The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2021 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225167 |
Summary: | Introduction: Care bundles help healthcare professionals provide the best care possible in a structured and reliable way. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply an instrument for inpatient follow-up by clinical pharmacists, and evaluate its results. Methods: The care bundle was based on previously validated instruments. Population consisted of patients monitored by clinical pharmacists at a general hospital. The study was conducted in two phases: the first involved the development and implementation of the bundle, and the evaluation of pharmaceutical interventions; the second involved analyzing data from patients treated with the bundle over one year. Results: The bundle included fourteen pharmaceutical follow-up criteria used in different patterns by each area of care. In the first phase of the study, 3263 patients were monitored and 536 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, with an 85.3% compliance rate. In the second phase of the study, follow-up data was collected from 21,214 patients. The bundle criteria were used in a similar way in clinical, surgical and cancer patients. Pharmacotherapy review was the most prevalent intervention in all cases (60.1%). Hospital discharge planning and medication reconciliation were performed with a similar frequency in clinical, surgical, pediatric and general patients. Conclusions: The development and validation of a bundle aimed at guiding the clinical activities of pharmacists helped standardize procedures and interventions. Pharmacotherapy review was the bundle criterion with the highest rate of application and interventions due to the hospital’s complexity and the need to consider individual patient needs and follow institutional policies. |
id |
UFRGS-2_bde3b18dd76476d304a12352195c64ac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225167 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Martinbiancho, Jacqueline KohutSilva, Daiandy daNegretto, GiovannaGonzatti, Janaína Rodrigues ChagasZuckermann, JoiceWinter, Juliana da SilvaGioda, Ricardo SoaresRocha, Bruno Simas da2021-08-05T04:30:15Z20212357-9730http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225167001129105Introduction: Care bundles help healthcare professionals provide the best care possible in a structured and reliable way. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply an instrument for inpatient follow-up by clinical pharmacists, and evaluate its results. Methods: The care bundle was based on previously validated instruments. Population consisted of patients monitored by clinical pharmacists at a general hospital. The study was conducted in two phases: the first involved the development and implementation of the bundle, and the evaluation of pharmaceutical interventions; the second involved analyzing data from patients treated with the bundle over one year. Results: The bundle included fourteen pharmaceutical follow-up criteria used in different patterns by each area of care. In the first phase of the study, 3263 patients were monitored and 536 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, with an 85.3% compliance rate. In the second phase of the study, follow-up data was collected from 21,214 patients. The bundle criteria were used in a similar way in clinical, surgical and cancer patients. Pharmacotherapy review was the most prevalent intervention in all cases (60.1%). Hospital discharge planning and medication reconciliation were performed with a similar frequency in clinical, surgical, pediatric and general patients. Conclusions: The development and validation of a bundle aimed at guiding the clinical activities of pharmacists helped standardize procedures and interventions. Pharmacotherapy review was the bundle criterion with the highest rate of application and interventions due to the hospital’s complexity and the need to consider individual patient needs and follow institutional policies.application/pdfengClinical and biomedical research. Porto Alegre. vol. 41, no. 1 (2021), p. 18-26Assistência farmacêuticaContinuidade da assistência ao pacientePacotes de assistência ao pacientePharmacy service, hospitalClinical pharmacyPharmaceutical interventionPatient care bundlesPatient safetyThe pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001129105.pdf.txt001129105.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain35484http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225167/2/001129105.pdf.txt999718d371ab239ff9a0933604c6fa9cMD52ORIGINAL001129105.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf332577http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225167/1/001129105.pdf0512414a2ed8c7c6b6ea435c8a1abc0aMD5110183/2251672021-08-18 04:39:35.376136oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225167Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-08-18T07:39:35Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring |
title |
The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring |
spellingShingle |
The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring Martinbiancho, Jacqueline Kohut Assistência farmacêutica Continuidade da assistência ao paciente Pacotes de assistência ao paciente Pharmacy service, hospital Clinical pharmacy Pharmaceutical intervention Patient care bundles Patient safety |
title_short |
The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring |
title_full |
The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring |
title_fullStr |
The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed |
The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring |
title_sort |
The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring |
author |
Martinbiancho, Jacqueline Kohut |
author_facet |
Martinbiancho, Jacqueline Kohut Silva, Daiandy da Negretto, Giovanna Gonzatti, Janaína Rodrigues Chagas Zuckermann, Joice Winter, Juliana da Silva Gioda, Ricardo Soares Rocha, Bruno Simas da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Daiandy da Negretto, Giovanna Gonzatti, Janaína Rodrigues Chagas Zuckermann, Joice Winter, Juliana da Silva Gioda, Ricardo Soares Rocha, Bruno Simas da |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martinbiancho, Jacqueline Kohut Silva, Daiandy da Negretto, Giovanna Gonzatti, Janaína Rodrigues Chagas Zuckermann, Joice Winter, Juliana da Silva Gioda, Ricardo Soares Rocha, Bruno Simas da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Assistência farmacêutica Continuidade da assistência ao paciente Pacotes de assistência ao paciente |
topic |
Assistência farmacêutica Continuidade da assistência ao paciente Pacotes de assistência ao paciente Pharmacy service, hospital Clinical pharmacy Pharmaceutical intervention Patient care bundles Patient safety |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Pharmacy service, hospital Clinical pharmacy Pharmaceutical intervention Patient care bundles Patient safety |
description |
Introduction: Care bundles help healthcare professionals provide the best care possible in a structured and reliable way. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply an instrument for inpatient follow-up by clinical pharmacists, and evaluate its results. Methods: The care bundle was based on previously validated instruments. Population consisted of patients monitored by clinical pharmacists at a general hospital. The study was conducted in two phases: the first involved the development and implementation of the bundle, and the evaluation of pharmaceutical interventions; the second involved analyzing data from patients treated with the bundle over one year. Results: The bundle included fourteen pharmaceutical follow-up criteria used in different patterns by each area of care. In the first phase of the study, 3263 patients were monitored and 536 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, with an 85.3% compliance rate. In the second phase of the study, follow-up data was collected from 21,214 patients. The bundle criteria were used in a similar way in clinical, surgical and cancer patients. Pharmacotherapy review was the most prevalent intervention in all cases (60.1%). Hospital discharge planning and medication reconciliation were performed with a similar frequency in clinical, surgical, pediatric and general patients. Conclusions: The development and validation of a bundle aimed at guiding the clinical activities of pharmacists helped standardize procedures and interventions. Pharmacotherapy review was the bundle criterion with the highest rate of application and interventions due to the hospital’s complexity and the need to consider individual patient needs and follow institutional policies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-05T04:30:15Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225167 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2357-9730 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001129105 |
identifier_str_mv |
2357-9730 001129105 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225167 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Clinical and biomedical research. Porto Alegre. vol. 41, no. 1 (2021), p. 18-26 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225167/2/001129105.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225167/1/001129105.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
999718d371ab239ff9a0933604c6fa9c 0512414a2ed8c7c6b6ea435c8a1abc0a |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1798487483369914368 |