Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cortelli, Sheila Cavalca
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Costa, Fernando Oliveira, Rode, Sigmar de Mello, Haas, Alex Nogueira, Andrade, Ana Karina Pinto de, Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes, Escobar, Elaine Cristina, Almeida, Eliete Rodrigues de, Cortelli, José Roberto, Pedrazzi, Vinicius
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/106743
Resumo: Different reasons can contribute to classifying dental prosthesis wearers as high-risk individuals in relation to dental biofilm accumulation. These include a past history of oral disease, age and additional retentive areas. Other common complaints include inflammation and halitosis. Moreover, prosthesis replacement and prosthetic pillar loss are generally associated with caries and periodontal disease recurrence. Therefore, the present study undertook to make a critical review of the literature, aiming at discussing the main aspects related to chemical agent prescriptions for dental prosthesis wearers. Most of the articles were selected based on relevance, methods and availability in regard to the specific subject under investigation, without considering publication year limitations. Different types of prostheses and their impact on teeth and other oral tissues were reported. It was demonstrated that there is greater biofilm buildup and increased inflammatory levels in the presence of different types of prostheses, suggesting that additional measures are required both on population-wide and individual levels in order to control these factors. Mechanical control consists of a combination of manual or electric toothbrush and toothpaste, as well as specific devices for interdental cleaning. Although many chemical agents exhibit antimicrobial benefits when used for prosthesis disinfection, only a few agents can be used safely without causing damage. Regarding the selection of antiseptics by the overall population, chlorhexidine is the most indicated in the short term and in sporadic cases. The most indicated adjuncts to overcome the deficiencies and limitations of daily mechanical biofilm control are products containing essential oils as active ingredients.
id UFRGS-2_a822c15e79eba238a7d0d52207afa393
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/106743
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Cortelli, Sheila CavalcaCosta, Fernando OliveiraRode, Sigmar de MelloHaas, Alex NogueiraAndrade, Ana Karina Pinto dePannuti, Cláudio MendesEscobar, Elaine CristinaAlmeida, Eliete Rodrigues deCortelli, José RobertoPedrazzi, Vinicius2014-11-12T02:14:28Z20141806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/10183/106743000936603Different reasons can contribute to classifying dental prosthesis wearers as high-risk individuals in relation to dental biofilm accumulation. These include a past history of oral disease, age and additional retentive areas. Other common complaints include inflammation and halitosis. Moreover, prosthesis replacement and prosthetic pillar loss are generally associated with caries and periodontal disease recurrence. Therefore, the present study undertook to make a critical review of the literature, aiming at discussing the main aspects related to chemical agent prescriptions for dental prosthesis wearers. Most of the articles were selected based on relevance, methods and availability in regard to the specific subject under investigation, without considering publication year limitations. Different types of prostheses and their impact on teeth and other oral tissues were reported. It was demonstrated that there is greater biofilm buildup and increased inflammatory levels in the presence of different types of prostheses, suggesting that additional measures are required both on population-wide and individual levels in order to control these factors. Mechanical control consists of a combination of manual or electric toothbrush and toothpaste, as well as specific devices for interdental cleaning. Although many chemical agents exhibit antimicrobial benefits when used for prosthesis disinfection, only a few agents can be used safely without causing damage. Regarding the selection of antiseptics by the overall population, chlorhexidine is the most indicated in the short term and in sporadic cases. The most indicated adjuncts to overcome the deficiencies and limitations of daily mechanical biofilm control are products containing essential oils as active ingredients.application/pdfengBrazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 28, nesp (Jan. 2014), p. 1-9Antissépticos bucaisBiofilmesPrótese dentáriaMouthwashesBiofilmsDental prosthesisMouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patientsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000936603.pdf000936603.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1462753http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/1/000936603.pdf8e3fe1a70664ea474d944d30fe60c37bMD51TEXT000936603.pdf.txt000936603.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain40363http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/2/000936603.pdf.txtb9163c0b179f7282f51f188eded08b09MD52THUMBNAIL000936603.pdf.jpg000936603.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1805http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/3/000936603.pdf.jpg8e88335c3e70e77bf2e7845e7c925292MD5310183/1067432018-10-22 07:47:51.427oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/106743Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-22T10:47:51Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients
title Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients
spellingShingle Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients
Cortelli, Sheila Cavalca
Antissépticos bucais
Biofilmes
Prótese dentária
Mouthwashes
Biofilms
Dental prosthesis
title_short Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients
title_full Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients
title_fullStr Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients
title_full_unstemmed Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients
title_sort Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients
author Cortelli, Sheila Cavalca
author_facet Cortelli, Sheila Cavalca
Costa, Fernando Oliveira
Rode, Sigmar de Mello
Haas, Alex Nogueira
Andrade, Ana Karina Pinto de
Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes
Escobar, Elaine Cristina
Almeida, Eliete Rodrigues de
Cortelli, José Roberto
Pedrazzi, Vinicius
author_role author
author2 Costa, Fernando Oliveira
Rode, Sigmar de Mello
Haas, Alex Nogueira
Andrade, Ana Karina Pinto de
Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes
Escobar, Elaine Cristina
Almeida, Eliete Rodrigues de
Cortelli, José Roberto
Pedrazzi, Vinicius
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cortelli, Sheila Cavalca
Costa, Fernando Oliveira
Rode, Sigmar de Mello
Haas, Alex Nogueira
Andrade, Ana Karina Pinto de
Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes
Escobar, Elaine Cristina
Almeida, Eliete Rodrigues de
Cortelli, José Roberto
Pedrazzi, Vinicius
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antissépticos bucais
Biofilmes
Prótese dentária
topic Antissépticos bucais
Biofilmes
Prótese dentária
Mouthwashes
Biofilms
Dental prosthesis
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Mouthwashes
Biofilms
Dental prosthesis
description Different reasons can contribute to classifying dental prosthesis wearers as high-risk individuals in relation to dental biofilm accumulation. These include a past history of oral disease, age and additional retentive areas. Other common complaints include inflammation and halitosis. Moreover, prosthesis replacement and prosthetic pillar loss are generally associated with caries and periodontal disease recurrence. Therefore, the present study undertook to make a critical review of the literature, aiming at discussing the main aspects related to chemical agent prescriptions for dental prosthesis wearers. Most of the articles were selected based on relevance, methods and availability in regard to the specific subject under investigation, without considering publication year limitations. Different types of prostheses and their impact on teeth and other oral tissues were reported. It was demonstrated that there is greater biofilm buildup and increased inflammatory levels in the presence of different types of prostheses, suggesting that additional measures are required both on population-wide and individual levels in order to control these factors. Mechanical control consists of a combination of manual or electric toothbrush and toothpaste, as well as specific devices for interdental cleaning. Although many chemical agents exhibit antimicrobial benefits when used for prosthesis disinfection, only a few agents can be used safely without causing damage. Regarding the selection of antiseptics by the overall population, chlorhexidine is the most indicated in the short term and in sporadic cases. The most indicated adjuncts to overcome the deficiencies and limitations of daily mechanical biofilm control are products containing essential oils as active ingredients.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-11-12T02:14:28Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/106743
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1806-8324
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000936603
identifier_str_mv 1806-8324
000936603
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/106743
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Brazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 28, nesp (Jan. 2014), p. 1-9
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/1/000936603.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/2/000936603.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/3/000936603.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8e3fe1a70664ea474d944d30fe60c37b
b9163c0b179f7282f51f188eded08b09
8e88335c3e70e77bf2e7845e7c925292
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224855555670016