Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Iraneide Castro de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Rocha Neto,Helio G., Nascimento,Isabella, Pinto,Vanessa Andrade Martins, Appolinario,José Carlos, Cavalcanti,Maria Tavares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852022000200074
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective This study explores the relationship between patients’ self-assessment and physicians’ evaluation regarding clinical stability. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out at the general outpatient clinic of the Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB-UFRJ) in a large sample (1,447) of outpatients, of which 67.9% were patients with severe mental disorders (SMD). We collected information using a structured questionnaire developed for this purpose, filled in by the patient’s physician. Clinical stability was assessed by means of five psychiatric instability criteria and by the physician’s global clinical impression over the six previous months. The patients’ self-assessment was based on a question about how they evaluated their health status: stable/better, worse, does not know. For the analyses, patients’ self-evaluation was considered as our standard. Results The sample was composed of 824 (57%) women with an average age of 49 years. The most prevalent diagnoses within the SMD category corresponded to 937 patients, of whom 846 (90.3%) assessed themselves as stable/better. The physicians’ evaluations agreed more with patients with bipolar disorders and less with schizophrenics regarding stability. As for patients with depressive disorder, physicians agreed more with them regarding instability. Conclusion The data analysis confirms our hypothesis that the self-assessment made by patients with SMD was accurate regarding their health condition, and that the self-assessment made by patients who considered themselves stable agree with the physicians’ evaluation.
id UFRJ-6_ae1f19bb6c0f62c9003d0eb731b0231b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0047-20852022000200074
network_acronym_str UFRJ-6
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional studyBipolar disorderdepressive disordersevere mental disordersschizophreniaself-assessmentABSTRACT Objective This study explores the relationship between patients’ self-assessment and physicians’ evaluation regarding clinical stability. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out at the general outpatient clinic of the Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB-UFRJ) in a large sample (1,447) of outpatients, of which 67.9% were patients with severe mental disorders (SMD). We collected information using a structured questionnaire developed for this purpose, filled in by the patient’s physician. Clinical stability was assessed by means of five psychiatric instability criteria and by the physician’s global clinical impression over the six previous months. The patients’ self-assessment was based on a question about how they evaluated their health status: stable/better, worse, does not know. For the analyses, patients’ self-evaluation was considered as our standard. Results The sample was composed of 824 (57%) women with an average age of 49 years. The most prevalent diagnoses within the SMD category corresponded to 937 patients, of whom 846 (90.3%) assessed themselves as stable/better. The physicians’ evaluations agreed more with patients with bipolar disorders and less with schizophrenics regarding stability. As for patients with depressive disorder, physicians agreed more with them regarding instability. Conclusion The data analysis confirms our hypothesis that the self-assessment made by patients with SMD was accurate regarding their health condition, and that the self-assessment made by patients who considered themselves stable agree with the physicians’ evaluation.Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852022000200074Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria v.71 n.2 2022reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/0047-2085000000344info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Iraneide Castro deRocha Neto,Helio G.Nascimento,IsabellaPinto,Vanessa Andrade MartinsAppolinario,José CarlosCavalcanti,Maria Tavareseng2022-07-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0047-20852022000200074Revistahttp://portalrev.enfermagem.bvs.br/index.php?issn=0047-2085&lang=ptONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editora@ipub.ufrj.br1982-02080047-2085opendoar:2022-07-12T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
spellingShingle Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
Oliveira,Iraneide Castro de
Bipolar disorder
depressive disorder
severe mental disorders
schizophrenia
self-assessment
title_short Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title_full Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title_sort Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
author Oliveira,Iraneide Castro de
author_facet Oliveira,Iraneide Castro de
Rocha Neto,Helio G.
Nascimento,Isabella
Pinto,Vanessa Andrade Martins
Appolinario,José Carlos
Cavalcanti,Maria Tavares
author_role author
author2 Rocha Neto,Helio G.
Nascimento,Isabella
Pinto,Vanessa Andrade Martins
Appolinario,José Carlos
Cavalcanti,Maria Tavares
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Iraneide Castro de
Rocha Neto,Helio G.
Nascimento,Isabella
Pinto,Vanessa Andrade Martins
Appolinario,José Carlos
Cavalcanti,Maria Tavares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bipolar disorder
depressive disorder
severe mental disorders
schizophrenia
self-assessment
topic Bipolar disorder
depressive disorder
severe mental disorders
schizophrenia
self-assessment
description ABSTRACT Objective This study explores the relationship between patients’ self-assessment and physicians’ evaluation regarding clinical stability. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out at the general outpatient clinic of the Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB-UFRJ) in a large sample (1,447) of outpatients, of which 67.9% were patients with severe mental disorders (SMD). We collected information using a structured questionnaire developed for this purpose, filled in by the patient’s physician. Clinical stability was assessed by means of five psychiatric instability criteria and by the physician’s global clinical impression over the six previous months. The patients’ self-assessment was based on a question about how they evaluated their health status: stable/better, worse, does not know. For the analyses, patients’ self-evaluation was considered as our standard. Results The sample was composed of 824 (57%) women with an average age of 49 years. The most prevalent diagnoses within the SMD category corresponded to 937 patients, of whom 846 (90.3%) assessed themselves as stable/better. The physicians’ evaluations agreed more with patients with bipolar disorders and less with schizophrenics regarding stability. As for patients with depressive disorder, physicians agreed more with them regarding instability. Conclusion The data analysis confirms our hypothesis that the self-assessment made by patients with SMD was accurate regarding their health condition, and that the self-assessment made by patients who considered themselves stable agree with the physicians’ evaluation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852022000200074
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852022000200074
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0047-2085000000344
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria v.71 n.2 2022
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editora@ipub.ufrj.br
_version_ 1750128247740301312