Pens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trial

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Machry, Rafael Vaz
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Cipriani, Gustavo da Fonseca, Pedroso, Henrique Umpierre, Nunes, Rafaela Ramos, Pires, Thaymê Luísa de Souza, Ferreira, Raquel, Vescovi, Betina, Moura, Gabriela Pereira de, Rodrigues, Ticiana da Costa
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/234482
Summary: Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent disease among elderly population. As the disease progresses, insulin may become necessary. The use of pens application seems to be more practical. However, the infuence of this method on glycemic control needs to be defned in elderly people. Methods: Randomized clinical trial comparing pens and syringes for insulin application among patients with type 2 DM over 60 years old and Glycated Hemoglobin>8.5% at baseline. The follow-up was 24 weeks, with monthly medical visits to adjust the treatment. All patients received insulin NPH and, if necessary, insulin Regular. We assessed glycemic control, adherence to treatment, hypoglycemia occurrence, need for adjustment in treatment and impact on quality of life, Results: We included 121 patients with mean age of 65.75 years. Sixty-one were randomized for pen group (PG) and 60 patients for syringe group (SG). At baseline, mean HbA1c was 10.34±1.66% and 9.90±1.25% (p=0.103) in PG and SG respectively. Mean HbA1c was 8.39±1.28% in PG and 8.85±1.74% in SG (p=0.101) at 24 weeks. However, there was a more signifcant reduction in PG (− 1.94±1.93% in PG and − 1.04±1.46% in SG, p < 0.05) during follow-up. We found no diference in treatment adherence rates, hypoglycemia, greater need for insulin doses or oral medication, and progression to basal-bolus insulin scheme. We also found no diference in the impact of the disease on quality of life between groups. Conclusion: Although we did not fnd any diference in the impact on quality of life, frequency of hypoglycemia or adherence, the PG showed a reduction in HbA1c higher in 24 weeks of follow-up.
id UFRGS-2_6a262f30068335d2fe5ac8fc8f8e0b02
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/234482
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Machry, Rafael VazCipriani, Gustavo da FonsecaPedroso, Henrique UmpierreNunes, Rafaela RamosPires, Thaymê Luísa de SouzaFerreira, RaquelVescovi, BetinaMoura, Gabriela Pereira deRodrigues, Ticiana da Costa2022-01-27T04:30:49Z20211758-5996http://hdl.handle.net/10183/234482001135277Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent disease among elderly population. As the disease progresses, insulin may become necessary. The use of pens application seems to be more practical. However, the infuence of this method on glycemic control needs to be defned in elderly people. Methods: Randomized clinical trial comparing pens and syringes for insulin application among patients with type 2 DM over 60 years old and Glycated Hemoglobin>8.5% at baseline. The follow-up was 24 weeks, with monthly medical visits to adjust the treatment. All patients received insulin NPH and, if necessary, insulin Regular. We assessed glycemic control, adherence to treatment, hypoglycemia occurrence, need for adjustment in treatment and impact on quality of life, Results: We included 121 patients with mean age of 65.75 years. Sixty-one were randomized for pen group (PG) and 60 patients for syringe group (SG). At baseline, mean HbA1c was 10.34±1.66% and 9.90±1.25% (p=0.103) in PG and SG respectively. Mean HbA1c was 8.39±1.28% in PG and 8.85±1.74% in SG (p=0.101) at 24 weeks. However, there was a more signifcant reduction in PG (− 1.94±1.93% in PG and − 1.04±1.46% in SG, p < 0.05) during follow-up. We found no diference in treatment adherence rates, hypoglycemia, greater need for insulin doses or oral medication, and progression to basal-bolus insulin scheme. We also found no diference in the impact of the disease on quality of life between groups. Conclusion: Although we did not fnd any diference in the impact on quality of life, frequency of hypoglycemia or adherence, the PG showed a reduction in HbA1c higher in 24 weeks of follow-up.application/pdfengDiabetology & metabolic syndrome. London. Vol. 13 (2021), 64, 9 p.Diabetes mellitus tipo 2IdosoInsulinaControle glicêmicoType 2 diabetesElderlyPen devicesInsulinAdherenceGlycemic controlPens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trialEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001135277.pdf.txt001135277.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain39255http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/234482/2/001135277.pdf.txtda304c65aa2e4fa91f58a447e1a58a2dMD52ORIGINAL001135277.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf878766http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/234482/1/001135277.pdff89ed498b90cf1cd63b8a85d90d58bf7MD5110183/2344822022-02-22 04:48:26.56087oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/234482Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2022-02-22T07:48:26Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Pens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trial
title Pens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trial
spellingShingle Pens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trial
Machry, Rafael Vaz
Diabetes mellitus tipo 2
Idoso
Insulina
Controle glicêmico
Type 2 diabetes
Elderly
Pen devices
Insulin
Adherence
Glycemic control
title_short Pens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Pens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Pens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Pens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort Pens versus syringes to deliver insulin among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes : a randomized controlled clinical trial
author Machry, Rafael Vaz
author_facet Machry, Rafael Vaz
Cipriani, Gustavo da Fonseca
Pedroso, Henrique Umpierre
Nunes, Rafaela Ramos
Pires, Thaymê Luísa de Souza
Ferreira, Raquel
Vescovi, Betina
Moura, Gabriela Pereira de
Rodrigues, Ticiana da Costa
author_role author
author2 Cipriani, Gustavo da Fonseca
Pedroso, Henrique Umpierre
Nunes, Rafaela Ramos
Pires, Thaymê Luísa de Souza
Ferreira, Raquel
Vescovi, Betina
Moura, Gabriela Pereira de
Rodrigues, Ticiana da Costa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machry, Rafael Vaz
Cipriani, Gustavo da Fonseca
Pedroso, Henrique Umpierre
Nunes, Rafaela Ramos
Pires, Thaymê Luísa de Souza
Ferreira, Raquel
Vescovi, Betina
Moura, Gabriela Pereira de
Rodrigues, Ticiana da Costa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diabetes mellitus tipo 2
Idoso
Insulina
Controle glicêmico
topic Diabetes mellitus tipo 2
Idoso
Insulina
Controle glicêmico
Type 2 diabetes
Elderly
Pen devices
Insulin
Adherence
Glycemic control
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Type 2 diabetes
Elderly
Pen devices
Insulin
Adherence
Glycemic control
description Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent disease among elderly population. As the disease progresses, insulin may become necessary. The use of pens application seems to be more practical. However, the infuence of this method on glycemic control needs to be defned in elderly people. Methods: Randomized clinical trial comparing pens and syringes for insulin application among patients with type 2 DM over 60 years old and Glycated Hemoglobin>8.5% at baseline. The follow-up was 24 weeks, with monthly medical visits to adjust the treatment. All patients received insulin NPH and, if necessary, insulin Regular. We assessed glycemic control, adherence to treatment, hypoglycemia occurrence, need for adjustment in treatment and impact on quality of life, Results: We included 121 patients with mean age of 65.75 years. Sixty-one were randomized for pen group (PG) and 60 patients for syringe group (SG). At baseline, mean HbA1c was 10.34±1.66% and 9.90±1.25% (p=0.103) in PG and SG respectively. Mean HbA1c was 8.39±1.28% in PG and 8.85±1.74% in SG (p=0.101) at 24 weeks. However, there was a more signifcant reduction in PG (− 1.94±1.93% in PG and − 1.04±1.46% in SG, p < 0.05) during follow-up. We found no diference in treatment adherence rates, hypoglycemia, greater need for insulin doses or oral medication, and progression to basal-bolus insulin scheme. We also found no diference in the impact of the disease on quality of life between groups. Conclusion: Although we did not fnd any diference in the impact on quality of life, frequency of hypoglycemia or adherence, the PG showed a reduction in HbA1c higher in 24 weeks of follow-up.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-01-27T04:30:49Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/234482
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1758-5996
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001135277
identifier_str_mv 1758-5996
001135277
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/234482
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Diabetology & metabolic syndrome. London. Vol. 13 (2021), 64, 9 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/234482/2/001135277.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/234482/1/001135277.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv da304c65aa2e4fa91f58a447e1a58a2d
f89ed498b90cf1cd63b8a85d90d58bf7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798487506902056960