Microvessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Waengertner, Luiz Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Meurer, Luíse, Cerski, Marcelle Reesink
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/189612
Resumo: Background: Evaluation of the MVD (modified Chalkley method) in a series of 79 cases of GISTs diagnosed by the Pathology Service at the HCPA (Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre) from January 1993 to December 2009. Methods: Seventy nine cases of GISTs were submitted to immunohistochemical analysis for CD31, an endothelial marker, to analyze MVD. Hot spots were identified for each case, and the mean numbers of stained blood vessels collected through Chalkley count, with the use of a 25 point grid, placed onto a scanned image. Images were analysed through an image analysis system. We used a cutoff of six vessels.Results: Our series was composed of 42 males and 37 females and presented an average age of 58.9 years. GISTs were predominately located in the stomach (45.6%) followed by the small intestine (38.0%). Sixty seven GISTs (84.8%) showed an average of less than six vessels stained by CD31 (MVD) and 12 (15.2%) GISTs an average of more than six vessels. A statistically significant difference was observed between survival rate of patients having GISTs with MVD of ≤ 6 vessels (mean = 2.4, CI 95%: 1.67 - 3.17) and patients having GISTs with MVD of ≥ 6 vessels (mean = 2.4, CI 95%: 1.67 - 3.17), P = 0.001. No association for MVD was observed related to sex, age, histological type, risk category, location and metastasis.Conclusions: Seventy nine cases of GISTs diagnosed at a single center in South Brazil were studied for MVD (Chalkley method). There was a statistically significant difference between MVD and the survival rate for these patients. The use of Chalkley method in GISTs may be helpful to evaluate clinical outcome.
id UFRGS-2_dc6f50f3acfebc43b361c1cb4f6d9d86
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/189612
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Waengertner, Luiz EduardoMeurer, LuíseCerski, Marcelle Reesink2019-03-27T04:07:43Z20111918-2813http://hdl.handle.net/10183/189612000822341Background: Evaluation of the MVD (modified Chalkley method) in a series of 79 cases of GISTs diagnosed by the Pathology Service at the HCPA (Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre) from January 1993 to December 2009. Methods: Seventy nine cases of GISTs were submitted to immunohistochemical analysis for CD31, an endothelial marker, to analyze MVD. Hot spots were identified for each case, and the mean numbers of stained blood vessels collected through Chalkley count, with the use of a 25 point grid, placed onto a scanned image. Images were analysed through an image analysis system. We used a cutoff of six vessels.Results: Our series was composed of 42 males and 37 females and presented an average age of 58.9 years. GISTs were predominately located in the stomach (45.6%) followed by the small intestine (38.0%). Sixty seven GISTs (84.8%) showed an average of less than six vessels stained by CD31 (MVD) and 12 (15.2%) GISTs an average of more than six vessels. A statistically significant difference was observed between survival rate of patients having GISTs with MVD of ≤ 6 vessels (mean = 2.4, CI 95%: 1.67 - 3.17) and patients having GISTs with MVD of ≥ 6 vessels (mean = 2.4, CI 95%: 1.67 - 3.17), P = 0.001. No association for MVD was observed related to sex, age, histological type, risk category, location and metastasis.Conclusions: Seventy nine cases of GISTs diagnosed at a single center in South Brazil were studied for MVD (Chalkley method). There was a statistically significant difference between MVD and the survival rate for these patients. The use of Chalkley method in GISTs may be helpful to evaluate clinical outcome.application/pdfengGastroenterology research. Brossard, Quebec. Vol. 4, no. 6 (Dec. 2011), p. 252-256.Tumores do estroma gastrointestinalBiomarcadoresGISTsChalkley methodMicrovessel densityAngiogenesisMicrovessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumorsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT000822341.pdf.txt000822341.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain19297http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/189612/2/000822341.pdf.txtaddf86a266b5fcc7b596c1d720178d57MD52ORIGINAL000822341.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf556558http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/189612/1/000822341.pdf13b39c2c8743e19cdc747fd8986a08f4MD5110183/1896122019-03-28 04:10:12.624761oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/189612Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-03-28T07:10:12Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Microvessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title Microvessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumors
spellingShingle Microvessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumors
Waengertner, Luiz Eduardo
Tumores do estroma gastrointestinal
Biomarcadores
GISTs
Chalkley method
Microvessel density
Angiogenesis
title_short Microvessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_full Microvessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_fullStr Microvessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_full_unstemmed Microvessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_sort Microvessel density (Chalkley method) in a series of 79 gastrointestinal stromal tumors
author Waengertner, Luiz Eduardo
author_facet Waengertner, Luiz Eduardo
Meurer, Luíse
Cerski, Marcelle Reesink
author_role author
author2 Meurer, Luíse
Cerski, Marcelle Reesink
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Waengertner, Luiz Eduardo
Meurer, Luíse
Cerski, Marcelle Reesink
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tumores do estroma gastrointestinal
Biomarcadores
topic Tumores do estroma gastrointestinal
Biomarcadores
GISTs
Chalkley method
Microvessel density
Angiogenesis
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv GISTs
Chalkley method
Microvessel density
Angiogenesis
description Background: Evaluation of the MVD (modified Chalkley method) in a series of 79 cases of GISTs diagnosed by the Pathology Service at the HCPA (Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre) from January 1993 to December 2009. Methods: Seventy nine cases of GISTs were submitted to immunohistochemical analysis for CD31, an endothelial marker, to analyze MVD. Hot spots were identified for each case, and the mean numbers of stained blood vessels collected through Chalkley count, with the use of a 25 point grid, placed onto a scanned image. Images were analysed through an image analysis system. We used a cutoff of six vessels.Results: Our series was composed of 42 males and 37 females and presented an average age of 58.9 years. GISTs were predominately located in the stomach (45.6%) followed by the small intestine (38.0%). Sixty seven GISTs (84.8%) showed an average of less than six vessels stained by CD31 (MVD) and 12 (15.2%) GISTs an average of more than six vessels. A statistically significant difference was observed between survival rate of patients having GISTs with MVD of ≤ 6 vessels (mean = 2.4, CI 95%: 1.67 - 3.17) and patients having GISTs with MVD of ≥ 6 vessels (mean = 2.4, CI 95%: 1.67 - 3.17), P = 0.001. No association for MVD was observed related to sex, age, histological type, risk category, location and metastasis.Conclusions: Seventy nine cases of GISTs diagnosed at a single center in South Brazil were studied for MVD (Chalkley method). There was a statistically significant difference between MVD and the survival rate for these patients. The use of Chalkley method in GISTs may be helpful to evaluate clinical outcome.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2011
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-03-27T04:07:43Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/189612
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1918-2813
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000822341
identifier_str_mv 1918-2813
000822341
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/189612
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Gastroenterology research. Brossard, Quebec. Vol. 4, no. 6 (Dec. 2011), p. 252-256.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/189612/2/000822341.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/189612/1/000822341.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv addf86a266b5fcc7b596c1d720178d57
13b39c2c8743e19cdc747fd8986a08f4
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224963929145344