Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posteriores
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca |
Texto Completo: | http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/2220 |
Resumo: | Composite restorations are daily performed in dental offices; however, few studies have reported the longevity of these restorations for long periods of observation. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of resin composite restorations placed in anterior and posterior teeth in the period between the years 1991 and 2001. From the files of a private dental clinic, 83 patients who received 375 restorations in posterior teeth and 61 patients with 237 restorations in anterior teeth with the composites Charisma (Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany), Herculite XR (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) or Z100 (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) participated in the study, being examined by two calibrated researchers. The restorations were evaluated according to the FDI criteria (World Dental Federation, HICKEL et al., 2007). After the fieldwork, data were double tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis using Stata version 11.0. Descriptive statistics were used to report the frequency of distribution of the restorations for the variables evaluated and for the causes of failures. The survival analyzes were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, to obtain the survival curves for the variables of interest, followed by the Log-Rank test for comparison between groups (α=0.05). The analysis of factors associated with failure over time was performed using a model of multivariate analysis by Cox regression with shared fragility. Of the total of 612 restorations, 69 were considered unsatisfactory. The annual failure rate observed at the final of the period was 0.76 to anterior teeth and 1.16 to posterior teeth. The aesthetic factor was the major cause in the anterior teeth, while in posterior were the fractures. Regarding the material, the composite Herculite was significantly better than Z100 and this better than Charisma. Restorations with the largest number of surfaces involved had the worst performance. The result of this study showed a satisfactory clinical performance. In relation of the material, the composite Herculite was significantly better than the Z100 and this better than Charisma. The restorations with the highest number of surfaces involved had the worst performance |
id |
UFPL_d020c27cb4541c12ab92bba765641d85 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br:123456789/2220 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPL |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4416236Z3http://lattes.cnpq.br/5439768560638141Jardim, Patrícia dos Santoshttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4731483J3Demarco, Flávio FernandoBaldissera, Rudimar Antônio2014-08-20T14:30:05Z2014-01-272014-08-20T14:30:05Z2012-09-14BALDISSERA, Rudimar Antonio. Clinical evaluation of composite restorations in anterior and posterior teeth. 2012. 83 f. Tese (Doutorado em Odontologia) - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, 2012.http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/2220Composite restorations are daily performed in dental offices; however, few studies have reported the longevity of these restorations for long periods of observation. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of resin composite restorations placed in anterior and posterior teeth in the period between the years 1991 and 2001. From the files of a private dental clinic, 83 patients who received 375 restorations in posterior teeth and 61 patients with 237 restorations in anterior teeth with the composites Charisma (Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany), Herculite XR (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) or Z100 (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) participated in the study, being examined by two calibrated researchers. The restorations were evaluated according to the FDI criteria (World Dental Federation, HICKEL et al., 2007). After the fieldwork, data were double tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis using Stata version 11.0. Descriptive statistics were used to report the frequency of distribution of the restorations for the variables evaluated and for the causes of failures. The survival analyzes were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, to obtain the survival curves for the variables of interest, followed by the Log-Rank test for comparison between groups (α=0.05). The analysis of factors associated with failure over time was performed using a model of multivariate analysis by Cox regression with shared fragility. Of the total of 612 restorations, 69 were considered unsatisfactory. The annual failure rate observed at the final of the period was 0.76 to anterior teeth and 1.16 to posterior teeth. The aesthetic factor was the major cause in the anterior teeth, while in posterior were the fractures. Regarding the material, the composite Herculite was significantly better than Z100 and this better than Charisma. Restorations with the largest number of surfaces involved had the worst performance. The result of this study showed a satisfactory clinical performance. In relation of the material, the composite Herculite was significantly better than the Z100 and this better than Charisma. The restorations with the highest number of surfaces involved had the worst performanceRestaurações de resina composta são confeccionadas diariamente nos consultórios odontológicos, porém poucos estudos reportam a longevidade destas restaurações por longos períodos de observação. Este estudo foi realizado para avaliar o desempenho clínico de restaurações de resina composta inseridas em dentes anteriores e posteriores no período de 1991 a 2001. A partir da verificação de prontuários do arquivo de uma clínica odontológica privada, 83 pacientes que receberam 375 restaurações em dentes posteriores e 61 pacientes com 237 restaurações em dentes anteriores com os compósitos Charisma (Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Alemanha), Herculite XR (Kerr, Orange, CA, EUA) ou Z100 (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, EUA) participaram do estudo e foram examinados por dois pesquisadores calibrados. As restaurações foram avaliadas de acordo com os critérios de avaliação clínica de restaurações propostos pela FDI (Federação Dentária Internacional) . Após o trabalho de campo, os dados foram tabulados por 2 digitalizadores e submetidos à análise estatística usando o Stata versão 11.0. Estatística descritiva foi usada para reportar a frequência de distribuição de restaurações para as variáveis avaliadas e para as causas de falhas. As análises de sobrevida foram realizadas pelo método de Kaplan Meier, para a obtenção das curvas de sobrevida para as variáveis de interesse, seguido do teste Log-Rank, para comparação entre grupos (α=0,05). A análise de fatores associados a falha ao longo do tempo foi realizada através de modelo de análise multivariável por regressão de Cox com fragilidade compartilhada. Do total das 612 restaurações, 69 foram consideradas insatisfatórias. A taxa de falha anual observada no final, foi de 0,76 para os dentes anteriores e de 1,16 para os posteriores. O fator estético foi a principal causa nos dentes anteriores enquanto que nos posteriores as fraturas., Em relação ao material a resina Herculite mostrou-se significantemente melhor que a Z100 e esta melhor que a Charisma. As restaurações com o maior número de faces envolvidas tiveram o pior desempenho. O resultado deste estudo mostrou que os compósitos apresentaram um bom desempenho clínico tanto em dentes posteriores quanto em anteriores, no acompanhamento a longo prazoapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de PelotasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em OdontologiaUFPelBROdontologiaEstudo clínicoLongevidadeRestaurações posterioresResina compostaRestaurações anterioresSecondary cariesClinical trialFailureFractureLongevityResin compositeAnterior restorationsPosterior restorationsSurvivalCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIAAvaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posterioresClinical evaluation of composite restorations in anterior and posterior teethinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiacainstname:Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)instacron:UFPELORIGINALtese Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdfapplication/pdf912046http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2220/1/tese%20Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf2e67255564e6053c35182672be9085fdMD51open accessTEXTtese Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf.txttese Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain127126http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2220/2/tese%20Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf.txt1ae29f64bcc5852ffe9c4199665bba4bMD52open accessTHUMBNAILtese Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf.jpgtese Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1863http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2220/3/tese%20Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf.jpg86e6e416923058a9fea9d34c87aeb564MD53open access123456789/22202023-06-19 18:45:47.525open accessoai:guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br:123456789/2220Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufpel.edu.br/oai/requestrippel@ufpel.edu.br || repositorio@ufpel.edu.br || aline.batista@ufpel.edu.bropendoar:2023-06-19T21:45:47Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca - Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posteriores |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Clinical evaluation of composite restorations in anterior and posterior teeth |
title |
Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posteriores |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posteriores Baldissera, Rudimar Antônio Estudo clínico Longevidade Restaurações posteriores Resina composta Restaurações anteriores Secondary caries Clinical trial Failure Fracture Longevity Resin composite Anterior restorations Posterior restorations Survival CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA |
title_short |
Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posteriores |
title_full |
Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posteriores |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posteriores |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posteriores |
title_sort |
Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina composta em dentes anteriores e posteriores |
author |
Baldissera, Rudimar Antônio |
author_facet |
Baldissera, Rudimar Antônio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.por.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4416236Z3 |
dc.contributor.advisorLattes.por.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5439768560638141 |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Jardim, Patrícia dos Santos |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4731483J3 |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Demarco, Flávio Fernando |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Baldissera, Rudimar Antônio |
contributor_str_mv |
Jardim, Patrícia dos Santos Demarco, Flávio Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Estudo clínico Longevidade Restaurações posteriores Resina composta Restaurações anteriores |
topic |
Estudo clínico Longevidade Restaurações posteriores Resina composta Restaurações anteriores Secondary caries Clinical trial Failure Fracture Longevity Resin composite Anterior restorations Posterior restorations Survival CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Secondary caries Clinical trial Failure Fracture Longevity Resin composite Anterior restorations Posterior restorations Survival |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA |
description |
Composite restorations are daily performed in dental offices; however, few studies have reported the longevity of these restorations for long periods of observation. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of resin composite restorations placed in anterior and posterior teeth in the period between the years 1991 and 2001. From the files of a private dental clinic, 83 patients who received 375 restorations in posterior teeth and 61 patients with 237 restorations in anterior teeth with the composites Charisma (Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany), Herculite XR (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) or Z100 (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) participated in the study, being examined by two calibrated researchers. The restorations were evaluated according to the FDI criteria (World Dental Federation, HICKEL et al., 2007). After the fieldwork, data were double tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis using Stata version 11.0. Descriptive statistics were used to report the frequency of distribution of the restorations for the variables evaluated and for the causes of failures. The survival analyzes were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, to obtain the survival curves for the variables of interest, followed by the Log-Rank test for comparison between groups (α=0.05). The analysis of factors associated with failure over time was performed using a model of multivariate analysis by Cox regression with shared fragility. Of the total of 612 restorations, 69 were considered unsatisfactory. The annual failure rate observed at the final of the period was 0.76 to anterior teeth and 1.16 to posterior teeth. The aesthetic factor was the major cause in the anterior teeth, while in posterior were the fractures. Regarding the material, the composite Herculite was significantly better than Z100 and this better than Charisma. Restorations with the largest number of surfaces involved had the worst performance. The result of this study showed a satisfactory clinical performance. In relation of the material, the composite Herculite was significantly better than the Z100 and this better than Charisma. The restorations with the highest number of surfaces involved had the worst performance |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-14 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2014-08-20T14:30:05Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-27 2014-08-20T14:30:05Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
BALDISSERA, Rudimar Antonio. Clinical evaluation of composite restorations in anterior and posterior teeth. 2012. 83 f. Tese (Doutorado em Odontologia) - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, 2012. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/2220 |
identifier_str_mv |
BALDISSERA, Rudimar Antonio. Clinical evaluation of composite restorations in anterior and posterior teeth. 2012. 83 f. Tese (Doutorado em Odontologia) - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, 2012. |
url |
http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/2220 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Pelotas |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFPel |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Odontologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Pelotas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca instname:Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL) instacron:UFPEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL) |
instacron_str |
UFPEL |
institution |
UFPEL |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2220/1/tese%20Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2220/2/tese%20Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf.txt http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2220/3/tese%20Rudimar_Antonio_Baldissera.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
2e67255564e6053c35182672be9085fd 1ae29f64bcc5852ffe9c4199665bba4b 86e6e416923058a9fea9d34c87aeb564 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca - Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rippel@ufpel.edu.br || repositorio@ufpel.edu.br || aline.batista@ufpel.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797767485693362176 |