TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tozei, William Peneda
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pereira, Milton Amaral, Pinto, Tayná Karine Sousa, Ferreira , Renato Melo, Soares, Everton Rocha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Corpoconsciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/corpoconsciencia/article/view/12268
Resumo: The objective was to compare the total volume and number of maximum repetitions (nMR) that can be performed in Leg Extensions (EXT) and Leg Flexion (FLEX), varying order of execution in traditional (TRAD) and agonist-antagonist paired set (AAPS) methods. Total volume and nMR of twelve men (22.8±2.7years) were evaluated (p<0.05) in four protocols: TRAD1 (4 sets EXT + 4 sets FLEX); TRAD2 (4 sets FLEX + 4 sets EXT); AAPS1 (4 sets EXT and FLEX) and; AAPS2 (4 sets FLEX and EXT). The total volume of the AAPS2 was greater than TRAD1 and TRAD2. Higher nMR was observed in FLEX compared to EXT in all protocols. It was concluded that depending on the method chosen and order of exercises, a greater total volume can be performed. Additionally, the nMR that can be performed in each resistance exercise seems to be influenced by the muscle group.
id UFMS-4_2a0cd4775ce17f2e14fbca63d58cae7f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br:article/12268
network_acronym_str UFMS-4
network_name_str Revista Corpoconsciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?MÉTODO TRADICIONAL FRENTE A MÉTODO SERIE EMPAREJADA AGONISTA-ANTAGONISTA PARA MIEMBROS INFERIORES: ¿EXISTEN DIFERENCIAS EN EL VOLUMEN TOTAL Y LAS REPETICIONES MÁXIMAS?MÉTODO TRADICIONAL VS. SÉRIE PAREADA AGONISTA-ANTAGONISTA PARA MEMBROS INFERIORES: HÁ DIFERENÇAS NO VOLUME TOTAL E REPETIÇÕES MÁXIMAS?Resistance Training MethodsTotal VolumeMaximum Number of RepetitionsOrder of ExercisesMétodos de Treinamento ResistidoVolume TotalNúmero de Repetições MáximasOrdem dos ExercíciosMétodos de Entrenamiento de Resistencia Volumen TotalNúmero de Repeticiones MáximasOrden de EjerciciosThe objective was to compare the total volume and number of maximum repetitions (nMR) that can be performed in Leg Extensions (EXT) and Leg Flexion (FLEX), varying order of execution in traditional (TRAD) and agonist-antagonist paired set (AAPS) methods. Total volume and nMR of twelve men (22.8±2.7years) were evaluated (p<0.05) in four protocols: TRAD1 (4 sets EXT + 4 sets FLEX); TRAD2 (4 sets FLEX + 4 sets EXT); AAPS1 (4 sets EXT and FLEX) and; AAPS2 (4 sets FLEX and EXT). The total volume of the AAPS2 was greater than TRAD1 and TRAD2. Higher nMR was observed in FLEX compared to EXT in all protocols. It was concluded that depending on the method chosen and order of exercises, a greater total volume can be performed. Additionally, the nMR that can be performed in each resistance exercise seems to be influenced by the muscle group.El objetivo fue comparar el volumen total y número de repeticiones máximas (nRM) en Extensíon de piernas (EXT) y flexión de piernas (FLEX), variando el orden de ejecución, en lo método tradicional (TRAD) y serie emparejada agonista-antagonista (SEAA). El volumen total (p<0,05) y el nRM de doce hombres (22,8±2,7años) fue evaluado en cuatro protocolos: TRAD1 (4 series EXT + 4 series FLEX); TRAD2 (4 series FLEX + 4 series EXT); SEAA1 (4 series EXT y FLEX); SEAA2 (4 series FLEX y EXT). El volumen total del protocolo SEAA2 fue mayor que TRAD1 y TRAD2. Se observó uno nRM más altas en FLEX en comparación con EXT en todos los protocolos. Se concluye que dependiendo del método adoptado y el orden de los ejercicios se puede realizar un mayor volumen total. Además, la nRM que se puede realizar en un ejercicio de fuerza parece estar influenciada por el grupo muscular utilizado.Objetivou-se comparar o volume total e número repetições máximas (nRM) que pode ser realizado nos exercícios Cadeira Extensora (EXT) e Cadeira Flexora (FLEX), variando ordem de execução, nos métodos tradicional (TRAD) e série pareada agonista-antagonista (SPAA). Avaliou-se (p<0,05) volume total e nRM de doze homens saudáveis (22,8±2,7anos), em quatro protocolos: TRAD1 (4 séries EXT + 4 séries FLEX); TRAD2 (4 séries FLEX + 4 séries EXT); SPAA1 (4 séries EXT e FLEX) e; SPAA2 (4 séries FLEX e EXT). O volume total do protocolo SPAA2 foi maior do que no TRAD1 e TRAD2. Foi observado maior nRM no FLEX em comparação com EXT em todos os protocolos utilizados. Conclui-se que dependendo do método adotado e ordem dos exercícios maior volume total pode ser realizado. Adicionalmente, o nRM que pode ser executado em um determinado exercício resistido parece ser influenciado pelo grupamento muscular utilizado.Faculdade de Educação Física da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso2021-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/corpoconsciencia/article/view/1226810.51283/rc.v25i2.12268Corpoconsciência; Revista Corpoconsciência, v. 25, n. 2, mai./ ago., 2021; 134-1482178-594510.51283/rc.v25i2reponame:Revista Corpoconsciência (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)instacron:UFMSporhttps://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/corpoconsciencia/article/view/12268/8321Copyright (c) 2021 Corpoconsciênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTozei, William Peneda Pereira, Milton Amaral Pinto, Tayná Karine SousaFerreira , Renato Melo Soares, Everton Rocha2021-07-28T22:55:11Zoai:periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br:article/12268Revistahttps://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/corpoconscienciaPUBhttps://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/corpoconsciencia/oai||ecmmoreira@uol.com.br2178-59451517-6096opendoar:2021-07-28T22:55:11Revista Corpoconsciência (Online) - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?
MÉTODO TRADICIONAL FRENTE A MÉTODO SERIE EMPAREJADA AGONISTA-ANTAGONISTA PARA MIEMBROS INFERIORES: ¿EXISTEN DIFERENCIAS EN EL VOLUMEN TOTAL Y LAS REPETICIONES MÁXIMAS?
MÉTODO TRADICIONAL VS. SÉRIE PAREADA AGONISTA-ANTAGONISTA PARA MEMBROS INFERIORES: HÁ DIFERENÇAS NO VOLUME TOTAL E REPETIÇÕES MÁXIMAS?
title TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?
spellingShingle TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?
Tozei, William Peneda
Resistance Training Methods
Total Volume
Maximum Number of Repetitions
Order of Exercises
Métodos de Treinamento Resistido
Volume Total
Número de Repetições Máximas
Ordem dos Exercícios
Métodos de Entrenamiento de Resistencia
Volumen Total
Número de Repeticiones Máximas
Orden de Ejercicios
title_short TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?
title_full TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?
title_fullStr TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?
title_full_unstemmed TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?
title_sort TRADITIONAL VS. PAIRED SERIES AGONIST-ANTAGONIST METHOD FOR LOWER LIMBS: ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN TOTAL VOLUME AND MAXIMUM REPETITIONS?
author Tozei, William Peneda
author_facet Tozei, William Peneda
Pereira, Milton Amaral
Pinto, Tayná Karine Sousa
Ferreira , Renato Melo
Soares, Everton Rocha
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Milton Amaral
Pinto, Tayná Karine Sousa
Ferreira , Renato Melo
Soares, Everton Rocha
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tozei, William Peneda
Pereira, Milton Amaral
Pinto, Tayná Karine Sousa
Ferreira , Renato Melo
Soares, Everton Rocha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Resistance Training Methods
Total Volume
Maximum Number of Repetitions
Order of Exercises
Métodos de Treinamento Resistido
Volume Total
Número de Repetições Máximas
Ordem dos Exercícios
Métodos de Entrenamiento de Resistencia
Volumen Total
Número de Repeticiones Máximas
Orden de Ejercicios
topic Resistance Training Methods
Total Volume
Maximum Number of Repetitions
Order of Exercises
Métodos de Treinamento Resistido
Volume Total
Número de Repetições Máximas
Ordem dos Exercícios
Métodos de Entrenamiento de Resistencia
Volumen Total
Número de Repeticiones Máximas
Orden de Ejercicios
description The objective was to compare the total volume and number of maximum repetitions (nMR) that can be performed in Leg Extensions (EXT) and Leg Flexion (FLEX), varying order of execution in traditional (TRAD) and agonist-antagonist paired set (AAPS) methods. Total volume and nMR of twelve men (22.8±2.7years) were evaluated (p<0.05) in four protocols: TRAD1 (4 sets EXT + 4 sets FLEX); TRAD2 (4 sets FLEX + 4 sets EXT); AAPS1 (4 sets EXT and FLEX) and; AAPS2 (4 sets FLEX and EXT). The total volume of the AAPS2 was greater than TRAD1 and TRAD2. Higher nMR was observed in FLEX compared to EXT in all protocols. It was concluded that depending on the method chosen and order of exercises, a greater total volume can be performed. Additionally, the nMR that can be performed in each resistance exercise seems to be influenced by the muscle group.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/corpoconsciencia/article/view/12268
10.51283/rc.v25i2.12268
url https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/corpoconsciencia/article/view/12268
identifier_str_mv 10.51283/rc.v25i2.12268
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicoscientificos.ufmt.br/ojs/index.php/corpoconsciencia/article/view/12268/8321
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Corpoconsciência
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Corpoconsciência
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Educação Física da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Educação Física da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Corpoconsciência; Revista Corpoconsciência, v. 25, n. 2, mai./ ago., 2021; 134-148
2178-5945
10.51283/rc.v25i2
reponame:Revista Corpoconsciência (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
instacron:UFMS
instname_str Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
instacron_str UFMS
institution UFMS
reponame_str Revista Corpoconsciência (Online)
collection Revista Corpoconsciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Corpoconsciência (Online) - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ecmmoreira@uol.com.br
_version_ 1798325460803780608

Registros relacionados