ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Geociências do Nordeste |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/article/view/19080 |
Resumo: | Water is an essential natural resource to all forms of life; however, antropic activity, population increase and urbanization are changing the quality of shallow springs and making them unavailable for certain uses. Groundwater emerges as alternative to complete or even replace surface water; however, it is essential to have control over antropic activities so they would not contaminate aquifers. Thus, the aim of the present study is to compare the DRASTIC and GOD methods applied to the Vacacaí-Mirim River basin, in Rio Grande do Sul State. Both methods recorded vulnerability classes between insignificant an external, with higher prevalence of moderate (DRASTIC) and high (GOD) vulnerability. The GOD method held 89.91% of the vulnerability in 2 classes (moderate and high), whereas the DRASTIC one recorded 66.15% in these same classes. The DRASTIC method presented the highest class vulnerabilities in the study site. This outcome regards more consistent results and similar to parameters recorded in the field. Nevertheless, GOD is simpler due to the number of variables necessary for its application. It is important highlighting the importance of applying these methodologies to provide subsidies for decision-making by water resource managers. |
id |
UFRN-12_00b9ed318d728a2da62f91a7ee12e196 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/19080 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Geociências do Nordeste |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES ANÁLISIS DE LA VULNERABILIDAD NATURAL A LA CONTAMINACIÓN DEL AGUA SUBTERRÁNEA: COMPARACIÓN ENTRE LA METODOLOGÍA GOD Y DRASTICANÁLISE DA VULNERABILIDADE NATURAL À CONTAMINAÇÃO DA ÁGUA SUBTERRÂNEA: COMPARATIVO ENTRE A METODOLOGIA GOD E DRASTICWater is an essential natural resource to all forms of life; however, antropic activity, population increase and urbanization are changing the quality of shallow springs and making them unavailable for certain uses. Groundwater emerges as alternative to complete or even replace surface water; however, it is essential to have control over antropic activities so they would not contaminate aquifers. Thus, the aim of the present study is to compare the DRASTIC and GOD methods applied to the Vacacaí-Mirim River basin, in Rio Grande do Sul State. Both methods recorded vulnerability classes between insignificant an external, with higher prevalence of moderate (DRASTIC) and high (GOD) vulnerability. The GOD method held 89.91% of the vulnerability in 2 classes (moderate and high), whereas the DRASTIC one recorded 66.15% in these same classes. The DRASTIC method presented the highest class vulnerabilities in the study site. This outcome regards more consistent results and similar to parameters recorded in the field. Nevertheless, GOD is simpler due to the number of variables necessary for its application. It is important highlighting the importance of applying these methodologies to provide subsidies for decision-making by water resource managers.El agua es un recurso natural esencial para todas las formas de vida, sin embargo, las actividades humanas, el crecimiento de la población y la urbanización están cambiando la calidad de las fuentes de agua superficial, haciéndolas no disponibles para ciertos usos. Es una alternativa para complementar o incluso sustituir el uso de las aguas superficiales a las aguas subterráneas, sin embargo, y las necesidades es un control para que las actividades humanas no vienen a contaminar el acuífero. En este sentido, este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar los métodos GOD y DRASTIC en la cuenca del río Vacacaí-Mirim, en el estado de Rio Grande do Sul. Ambos métodos tenían sus clases de vulnerabilidad entre insignificante y extrema, con un mayor predominio de vulnerabilidad media (DRASTIC) y alta (GOD). El método GOD concentró el 89.91% de la vulnerabilidad en 2 clases (media y alta), mientras que DRASTIC presentó el 66.15% en estas mismas clases. Por lo tanto, DRASTIC, en el área de estudio, presentó una mayor variabilidad de clase, lo que indica resultados más consistentes y con parámetros obtenidos en el campo. Sin embargo, GOD se simplifica por la cantidad de variables requeridas para su aplicación. De este modo, se pone de relieve la importancia de la aplicación de estas metodologías para proporcionar información para la toma de decisiones para los administradores de los recursos hídricos.A água é um recurso natural imprescindível para todas as formas de vida, porém, atividades antrópicas, aumento populacional e urbanização estão alterando a qualidade dos mananciais superficiais, tornando indisponível para determinados usos. Surge como alternativa para complementar ou até mesmo substituir o uso da água superficial a água subterrânea, porém, e necessita-se de um controle para que atividades antrópicas não venham a contaminar o aquífero. Nesse sentido, esse estudo tem por objetivo comparar os métodos DRASTIC e GOD na bacia hidrográfica do Rio Vacacaí-Mirim, no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Ambos os métodos tiveram suas classes de vulnerabilidade entre insignificante e extrema, com maior predominâncias da vulnerabilidade média (DRASTIC) e alta (GOD). O método GOD concentrou 89,91 % da vulnerabilidade em 2 classes (Média e alta), já o DRASTIC apresentou 66,15 % nessas mesmas classes. Assim, o DRASTIC, na área de estudo apresentou, uma maior variabilidade das classes, indicando resultados mais consistentes, e com parâmetros obtidos a campo. Porém, o GOD é mais simplificado pelo número de variáveis necessárias para sua aplicação. Assim, destaca-se a importância da aplicação dessas metodologias para fornecer subsídios para tomadas de decisões para gestores dos recursos hídricos.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte2020-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/article/view/1908010.21680/2447-3359.2020v6n2ID19080Revista de Geociências do Nordeste; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 45-532447-335910.21680/2447-3359.2020v6n2reponame:Revista de Geociências do Nordesteinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporenghttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/article/view/19080/13103https://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/article/view/19080/13104Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Geociências do Nordesteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKemerich, Pedro Daniel da CunhaMartins, Sérgio RobertoKobiyama, MasatoDescovi Filho, Leônidas Luiz Volcato Borba, Willian Fernando deSouza, Éricklis Edson Boito deFernandes, Gabriel D'ávila2020-08-14T22:11:10Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/19080Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/oairegneufrn@gmail.com || periodicos@bczm.ufrn.br2447-33592447-3359opendoar:2020-08-14T22:11:10Revista de Geociências do Nordeste - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES ANÁLISIS DE LA VULNERABILIDAD NATURAL A LA CONTAMINACIÓN DEL AGUA SUBTERRÁNEA: COMPARACIÓN ENTRE LA METODOLOGÍA GOD Y DRASTIC ANÁLISE DA VULNERABILIDADE NATURAL À CONTAMINAÇÃO DA ÁGUA SUBTERRÂNEA: COMPARATIVO ENTRE A METODOLOGIA GOD E DRASTIC |
title |
ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES |
spellingShingle |
ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES Kemerich, Pedro Daniel da Cunha |
title_short |
ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES |
title_full |
ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES |
title_fullStr |
ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES |
title_full_unstemmed |
ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES |
title_sort |
ANALYSIS OF NATURAL VULNERABILITY TO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION: COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GOD AND DRASTIC METHODOLOGIES |
author |
Kemerich, Pedro Daniel da Cunha |
author_facet |
Kemerich, Pedro Daniel da Cunha Martins, Sérgio Roberto Kobiyama, Masato Descovi Filho, Leônidas Luiz Volcato Borba, Willian Fernando de Souza, Éricklis Edson Boito de Fernandes, Gabriel D'ávila |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, Sérgio Roberto Kobiyama, Masato Descovi Filho, Leônidas Luiz Volcato Borba, Willian Fernando de Souza, Éricklis Edson Boito de Fernandes, Gabriel D'ávila |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kemerich, Pedro Daniel da Cunha Martins, Sérgio Roberto Kobiyama, Masato Descovi Filho, Leônidas Luiz Volcato Borba, Willian Fernando de Souza, Éricklis Edson Boito de Fernandes, Gabriel D'ávila |
description |
Water is an essential natural resource to all forms of life; however, antropic activity, population increase and urbanization are changing the quality of shallow springs and making them unavailable for certain uses. Groundwater emerges as alternative to complete or even replace surface water; however, it is essential to have control over antropic activities so they would not contaminate aquifers. Thus, the aim of the present study is to compare the DRASTIC and GOD methods applied to the Vacacaí-Mirim River basin, in Rio Grande do Sul State. Both methods recorded vulnerability classes between insignificant an external, with higher prevalence of moderate (DRASTIC) and high (GOD) vulnerability. The GOD method held 89.91% of the vulnerability in 2 classes (moderate and high), whereas the DRASTIC one recorded 66.15% in these same classes. The DRASTIC method presented the highest class vulnerabilities in the study site. This outcome regards more consistent results and similar to parameters recorded in the field. Nevertheless, GOD is simpler due to the number of variables necessary for its application. It is important highlighting the importance of applying these methodologies to provide subsidies for decision-making by water resource managers. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/article/view/19080 10.21680/2447-3359.2020v6n2ID19080 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/article/view/19080 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/2447-3359.2020v6n2ID19080 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/article/view/19080/13103 https://periodicos.ufrn.br/revistadoregne/article/view/19080/13104 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Geociências do Nordeste info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Geociências do Nordeste |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Geociências do Nordeste; v. 6 n. 2 (2020); 45-53 2447-3359 10.21680/2447-3359.2020v6n2 reponame:Revista de Geociências do Nordeste instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Revista de Geociências do Nordeste |
collection |
Revista de Geociências do Nordeste |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Geociências do Nordeste - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
regneufrn@gmail.com || periodicos@bczm.ufrn.br |
_version_ |
1797052929018953728 |