Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gakidou, Emmanuela, Duncan, Bruce Bartholow, Kieling, Christian Costa, Schmidt, Maria Inês, Murray, Christopher J. L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/201490
Resumo: Background The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) provides a comprehensive assessment of risk factor exposure and attributable burden of disease. By providing estimates over a long time series, this study can monitor risk exposure trends critical to health surveillance and inform policy debates on the importance of addressing risks in context. Interpretation Increasingly detailed understanding of the trends in risk exposure and the RRs for each risk-outcome pair provide insights into both the magnitude of health loss attributable to risks and how modification of risk exposure has contributed to health trends. Metabolic risks warrant particular policy attention, due to their large contribution to global disease burden, increasing trends, and variable patterns across countries at the same level of development. GBD 2016 findings show that, while it has huge potential to improve health, risk modification has played a relatively small part in the past decade.
id UFRGS-2_c96d00dbe51c542baa3f5c3869408348
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/201490
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling World Health Organization. Global Burden of DiseaseGakidou, EmmanuelaDuncan, Bruce BartholowKieling, Christian CostaSchmidt, Maria InêsMurray, Christopher J. L.2019-11-09T03:50:49Z20170140-6736http://hdl.handle.net/10183/201490001075261Background The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) provides a comprehensive assessment of risk factor exposure and attributable burden of disease. By providing estimates over a long time series, this study can monitor risk exposure trends critical to health surveillance and inform policy debates on the importance of addressing risks in context. Interpretation Increasingly detailed understanding of the trends in risk exposure and the RRs for each risk-outcome pair provide insights into both the magnitude of health loss attributable to risks and how modification of risk exposure has contributed to health trends. Metabolic risks warrant particular policy attention, due to their large contribution to global disease burden, increasing trends, and variable patterns across countries at the same level of development. GBD 2016 findings show that, while it has huge potential to improve health, risk modification has played a relatively small part in the past decade.application/pdfengThe Lancet. London. Vol. 390, no. 10100 (Sept. 2017), p. 1345-1422Saúde globalFatores de riscoAssunção de riscosGlobal, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001075261.pdf.txt001075261.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain457106http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/201490/2/001075261.pdf.txt56a1defa4423c86ba5138d7c7cebe2b6MD52ORIGINAL001075261.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1563607http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/201490/1/001075261.pdf06759f69d35afe4596512b318e2d4b92MD5110183/2014902019-11-10 04:51:51.164363oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/201490Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-11-10T06:51:51Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
title Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
spellingShingle Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease
Saúde global
Fatores de risco
Assunção de riscos
title_short Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
title_full Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
title_fullStr Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
title_full_unstemmed Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
title_sort Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016 : a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
author World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease
author_facet World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease
Gakidou, Emmanuela
Duncan, Bruce Bartholow
Kieling, Christian Costa
Schmidt, Maria Inês
Murray, Christopher J. L.
author_role author
author2 Gakidou, Emmanuela
Duncan, Bruce Bartholow
Kieling, Christian Costa
Schmidt, Maria Inês
Murray, Christopher J. L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease
Gakidou, Emmanuela
Duncan, Bruce Bartholow
Kieling, Christian Costa
Schmidt, Maria Inês
Murray, Christopher J. L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Saúde global
Fatores de risco
Assunção de riscos
topic Saúde global
Fatores de risco
Assunção de riscos
description Background The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) provides a comprehensive assessment of risk factor exposure and attributable burden of disease. By providing estimates over a long time series, this study can monitor risk exposure trends critical to health surveillance and inform policy debates on the importance of addressing risks in context. Interpretation Increasingly detailed understanding of the trends in risk exposure and the RRs for each risk-outcome pair provide insights into both the magnitude of health loss attributable to risks and how modification of risk exposure has contributed to health trends. Metabolic risks warrant particular policy attention, due to their large contribution to global disease burden, increasing trends, and variable patterns across countries at the same level of development. GBD 2016 findings show that, while it has huge potential to improve health, risk modification has played a relatively small part in the past decade.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-11-09T03:50:49Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/201490
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0140-6736
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001075261
identifier_str_mv 0140-6736
001075261
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/201490
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv The Lancet. London. Vol. 390, no. 10100 (Sept. 2017), p. 1345-1422
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/201490/2/001075261.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/201490/1/001075261.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 56a1defa4423c86ba5138d7c7cebe2b6
06759f69d35afe4596512b318e2d4b92
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798487417408192512