Longitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocol

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Leonardo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Barbisan, Guilherme Kirsten, Rebouças, Cinthia Danielle Araújo Vasconcelos, Rocha, Neusa Sica da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/212775
Resumo: Background: Despite extensive research in the field of psychotherapies, few studies have compared the primary psychotherapies of naturalistic design, which represents real-life situations. Objective: The objectives of this study were to evaluate three modalities of evidence-based psychotherapy for clinical, psychosocial, and biological outcomes and to identify the mediators and confounders of this process. Our primary hypothesis is that all psychotherapies will improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes and will increase BDNF levels. Methods: Design: longitudinal, naturalistic. Participants: One hundred twenty-six patients who underwent one of three evidence-based modalities of individual psychotherapy [psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT), interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), and cognitive–behavioral psychotherapy (CBT)] were included. Measure: Primary outcomes are divided into three domains of variables: clinical (general psychiatric symptoms), biological (serum BDNF levels), and psychosocial (resilience, quality of life, coping strategies, social support, and quality of life-adjusted years of life). Confounding/mediator variables included clinical (personality traits, type of psychotherapy, number of sessions, concomitant use of pharmacological treatment, history of previous psychotherapeutic treatment, medical and psychiatric comorbidities, and psychiatric diagnosis), psychosocial (psychosocial stressors, therapeutic alliance, and defense mechanism style), and other (religiosity) factors. Procedure: The follow-up period will be baseline and 6 months and 1 year after entering the study. The study will include 42 controls for biological variables only. Sample size calculation considered a significance level of 5% and a power of 80% to detect a difference of 0.22 with a standard deviation of 0.43, assuming losses of 20–30% of patients. The comparison between the modalities of psychotherapy will be by generalized estimating equations (GEE) model, the analysis of mediators by the Hayes method, and confounders by multivariate logistic regression. Discussion: The findings of this study are intended to demonstrate the outcomes of evidence-based psychotherapies for clinical, psychosocial, and biological parameters and to understand the mediators and confounders of this process in a real-life setting for patients with severe mental illness, thus contributing to the establishment of evidence-based public health policies in the field of psychological interventions.
id UFRGS-2_51919ccc78593fa5920a3fcd89f01093
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/212775
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Gonçalves, LeonardoBarbisan, Guilherme KirstenRebouças, Cinthia Danielle Araújo VasconcelosRocha, Neusa Sica da2020-08-08T03:46:23Z20191664-0640http://hdl.handle.net/10183/212775001115949Background: Despite extensive research in the field of psychotherapies, few studies have compared the primary psychotherapies of naturalistic design, which represents real-life situations. Objective: The objectives of this study were to evaluate three modalities of evidence-based psychotherapy for clinical, psychosocial, and biological outcomes and to identify the mediators and confounders of this process. Our primary hypothesis is that all psychotherapies will improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes and will increase BDNF levels. Methods: Design: longitudinal, naturalistic. Participants: One hundred twenty-six patients who underwent one of three evidence-based modalities of individual psychotherapy [psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT), interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), and cognitive–behavioral psychotherapy (CBT)] were included. Measure: Primary outcomes are divided into three domains of variables: clinical (general psychiatric symptoms), biological (serum BDNF levels), and psychosocial (resilience, quality of life, coping strategies, social support, and quality of life-adjusted years of life). Confounding/mediator variables included clinical (personality traits, type of psychotherapy, number of sessions, concomitant use of pharmacological treatment, history of previous psychotherapeutic treatment, medical and psychiatric comorbidities, and psychiatric diagnosis), psychosocial (psychosocial stressors, therapeutic alliance, and defense mechanism style), and other (religiosity) factors. Procedure: The follow-up period will be baseline and 6 months and 1 year after entering the study. The study will include 42 controls for biological variables only. Sample size calculation considered a significance level of 5% and a power of 80% to detect a difference of 0.22 with a standard deviation of 0.43, assuming losses of 20–30% of patients. The comparison between the modalities of psychotherapy will be by generalized estimating equations (GEE) model, the analysis of mediators by the Hayes method, and confounders by multivariate logistic regression. Discussion: The findings of this study are intended to demonstrate the outcomes of evidence-based psychotherapies for clinical, psychosocial, and biological parameters and to understand the mediators and confounders of this process in a real-life setting for patients with severe mental illness, thus contributing to the establishment of evidence-based public health policies in the field of psychological interventions.application/pdfengFrontiers in psychiatry. Lausanne. Vol. 10 (April 2019), 212, 8 f.PsicoterapiaEstudos longitudinaisTerapia psicanaliticaTerapia cognitivo-comportamentalPsicoterapia interpessoalPsychotherapyLongitudinal studiesInterpersonal psychotherapyPsychoanalytical psychotherapyCognitive–behavioral therapyLongitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocolEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001115949.pdf.txt001115949.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain45330http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/212775/2/001115949.pdf.txte2dd531040988fb2a003a24dcf40439cMD52ORIGINAL001115949.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1140944http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/212775/1/001115949.pdff9f835eb34c8b5dba6911112fd6d846cMD5110183/2127752020-08-09 03:33:03.139976oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/212775Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-08-09T06:33:03Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Longitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocol
title Longitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocol
spellingShingle Longitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocol
Gonçalves, Leonardo
Psicoterapia
Estudos longitudinais
Terapia psicanalitica
Terapia cognitivo-comportamental
Psicoterapia interpessoal
Psychotherapy
Longitudinal studies
Interpersonal psychotherapy
Psychoanalytical psychotherapy
Cognitive–behavioral therapy
title_short Longitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocol
title_full Longitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocol
title_fullStr Longitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocol
title_sort Longitudinal investigation of psychotherapy outcomes (LIPO) : description of the study protocol
author Gonçalves, Leonardo
author_facet Gonçalves, Leonardo
Barbisan, Guilherme Kirsten
Rebouças, Cinthia Danielle Araújo Vasconcelos
Rocha, Neusa Sica da
author_role author
author2 Barbisan, Guilherme Kirsten
Rebouças, Cinthia Danielle Araújo Vasconcelos
Rocha, Neusa Sica da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Leonardo
Barbisan, Guilherme Kirsten
Rebouças, Cinthia Danielle Araújo Vasconcelos
Rocha, Neusa Sica da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psicoterapia
Estudos longitudinais
Terapia psicanalitica
Terapia cognitivo-comportamental
Psicoterapia interpessoal
topic Psicoterapia
Estudos longitudinais
Terapia psicanalitica
Terapia cognitivo-comportamental
Psicoterapia interpessoal
Psychotherapy
Longitudinal studies
Interpersonal psychotherapy
Psychoanalytical psychotherapy
Cognitive–behavioral therapy
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Psychotherapy
Longitudinal studies
Interpersonal psychotherapy
Psychoanalytical psychotherapy
Cognitive–behavioral therapy
description Background: Despite extensive research in the field of psychotherapies, few studies have compared the primary psychotherapies of naturalistic design, which represents real-life situations. Objective: The objectives of this study were to evaluate three modalities of evidence-based psychotherapy for clinical, psychosocial, and biological outcomes and to identify the mediators and confounders of this process. Our primary hypothesis is that all psychotherapies will improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes and will increase BDNF levels. Methods: Design: longitudinal, naturalistic. Participants: One hundred twenty-six patients who underwent one of three evidence-based modalities of individual psychotherapy [psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT), interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), and cognitive–behavioral psychotherapy (CBT)] were included. Measure: Primary outcomes are divided into three domains of variables: clinical (general psychiatric symptoms), biological (serum BDNF levels), and psychosocial (resilience, quality of life, coping strategies, social support, and quality of life-adjusted years of life). Confounding/mediator variables included clinical (personality traits, type of psychotherapy, number of sessions, concomitant use of pharmacological treatment, history of previous psychotherapeutic treatment, medical and psychiatric comorbidities, and psychiatric diagnosis), psychosocial (psychosocial stressors, therapeutic alliance, and defense mechanism style), and other (religiosity) factors. Procedure: The follow-up period will be baseline and 6 months and 1 year after entering the study. The study will include 42 controls for biological variables only. Sample size calculation considered a significance level of 5% and a power of 80% to detect a difference of 0.22 with a standard deviation of 0.43, assuming losses of 20–30% of patients. The comparison between the modalities of psychotherapy will be by generalized estimating equations (GEE) model, the analysis of mediators by the Hayes method, and confounders by multivariate logistic regression. Discussion: The findings of this study are intended to demonstrate the outcomes of evidence-based psychotherapies for clinical, psychosocial, and biological parameters and to understand the mediators and confounders of this process in a real-life setting for patients with severe mental illness, thus contributing to the establishment of evidence-based public health policies in the field of psychological interventions.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-08-08T03:46:23Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/212775
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1664-0640
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001115949
identifier_str_mv 1664-0640
001115949
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/212775
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Frontiers in psychiatry. Lausanne. Vol. 10 (April 2019), 212, 8 f.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/212775/2/001115949.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/212775/1/001115949.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e2dd531040988fb2a003a24dcf40439c
f9f835eb34c8b5dba6911112fd6d846c
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224997043175424