Rousseau and the paradox of censorship

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Júnior, José Benedito de Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Tomaz, Loyana Christian de Lima, Castro, Luciana Xavier de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the apparent contradiction between the institution of censorship in the Social Contract of Rousseau and the censorship he suffered in Geneva and Paris. With this aim, we will analyze the concept of censorship in the Social Contract and the Rousseau’s arguments in the works: Letters of the Mountain and the Letter to Christophe Beaumont, supported in the work of some experts on Rousseau's political work. Our studies allow us to conclude Jean-Jacques Rousseau does in fact, admit the possibility of censorship; however, the action of the censors must be restricted by public opinion, just like the prince’s actions by the laws. In addition, if there is a similar process it should meet all the requirements of the civil law of the State where censorship takes place. Both in Paris and in Geneva Rousseau disagrees with the way they dealt with him and his works.
id UFRB-4_b309ee1380b03fb32c10ec9248fc3448
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/978
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling Rousseau and the paradox of censorshipRousseau e o paradoxo da censuraCensura; Filosofia; Política; Religião; Rousseau.Censorship; Philosophy; Politics; Religion; Rousseau.This article aims to analyze the apparent contradiction between the institution of censorship in the Social Contract of Rousseau and the censorship he suffered in Geneva and Paris. With this aim, we will analyze the concept of censorship in the Social Contract and the Rousseau’s arguments in the works: Letters of the Mountain and the Letter to Christophe Beaumont, supported in the work of some experts on Rousseau's political work. Our studies allow us to conclude Jean-Jacques Rousseau does in fact, admit the possibility of censorship; however, the action of the censors must be restricted by public opinion, just like the prince’s actions by the laws. In addition, if there is a similar process it should meet all the requirements of the civil law of the State where censorship takes place. Both in Paris and in Geneva Rousseau disagrees with the way they dealt with him and his works.Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar a aparente contradição entre a instituição da censura no Contrato Social de Rousseau e a censura que sofreu em Genebra e Paris. Para tanto analisaremos o conceito de censura no Contrato Social e os argumentos utilizados por Rousseau nas obras Cartas escritas da Montanha e a Carta à Christophe Beaumont, com apoio na obra de alguns comentadores da obra política de Rousseau. Nossos estudos nos levam a concluir que Jean-Jacques Rousseau admite, de fato, a possibilidade da instituição da censura, no entanto, a ação dos censores deve ser restrita pela opinião pública, tal como a do príncipe em relação às leis. Além disso, se há um processo semelhante deveria atender todos os requisitos da legislação civil do Estado no qual ocorre. Tanto em Paris, como em Genebra Rousseau discorda do modo como procederam em relação às suas obras e sua pessoa.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2018-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/97810.31977/grirfi.v18i2.978Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2018); 176-1862178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978/586Copyright (c) 2018 José Benedito de Almeida Júnior, Loyana Christian de Lima Tomaz, Luciana Xavier de Castroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJúnior, José Benedito de AlmeidaTomaz, Loyana Christian de LimaCastro, Luciana Xavier de2020-06-30T18:14:25Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/978Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:14:25Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
Rousseau e o paradoxo da censura
title Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
spellingShingle Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
Júnior, José Benedito de Almeida
Censura; Filosofia; Política; Religião; Rousseau.
Censorship; Philosophy; Politics; Religion; Rousseau.
title_short Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
title_full Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
title_fullStr Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
title_full_unstemmed Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
title_sort Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
author Júnior, José Benedito de Almeida
author_facet Júnior, José Benedito de Almeida
Tomaz, Loyana Christian de Lima
Castro, Luciana Xavier de
author_role author
author2 Tomaz, Loyana Christian de Lima
Castro, Luciana Xavier de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Júnior, José Benedito de Almeida
Tomaz, Loyana Christian de Lima
Castro, Luciana Xavier de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Censura; Filosofia; Política; Religião; Rousseau.
Censorship; Philosophy; Politics; Religion; Rousseau.
topic Censura; Filosofia; Política; Religião; Rousseau.
Censorship; Philosophy; Politics; Religion; Rousseau.
description This article aims to analyze the apparent contradiction between the institution of censorship in the Social Contract of Rousseau and the censorship he suffered in Geneva and Paris. With this aim, we will analyze the concept of censorship in the Social Contract and the Rousseau’s arguments in the works: Letters of the Mountain and the Letter to Christophe Beaumont, supported in the work of some experts on Rousseau's political work. Our studies allow us to conclude Jean-Jacques Rousseau does in fact, admit the possibility of censorship; however, the action of the censors must be restricted by public opinion, just like the prince’s actions by the laws. In addition, if there is a similar process it should meet all the requirements of the civil law of the State where censorship takes place. Both in Paris and in Geneva Rousseau disagrees with the way they dealt with him and his works.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978
10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.978
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.978
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978/586
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2018); 176-186
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732699538423808

Registros relacionados