The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martinbiancho, Jacqueline Kohut
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Silva, Daiandy da, Negretto, Giovanna, Gonzatti, Janaína Rodrigues Chagas, Zuckermann, Joice, Winter, Juliana da Silva, Gioda, Ricardo Soares, Rocha, Bruno Simas da
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225167
Summary: Introduction: Care bundles help healthcare professionals provide the best care possible in a structured and reliable way. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply an instrument for inpatient follow-up by clinical pharmacists, and evaluate its results. Methods: The care bundle was based on previously validated instruments. Population consisted of patients monitored by clinical pharmacists at a general hospital. The study was conducted in two phases: the first involved the development and implementation of the bundle, and the evaluation of pharmaceutical interventions; the second involved analyzing data from patients treated with the bundle over one year. Results: The bundle included fourteen pharmaceutical follow-up criteria used in different patterns by each area of care. In the first phase of the study, 3263 patients were monitored and 536 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, with an 85.3% compliance rate. In the second phase of the study, follow-up data was collected from 21,214 patients. The bundle criteria were used in a similar way in clinical, surgical and cancer patients. Pharmacotherapy review was the most prevalent intervention in all cases (60.1%). Hospital discharge planning and medication reconciliation were performed with a similar frequency in clinical, surgical, pediatric and general patients. Conclusions: The development and validation of a bundle aimed at guiding the clinical activities of pharmacists helped standardize procedures and interventions. Pharmacotherapy review was the bundle criterion with the highest rate of application and interventions due to the hospital’s complexity and the need to consider individual patient needs and follow institutional policies.
id UFRGS-2_bde3b18dd76476d304a12352195c64ac
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225167
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Martinbiancho, Jacqueline KohutSilva, Daiandy daNegretto, GiovannaGonzatti, Janaína Rodrigues ChagasZuckermann, JoiceWinter, Juliana da SilvaGioda, Ricardo SoaresRocha, Bruno Simas da2021-08-05T04:30:15Z20212357-9730http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225167001129105Introduction: Care bundles help healthcare professionals provide the best care possible in a structured and reliable way. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply an instrument for inpatient follow-up by clinical pharmacists, and evaluate its results. Methods: The care bundle was based on previously validated instruments. Population consisted of patients monitored by clinical pharmacists at a general hospital. The study was conducted in two phases: the first involved the development and implementation of the bundle, and the evaluation of pharmaceutical interventions; the second involved analyzing data from patients treated with the bundle over one year. Results: The bundle included fourteen pharmaceutical follow-up criteria used in different patterns by each area of care. In the first phase of the study, 3263 patients were monitored and 536 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, with an 85.3% compliance rate. In the second phase of the study, follow-up data was collected from 21,214 patients. The bundle criteria were used in a similar way in clinical, surgical and cancer patients. Pharmacotherapy review was the most prevalent intervention in all cases (60.1%). Hospital discharge planning and medication reconciliation were performed with a similar frequency in clinical, surgical, pediatric and general patients. Conclusions: The development and validation of a bundle aimed at guiding the clinical activities of pharmacists helped standardize procedures and interventions. Pharmacotherapy review was the bundle criterion with the highest rate of application and interventions due to the hospital’s complexity and the need to consider individual patient needs and follow institutional policies.application/pdfengClinical and biomedical research. Porto Alegre. vol. 41, no. 1 (2021), p. 18-26Assistência farmacêuticaContinuidade da assistência ao pacientePacotes de assistência ao pacientePharmacy service, hospitalClinical pharmacyPharmaceutical interventionPatient care bundlesPatient safetyThe pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001129105.pdf.txt001129105.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain35484http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225167/2/001129105.pdf.txt999718d371ab239ff9a0933604c6fa9cMD52ORIGINAL001129105.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf332577http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225167/1/001129105.pdf0512414a2ed8c7c6b6ea435c8a1abc0aMD5110183/2251672021-08-18 04:39:35.376136oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225167Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-08-18T07:39:35Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring
title The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring
spellingShingle The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring
Martinbiancho, Jacqueline Kohut
Assistência farmacêutica
Continuidade da assistência ao paciente
Pacotes de assistência ao paciente
Pharmacy service, hospital
Clinical pharmacy
Pharmaceutical intervention
Patient care bundles
Patient safety
title_short The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring
title_full The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring
title_fullStr The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring
title_full_unstemmed The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring
title_sort The pharmaceutical care bundle : development and evaluation of an instrument for inpatient monitoring
author Martinbiancho, Jacqueline Kohut
author_facet Martinbiancho, Jacqueline Kohut
Silva, Daiandy da
Negretto, Giovanna
Gonzatti, Janaína Rodrigues Chagas
Zuckermann, Joice
Winter, Juliana da Silva
Gioda, Ricardo Soares
Rocha, Bruno Simas da
author_role author
author2 Silva, Daiandy da
Negretto, Giovanna
Gonzatti, Janaína Rodrigues Chagas
Zuckermann, Joice
Winter, Juliana da Silva
Gioda, Ricardo Soares
Rocha, Bruno Simas da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martinbiancho, Jacqueline Kohut
Silva, Daiandy da
Negretto, Giovanna
Gonzatti, Janaína Rodrigues Chagas
Zuckermann, Joice
Winter, Juliana da Silva
Gioda, Ricardo Soares
Rocha, Bruno Simas da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assistência farmacêutica
Continuidade da assistência ao paciente
Pacotes de assistência ao paciente
topic Assistência farmacêutica
Continuidade da assistência ao paciente
Pacotes de assistência ao paciente
Pharmacy service, hospital
Clinical pharmacy
Pharmaceutical intervention
Patient care bundles
Patient safety
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Pharmacy service, hospital
Clinical pharmacy
Pharmaceutical intervention
Patient care bundles
Patient safety
description Introduction: Care bundles help healthcare professionals provide the best care possible in a structured and reliable way. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply an instrument for inpatient follow-up by clinical pharmacists, and evaluate its results. Methods: The care bundle was based on previously validated instruments. Population consisted of patients monitored by clinical pharmacists at a general hospital. The study was conducted in two phases: the first involved the development and implementation of the bundle, and the evaluation of pharmaceutical interventions; the second involved analyzing data from patients treated with the bundle over one year. Results: The bundle included fourteen pharmaceutical follow-up criteria used in different patterns by each area of care. In the first phase of the study, 3263 patients were monitored and 536 pharmaceutical interventions were performed, with an 85.3% compliance rate. In the second phase of the study, follow-up data was collected from 21,214 patients. The bundle criteria were used in a similar way in clinical, surgical and cancer patients. Pharmacotherapy review was the most prevalent intervention in all cases (60.1%). Hospital discharge planning and medication reconciliation were performed with a similar frequency in clinical, surgical, pediatric and general patients. Conclusions: The development and validation of a bundle aimed at guiding the clinical activities of pharmacists helped standardize procedures and interventions. Pharmacotherapy review was the bundle criterion with the highest rate of application and interventions due to the hospital’s complexity and the need to consider individual patient needs and follow institutional policies.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-08-05T04:30:15Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225167
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2357-9730
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001129105
identifier_str_mv 2357-9730
001129105
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225167
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Clinical and biomedical research. Porto Alegre. vol. 41, no. 1 (2021), p. 18-26
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225167/2/001129105.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225167/1/001129105.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 999718d371ab239ff9a0933604c6fa9c
0512414a2ed8c7c6b6ea435c8a1abc0a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798487483369914368