Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muniz, Eduardo Correa
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Verdi, Renato, Leão, Joice Aparecida, Back, Alberto, Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro do
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170553
Summary: Salmonellosis ranks among the major diseases of commercial poultry, and its presence in poultry flocks is responsible for economic losses and risks related to public health. Vaccines are an important tool within integrated programmes to control salmonellosis. The purpose of this study was to assess cross-protection provided by the Poulvac® ST vaccine in the control of Salmonella Heidelberg in experimentally challenged 3- and 21-day-old birds. Eighty birds were identified and separated into four treatments (T1: vaccinated and challenged at 3 days of age, T2: unvaccinated and challenged at 3 days of age, T3: vaccinated and challenged at 21 days of age, and T4: unvaccinated and challenged at 21 days of age). The inoculum was produced from a Brazilian field strain of SH. At the end of the experiment, caecum and liver/ spleen samples were collected for quantitative and qualitative analysis of SH, respectively. Analysis of the liver/spleen showed that Poulvac® ST significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced the percentage of SH positivity in the group challenged at 3 days of age, while in the group challenged at 21 days this difference was almost considered significant (P = 0.1818). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference in SH count in the caecum (CFU/g) in the group challenged at 3 days, but for the group challenged at 21 days the SH counts were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) lower in the vaccinated group when compared to the positive control.
id UFRGS-2_d330620e499db379fb439c94fece35d0
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/170553
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Muniz, Eduardo CorreaVerdi, RenatoLeão, Joice AparecidaBack, AlbertoNascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro do2017-11-24T02:26:14Z2017http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170553001025946Salmonellosis ranks among the major diseases of commercial poultry, and its presence in poultry flocks is responsible for economic losses and risks related to public health. Vaccines are an important tool within integrated programmes to control salmonellosis. The purpose of this study was to assess cross-protection provided by the Poulvac® ST vaccine in the control of Salmonella Heidelberg in experimentally challenged 3- and 21-day-old birds. Eighty birds were identified and separated into four treatments (T1: vaccinated and challenged at 3 days of age, T2: unvaccinated and challenged at 3 days of age, T3: vaccinated and challenged at 21 days of age, and T4: unvaccinated and challenged at 21 days of age). The inoculum was produced from a Brazilian field strain of SH. At the end of the experiment, caecum and liver/ spleen samples were collected for quantitative and qualitative analysis of SH, respectively. Analysis of the liver/spleen showed that Poulvac® ST significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced the percentage of SH positivity in the group challenged at 3 days of age, while in the group challenged at 21 days this difference was almost considered significant (P = 0.1818). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference in SH count in the caecum (CFU/g) in the group challenged at 3 days, but for the group challenged at 21 days the SH counts were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) lower in the vaccinated group when compared to the positive control.application/pdfengAvian Pathology. Inglaterra. Vol. 46, n. 6, (2017), p. 676-682Salmonella HeidelbergAlimentos : ContaminacaoSegurança alimentarAvesAroA genetically modified live vaccineCross-protectionFoodborne diseaseVaccinationEvaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella HeidelbergEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001025946.pdf001025946.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1123498http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170553/1/001025946.pdf4db01930b56d30cbfed27052452059acMD51TEXT001025946.pdf.txt001025946.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain37683http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170553/2/001025946.pdf.txt1406a868194b05052366e67f82d75cc7MD5210183/1705532017-11-25 02:26:57.922657oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/170553Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2017-11-25T04:26:57Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg
title Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg
spellingShingle Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg
Muniz, Eduardo Correa
Salmonella Heidelberg
Alimentos : Contaminacao
Segurança alimentar
Aves
AroA genetically modified live vaccine
Cross-protection
Foodborne disease
Vaccination
title_short Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg
title_full Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg
title_fullStr Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg
title_sort Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a genetically modified live vaccine in broilers challenged with Salmonella Heidelberg
author Muniz, Eduardo Correa
author_facet Muniz, Eduardo Correa
Verdi, Renato
Leão, Joice Aparecida
Back, Alberto
Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro do
author_role author
author2 Verdi, Renato
Leão, Joice Aparecida
Back, Alberto
Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro do
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Muniz, Eduardo Correa
Verdi, Renato
Leão, Joice Aparecida
Back, Alberto
Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Salmonella Heidelberg
Alimentos : Contaminacao
Segurança alimentar
Aves
topic Salmonella Heidelberg
Alimentos : Contaminacao
Segurança alimentar
Aves
AroA genetically modified live vaccine
Cross-protection
Foodborne disease
Vaccination
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv AroA genetically modified live vaccine
Cross-protection
Foodborne disease
Vaccination
description Salmonellosis ranks among the major diseases of commercial poultry, and its presence in poultry flocks is responsible for economic losses and risks related to public health. Vaccines are an important tool within integrated programmes to control salmonellosis. The purpose of this study was to assess cross-protection provided by the Poulvac® ST vaccine in the control of Salmonella Heidelberg in experimentally challenged 3- and 21-day-old birds. Eighty birds were identified and separated into four treatments (T1: vaccinated and challenged at 3 days of age, T2: unvaccinated and challenged at 3 days of age, T3: vaccinated and challenged at 21 days of age, and T4: unvaccinated and challenged at 21 days of age). The inoculum was produced from a Brazilian field strain of SH. At the end of the experiment, caecum and liver/ spleen samples were collected for quantitative and qualitative analysis of SH, respectively. Analysis of the liver/spleen showed that Poulvac® ST significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced the percentage of SH positivity in the group challenged at 3 days of age, while in the group challenged at 21 days this difference was almost considered significant (P = 0.1818). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference in SH count in the caecum (CFU/g) in the group challenged at 3 days, but for the group challenged at 21 days the SH counts were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) lower in the vaccinated group when compared to the positive control.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-11-24T02:26:14Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170553
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001025946
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170553
identifier_str_mv 001025946
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Avian Pathology. Inglaterra. Vol. 46, n. 6, (2017), p. 676-682
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170553/1/001025946.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170553/2/001025946.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4db01930b56d30cbfed27052452059ac
1406a868194b05052366e67f82d75cc7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798487360770408448