Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of Bibliometrics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Em Questão (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/125489
Resumo: Eponyms occur in several areas of knowledge and in the scientific field they are part of the science reward system, as they permanently signal the authors' original contribution to the advancement of knowledge in their areas. In this context, the objective of this article was to elaborate and apply a model of analysis of eponyms present in scientific articles in the field of Bibliometrics. This is an exploratory and descriptive research with a qualitative-quantitative methodology and anchored in bibliometric and content analyses. The corpus of analysis consisted of eponyms (n=246) selected from articles (n=104) published in five journals in the field of Information Science. The main results indicated that the most frequent eponyms were the three classical laws of Bibliometrics (Bradford's Law, Lotka's Law and Zipf's Law), followed by eponymous expressions from other areas of knowledge, such as Mathematics and Statistics, as well as the occurrence of obliteration by incorporation arising from the non-citation of the original works that originated the eponyms. Among the eponymists (n=203) one stood out for citing the majority (n=21) of the eponymized (n=38). Thus, by choosing a theoretical framework based on the Sociology of Science and Information Science, the analysis model developed and applied to a set of scientific texts shed light on the understanding of the reward system of science through the study of eponymy in the field of Bibliometrics.
id UFRGS-8_a23ecc2ad401e16d449d6c3c031ccaa7
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125489
network_acronym_str UFRGS-8
network_name_str Em Questão (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of BibliometricsEpônimos em textos científicos: modelo de análise e aplicação no campo da Bibliometriaeponymsscientific recognitionsociology of scienceInformation scienceBibliometricsepônimosreconhecimento científicosociologia da ciênciaCiência da informaçãoBibliometria Eponyms occur in several areas of knowledge and in the scientific field they are part of the science reward system, as they permanently signal the authors' original contribution to the advancement of knowledge in their areas. In this context, the objective of this article was to elaborate and apply a model of analysis of eponyms present in scientific articles in the field of Bibliometrics. This is an exploratory and descriptive research with a qualitative-quantitative methodology and anchored in bibliometric and content analyses. The corpus of analysis consisted of eponyms (n=246) selected from articles (n=104) published in five journals in the field of Information Science. The main results indicated that the most frequent eponyms were the three classical laws of Bibliometrics (Bradford's Law, Lotka's Law and Zipf's Law), followed by eponymous expressions from other areas of knowledge, such as Mathematics and Statistics, as well as the occurrence of obliteration by incorporation arising from the non-citation of the original works that originated the eponyms. Among the eponymists (n=203) one stood out for citing the majority (n=21) of the eponymized (n=38). Thus, by choosing a theoretical framework based on the Sociology of Science and Information Science, the analysis model developed and applied to a set of scientific texts shed light on the understanding of the reward system of science through the study of eponymy in the field of Bibliometrics.Epônimos ocorrem em várias áreas do conhecimento e no campo científico fazem parte do sistema de recompensas da ciência, pois sinalizam de maneira duradoura a contribuição original dos autores para o avanço do conhecimento em suas áreas. Nesse contexto, o objetivo desse artigo foi elaborar e aplicar um modelo de análise de epônimos presentes em artigos científicos do campo da Bibliometria. A pesquisa é do tipo exploratória e descritiva com metodologia quali-quantitativa ancorada nas análises bibliométrica e de conteúdo. O corpus de análise foi composto por epônimos (n=246) selecionados em artigos (n=104) publicados em cinco periódicos da área de Ciência da Informação. Os principais resultados indicaram que os epônimos mais frequentes foram as três leis clássicas da Bibliometria (Lei de Bradford, Lei de Lotka e Lei de Zipf), seguidas por expressões eponímicas de outras áreas de conhecimento, tais como a Matemática e a Estatística, bem como a ocorrência da obliteração por incorporação advinda da não citação dos trabalhos originais que originaram os epônimos. Dentre os eponimizadores (n=203) um se destacou por citar a maioria (n=21) dos eponimizados (n=38). Assim, ao eleger um referencial teórico fundamentado na Sociologia da Ciência e na Ciência da Informação, o modelo de análise elaborado e aplicado em um conjunto de textos científicos lançou luzes para a compreensão do sistema de recompensas da ciência por meio do estudo da eponímia no campo da Bibliometria.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2023-03-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/12548910.19132/1808-5245.29.125489Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 125489Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 125489Em Questão; v. 29 (2023); 1254891808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/125489/88013Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini 2023-12-07T14:06:54Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125489Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2023-12-07T14:06:54Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of Bibliometrics
Epônimos em textos científicos: modelo de análise e aplicação no campo da Bibliometria
title Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of Bibliometrics
spellingShingle Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of Bibliometrics
Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
eponyms
scientific recognition
sociology of science
Information science
Bibliometrics
epônimos
reconhecimento científico
sociologia da ciência
Ciência da informação
Bibliometria
title_short Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of Bibliometrics
title_full Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of Bibliometrics
title_fullStr Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of Bibliometrics
title_full_unstemmed Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of Bibliometrics
title_sort Eponyms in scientific texts: analysis model and application in the field of Bibliometrics
author Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
author_facet Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv eponyms
scientific recognition
sociology of science
Information science
Bibliometrics
epônimos
reconhecimento científico
sociologia da ciência
Ciência da informação
Bibliometria
topic eponyms
scientific recognition
sociology of science
Information science
Bibliometrics
epônimos
reconhecimento científico
sociologia da ciência
Ciência da informação
Bibliometria
description Eponyms occur in several areas of knowledge and in the scientific field they are part of the science reward system, as they permanently signal the authors' original contribution to the advancement of knowledge in their areas. In this context, the objective of this article was to elaborate and apply a model of analysis of eponyms present in scientific articles in the field of Bibliometrics. This is an exploratory and descriptive research with a qualitative-quantitative methodology and anchored in bibliometric and content analyses. The corpus of analysis consisted of eponyms (n=246) selected from articles (n=104) published in five journals in the field of Information Science. The main results indicated that the most frequent eponyms were the three classical laws of Bibliometrics (Bradford's Law, Lotka's Law and Zipf's Law), followed by eponymous expressions from other areas of knowledge, such as Mathematics and Statistics, as well as the occurrence of obliteration by incorporation arising from the non-citation of the original works that originated the eponyms. Among the eponymists (n=203) one stood out for citing the majority (n=21) of the eponymized (n=38). Thus, by choosing a theoretical framework based on the Sociology of Science and Information Science, the analysis model developed and applied to a set of scientific texts shed light on the understanding of the reward system of science through the study of eponymy in the field of Bibliometrics.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/125489
10.19132/1808-5245.29.125489
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/125489
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1808-5245.29.125489
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/125489/88013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 125489
Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 125489
Em Questão; v. 29 (2023); 125489
1808-5245
1807-8893
reponame:Em Questão (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Em Questão (Online)
collection Em Questão (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1789438636967591936