José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and Literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Francisco Régis Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: História da Historiografia
Texto Completo: https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/815
Resumo: Based on Michel de Certeau’s interrogations about the “historiographical operation”, this article examines the ways in which José de Alencar sought to legitimize his way of making the past an object of knowledge. We comprehend, thus, that novelists have also undertaken the task of understanding the past. And in addition to this fact, or underlying it, novelists came to rival the alleged circumscription that historians were establishing. In this sense, we intend to approach how José de Alencar’s writing partook in those strains, which started to be strengthened in the 19th century, turning history into the “other” of literature and literature into the “other” of history. Some clashes between history and literature will be examined, considering that the struggles for boundaries between history and literature are part of the very legitimacy that the writing of history constitutes for itself. Some comparisons will be made between José de Alencar’s writing and that of other novelists, in order to chart disputes and identify the perspective of realizing how literature came to assert itself as the “other” of “history writing”.
id UFOP-2_7da7dd71f261e15a05100fa5eb1c7a56
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/815
network_acronym_str UFOP-2
network_name_str História da Historiografia
repository_id_str
spelling José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and LiteratureJosé de Alencar e a operação historiográfica: fronteiras e disputas entre história e literaturaHistoryLiteratureNarrativesHistoriaLiteraturaNarrativasHistóriaLiteraturaNarrativasBased on Michel de Certeau’s interrogations about the “historiographical operation”, this article examines the ways in which José de Alencar sought to legitimize his way of making the past an object of knowledge. We comprehend, thus, that novelists have also undertaken the task of understanding the past. And in addition to this fact, or underlying it, novelists came to rival the alleged circumscription that historians were establishing. In this sense, we intend to approach how José de Alencar’s writing partook in those strains, which started to be strengthened in the 19th century, turning history into the “other” of literature and literature into the “other” of history. Some clashes between history and literature will be examined, considering that the struggles for boundaries between history and literature are part of the very legitimacy that the writing of history constitutes for itself. Some comparisons will be made between José de Alencar’s writing and that of other novelists, in order to chart disputes and identify the perspective of realizing how literature came to assert itself as the “other” of “history writing”.Com base nas interrogações de Michel de Certeau sobre a “operação historiográfica”, este artigo examina os modos pelos quais José de Alencar procurou dar legitimidade ao seu modo de fazer do passado um objeto de conhecimento. Compreende-se, desse modo, que os romancistas assumiram, também, a tarefa de compreender o passado. E, além disso, ou subjacente a isso, passaram a rivalizar com a suposta circunscrição que os historiadores foram estabelecendo. Pretende-se abordar como a escrita de José de Alencar faz parte dessas tensões que ganharam mais força a partir do século XIX, transformando a história no “outro” da literatura, e a literatura no “outro” da história. Serão analisados certos confrontos entre história e literatura, levando-se em consideração que as lutas pelas fronteiras entre ambas fazem parte da própria legitimidade que a escrita da história vai constituindo para si mesma. Serão feitas algumas comparações entre a escrita de José de Alencar e a de outros romancistas, no sentido de mapear disputas e na perspectiva de perceber como a literatura foi se afirmando como o “outro” da “escrita da história”.Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2015-09-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/81510.15848/hh.v0i18.815História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 8 No. 18 (2015)História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 8 Núm. 18 (2015)História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 8 n. 18 (2015)1983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPporhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/815/572Ramos, Francisco Régis Lopesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-05-02T02:38:11Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/815Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2020-05-02T02:38:11História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and Literature
José de Alencar e a operação historiográfica: fronteiras e disputas entre história e literatura
title José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and Literature
spellingShingle José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and Literature
Ramos, Francisco Régis Lopes
History
Literature
Narratives
Historia
Literatura
Narrativas
História
Literatura
Narrativas
title_short José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and Literature
title_full José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and Literature
title_fullStr José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and Literature
title_full_unstemmed José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and Literature
title_sort José de Alencar and the Historiographical Operation: Borders and Disputes between History and Literature
author Ramos, Francisco Régis Lopes
author_facet Ramos, Francisco Régis Lopes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Francisco Régis Lopes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv History
Literature
Narratives
Historia
Literatura
Narrativas
História
Literatura
Narrativas
topic History
Literature
Narratives
Historia
Literatura
Narrativas
História
Literatura
Narrativas
description Based on Michel de Certeau’s interrogations about the “historiographical operation”, this article examines the ways in which José de Alencar sought to legitimize his way of making the past an object of knowledge. We comprehend, thus, that novelists have also undertaken the task of understanding the past. And in addition to this fact, or underlying it, novelists came to rival the alleged circumscription that historians were establishing. In this sense, we intend to approach how José de Alencar’s writing partook in those strains, which started to be strengthened in the 19th century, turning history into the “other” of literature and literature into the “other” of history. Some clashes between history and literature will be examined, considering that the struggles for boundaries between history and literature are part of the very legitimacy that the writing of history constitutes for itself. Some comparisons will be made between José de Alencar’s writing and that of other novelists, in order to chart disputes and identify the perspective of realizing how literature came to assert itself as the “other” of “history writing”.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/815
10.15848/hh.v0i18.815
url https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/815
identifier_str_mv 10.15848/hh.v0i18.815
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/815/572
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 8 No. 18 (2015)
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 8 Núm. 18 (2015)
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 8 n. 18 (2015)
1983-9928
reponame:História da Historiografia
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str História da Historiografia
collection História da Historiografia
repository.name.fl_str_mv História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com
_version_ 1797220358584008704