Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Ideusa Celestino
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/603
Resumo: In this article we approach the cosmologic theme dominant on the second half of the XVI century. Polarized in two antagonic positions: the geocentrism supporters, who defended the aristotelian-ptolemaic’s descriptive model, and the copernicans who defended the idea of a heliocentric cosmos. To present this debate we base ourselves in PLATO, 2001; ARISTOTLE, 2002; COPERNIC, 2009 and BRUNO, 2012; in an hermeneutic reading of the cosmologic discussion presented by these authors.  In face of this two descriptive views of the cosmos we take interest in investigate which position Giordano Bruno held in this scenario. In his works Bruno presents himself as a contumacious critic of the geocentrism, related directed this description to Aristotle, and as a defender of the copernican heliocentrism. The cosmologic debate of Giordano Bruno is displayed in many works, among them we can mention The Ash Wednesday Supper published in 1584 and L’immenso e gli innumerevoli in 1592. Bruno’s refusal of the aristotelianism is very incisive, but the same strength doesn't seem to be applied to the Copernican cosmological model. With that in mind we wonder what may justify the formulation of Giordano Bruno’s praise, with reservations, to Corpernic. It’s concluded then that, in spite of the proximity with the Copernican heliocentrism, is not possible to characterize Bruno as a Copernican.  Copernic remained attached to the concepts of the last sphere, hierarchical universe, for instance, definititions that are refuted by Bruno. Giordano Bruno’s cosmos is infinity, homogeneous and populated by uncountable worlds. These concepts were not inserted in the Copernican heliocentric cosmos.
id UFRB-4_37a8c7bb8144aa945a0fe1bed322028a
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/603
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrismGiordano Bruno: entre o geocentrismo e o heliocentrismoGeocentrismo; Heliocentrismo; Universo; Infinito; Homogêneo.Geocentrism; Heliocentrism; Universe; Infinity; HomogeneousIn this article we approach the cosmologic theme dominant on the second half of the XVI century. Polarized in two antagonic positions: the geocentrism supporters, who defended the aristotelian-ptolemaic’s descriptive model, and the copernicans who defended the idea of a heliocentric cosmos. To present this debate we base ourselves in PLATO, 2001; ARISTOTLE, 2002; COPERNIC, 2009 and BRUNO, 2012; in an hermeneutic reading of the cosmologic discussion presented by these authors.  In face of this two descriptive views of the cosmos we take interest in investigate which position Giordano Bruno held in this scenario. In his works Bruno presents himself as a contumacious critic of the geocentrism, related directed this description to Aristotle, and as a defender of the copernican heliocentrism. The cosmologic debate of Giordano Bruno is displayed in many works, among them we can mention The Ash Wednesday Supper published in 1584 and L’immenso e gli innumerevoli in 1592. Bruno’s refusal of the aristotelianism is very incisive, but the same strength doesn't seem to be applied to the Copernican cosmological model. With that in mind we wonder what may justify the formulation of Giordano Bruno’s praise, with reservations, to Corpernic. It’s concluded then that, in spite of the proximity with the Copernican heliocentrism, is not possible to characterize Bruno as a Copernican.  Copernic remained attached to the concepts of the last sphere, hierarchical universe, for instance, definititions that are refuted by Bruno. Giordano Bruno’s cosmos is infinity, homogeneous and populated by uncountable worlds. These concepts were not inserted in the Copernican heliocentric cosmos.Neste artigo abordamos a temática cosmológica dominante na segunda metade do século XVI. Polarizada entre duas posições antagônicas: os partidários do geocentrismo, que se apoiavam no modelo descritivo aristotélico-ptolomaico, e os copernicanos que defendiam um cosmo heliocêntrico. Para desenvolver esse debate nos apoiamos em PLATAO, 2001; ARISTÓTELES, 2002 e COPÉRNICO, 2009, BRUNO, 2012; numa leitura hermenêutica da discussão cosmológica apresentada por esses autores. Diante desses dois víeis descritivos do cosmo nos interessava investigar qual a posição adotada por Giordano Bruno diante desse contexto. Bruno, nos seus textos se apresenta como um crítico contumaz do geocentrismo, relacionando diretamente tal descrição a Aristóteles, e como um defensor do heliocentrismo copernicano. O debate cosmológico bruniano é expostos em várias obras, entre elas podemos citar A ceia das Cinzas publicada em 1584 e L’immenso e gli innumerevoli de 1592. O antiaristotelismo de Bruno é bastante contundente, mas o mesmo vigor não aparece ao tratar o modelo cosmológico copernicano. Nos perguntamos, então, o que justificava a elaboração do elogio bruniano, com ressalvas, a Copérnico. Concluímos que, apesar da aproximação com o heliocentrismo copernicano, não é possível caracterizar Bruno como um copernicano. Copérnico permaneceu atrelado aos conceito de última esfera, de universo hierarquizado, por exemplo, definições que são refutadas por Bruno. O cosmo bruniano é infinito, homogêneo e povoado de inumeráveis mundos. Esses conceitos não estão presentes no cosmo heliocêntrico copernicano.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2014-06-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/60310.31977/grirfi.v9i1.603Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 9 n. 1 (2014); 1-252178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/603/319Copyright (c) 2014 Ideusa Celestino Lopesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes, Ideusa Celestino2020-06-30T18:18:07Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/603Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:18:07Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrism
Giordano Bruno: entre o geocentrismo e o heliocentrismo
title Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrism
spellingShingle Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrism
Lopes, Ideusa Celestino
Geocentrismo; Heliocentrismo; Universo; Infinito; Homogêneo.
Geocentrism; Heliocentrism; Universe; Infinity; Homogeneous
title_short Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrism
title_full Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrism
title_fullStr Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrism
title_full_unstemmed Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrism
title_sort Giordano Bruno: between geocentrism and heliocentrism
author Lopes, Ideusa Celestino
author_facet Lopes, Ideusa Celestino
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes, Ideusa Celestino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Geocentrismo; Heliocentrismo; Universo; Infinito; Homogêneo.
Geocentrism; Heliocentrism; Universe; Infinity; Homogeneous
topic Geocentrismo; Heliocentrismo; Universo; Infinito; Homogêneo.
Geocentrism; Heliocentrism; Universe; Infinity; Homogeneous
description In this article we approach the cosmologic theme dominant on the second half of the XVI century. Polarized in two antagonic positions: the geocentrism supporters, who defended the aristotelian-ptolemaic’s descriptive model, and the copernicans who defended the idea of a heliocentric cosmos. To present this debate we base ourselves in PLATO, 2001; ARISTOTLE, 2002; COPERNIC, 2009 and BRUNO, 2012; in an hermeneutic reading of the cosmologic discussion presented by these authors.  In face of this two descriptive views of the cosmos we take interest in investigate which position Giordano Bruno held in this scenario. In his works Bruno presents himself as a contumacious critic of the geocentrism, related directed this description to Aristotle, and as a defender of the copernican heliocentrism. The cosmologic debate of Giordano Bruno is displayed in many works, among them we can mention The Ash Wednesday Supper published in 1584 and L’immenso e gli innumerevoli in 1592. Bruno’s refusal of the aristotelianism is very incisive, but the same strength doesn't seem to be applied to the Copernican cosmological model. With that in mind we wonder what may justify the formulation of Giordano Bruno’s praise, with reservations, to Corpernic. It’s concluded then that, in spite of the proximity with the Copernican heliocentrism, is not possible to characterize Bruno as a Copernican.  Copernic remained attached to the concepts of the last sphere, hierarchical universe, for instance, definititions that are refuted by Bruno. Giordano Bruno’s cosmos is infinity, homogeneous and populated by uncountable worlds. These concepts were not inserted in the Copernican heliocentric cosmos.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/603
10.31977/grirfi.v9i1.603
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/603
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v9i1.603
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/603/319
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Ideusa Celestino Lopes
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Ideusa Celestino Lopes
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 9 n. 1 (2014); 1-25
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732698550665216