Aspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felino

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ehlers, Luiza Presser
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Slaviero, Mônica, Vargas, Thainã Piccolo, Argenta, Fernando Froner, Driemeier, David, Costa, Fernanda Vieira Amorim da, Pavarini, Saulo Petinatti, Sonne, Luciana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/204144
Resumo: Background: The feline eosinophilic granuloma complex (FEGC) includes a group of lesions that affect the skin, mucocutaneous junctions, and oral cavity of cats. It comprises three distinct clinical entities: the eosinophilic ulcer (EU), the eosinophilic plaque (EP) and the eosinophilic granuloma (EG). The EU is usually found in the upper lip. Lesions of EP occur most commonly on the abdomen and medial thigh. The EG lesions usually appear on the tongue and hard palate. The aim of this study is to describe the localization and pathological findings of FEGC through a retrospective study and testing by immunohistochemistry if feline herpesvirus type 1 (FHV-1) infection may be associated. Materials, Methods & Results: The records of biopsy specimens from the Department of Veterinary Pathology of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul were recovered and cats diagnosed with FEGC were selected since January 2006 to December 2017. General data, such as age, sex, breed and distribution lesions, were analyzed and compiled. The histological slides were reviewed by optical microscopy and the microscopic findings were detailed. Sections of tissue were used in immunohistochemistry to investigate the presence of feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) using anti-FHV-1 antibody. In this study, 30 cats were diagnosed with FEGC. Most part of the cats were mixed breed (27/30), and there were no sex predisposition. The age of the cats ranged from seven months to 13 years old, and the median was three years. The lesion distribution of FEGC was 40% in oral cavity, 33.3% in skin and 26.6% in mucocutaneous junction. Histologically, the main lesion of all distributions was characterized by diffuse dermal/submucosa inflammatory infiltrate composed of eosinophils. Within the inflammation there were large irregular foci of collagen fibers and degranulated and degenerating eosinophil (“flame figures”). Oftentimes these foci were surrounded by macrophages and fewer multinucleated histiocytic giant cells. There were mild to moderate inflammatory infiltrate of mast cells, lymphocytes and plasm cells in dermis and submucosa. Ulceration of epidermis and mucosa were observed in majority of FEGC lesions with inflammatory infiltrate of neutrophils. All cases were negative for FHV-1 in the immunohistochemical evaluation. Discussion: In this study, feline eosinophilic granuloma complex was uncommon, accounting 0.96% of the feline cases diagnosticated in 15 years. Agreeing with the other authors, there was no sex and breed predilection. The median of age were three years old, some authors report higher occurrence in young animals and associated with genetic predisposition. Histologically, the most frequent findings were submucous and dermal inflammatory infiltrate composed primarily of eosinophils associated with areas of “flame figures”. Surrounded these areas, there were intense inflammatory infiltrate composed of macrophages, palisading macrophages and fewer multinucleated histiocytic giant cells as previously described by other authors. The ulceration of epidermis and mucosa was a common finding of eosinophilic granuloma complex lesions especially in cases where the oral cavity was affected. In this study, we could not evaluate the presence of FHV-1 in feline cases of eosinophilic granuloma complex. The area commonly affected in cases of FEGC was the oral mucosa. It may be due to differentiate from other diseases that affect the same area. Feline eosinophilic granuloma complex are important differential diagnosis for other diseases that include neoplasms, especially squamous cell carcinoma.
id UFRGS-2_0d5b60040e065e5e1263375917c58859
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/204144
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Ehlers, Luiza PresserSlaviero, MônicaVargas, Thainã PiccoloArgenta, Fernando FronerDriemeier, DavidCosta, Fernanda Vieira Amorim daPavarini, Saulo PetinattiSonne, Luciana2020-01-14T04:15:49Z20191678-0345http://hdl.handle.net/10183/204144001109026Background: The feline eosinophilic granuloma complex (FEGC) includes a group of lesions that affect the skin, mucocutaneous junctions, and oral cavity of cats. It comprises three distinct clinical entities: the eosinophilic ulcer (EU), the eosinophilic plaque (EP) and the eosinophilic granuloma (EG). The EU is usually found in the upper lip. Lesions of EP occur most commonly on the abdomen and medial thigh. The EG lesions usually appear on the tongue and hard palate. The aim of this study is to describe the localization and pathological findings of FEGC through a retrospective study and testing by immunohistochemistry if feline herpesvirus type 1 (FHV-1) infection may be associated. Materials, Methods & Results: The records of biopsy specimens from the Department of Veterinary Pathology of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul were recovered and cats diagnosed with FEGC were selected since January 2006 to December 2017. General data, such as age, sex, breed and distribution lesions, were analyzed and compiled. The histological slides were reviewed by optical microscopy and the microscopic findings were detailed. Sections of tissue were used in immunohistochemistry to investigate the presence of feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) using anti-FHV-1 antibody. In this study, 30 cats were diagnosed with FEGC. Most part of the cats were mixed breed (27/30), and there were no sex predisposition. The age of the cats ranged from seven months to 13 years old, and the median was three years. The lesion distribution of FEGC was 40% in oral cavity, 33.3% in skin and 26.6% in mucocutaneous junction. Histologically, the main lesion of all distributions was characterized by diffuse dermal/submucosa inflammatory infiltrate composed of eosinophils. Within the inflammation there were large irregular foci of collagen fibers and degranulated and degenerating eosinophil (“flame figures”). Oftentimes these foci were surrounded by macrophages and fewer multinucleated histiocytic giant cells. There were mild to moderate inflammatory infiltrate of mast cells, lymphocytes and plasm cells in dermis and submucosa. Ulceration of epidermis and mucosa were observed in majority of FEGC lesions with inflammatory infiltrate of neutrophils. All cases were negative for FHV-1 in the immunohistochemical evaluation. Discussion: In this study, feline eosinophilic granuloma complex was uncommon, accounting 0.96% of the feline cases diagnosticated in 15 years. Agreeing with the other authors, there was no sex and breed predilection. The median of age were three years old, some authors report higher occurrence in young animals and associated with genetic predisposition. Histologically, the most frequent findings were submucous and dermal inflammatory infiltrate composed primarily of eosinophils associated with areas of “flame figures”. Surrounded these areas, there were intense inflammatory infiltrate composed of macrophages, palisading macrophages and fewer multinucleated histiocytic giant cells as previously described by other authors. The ulceration of epidermis and mucosa was a common finding of eosinophilic granuloma complex lesions especially in cases where the oral cavity was affected. In this study, we could not evaluate the presence of FHV-1 in feline cases of eosinophilic granuloma complex. The area commonly affected in cases of FEGC was the oral mucosa. It may be due to differentiate from other diseases that affect the same area. Feline eosinophilic granuloma complex are important differential diagnosis for other diseases that include neoplasms, especially squamous cell carcinoma.application/pdfporActa scientiae veterinariae. Porto Alegre, RS. Vol. 47 (2019), Pub. 1716, 7 p.Granuloma eosinófiloFelinosEpidemiologiaDiagnóstico diferencialEosinophilic granuloma complexFelineHistopathologyAspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felinoEpidemiologic and pathologic aspects of feline eosinophilic granuloma complex info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001109026.pdf.txt001109026.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain27316http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/204144/2/001109026.pdf.txtcaff738749922e4708d235503a3cf876MD52ORIGINAL001109026.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf1310492http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/204144/1/001109026.pdfa68ae45e6974c4346cd2343b3143b5feMD5110183/2041442020-01-15 05:16:27.658216oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/204144Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-01-15T07:16:27Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Aspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felino
dc.title.alternative.en.fl_str_mv Epidemiologic and pathologic aspects of feline eosinophilic granuloma complex
title Aspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felino
spellingShingle Aspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felino
Ehlers, Luiza Presser
Granuloma eosinófilo
Felinos
Epidemiologia
Diagnóstico diferencial
Eosinophilic granuloma complex
Feline
Histopathology
title_short Aspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felino
title_full Aspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felino
title_fullStr Aspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felino
title_full_unstemmed Aspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felino
title_sort Aspectos epidemiológicos e patológicos do complexo granuloma eosinofílico felino
author Ehlers, Luiza Presser
author_facet Ehlers, Luiza Presser
Slaviero, Mônica
Vargas, Thainã Piccolo
Argenta, Fernando Froner
Driemeier, David
Costa, Fernanda Vieira Amorim da
Pavarini, Saulo Petinatti
Sonne, Luciana
author_role author
author2 Slaviero, Mônica
Vargas, Thainã Piccolo
Argenta, Fernando Froner
Driemeier, David
Costa, Fernanda Vieira Amorim da
Pavarini, Saulo Petinatti
Sonne, Luciana
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ehlers, Luiza Presser
Slaviero, Mônica
Vargas, Thainã Piccolo
Argenta, Fernando Froner
Driemeier, David
Costa, Fernanda Vieira Amorim da
Pavarini, Saulo Petinatti
Sonne, Luciana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Granuloma eosinófilo
Felinos
Epidemiologia
Diagnóstico diferencial
topic Granuloma eosinófilo
Felinos
Epidemiologia
Diagnóstico diferencial
Eosinophilic granuloma complex
Feline
Histopathology
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Eosinophilic granuloma complex
Feline
Histopathology
description Background: The feline eosinophilic granuloma complex (FEGC) includes a group of lesions that affect the skin, mucocutaneous junctions, and oral cavity of cats. It comprises three distinct clinical entities: the eosinophilic ulcer (EU), the eosinophilic plaque (EP) and the eosinophilic granuloma (EG). The EU is usually found in the upper lip. Lesions of EP occur most commonly on the abdomen and medial thigh. The EG lesions usually appear on the tongue and hard palate. The aim of this study is to describe the localization and pathological findings of FEGC through a retrospective study and testing by immunohistochemistry if feline herpesvirus type 1 (FHV-1) infection may be associated. Materials, Methods & Results: The records of biopsy specimens from the Department of Veterinary Pathology of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul were recovered and cats diagnosed with FEGC were selected since January 2006 to December 2017. General data, such as age, sex, breed and distribution lesions, were analyzed and compiled. The histological slides were reviewed by optical microscopy and the microscopic findings were detailed. Sections of tissue were used in immunohistochemistry to investigate the presence of feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) using anti-FHV-1 antibody. In this study, 30 cats were diagnosed with FEGC. Most part of the cats were mixed breed (27/30), and there were no sex predisposition. The age of the cats ranged from seven months to 13 years old, and the median was three years. The lesion distribution of FEGC was 40% in oral cavity, 33.3% in skin and 26.6% in mucocutaneous junction. Histologically, the main lesion of all distributions was characterized by diffuse dermal/submucosa inflammatory infiltrate composed of eosinophils. Within the inflammation there were large irregular foci of collagen fibers and degranulated and degenerating eosinophil (“flame figures”). Oftentimes these foci were surrounded by macrophages and fewer multinucleated histiocytic giant cells. There were mild to moderate inflammatory infiltrate of mast cells, lymphocytes and plasm cells in dermis and submucosa. Ulceration of epidermis and mucosa were observed in majority of FEGC lesions with inflammatory infiltrate of neutrophils. All cases were negative for FHV-1 in the immunohistochemical evaluation. Discussion: In this study, feline eosinophilic granuloma complex was uncommon, accounting 0.96% of the feline cases diagnosticated in 15 years. Agreeing with the other authors, there was no sex and breed predilection. The median of age were three years old, some authors report higher occurrence in young animals and associated with genetic predisposition. Histologically, the most frequent findings were submucous and dermal inflammatory infiltrate composed primarily of eosinophils associated with areas of “flame figures”. Surrounded these areas, there were intense inflammatory infiltrate composed of macrophages, palisading macrophages and fewer multinucleated histiocytic giant cells as previously described by other authors. The ulceration of epidermis and mucosa was a common finding of eosinophilic granuloma complex lesions especially in cases where the oral cavity was affected. In this study, we could not evaluate the presence of FHV-1 in feline cases of eosinophilic granuloma complex. The area commonly affected in cases of FEGC was the oral mucosa. It may be due to differentiate from other diseases that affect the same area. Feline eosinophilic granuloma complex are important differential diagnosis for other diseases that include neoplasms, especially squamous cell carcinoma.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-01-14T04:15:49Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/204144
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1678-0345
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001109026
identifier_str_mv 1678-0345
001109026
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/204144
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Acta scientiae veterinariae. Porto Alegre, RS. Vol. 47 (2019), Pub. 1716, 7 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/204144/2/001109026.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/204144/1/001109026.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv caff738749922e4708d235503a3cf876
a68ae45e6974c4346cd2343b3143b5fe
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798487421449404416