Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnout

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monteiro, Gabriela Massaro Carneiro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Baeza, Fernanda Lucia Capitanio, Hauck, Simone
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225116
Resumo: Introduction: Physician burnout is considered an epidemic. In 2019, 44% of U.S. physicians reported feeling burned out. The work environment is a central risk factor for this. The aim of this study is to develop and test an instrument to evaluate work environment factors in medical training courses. Method: After focus groups, an initial pool of 14 items was generated and tested in a pilot study (n = 66). Face validity was verified, and small adjustments were made. The resulting version was administered to a sample of 115 psychiatry residents. Eleven items were selected based on the correlations between them, principal component analysis, and theoretical reasons, and then tested for internal and construct validity. Results: The final version had high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.898) and comprised three dimensions: relations with the institution; with colleagues; and with preceptors. Both total scores and dimensions correlated significantly with burnout scores (p < 0.01). Cutoffs defining the environment as healthy (>32 points); risky (23-31 points); or toxic (<22 points) were suggested and related to the risk of burnout. Conclusion: Several authors have emphasized the importance of approaching institutional factors as an effective strategy for coping with the increased prevalence of burnout. This instrument should contribute to these efforts.
id UFRGS-2_4bbb321f7e121ae0b24636948a4b721d
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225116
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Monteiro, Gabriela Massaro CarneiroBaeza, Fernanda Lucia CapitanioHauck, Simone2021-08-05T04:29:18Z20202238-0019http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225116001129230Introduction: Physician burnout is considered an epidemic. In 2019, 44% of U.S. physicians reported feeling burned out. The work environment is a central risk factor for this. The aim of this study is to develop and test an instrument to evaluate work environment factors in medical training courses. Method: After focus groups, an initial pool of 14 items was generated and tested in a pilot study (n = 66). Face validity was verified, and small adjustments were made. The resulting version was administered to a sample of 115 psychiatry residents. Eleven items were selected based on the correlations between them, principal component analysis, and theoretical reasons, and then tested for internal and construct validity. Results: The final version had high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.898) and comprised three dimensions: relations with the institution; with colleagues; and with preceptors. Both total scores and dimensions correlated significantly with burnout scores (p < 0.01). Cutoffs defining the environment as healthy (>32 points); risky (23-31 points); or toxic (<22 points) were suggested and related to the risk of burnout. Conclusion: Several authors have emphasized the importance of approaching institutional factors as an effective strategy for coping with the increased prevalence of burnout. This instrument should contribute to these efforts.application/pdfengTrends in psychiatry and psychotherapy. Vol. 42, n. 2 (2020), p. 185-189.Esgotamento profissionalEducação médicaEstudo de validaçãoBurnoutMedical educationValidation studiesStress disordersEnvironmentWork Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnoutinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001129230.pdf.txt001129230.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain20883http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225116/2/001129230.pdf.txt94203fed5d4e0a89b573e5fda4cfab4aMD52ORIGINAL001129230.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf157922http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225116/1/001129230.pdf00bf21dcd3f935ebd2da119f359938b0MD5110183/2251162023-10-28 03:32:19.226137oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225116Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-10-28T06:32:19Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnout
title Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnout
spellingShingle Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnout
Monteiro, Gabriela Massaro Carneiro
Esgotamento profissional
Educação médica
Estudo de validação
Burnout
Medical education
Validation studies
Stress disorders
Environment
title_short Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnout
title_full Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnout
title_fullStr Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnout
title_full_unstemmed Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnout
title_sort Work Environment Evaluation Instrument (WEEI) : development, validation, and association with burnout
author Monteiro, Gabriela Massaro Carneiro
author_facet Monteiro, Gabriela Massaro Carneiro
Baeza, Fernanda Lucia Capitanio
Hauck, Simone
author_role author
author2 Baeza, Fernanda Lucia Capitanio
Hauck, Simone
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monteiro, Gabriela Massaro Carneiro
Baeza, Fernanda Lucia Capitanio
Hauck, Simone
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Esgotamento profissional
Educação médica
Estudo de validação
topic Esgotamento profissional
Educação médica
Estudo de validação
Burnout
Medical education
Validation studies
Stress disorders
Environment
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Burnout
Medical education
Validation studies
Stress disorders
Environment
description Introduction: Physician burnout is considered an epidemic. In 2019, 44% of U.S. physicians reported feeling burned out. The work environment is a central risk factor for this. The aim of this study is to develop and test an instrument to evaluate work environment factors in medical training courses. Method: After focus groups, an initial pool of 14 items was generated and tested in a pilot study (n = 66). Face validity was verified, and small adjustments were made. The resulting version was administered to a sample of 115 psychiatry residents. Eleven items were selected based on the correlations between them, principal component analysis, and theoretical reasons, and then tested for internal and construct validity. Results: The final version had high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.898) and comprised three dimensions: relations with the institution; with colleagues; and with preceptors. Both total scores and dimensions correlated significantly with burnout scores (p < 0.01). Cutoffs defining the environment as healthy (>32 points); risky (23-31 points); or toxic (<22 points) were suggested and related to the risk of burnout. Conclusion: Several authors have emphasized the importance of approaching institutional factors as an effective strategy for coping with the increased prevalence of burnout. This instrument should contribute to these efforts.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-08-05T04:29:18Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225116
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2238-0019
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001129230
identifier_str_mv 2238-0019
001129230
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225116
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy. Vol. 42, n. 2 (2020), p. 185-189.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225116/2/001129230.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225116/1/001129230.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 94203fed5d4e0a89b573e5fda4cfab4a
00bf21dcd3f935ebd2da119f359938b0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798487483292319744