Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bampi,D.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Borstnez,K.K., Dias,C.P., Costa,O.A.D., Moreira,F., Peripolli,V., Oliveira Júnior,J.M., Schwegler,E., Rauber,L.P., Bianchi,I.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352020000501675
Resumo: ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy on reproductive performance and animal welfare parameters. After artificial insemination protocol, 524 females were divided into two gestation housing systems: PEN1=animals housed in individual stalls during the breeding and after group-housed; PEN32=animals housed in individual stalls from breeding until 32 days of pregnancy and after group-housed. The number of piglets born, and the pregnancy and farrowing rates were evaluated. Welfare parameters related to the pregnancy phase were used. Females who weaned more piglets in the previous farrowing had a higher number of piglets born at the next farrowing. The pregnancy rate was affected by the number of semen doses. The farrowing rate was not influenced by the evaluated parameters, with average value of 91.36%. There was no effect of the gestation housing system and the genetic lines on pregnancy and farrowing rates, with values above 90.0%. The animal welfare indicators showed more compromised parameters in PEN1 system. PEN1 system did not impair the reproductive performance although it presented more compromised animal welfare parameters.
id UFMG-8_10d61b78d33d75a8849083ff5753d88a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-09352020000501675
network_acronym_str UFMG-8
network_name_str Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancygroup-housedindividual stallspregnancy phasesowABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy on reproductive performance and animal welfare parameters. After artificial insemination protocol, 524 females were divided into two gestation housing systems: PEN1=animals housed in individual stalls during the breeding and after group-housed; PEN32=animals housed in individual stalls from breeding until 32 days of pregnancy and after group-housed. The number of piglets born, and the pregnancy and farrowing rates were evaluated. Welfare parameters related to the pregnancy phase were used. Females who weaned more piglets in the previous farrowing had a higher number of piglets born at the next farrowing. The pregnancy rate was affected by the number of semen doses. The farrowing rate was not influenced by the evaluated parameters, with average value of 91.36%. There was no effect of the gestation housing system and the genetic lines on pregnancy and farrowing rates, with values above 90.0%. The animal welfare indicators showed more compromised parameters in PEN1 system. PEN1 system did not impair the reproductive performance although it presented more compromised animal welfare parameters.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352020000501675Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.72 n.5 2020reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG10.1590/1678-4162-11767info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBampi,D.Borstnez,K.K.Dias,C.P.Costa,O.A.D.Moreira,F.Peripolli,V.Oliveira Júnior,J.M.Schwegler,E.Rauber,L.P.Bianchi,I.eng2020-11-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-09352020000501675Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/abmvz/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpjournal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br1678-41620102-0935opendoar:2020-11-05T00:00Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
spellingShingle Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
Bampi,D.
group-housed
individual stalls
pregnancy phase
sow
title_short Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title_full Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title_fullStr Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
title_sort Evaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy
author Bampi,D.
author_facet Bampi,D.
Borstnez,K.K.
Dias,C.P.
Costa,O.A.D.
Moreira,F.
Peripolli,V.
Oliveira Júnior,J.M.
Schwegler,E.
Rauber,L.P.
Bianchi,I.
author_role author
author2 Borstnez,K.K.
Dias,C.P.
Costa,O.A.D.
Moreira,F.
Peripolli,V.
Oliveira Júnior,J.M.
Schwegler,E.
Rauber,L.P.
Bianchi,I.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bampi,D.
Borstnez,K.K.
Dias,C.P.
Costa,O.A.D.
Moreira,F.
Peripolli,V.
Oliveira Júnior,J.M.
Schwegler,E.
Rauber,L.P.
Bianchi,I.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv group-housed
individual stalls
pregnancy phase
sow
topic group-housed
individual stalls
pregnancy phase
sow
description ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy on reproductive performance and animal welfare parameters. After artificial insemination protocol, 524 females were divided into two gestation housing systems: PEN1=animals housed in individual stalls during the breeding and after group-housed; PEN32=animals housed in individual stalls from breeding until 32 days of pregnancy and after group-housed. The number of piglets born, and the pregnancy and farrowing rates were evaluated. Welfare parameters related to the pregnancy phase were used. Females who weaned more piglets in the previous farrowing had a higher number of piglets born at the next farrowing. The pregnancy rate was affected by the number of semen doses. The farrowing rate was not influenced by the evaluated parameters, with average value of 91.36%. There was no effect of the gestation housing system and the genetic lines on pregnancy and farrowing rates, with values above 90.0%. The animal welfare indicators showed more compromised parameters in PEN1 system. PEN1 system did not impair the reproductive performance although it presented more compromised animal welfare parameters.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352020000501675
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352020000501675
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-4162-11767
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.72 n.5 2020
reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
collection Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv journal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br
_version_ 1750220894645518336