Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Traebert,Eliane
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Parma,Gabriel Oscar Cremona, Traebert,Jefferson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852016000400309
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective To assess the internal validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). Methods The questionnaire was applied to a sample of 80 adults of both sexes. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted after previous analysis of communalities and global suitability of the method to determine questions that did not share a significant percentage of variance with the defined factors. Varimax rotation method with Kaiser’s normalization was used to minimize the number of questions that had high factor loads. Results The Brazilian version maintained 28 questions distributed in four new dimensions containing 11, 5, 7, and 5 questions, respectively. To obtain those four factors or dimensions, we selected those with eigenvalue greater than two, which explained about 50% of the data variability. Conclusion The Brazilian version under examination showed different behaviors from those in the original instrument. A review of the instrument questions and dimensions is clearly needed. Further research with larger samples is required to examine the rating scale and its suitability to the Brazilian context.
id UFRJ-6_96aa95fdb11dc13c63afa00e95d42b7b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0047-20852016000400309
network_acronym_str UFRJ-6
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment DeviceFamily functioningquestionnairecross-cultural adaptationvalidityABSTRACT Objective To assess the internal validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). Methods The questionnaire was applied to a sample of 80 adults of both sexes. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted after previous analysis of communalities and global suitability of the method to determine questions that did not share a significant percentage of variance with the defined factors. Varimax rotation method with Kaiser’s normalization was used to minimize the number of questions that had high factor loads. Results The Brazilian version maintained 28 questions distributed in four new dimensions containing 11, 5, 7, and 5 questions, respectively. To obtain those four factors or dimensions, we selected those with eigenvalue greater than two, which explained about 50% of the data variability. Conclusion The Brazilian version under examination showed different behaviors from those in the original instrument. A review of the instrument questions and dimensions is clearly needed. Further research with larger samples is required to examine the rating scale and its suitability to the Brazilian context.Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852016000400309Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria v.65 n.4 2016reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/0047-2085000000138info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTraebert,ElianeParma,Gabriel Oscar CremonaTraebert,Jeffersoneng2017-02-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0047-20852016000400309Revistahttp://portalrev.enfermagem.bvs.br/index.php?issn=0047-2085&lang=ptONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editora@ipub.ufrj.br1982-02080047-2085opendoar:2017-02-02T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device
title Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device
spellingShingle Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device
Traebert,Eliane
Family functioning
questionnaire
cross-cultural adaptation
validity
title_short Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device
title_full Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device
title_fullStr Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device
title_full_unstemmed Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device
title_sort Internal construct validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device
author Traebert,Eliane
author_facet Traebert,Eliane
Parma,Gabriel Oscar Cremona
Traebert,Jefferson
author_role author
author2 Parma,Gabriel Oscar Cremona
Traebert,Jefferson
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Traebert,Eliane
Parma,Gabriel Oscar Cremona
Traebert,Jefferson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Family functioning
questionnaire
cross-cultural adaptation
validity
topic Family functioning
questionnaire
cross-cultural adaptation
validity
description ABSTRACT Objective To assess the internal validity of a Brazilian version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). Methods The questionnaire was applied to a sample of 80 adults of both sexes. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted after previous analysis of communalities and global suitability of the method to determine questions that did not share a significant percentage of variance with the defined factors. Varimax rotation method with Kaiser’s normalization was used to minimize the number of questions that had high factor loads. Results The Brazilian version maintained 28 questions distributed in four new dimensions containing 11, 5, 7, and 5 questions, respectively. To obtain those four factors or dimensions, we selected those with eigenvalue greater than two, which explained about 50% of the data variability. Conclusion The Brazilian version under examination showed different behaviors from those in the original instrument. A review of the instrument questions and dimensions is clearly needed. Further research with larger samples is required to examine the rating scale and its suitability to the Brazilian context.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852016000400309
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852016000400309
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0047-2085000000138
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria v.65 n.4 2016
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editora@ipub.ufrj.br
_version_ 1750128246954917888