The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garcia, Luiz Carlos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Fonseca, Alberto de Freitas Castro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFOP
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/10749
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479718305036?via%3Dihub
Resumo: Scholars have long been highlighting the value of administrative sanctions in improving environmental policy enforcement. However, few studies have evaluated how such sanctions are implemented, particularly in the context of environmental impact assessments (EIA) and their respective follow-up programs. The main objective of this article was to evaluate how administrative sanctions have been used in EIA follow-ups, using the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais as the empirical context. More specifically it tried to understand what have been the main triggers, frequency, nature and financial values of the sanctions issued to noncompliant mining projects operating under the conditions of environmental licenses. First, through literature reviews, the study characterized the institutional and regulatory framework in which administrative sanctions are applied. Content analyzes of 29 infraction processes further revealed that lump sum fines are the preferred option of administrative sanction in EIA followups. The analysis also revealed that the fines could be perceived as disproportionally small if one considers the size and financial power of non-compliant companies. The great majority of the fines were paid by developers: a fact that contradicts previous empirical findings and anecdotal evidence in Brazil. Overall, the study suggests that the impact of administrative sanctions in corporate behavior, while unclear, is likely small. The study concludes by discussing practical and academic implications.
id UFOP_09a1a76f5076d09ffe0b0cfa1bad3d2e
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:123456789/10749
network_acronym_str UFOP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
repository_id_str 3233
spelling Garcia, Luiz CarlosFonseca, Alberto de Freitas Castro2019-02-22T14:30:26Z2019-02-22T14:30:26Z2018GARCIA, L. C.; FONSECA, A. de F. C. The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 219, p. 46-55, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479718305036?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.03014797http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/10749https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479718305036?via%3DihubScholars have long been highlighting the value of administrative sanctions in improving environmental policy enforcement. However, few studies have evaluated how such sanctions are implemented, particularly in the context of environmental impact assessments (EIA) and their respective follow-up programs. The main objective of this article was to evaluate how administrative sanctions have been used in EIA follow-ups, using the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais as the empirical context. More specifically it tried to understand what have been the main triggers, frequency, nature and financial values of the sanctions issued to noncompliant mining projects operating under the conditions of environmental licenses. First, through literature reviews, the study characterized the institutional and regulatory framework in which administrative sanctions are applied. Content analyzes of 29 infraction processes further revealed that lump sum fines are the preferred option of administrative sanction in EIA followups. The analysis also revealed that the fines could be perceived as disproportionally small if one considers the size and financial power of non-compliant companies. The great majority of the fines were paid by developers: a fact that contradicts previous empirical findings and anecdotal evidence in Brazil. Overall, the study suggests that the impact of administrative sanctions in corporate behavior, while unclear, is likely small. The study concludes by discussing practical and academic implications.Environmental policy enforcementAdministrative sanctionsEnvironmental impact assessment - EIAEIA follow-upBrazilThe use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOPinstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8924http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/bitstream/123456789/10749/2/license.txt62604f8d955274beb56c80ce1ee5dcaeMD52ORIGINALARTIGO_UseAdministrativeSanctions.pdfARTIGO_UseAdministrativeSanctions.pdfapplication/pdf734163http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/bitstream/123456789/10749/1/ARTIGO_UseAdministrativeSanctions.pdf321a8e68c62674a9c91189c8f6fead27MD51123456789/107492019-02-22 09:30:26.149oai:localhost: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ório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/oai/requestrepositorio@ufop.edu.bropendoar:32332019-02-22T14:30:26Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.
title The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.
spellingShingle The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.
Garcia, Luiz Carlos
Environmental policy enforcement
Administrative sanctions
Environmental impact assessment - EIA
EIA follow-up
Brazil
title_short The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.
title_full The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.
title_fullStr The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.
title_full_unstemmed The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.
title_sort The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups.
author Garcia, Luiz Carlos
author_facet Garcia, Luiz Carlos
Fonseca, Alberto de Freitas Castro
author_role author
author2 Fonseca, Alberto de Freitas Castro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garcia, Luiz Carlos
Fonseca, Alberto de Freitas Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environmental policy enforcement
Administrative sanctions
Environmental impact assessment - EIA
EIA follow-up
Brazil
topic Environmental policy enforcement
Administrative sanctions
Environmental impact assessment - EIA
EIA follow-up
Brazil
description Scholars have long been highlighting the value of administrative sanctions in improving environmental policy enforcement. However, few studies have evaluated how such sanctions are implemented, particularly in the context of environmental impact assessments (EIA) and their respective follow-up programs. The main objective of this article was to evaluate how administrative sanctions have been used in EIA follow-ups, using the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais as the empirical context. More specifically it tried to understand what have been the main triggers, frequency, nature and financial values of the sanctions issued to noncompliant mining projects operating under the conditions of environmental licenses. First, through literature reviews, the study characterized the institutional and regulatory framework in which administrative sanctions are applied. Content analyzes of 29 infraction processes further revealed that lump sum fines are the preferred option of administrative sanction in EIA followups. The analysis also revealed that the fines could be perceived as disproportionally small if one considers the size and financial power of non-compliant companies. The great majority of the fines were paid by developers: a fact that contradicts previous empirical findings and anecdotal evidence in Brazil. Overall, the study suggests that the impact of administrative sanctions in corporate behavior, while unclear, is likely small. The study concludes by discussing practical and academic implications.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-02-22T14:30:26Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-02-22T14:30:26Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv GARCIA, L. C.; FONSECA, A. de F. C. The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 219, p. 46-55, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479718305036?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/10749
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 03014797
dc.identifier.uri2.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479718305036?via%3Dihub
identifier_str_mv GARCIA, L. C.; FONSECA, A. de F. C. The use of administrative sanctions to prevent environmental damage in impact assessment follow-ups. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 219, p. 46-55, 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479718305036?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2019.
03014797
url http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/10749
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479718305036?via%3Dihub
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOP
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
collection Repositório Institucional da UFOP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/bitstream/123456789/10749/2/license.txt
http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/bitstream/123456789/10749/1/ARTIGO_UseAdministrativeSanctions.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 62604f8d955274beb56c80ce1ee5dcae
321a8e68c62674a9c91189c8f6fead27
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufop.edu.br
_version_ 1797950201633177600