERNANDES, R.; HARTLING, L. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 48, Mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0325-5.
/*ref*/PRINSEN, C. et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 5, p. 1147-1157, Feb. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.
/*ref*/RAHIMI, S.; FARNIA, M. Comparative Generic Analysis of Introductions of English and Persian Dentistry Research Articles. RELP, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 27-40, 2017.
/*ref*/RUIYING, Y.; ALLISON, D. Research articles in applied linguistics: Structures from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 3, p. 264-279, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00005-X.
/*ref*/SALAGER-MEYER, F.; ARIZA, M. Academic criticism in Spanish medical discourse: A cross-generic approach (1930-1999). International Journal of Applied Linguistics, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 1, p. 96-114, Apr. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00039.
/*ref*/SALAGER-MEYER, F.; LEWIN, B.; LUZARDO, M. Neutral, risky or provocative? Trends in titling practices in complementary and alternative medicine articles (1995–2016). Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 263-289, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20420/rlfe.2017.346.
/*ref*/SAMRAJ, B. Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v. 12, n. 4, p. 299-310, Dec. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001.
/*ref*/SANTULLI, F.; AGOSTINI, C. The Case against Homeopathy: A Study of the Rhetoric of Meta-Analysis. In: MACI, S.; SALA, M. (Ed.). Genre Variation in Academic Communication. Emerging Disciplinary Trends. Bergamo: CERLIS, 2012. p. 175-198.
/*ref*/SKELTON, J. Analysis of the structure of original research papers: an aid to writing original papers for publication. British Journal of General Practice, [s. l.], v. 44, n. 387, p. 455-459, 1994.
/*ref*/SWALES, J. Genre analysis: English in academic research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
/*ref*/SWALES, J. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827.
/*ref*/TANKÓ, G. Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, [s. l.], v.27, p. 42-55, May 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.003.
/*ref*/TEJADA, H.; CASTELLANOS, M.; ROBAYO, F. Genre Analysis Applied to Two Textual Patterns for an English for Specific Purposes Course ESP. Folios, [s. l.], v. 46, n. 2, p. 145-162, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/01234870.46folios145.162 .
/*ref*/TESSUTO, G. Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 37, p. 13-26, Jan. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.002.
/*ref*/VAN TULDER, M. et al. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for spinal disorders. Spine, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 20, p. 2323-2330, Oct. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199710150-00001.
/*ref*/VAN TULDER, M. et al. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 12, p. 1290-1299, July 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000065484.95996.AF.
/*ref*/VATHANALAOHA, K.; TANGKIENGSIRISIN, S. Genre Analysis of Experiment-based Dental Research Article Abstracts: Thai and International Journals. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 1-14, 2018.
/*ref*/WHITING, P. et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [s. l.], v. 69, p. 225-234, June 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005.
/*ref*/WRIGHT, H. R. Lexical bundles in stand-alone literature reviews: Sections, frequencies, and functions. English for Specific Purposes, [s. l.], v. 54, p. 1-14, Apr. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.09.001.
/*ref*/ZENG, X. et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, [s. l.], v. 8, p. 2-10, Jan. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12141.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 21, No 3 (2021); 699-731
Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 21, No 3 (2021); 699-731
Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 21, No 3 (2021); 699-731
1984-6398
1676-0786
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rblasecretaria@gmail.com||periodicosfaleufmg@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711100456927232

Registros relacionados