Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School Education

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miguel, Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Tamayo, Carolina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Educação & Realidade
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/107911
Resumo: Founded on the conviction that Wittgenstein’s oeuvre - which has as initial emblematic decolonial landmark the therapeutic-grammatical criticism that he addresses to the monumental work of Scottish anthropologist James George Frazer, entitled The golden bough - can be seen not exactly as a philosophy or a new philosophy, but as a (self) therapeutic philosophizing about a set of problems that the scholar tradition called ‘philosophical’ - among which, the basic problem of language that, to him, does not constitute a problem among others, but the condition for philosophizing and, by extension, for the philosophical or verbalist deconstruction of the other problems -, the purpose of this article is to characterize and describe therapeutically what we see as the decolonial aspect of this philosophizing. To this end, we will take to the divan, constituting it as a disease that can be treated by a therapeutic-grammatical attitude, the very problem of coloniality that has been guiding global school education since the constitution of national schooling systems, since the 19th century. From this perspective, we have assumed and practiced the belief that a (self) therapeutic writing must also be a (self) decolonial writing. Thus, we chose to write this article according to a polyphonic dialogic genre, which is also one of the characteristics of the therapeutic manner of philosophizing of LW. We specify the authorship of the voices participating in the dialogue by the initials of the first and last names of their authors, so Ludwig Wittgenstein will appear as LW. Our voices, in turn, will be referenced using HW and WH, which, intentionally, do not distinguish them.
id UFRGS-9_2b39f7980f2b2eb3c0e03f865c2146e3
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/107911
network_acronym_str UFRGS-9
network_name_str Educação & Realidade
repository_id_str
spelling Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School EducationWittgenstein, Terapia e Educação Escolar DecolonialEducação escolar decolonialLudwig WittgensteinTerapia.Decolonial school educationLudwig WittgensteinTherapy.Founded on the conviction that Wittgenstein’s oeuvre - which has as initial emblematic decolonial landmark the therapeutic-grammatical criticism that he addresses to the monumental work of Scottish anthropologist James George Frazer, entitled The golden bough - can be seen not exactly as a philosophy or a new philosophy, but as a (self) therapeutic philosophizing about a set of problems that the scholar tradition called ‘philosophical’ - among which, the basic problem of language that, to him, does not constitute a problem among others, but the condition for philosophizing and, by extension, for the philosophical or verbalist deconstruction of the other problems -, the purpose of this article is to characterize and describe therapeutically what we see as the decolonial aspect of this philosophizing. To this end, we will take to the divan, constituting it as a disease that can be treated by a therapeutic-grammatical attitude, the very problem of coloniality that has been guiding global school education since the constitution of national schooling systems, since the 19th century. From this perspective, we have assumed and practiced the belief that a (self) therapeutic writing must also be a (self) decolonial writing. Thus, we chose to write this article according to a polyphonic dialogic genre, which is also one of the characteristics of the therapeutic manner of philosophizing of LW. We specify the authorship of the voices participating in the dialogue by the initials of the first and last names of their authors, so Ludwig Wittgenstein will appear as LW. Our voices, in turn, will be referenced using HW and WH, which, intentionally, do not distinguish them.Partindo-se da convicção de que o conjunto da obra de Wittgenstein - que tem como marco decolonial emblemático de partida a crítica terapêutico-gramatical que ele dirige à obra monumental do antropólogo escocês James George Frazer, intitulada O ramo de ouro - pode ser visto, não propriamente como uma filosofia ou uma nova filosofia, mas como um filosofar (auto)terapêutico acerca de um conjunto de problemas que a tradição escolar denominou ‘filosóficos’ - dentre eles, o problema básico da linguagem que, para ele, não constitui um problema entre outros, mas a condição para o filosofar e, por extensão, para a desconstrução filosófica ou verbalista dos demais problemas -, o propósito deste artigo é caracterizar e descrever terapeuticamente o que vemos como o aspecto decolonial desse filosofar. Para isso, levaremos ao divã, constitutindo-o como uma doença passível de ser tratada por uma atitude terapêutico-gramatical, o próprio problema da colonialidade que vem orientando a educação escolar global desde a constituição dos sistemas nacionais de escolarização, a partir do século XIX. Sob esta perspectiva, temos assumido e praticado a crença de que uma escrita (auto)terapêutica deve ser também uma escrita (auto)decolonial. Assim, optamos por escrever este artigo segundo um gênero dialógico polifônico, que é também uma das características do modo terapêutico de LW filosofar. Especificamos as autorias das vozes que participam do diálogo pelas iniciais do nome e sobrenome de seus autores, de modo que Ludwig Wittgenstein aparecerá como LW. Já as nossas vozes serão referenciadas por HW e WH, o que, intencionalmente, não as distinguem.FACED - UFRGS2020-11-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/107911Educação & Realidade [Education & Reality]; Vol. 45 No. 3 (2020)Educação & Realidade; v. 45 n. 3 (2020)2175-62360100-3143reponame:Educação & Realidadeinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/107911/59014https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/107911/59015Copyright (c) 2020 Educação & Realidadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiguel, AntonioTamayo, Carolina2020-11-03T11:50:32Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/107911Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/educacaoerealidadePUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/educacaoerealidade/oai||educreal@ufrgs.br2175-62360100-3143opendoar:2020-11-03T11:50:32Educação & Realidade - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School Education
Wittgenstein, Terapia e Educação Escolar Decolonial
title Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School Education
spellingShingle Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School Education
Miguel, Antonio
Educação escolar decolonial
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Terapia.
Decolonial school education
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Therapy.
title_short Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School Education
title_full Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School Education
title_fullStr Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School Education
title_full_unstemmed Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School Education
title_sort Wittgenstein, Therapy and Decolonial School Education
author Miguel, Antonio
author_facet Miguel, Antonio
Tamayo, Carolina
author_role author
author2 Tamayo, Carolina
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miguel, Antonio
Tamayo, Carolina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Educação escolar decolonial
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Terapia.
Decolonial school education
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Therapy.
topic Educação escolar decolonial
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Terapia.
Decolonial school education
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Therapy.
description Founded on the conviction that Wittgenstein’s oeuvre - which has as initial emblematic decolonial landmark the therapeutic-grammatical criticism that he addresses to the monumental work of Scottish anthropologist James George Frazer, entitled The golden bough - can be seen not exactly as a philosophy or a new philosophy, but as a (self) therapeutic philosophizing about a set of problems that the scholar tradition called ‘philosophical’ - among which, the basic problem of language that, to him, does not constitute a problem among others, but the condition for philosophizing and, by extension, for the philosophical or verbalist deconstruction of the other problems -, the purpose of this article is to characterize and describe therapeutically what we see as the decolonial aspect of this philosophizing. To this end, we will take to the divan, constituting it as a disease that can be treated by a therapeutic-grammatical attitude, the very problem of coloniality that has been guiding global school education since the constitution of national schooling systems, since the 19th century. From this perspective, we have assumed and practiced the belief that a (self) therapeutic writing must also be a (self) decolonial writing. Thus, we chose to write this article according to a polyphonic dialogic genre, which is also one of the characteristics of the therapeutic manner of philosophizing of LW. We specify the authorship of the voices participating in the dialogue by the initials of the first and last names of their authors, so Ludwig Wittgenstein will appear as LW. Our voices, in turn, will be referenced using HW and WH, which, intentionally, do not distinguish them.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/107911
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/107911
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/107911/59014
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/107911/59015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Educação & Realidade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Educação & Realidade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACED - UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACED - UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação & Realidade [Education & Reality]; Vol. 45 No. 3 (2020)
Educação & Realidade; v. 45 n. 3 (2020)
2175-6236
0100-3143
reponame:Educação & Realidade
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Educação & Realidade
collection Educação & Realidade
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação & Realidade - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||educreal@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1789438615569301504