Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cardinal, Kátia Maria, Gouvêa, Fernanda de Lucena, Schroeder, Bruna, Ceron, Marcos Speroni, Lunedo, Raquel, Frazzon, Ana Paula Guedes, Frazzon, Jeverson, Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/218311
Resumo: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a cashew nut shell oil and commercial castor oil blend (CNSL-Castor oil) on the performance and microbiota of broiler chickens with and without coccidiosis challenge. A total of 864 one-day-old male chicks (Cobb) were randomly distributed to receive 6 treatments (8 pens/treatment; 18 chicks/pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial, with 3 additives (control [non-additives], 100ppm sodium monensin, or 0.15% CNSL-Castor oil blend), and 2 levels of coccidiosis challenge at 14 D of age (unchallenged or inoculated by gavage with 1mL of solution containing oocysts sporulated with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima). No differences in productive performance were observed among treatments in the pre-challenge period and in unchallenged birds (P > 0.05). Seven-days post-challenge, birds receiving monensin performed better than birds in the positive control group (non-additive and challenge) or in the CNSL-Castor oil group (P > 0.05). However, 14 D post-challenge, birds supplemented with CNSL-Castor oil presented higher weight gain and better feed conversion (P > 0.05), without any change in feed intake (P > 0.05). During the accumulated period (1 to 42 D of age), the live weight, weight gain, and feed intake did not differ between the CNSL-Castor oil and monensin groups, both of which presented higher values than the positive control. Lactobacillus spp. and Clostridium perfringens numbers were increased in the challenged birds (P < 0.05). CNSL-Castor oil supplementation reduced Clostridium cluster XIV, C. perfringens, and S. aureus, compared with the monensin and control groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the CNSL-Castor oil group presented the highest number of Lactobacillus spp. copies, followed by the monensin and positive control groups (P > 0.05). Thus, monensin and CNSL-Castor oil effectively minimized the impact of coccidiosis at different times. While monensin acts as an antimicrobial, CNSL-Castor oil modulates the intestinal microbiota with antimicrobial action against gram-positive bacteria, mainly C. perfringens and S. aureus.
id UFRGS-2_bc21fbc70c727974e10dfa48437d2673
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/218311
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Moraes, Priscila de OliveiraCardinal, Kátia MariaGouvêa, Fernanda de LucenaSchroeder, BrunaCeron, Marcos SperoniLunedo, RaquelFrazzon, Ana Paula GuedesFrazzon, JeversonRibeiro, Andrea Machado Leal2021-03-02T04:15:58Z20190032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/10183/218311001122002The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a cashew nut shell oil and commercial castor oil blend (CNSL-Castor oil) on the performance and microbiota of broiler chickens with and without coccidiosis challenge. A total of 864 one-day-old male chicks (Cobb) were randomly distributed to receive 6 treatments (8 pens/treatment; 18 chicks/pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial, with 3 additives (control [non-additives], 100ppm sodium monensin, or 0.15% CNSL-Castor oil blend), and 2 levels of coccidiosis challenge at 14 D of age (unchallenged or inoculated by gavage with 1mL of solution containing oocysts sporulated with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima). No differences in productive performance were observed among treatments in the pre-challenge period and in unchallenged birds (P > 0.05). Seven-days post-challenge, birds receiving monensin performed better than birds in the positive control group (non-additive and challenge) or in the CNSL-Castor oil group (P > 0.05). However, 14 D post-challenge, birds supplemented with CNSL-Castor oil presented higher weight gain and better feed conversion (P > 0.05), without any change in feed intake (P > 0.05). During the accumulated period (1 to 42 D of age), the live weight, weight gain, and feed intake did not differ between the CNSL-Castor oil and monensin groups, both of which presented higher values than the positive control. Lactobacillus spp. and Clostridium perfringens numbers were increased in the challenged birds (P < 0.05). CNSL-Castor oil supplementation reduced Clostridium cluster XIV, C. perfringens, and S. aureus, compared with the monensin and control groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the CNSL-Castor oil group presented the highest number of Lactobacillus spp. copies, followed by the monensin and positive control groups (P > 0.05). Thus, monensin and CNSL-Castor oil effectively minimized the impact of coccidiosis at different times. While monensin acts as an antimicrobial, CNSL-Castor oil modulates the intestinal microbiota with antimicrobial action against gram-positive bacteria, mainly C. perfringens and S. aureus.application/pdfengPoultry science. Vol. 98, no. 11 (Nov. 2019), p. 5456-5464Óleo de rícinoAnacardiumInterações entre hospedeiro e microrganismosMicrobiotaMicrobioma gastrointestinalCoccidioseCoccidiosisFunctional oilGut healthMicrobiotaMonensinComparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilersEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001122002.pdf.txt001122002.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain44087http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/218311/2/001122002.pdf.txtaa834fff8001eb8eabd59fa14cafa2e5MD52ORIGINAL001122002.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf350540http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/218311/1/001122002.pdfb3e05444ebfdf951f09ec55d34f44d95MD5110183/2183112023-05-25 03:26:48.38931oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/218311Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-05-25T06:26:48Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers
title Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers
spellingShingle Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Óleo de rícino
Anacardium
Interações entre hospedeiro e microrganismos
Microbiota
Microbioma gastrointestinal
Coccidiose
Coccidiosis
Functional oil
Gut health
Microbiota
Monensin
title_short Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers
title_full Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers
title_fullStr Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers
title_sort Comparison between a commercial blend of functional oils and monensin on the performance and microbiota of coccidiosis-challenged broilers
author Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
author_facet Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Gouvêa, Fernanda de Lucena
Schroeder, Bruna
Ceron, Marcos Speroni
Lunedo, Raquel
Frazzon, Ana Paula Guedes
Frazzon, Jeverson
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
author_role author
author2 Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Gouvêa, Fernanda de Lucena
Schroeder, Bruna
Ceron, Marcos Speroni
Lunedo, Raquel
Frazzon, Ana Paula Guedes
Frazzon, Jeverson
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Gouvêa, Fernanda de Lucena
Schroeder, Bruna
Ceron, Marcos Speroni
Lunedo, Raquel
Frazzon, Ana Paula Guedes
Frazzon, Jeverson
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Óleo de rícino
Anacardium
Interações entre hospedeiro e microrganismos
Microbiota
Microbioma gastrointestinal
Coccidiose
topic Óleo de rícino
Anacardium
Interações entre hospedeiro e microrganismos
Microbiota
Microbioma gastrointestinal
Coccidiose
Coccidiosis
Functional oil
Gut health
Microbiota
Monensin
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Coccidiosis
Functional oil
Gut health
Microbiota
Monensin
description The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a cashew nut shell oil and commercial castor oil blend (CNSL-Castor oil) on the performance and microbiota of broiler chickens with and without coccidiosis challenge. A total of 864 one-day-old male chicks (Cobb) were randomly distributed to receive 6 treatments (8 pens/treatment; 18 chicks/pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial, with 3 additives (control [non-additives], 100ppm sodium monensin, or 0.15% CNSL-Castor oil blend), and 2 levels of coccidiosis challenge at 14 D of age (unchallenged or inoculated by gavage with 1mL of solution containing oocysts sporulated with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima). No differences in productive performance were observed among treatments in the pre-challenge period and in unchallenged birds (P > 0.05). Seven-days post-challenge, birds receiving monensin performed better than birds in the positive control group (non-additive and challenge) or in the CNSL-Castor oil group (P > 0.05). However, 14 D post-challenge, birds supplemented with CNSL-Castor oil presented higher weight gain and better feed conversion (P > 0.05), without any change in feed intake (P > 0.05). During the accumulated period (1 to 42 D of age), the live weight, weight gain, and feed intake did not differ between the CNSL-Castor oil and monensin groups, both of which presented higher values than the positive control. Lactobacillus spp. and Clostridium perfringens numbers were increased in the challenged birds (P < 0.05). CNSL-Castor oil supplementation reduced Clostridium cluster XIV, C. perfringens, and S. aureus, compared with the monensin and control groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the CNSL-Castor oil group presented the highest number of Lactobacillus spp. copies, followed by the monensin and positive control groups (P > 0.05). Thus, monensin and CNSL-Castor oil effectively minimized the impact of coccidiosis at different times. While monensin acts as an antimicrobial, CNSL-Castor oil modulates the intestinal microbiota with antimicrobial action against gram-positive bacteria, mainly C. perfringens and S. aureus.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-03-02T04:15:58Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/218311
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0032-5791
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001122002
identifier_str_mv 0032-5791
001122002
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/218311
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Poultry science. Vol. 98, no. 11 (Nov. 2019), p. 5456-5464
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/218311/2/001122002.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/218311/1/001122002.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv aa834fff8001eb8eabd59fa14cafa2e5
b3e05444ebfdf951f09ec55d34f44d95
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798487456123715584