Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Morgado,Fabiane F. R.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Meireles,Juliana F. F., Neves,Clara M., Amaral,Ana C. S., Ferreira,Maria E. C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722017000103301
Resumo: Abstract The scale development process is critical to building knowledge in human and social sciences. The present paper aimed (a) to provide a systematic review of the published literature regarding current practices of the scale development process, (b) to assess the main limitations reported by the authors in these processes, and (c) to provide a set of recommendations for best practices in future scale development research. Papers were selected in September 2015, with the search terms “scale development” and “limitations” from three databases: Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, with no time restriction. We evaluated 105 studies published between 1976 and 2015. The analysis considered the three basic steps in scale development: item generation, theoretical analysis, and psychometric analysis. The study identified ten main types of limitation in these practices reported in the literature: sample characteristic limitations, methodological limitations, psychometric limitations, qualitative research limitations, missing data, social desirability bias, item limitations, brevity of the scale, difficulty controlling all variables, and lack of manual instructions. Considering these results, various studies analyzed in this review clearly identified methodological weaknesses in the scale development process (e.g., smaller sample sizes in psychometric analysis), but only a few researchers recognized and recorded these limitations. We hope that a systematic knowledge of the difficulties usually reported in scale development will help future researchers to recognize their own limitations and especially to make the most appropriate choices among different conceptions and methodological strategies.
id UFRGS-5_172496aefd33ec050fbcfa94dd2932e7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-79722017000103301
network_acronym_str UFRGS-5
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practicesAssessmentMeasurementPsychometricsReliabilityValidityAbstract The scale development process is critical to building knowledge in human and social sciences. The present paper aimed (a) to provide a systematic review of the published literature regarding current practices of the scale development process, (b) to assess the main limitations reported by the authors in these processes, and (c) to provide a set of recommendations for best practices in future scale development research. Papers were selected in September 2015, with the search terms “scale development” and “limitations” from three databases: Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, with no time restriction. We evaluated 105 studies published between 1976 and 2015. The analysis considered the three basic steps in scale development: item generation, theoretical analysis, and psychometric analysis. The study identified ten main types of limitation in these practices reported in the literature: sample characteristic limitations, methodological limitations, psychometric limitations, qualitative research limitations, missing data, social desirability bias, item limitations, brevity of the scale, difficulty controlling all variables, and lack of manual instructions. Considering these results, various studies analyzed in this review clearly identified methodological weaknesses in the scale development process (e.g., smaller sample sizes in psychometric analysis), but only a few researchers recognized and recorded these limitations. We hope that a systematic knowledge of the difficulties usually reported in scale development will help future researchers to recognize their own limitations and especially to make the most appropriate choices among different conceptions and methodological strategies.Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722017000103301Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.30 2017reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGS10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMorgado,Fabiane F. R.Meireles,Juliana F. F.Neves,Clara M.Amaral,Ana C. S.Ferreira,Maria E. C.eng2017-03-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-79722017000103301Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prc/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpprc@springeropen.com1678-71530102-7972opendoar:2017-03-23T00:00Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
title Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
spellingShingle Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
Morgado,Fabiane F. R.
Assessment
Measurement
Psychometrics
Reliability
Validity
title_short Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
title_full Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
title_fullStr Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
title_full_unstemmed Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
title_sort Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices
author Morgado,Fabiane F. R.
author_facet Morgado,Fabiane F. R.
Meireles,Juliana F. F.
Neves,Clara M.
Amaral,Ana C. S.
Ferreira,Maria E. C.
author_role author
author2 Meireles,Juliana F. F.
Neves,Clara M.
Amaral,Ana C. S.
Ferreira,Maria E. C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Morgado,Fabiane F. R.
Meireles,Juliana F. F.
Neves,Clara M.
Amaral,Ana C. S.
Ferreira,Maria E. C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assessment
Measurement
Psychometrics
Reliability
Validity
topic Assessment
Measurement
Psychometrics
Reliability
Validity
description Abstract The scale development process is critical to building knowledge in human and social sciences. The present paper aimed (a) to provide a systematic review of the published literature regarding current practices of the scale development process, (b) to assess the main limitations reported by the authors in these processes, and (c) to provide a set of recommendations for best practices in future scale development research. Papers were selected in September 2015, with the search terms “scale development” and “limitations” from three databases: Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, with no time restriction. We evaluated 105 studies published between 1976 and 2015. The analysis considered the three basic steps in scale development: item generation, theoretical analysis, and psychometric analysis. The study identified ten main types of limitation in these practices reported in the literature: sample characteristic limitations, methodological limitations, psychometric limitations, qualitative research limitations, missing data, social desirability bias, item limitations, brevity of the scale, difficulty controlling all variables, and lack of manual instructions. Considering these results, various studies analyzed in this review clearly identified methodological weaknesses in the scale development process (e.g., smaller sample sizes in psychometric analysis), but only a few researchers recognized and recorded these limitations. We hope that a systematic knowledge of the difficulties usually reported in scale development will help future researchers to recognize their own limitations and especially to make the most appropriate choices among different conceptions and methodological strategies.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722017000103301
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722017000103301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.30 2017
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv prc@springeropen.com
_version_ 1750134866617303040