Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/218311 |
Resumo: | The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a cashew nut shell oil and commercial castor oil blend (CNSL-Castor oil) on the performance and microbiota of broiler chickens with and without coccidiosis challenge. A total of 864 one-day-old male chicks (Cobb) were randomly distributed to receive 6 treatments (8 pens/treatment; 18 chicks/pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial, with 3 additives (control [non-additives], 100ppm sodium monensin, or 0.15% CNSL-Castor oil blend), and 2 levels of coccidiosis challenge at 14 D of age (unchallenged or inoculated by gavage with 1mL of solution containing oocysts sporulated with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima). No differences in productive performance were observed among treatments in the pre-challenge period and in unchallenged birds (P > 0.05). Seven-days post-challenge, birds receiving monensin performed better than birds in the positive control group (non-additive and challenge) or in the CNSL-Castor oil group (P > 0.05). However, 14 D post-challenge, birds supplemented with CNSL-Castor oil presented higher weight gain and better feed conversion (P > 0.05), without any change in feed intake (P > 0.05). During the accumulated period (1 to 42 D of age), the live weight, weight gain, and feed intake did not differ between the CNSL-Castor oil and monensin groups, both of which presented higher values than the positive control. Lactobacillus spp. and Clostridium perfringens numbers were increased in the challenged birds (P < 0.05). CNSL-Castor oil supplementation reduced Clostridium cluster XIV, C. perfringens, and S. aureus, compared with the monensin and control groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the CNSL-Castor oil group presented the highest number of Lactobacillus spp. copies, followed by the monensin and positive control groups (P > 0.05). Thus, monensin and CNSL-Castor oil effectively minimized the impact of coccidiosis at different times. While monensin acts as an antimicrobial, CNSL-Castor oil modulates the intestinal microbiota with antimicrobial action against gram-positive bacteria, mainly C. perfringens and S. aureus. |
id |
UFRGS-2_bc21fbc70c727974e10dfa48437d2673 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/218311 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Moraes, Priscila de OliveiraCardinal, Kátia MariaGouvêa, Fernanda de LucenaSchroeder, BrunaCeron, Marcos SperoniLunedo, RaquelFrazzon, Ana Paula GuedesFrazzon, JeversonRibeiro, Andrea Machado Leal2021-03-02T04:15:58Z20190032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/10183/218311001122002The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a cashew nut shell oil and commercial castor oil blend (CNSL-Castor oil) on the performance and microbiota of broiler chickens with and without coccidiosis challenge. A total of 864 one-day-old male chicks (Cobb) were randomly distributed to receive 6 treatments (8 pens/treatment; 18 chicks/pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial, with 3 additives (control [non-additives], 100ppm sodium monensin, or 0.15% CNSL-Castor oil blend), and 2 levels of coccidiosis challenge at 14 D of age (unchallenged or inoculated by gavage with 1mL of solution containing oocysts sporulated with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima). No differences in productive performance were observed among treatments in the pre-challenge period and in unchallenged birds (P > 0.05). Seven-days post-challenge, birds receiving monensin performed better than birds in the positive control group (non-additive and challenge) or in the CNSL-Castor oil group (P > 0.05). However, 14 D post-challenge, birds supplemented with CNSL-Castor oil presented higher weight gain and better feed conversion (P > 0.05), without any change in feed intake (P > 0.05). During the accumulated period (1 to 42 D of age), the live weight, weight gain, and feed intake did not differ between the CNSL-Castor oil and monensin groups, both of which presented higher values than the positive control. Lactobacillus spp. and Clostridium perfringens numbers were increased in the challenged birds (P < 0.05). CNSL-Castor oil supplementation reduced Clostridium cluster XIV, C. perfringens, and S. aureus, compared with the monensin and control groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the CNSL-Castor oil group presented the highest number of Lactobacillus spp. copies, followed by the monensin and positive control groups (P > 0.05). Thus, monensin and CNSL-Castor oil effectively minimized the impact of coccidiosis at different times. While monensin acts as an antimicrobial, CNSL-Castor oil modulates the intestinal microbiota with antimicrobial action against gram-positive bacteria, mainly C. perfringens and S. aureus.application/pdfengPoultry science. Vol. 98, no. 11 (Nov. 2019), p. 5456-5464Óleo de rícinoAnacardiumInterações entre hospedeiro e microrganismosMicrobiotaMicrobioma gastrointestinalCoccidioseCoccidiosisFunctional oilGut healthMicrobiotaMonensinComparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilersEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001122002.pdf.txt001122002.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain44087http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/218311/2/001122002.pdf.txtaa834fff8001eb8eabd59fa14cafa2e5MD52ORIGINAL001122002.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf350540http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/218311/1/001122002.pdfb3e05444ebfdf951f09ec55d34f44d95MD5110183/2183112023-05-25 03:26:48.38931oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/218311Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-05-25T06:26:48Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers |
title |
Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira Óleo de rícino Anacardium Interações entre hospedeiro e microrganismos Microbiota Microbioma gastrointestinal Coccidiose Coccidiosis Functional oil Gut health Microbiota Monensin |
title_short |
Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers |
title_full |
Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers |
title_sort |
Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers |
author |
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira Cardinal, Kátia Maria Gouvêa, Fernanda de Lucena Schroeder, Bruna Ceron, Marcos Speroni Lunedo, Raquel Frazzon, Ana Paula Guedes Frazzon, Jeverson Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cardinal, Kátia Maria Gouvêa, Fernanda de Lucena Schroeder, Bruna Ceron, Marcos Speroni Lunedo, Raquel Frazzon, Ana Paula Guedes Frazzon, Jeverson Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira Cardinal, Kátia Maria Gouvêa, Fernanda de Lucena Schroeder, Bruna Ceron, Marcos Speroni Lunedo, Raquel Frazzon, Ana Paula Guedes Frazzon, Jeverson Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Óleo de rícino Anacardium Interações entre hospedeiro e microrganismos Microbiota Microbioma gastrointestinal Coccidiose |
topic |
Óleo de rícino Anacardium Interações entre hospedeiro e microrganismos Microbiota Microbioma gastrointestinal Coccidiose Coccidiosis Functional oil Gut health Microbiota Monensin |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Coccidiosis Functional oil Gut health Microbiota Monensin |
description |
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a cashew nut shell oil and commercial castor oil blend (CNSL-Castor oil) on the performance and microbiota of broiler chickens with and without coccidiosis challenge. A total of 864 one-day-old male chicks (Cobb) were randomly distributed to receive 6 treatments (8 pens/treatment; 18 chicks/pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial, with 3 additives (control [non-additives], 100ppm sodium monensin, or 0.15% CNSL-Castor oil blend), and 2 levels of coccidiosis challenge at 14 D of age (unchallenged or inoculated by gavage with 1mL of solution containing oocysts sporulated with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima). No differences in productive performance were observed among treatments in the pre-challenge period and in unchallenged birds (P > 0.05). Seven-days post-challenge, birds receiving monensin performed better than birds in the positive control group (non-additive and challenge) or in the CNSL-Castor oil group (P > 0.05). However, 14 D post-challenge, birds supplemented with CNSL-Castor oil presented higher weight gain and better feed conversion (P > 0.05), without any change in feed intake (P > 0.05). During the accumulated period (1 to 42 D of age), the live weight, weight gain, and feed intake did not differ between the CNSL-Castor oil and monensin groups, both of which presented higher values than the positive control. Lactobacillus spp. and Clostridium perfringens numbers were increased in the challenged birds (P < 0.05). CNSL-Castor oil supplementation reduced Clostridium cluster XIV, C. perfringens, and S. aureus, compared with the monensin and control groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the CNSL-Castor oil group presented the highest number of Lactobacillus spp. copies, followed by the monensin and positive control groups (P > 0.05). Thus, monensin and CNSL-Castor oil effectively minimized the impact of coccidiosis at different times. While monensin acts as an antimicrobial, CNSL-Castor oil modulates the intestinal microbiota with antimicrobial action against gram-positive bacteria, mainly C. perfringens and S. aureus. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-02T04:15:58Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/218311 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0032-5791 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001122002 |
identifier_str_mv |
0032-5791 001122002 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/218311 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Poultry science. Vol. 98, no. 11 (Nov. 2019), p. 5456-5464 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/218311/2/001122002.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/218311/1/001122002.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
aa834fff8001eb8eabd59fa14cafa2e5 b3e05444ebfdf951f09ec55d34f44d95 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1798487456123715584 |