Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Nunes, Leandro Meirelles, Bernardi, Juliana Rombaldi, Moreira, Paula Ruffoni, Mariath, Adriela Azevedo Souza, Gomes, Erissandra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267232
Resumo: Objective: Compare the occurrence of choking and gagging in infants subjected to three complementary feeding (CF) methods. Methods: Randomized clinical trial with mother-infant pairs, allocated according to the following methods of CF: a) Parent-Led Weaning (PLW) — group control, b) Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS), and c) mixed (initially BLISS and if the infant presents a lack of interest or dissatisfaction, PLW), with the last two methods guided by the infant. Mothers received nutritional intervention on CF and prevention of choking and gagging according to the method at 5.5 months of age and remained in follow-up until 12 months. Frequencies of choking and gagging were collected by questionnaire at nine and 12 months. The comparison between groups was performed using the analysis of variance test (p < 0.05). Results 130 infants were followed, and 34 (26.2%) children presented choking between six and 12 months of age, 13 (30.2%) in PLW, 10 (22.2%) BLISS, and 11 (26.2%) mixed method, no significative difference between methods (p > 0.05). The choking was caused mainly by the semi-solid/solid consistency. Moreover, 100 (80%) infants aged from six to 12 months presented gagging and their characteristics were not statistically different among groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Infants following a baby-led feeding method that includes advice on minimizing choking risk do not seem more likely to choke than infants following traditional feeding practice that includes advice on minimizing choking risk.
id UFRGS-2_356eefaf1e5819982c1f323e37caebab
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/267232
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira deNunes, Leandro MeirellesBernardi, Juliana RombaldiMoreira, Paula RuffoniMariath, Adriela Azevedo SouzaGomes, Erissandra2023-11-18T03:25:21Z20230021-7557http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267232001186716Objective: Compare the occurrence of choking and gagging in infants subjected to three complementary feeding (CF) methods. Methods: Randomized clinical trial with mother-infant pairs, allocated according to the following methods of CF: a) Parent-Led Weaning (PLW) — group control, b) Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS), and c) mixed (initially BLISS and if the infant presents a lack of interest or dissatisfaction, PLW), with the last two methods guided by the infant. Mothers received nutritional intervention on CF and prevention of choking and gagging according to the method at 5.5 months of age and remained in follow-up until 12 months. Frequencies of choking and gagging were collected by questionnaire at nine and 12 months. The comparison between groups was performed using the analysis of variance test (p < 0.05). Results 130 infants were followed, and 34 (26.2%) children presented choking between six and 12 months of age, 13 (30.2%) in PLW, 10 (22.2%) BLISS, and 11 (26.2%) mixed method, no significative difference between methods (p > 0.05). The choking was caused mainly by the semi-solid/solid consistency. Moreover, 100 (80%) infants aged from six to 12 months presented gagging and their characteristics were not statistically different among groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Infants following a baby-led feeding method that includes advice on minimizing choking risk do not seem more likely to choke than infants following traditional feeding practice that includes advice on minimizing choking risk.application/pdfengJornal de pediatria. Vol. 99, n. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2023), p. 574-581EngasgoFenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição do lactenteMétodos de alimentaçãoEnsaio clínico controlado aleatórioChokingInfant feedingFeeding methodsRandomized clinical trialChoking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trialinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001186716.pdf.txt001186716.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain33819http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267232/2/001186716.pdf.txt494932d57eb31291f9d8ee9b744becb7MD52ORIGINAL001186716.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1208940http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267232/1/001186716.pdf06c2ebc0d6944a438a44d620f62f2770MD5110183/2672322023-11-19 04:21:19.020085oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/267232Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-11-19T06:21:19Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial
title Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial
Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira de
Engasgo
Fenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição do lactente
Métodos de alimentação
Ensaio clínico controlado aleatório
Choking
Infant feeding
Feeding methods
Randomized clinical trial
title_short Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial
title_full Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial
title_sort Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial
author Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira de
author_facet Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira de
Nunes, Leandro Meirelles
Bernardi, Juliana Rombaldi
Moreira, Paula Ruffoni
Mariath, Adriela Azevedo Souza
Gomes, Erissandra
author_role author
author2 Nunes, Leandro Meirelles
Bernardi, Juliana Rombaldi
Moreira, Paula Ruffoni
Mariath, Adriela Azevedo Souza
Gomes, Erissandra
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira de
Nunes, Leandro Meirelles
Bernardi, Juliana Rombaldi
Moreira, Paula Ruffoni
Mariath, Adriela Azevedo Souza
Gomes, Erissandra
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Engasgo
Fenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição do lactente
Métodos de alimentação
Ensaio clínico controlado aleatório
topic Engasgo
Fenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição do lactente
Métodos de alimentação
Ensaio clínico controlado aleatório
Choking
Infant feeding
Feeding methods
Randomized clinical trial
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Choking
Infant feeding
Feeding methods
Randomized clinical trial
description Objective: Compare the occurrence of choking and gagging in infants subjected to three complementary feeding (CF) methods. Methods: Randomized clinical trial with mother-infant pairs, allocated according to the following methods of CF: a) Parent-Led Weaning (PLW) — group control, b) Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS), and c) mixed (initially BLISS and if the infant presents a lack of interest or dissatisfaction, PLW), with the last two methods guided by the infant. Mothers received nutritional intervention on CF and prevention of choking and gagging according to the method at 5.5 months of age and remained in follow-up until 12 months. Frequencies of choking and gagging were collected by questionnaire at nine and 12 months. The comparison between groups was performed using the analysis of variance test (p < 0.05). Results 130 infants were followed, and 34 (26.2%) children presented choking between six and 12 months of age, 13 (30.2%) in PLW, 10 (22.2%) BLISS, and 11 (26.2%) mixed method, no significative difference between methods (p > 0.05). The choking was caused mainly by the semi-solid/solid consistency. Moreover, 100 (80%) infants aged from six to 12 months presented gagging and their characteristics were not statistically different among groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Infants following a baby-led feeding method that includes advice on minimizing choking risk do not seem more likely to choke than infants following traditional feeding practice that includes advice on minimizing choking risk.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-11-18T03:25:21Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267232
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0021-7557
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001186716
identifier_str_mv 0021-7557
001186716
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267232
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Jornal de pediatria. Vol. 99, n. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2023), p. 574-581
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267232/2/001186716.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267232/1/001186716.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 494932d57eb31291f9d8ee9b744becb7
06c2ebc0d6944a438a44d620f62f2770
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225104524312576