PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Shirleide Santos Nunes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Mônica Cristina Oliveira, André Luís Branco de Barros, Juliana de Oliveira Silva, Renata Salgado Fernandes, Sued Eustaquio Mendes Miranda, Elaine Amaral Leite, Marcelo Alexandre de Farias, Rodrigo Villares Portugal, Geovanni Dantas Cassali, Danyelle M. Townsend
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020272
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60460
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-9581
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-2156
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-3811
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9521-5236
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-8717
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-6743
Resumo: PEGylated liposomes are largely studied as long-circulating drug delivery systems. Nevertheless, the addition of PEG can result in reduced interactions between liposomes and cells, hindering liposomal internalization into target cells. The presence of PEG on the surface of pH-sensitive liposomes is not advantageous in terms of biodistribution and tumor uptake, raising the question of whether the indiscriminate use of PEG benefits the formulation. In this study, two doxorubicin-loaded pH-sensitive liposomal formulations, PEGylated (Lip2000-DOX) or non-PEGylated (Lip-DOX), were prepared and characterized. Overall, the PEGylated and non-PEGylated liposomes showed no differences in size or morphology in Cryo-TEM image analysis. Specifically, DLS analysis showed a mean diameter of 140 nm, PDI lower than 0.2, and zeta potential close to neutrality. Both formulations showed an EP higher than 90%. With respect to drug delivery, Lip-DOX had better cellular uptake than Lip2000-DOX, suggesting that the presence of PEG reduced the amount of intracellular DOX accumulation. The antitumor activities of free-DOX and both liposomal formulations were evaluated in 4T1 breast tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. The results showed that Lip-DOX was more effective in controlling tumor growth than other groups, inhibiting tumor growth by 60.4%. Histological lung analysis confirmed that none of the animals in the Lip-DOX group had metastatic foci. These results support that pH-sensitive liposomes have interesting antitumor properties and may produce important outcomes without PEG.
id UFMG_382bcf132a42b47d9c44d4eb81864054
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/60460
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2023-11-01T21:51:51Z2023-11-01T21:51:51Z2022142https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics140202721999-4923http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60460https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-9581https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-2156https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-3811https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9521-5236https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-8717https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-6743PEGylated liposomes are largely studied as long-circulating drug delivery systems. Nevertheless, the addition of PEG can result in reduced interactions between liposomes and cells, hindering liposomal internalization into target cells. The presence of PEG on the surface of pH-sensitive liposomes is not advantageous in terms of biodistribution and tumor uptake, raising the question of whether the indiscriminate use of PEG benefits the formulation. In this study, two doxorubicin-loaded pH-sensitive liposomal formulations, PEGylated (Lip2000-DOX) or non-PEGylated (Lip-DOX), were prepared and characterized. Overall, the PEGylated and non-PEGylated liposomes showed no differences in size or morphology in Cryo-TEM image analysis. Specifically, DLS analysis showed a mean diameter of 140 nm, PDI lower than 0.2, and zeta potential close to neutrality. Both formulations showed an EP higher than 90%. With respect to drug delivery, Lip-DOX had better cellular uptake than Lip2000-DOX, suggesting that the presence of PEG reduced the amount of intracellular DOX accumulation. The antitumor activities of free-DOX and both liposomal formulations were evaluated in 4T1 breast tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. The results showed that Lip-DOX was more effective in controlling tumor growth than other groups, inhibiting tumor growth by 60.4%. Histological lung analysis confirmed that none of the animals in the Lip-DOX group had metastatic foci. These results support that pH-sensitive liposomes have interesting antitumor properties and may produce important outcomes without PEG.Os lipossomas PEGuilados são amplamente estudados como sistemas de administração de medicamentos de longa circulação. No entanto, a adição de PEG pode resultar na redução das interações entre lipossomas e células, dificultando a internalização lipossomal nas células alvo. A presença de PEG na superfície de lipossomas sensíveis ao pH não é vantajosa em termos de biodistribuição e absorção tumoral, levantando a questão se o uso indiscriminado de PEG beneficia a formulação. Neste estudo, duas formulações lipossomais sensíveis ao pH carregadas de doxorrubicina, PEGuiladas (Lip2000-DOX) ou não PEGuiladas (Lip-DOX), foram preparadas e caracterizadas. No geral, os lipossomas PEGuilados e não PEGuilados não mostraram diferenças no tamanho ou morfologia na análise de imagens Cryo-TEM. Especificamente, a análise DLS mostrou diâmetro médio de 140 nm, PDI inferior a 0,2 e potencial zeta próximo da neutralidade. Ambas as formulações apresentaram EP superior a 90%. No que diz respeito à administração do medicamento, o Lip-DOX apresentou melhor captação celular que o Lip2000-DOX, sugerindo que a presença de PEG reduziu a quantidade de acúmulo intracelular de DOX. As atividades antitumorais da DOX livre e de ambas as formulações lipossomais foram avaliadas em camundongos BALB/c portadores de tumor de mama 4T1. Os resultados mostraram que Lip-DOX foi mais eficaz no controle do crescimento tumoral do que outros grupos, inibindo o crescimento tumoral em 60,4%. A análise histológica do pulmão confirmou que nenhum dos animais do grupo Lip-DOX apresentava focos metastáticos. Estes resultados apoiam que os lipossomas sensíveis ao pH têm propriedades antitumorais interessantes e podem produzir resultados importantes sem PEG.CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisporUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGBrasilFAR - DEPARTAMENTO DE ANÁLISES CLÍNICAS E TOXICOLÓGICASFAR - DEPARTAMENTO DE PRODUTOS FARMACÊUTICOSICB - DEPARTAMENTO DE PATOLOGIAPharmaceuticsLipossomosAntineoplásicosPolietilenoglicóisNeoplasiasDoxorrubicinaLiposomesPolyethylene glycolAntitumor activityPEGylated liposomesDoxorubicinPEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity studyLipossomas sensíveis ao pH PEGuilados versus não PEGuilados: novos insights de um estudo comparativo de atividade antitumoralinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/2/272Shirleide Santos NunesMônica Cristina OliveiraAndré Luís Branco de BarrosJuliana de Oliveira SilvaRenata Salgado FernandesSued Eustaquio Mendes MirandaElaine Amaral LeiteMarcelo Alexandre de FariasRodrigo Villares PortugalGeovanni Dantas CassaliDanyelle M. Townsendapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGLICENSELicense.txtLicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82042https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/60460/1/License.txtfa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22MD51ORIGINALPEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes_ new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study.pdfPEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes_ new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study.pdfapplication/pdf1278391https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/60460/2/PEGylated%20versus%20non-PEGylated%20pH-sensitive%20liposomes_%20new%20insights%20from%20a%20comparative%20antitumor%20activity%20study.pdf128f1c6f05c37d207def4e20284741fcMD521843/604602023-11-01 18:51:52.036oai:repositorio.ufmg.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2023-11-01T21:51:52Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Lipossomas sensíveis ao pH PEGuilados versus não PEGuilados: novos insights de um estudo comparativo de atividade antitumoral
title PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study
spellingShingle PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study
Shirleide Santos Nunes
Liposomes
Polyethylene glycol
Antitumor activity
PEGylated liposomes
Doxorubicin
Lipossomos
Antineoplásicos
Polietilenoglicóis
Neoplasias
Doxorrubicina
title_short PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study
title_full PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study
title_fullStr PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study
title_full_unstemmed PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study
title_sort PEGylated versus non-PEGylated pH-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study
author Shirleide Santos Nunes
author_facet Shirleide Santos Nunes
Mônica Cristina Oliveira
André Luís Branco de Barros
Juliana de Oliveira Silva
Renata Salgado Fernandes
Sued Eustaquio Mendes Miranda
Elaine Amaral Leite
Marcelo Alexandre de Farias
Rodrigo Villares Portugal
Geovanni Dantas Cassali
Danyelle M. Townsend
author_role author
author2 Mônica Cristina Oliveira
André Luís Branco de Barros
Juliana de Oliveira Silva
Renata Salgado Fernandes
Sued Eustaquio Mendes Miranda
Elaine Amaral Leite
Marcelo Alexandre de Farias
Rodrigo Villares Portugal
Geovanni Dantas Cassali
Danyelle M. Townsend
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Shirleide Santos Nunes
Mônica Cristina Oliveira
André Luís Branco de Barros
Juliana de Oliveira Silva
Renata Salgado Fernandes
Sued Eustaquio Mendes Miranda
Elaine Amaral Leite
Marcelo Alexandre de Farias
Rodrigo Villares Portugal
Geovanni Dantas Cassali
Danyelle M. Townsend
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Liposomes
Polyethylene glycol
Antitumor activity
PEGylated liposomes
Doxorubicin
topic Liposomes
Polyethylene glycol
Antitumor activity
PEGylated liposomes
Doxorubicin
Lipossomos
Antineoplásicos
Polietilenoglicóis
Neoplasias
Doxorrubicina
dc.subject.other.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Lipossomos
Antineoplásicos
Polietilenoglicóis
Neoplasias
Doxorrubicina
description PEGylated liposomes are largely studied as long-circulating drug delivery systems. Nevertheless, the addition of PEG can result in reduced interactions between liposomes and cells, hindering liposomal internalization into target cells. The presence of PEG on the surface of pH-sensitive liposomes is not advantageous in terms of biodistribution and tumor uptake, raising the question of whether the indiscriminate use of PEG benefits the formulation. In this study, two doxorubicin-loaded pH-sensitive liposomal formulations, PEGylated (Lip2000-DOX) or non-PEGylated (Lip-DOX), were prepared and characterized. Overall, the PEGylated and non-PEGylated liposomes showed no differences in size or morphology in Cryo-TEM image analysis. Specifically, DLS analysis showed a mean diameter of 140 nm, PDI lower than 0.2, and zeta potential close to neutrality. Both formulations showed an EP higher than 90%. With respect to drug delivery, Lip-DOX had better cellular uptake than Lip2000-DOX, suggesting that the presence of PEG reduced the amount of intracellular DOX accumulation. The antitumor activities of free-DOX and both liposomal formulations were evaluated in 4T1 breast tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. The results showed that Lip-DOX was more effective in controlling tumor growth than other groups, inhibiting tumor growth by 60.4%. Histological lung analysis confirmed that none of the animals in the Lip-DOX group had metastatic foci. These results support that pH-sensitive liposomes have interesting antitumor properties and may produce important outcomes without PEG.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-11-01T21:51:51Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-11-01T21:51:51Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60460
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020272
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1999-4923
dc.identifier.orcid.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-9581
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-2156
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-3811
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9521-5236
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-8717
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-6743
url https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020272
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60460
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-9581
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-2156
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-3811
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9521-5236
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-8717
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-6743
identifier_str_mv 1999-4923
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Pharmaceutics
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv FAR - DEPARTAMENTO DE ANÁLISES CLÍNICAS E TOXICOLÓGICAS
FAR - DEPARTAMENTO DE PRODUTOS FARMACÊUTICOS
ICB - DEPARTAMENTO DE PATOLOGIA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/60460/1/License.txt
https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/60460/2/PEGylated%20versus%20non-PEGylated%20pH-sensitive%20liposomes_%20new%20insights%20from%20a%20comparative%20antitumor%20activity%20study.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv fa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22
128f1c6f05c37d207def4e20284741fc
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801676700726067200