Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Becker, Vanessa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lucena-Silva, Daniely de, Molozzi, Joseline, Severiano, Juliana dos Santos, Barbosa, Jose Etham de Lucena
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRN
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/30855
Resumo: Geoengineering techniques have been used to control phosphorus and cyanobacteria in lakes promising greater and quicker chemical and ecological recovery. Techniques that use coagulants and clays to remove particulates and dissolved phosphorus from the water column have received great. In this study, bench-scale “flock & sink” assays were carried out to evaluate the efficiency of the coagulants aluminium sulphate (SUL), polyaluminium chloride (PAC) and chitosan (CHI), alone and combined with natural bentonite clays (BEN) and lanthanum-modified bentonite (LMB), to remove of phosphorus from a eutrophic reservoir in a semi-arid region of Brazil. In addition, the study seeks to assess the effects on the cyanobacteria density and the intra- and extracellular concentrations of cyanotoxins after the application of these geoengineering materials. The SUL and PAC coagulants effectively reduced the total phosphorus (TP), reactive soluble phosphorus (SRP), turbidity, chlorophyll-a, cyanobacteria density and intracellular microcystin, whereas CHI showed a low removal efficiency. Lanthanum-modified bentonite proved to be more effective than BEN; however, the application of the coagulants only was sufficient to successfully remove phosphorus and cyanobacteria from the water column. In addition, the efficiency of the “flock & sink” technique in cell removal varied among the cyanobacteria species. Small colonial species such as Aphanocapsa delicatissima, Merismopedia glauca and Merismopedia tenuissima were removed regardless of the treatment used, including those with CHI and BEN. As for the filamentous cyanobacteria, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, Geitlerinema amphibium, Planktothrix agardhii and Pseudanabaena catenata, removal was achieved only using PAC, SUL and LMB alone or when combined. The intracellular concentrations of saxitoxin and cylindrospermopsin and the extracellular fraction of these cyanotoxins and of microcystin were not influenced by the application of coagulants and clays. This indicates that cell lysis did not occur with the addition of the geoengineering materials. These results demonstrate that the “flock & sink” technique could be used for restoration of eutrophic waters
id UFRN_540a3ed407701de017908a63843225f5
oai_identifier_str oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/30855
network_acronym_str UFRN
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
repository_id_str
spelling Becker, VanessaLucena-Silva, Daniely deMolozzi, JoselineSeveriano, Juliana dos SantosBarbosa, Jose Etham de Lucena2020-12-07T13:31:26Z2020-12-07T13:31:26Z2019-04-30LUCENA-SILVA, Daniely de; MOLOZZI, Joseline; SEVERIANO, Juliana dos Santos; BECKER, Vanessa; BARBOSA, José Etham de Lucena. Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters. Water Research, [S.L.], v. 159, p. 262-273, ago. 2019. Elsevier BV. Disponível em <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135419303744?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em 20 out 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.057.0043-1354https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/3085510.1016/j.watres.2019.04.057Elsevier BVAttribution 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBentoniteLanthanum-modified bentoniteFlocculationMicrocystinPolyaluminium chlorideChitosanAluminium sulphateRemoval efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic watersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleGeoengineering techniques have been used to control phosphorus and cyanobacteria in lakes promising greater and quicker chemical and ecological recovery. Techniques that use coagulants and clays to remove particulates and dissolved phosphorus from the water column have received great. In this study, bench-scale “flock & sink” assays were carried out to evaluate the efficiency of the coagulants aluminium sulphate (SUL), polyaluminium chloride (PAC) and chitosan (CHI), alone and combined with natural bentonite clays (BEN) and lanthanum-modified bentonite (LMB), to remove of phosphorus from a eutrophic reservoir in a semi-arid region of Brazil. In addition, the study seeks to assess the effects on the cyanobacteria density and the intra- and extracellular concentrations of cyanotoxins after the application of these geoengineering materials. The SUL and PAC coagulants effectively reduced the total phosphorus (TP), reactive soluble phosphorus (SRP), turbidity, chlorophyll-a, cyanobacteria density and intracellular microcystin, whereas CHI showed a low removal efficiency. Lanthanum-modified bentonite proved to be more effective than BEN; however, the application of the coagulants only was sufficient to successfully remove phosphorus and cyanobacteria from the water column. In addition, the efficiency of the “flock & sink” technique in cell removal varied among the cyanobacteria species. Small colonial species such as Aphanocapsa delicatissima, Merismopedia glauca and Merismopedia tenuissima were removed regardless of the treatment used, including those with CHI and BEN. As for the filamentous cyanobacteria, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, Geitlerinema amphibium, Planktothrix agardhii and Pseudanabaena catenata, removal was achieved only using PAC, SUL and LMB alone or when combined. The intracellular concentrations of saxitoxin and cylindrospermopsin and the extracellular fraction of these cyanotoxins and of microcystin were not influenced by the application of coagulants and clays. This indicates that cell lysis did not occur with the addition of the geoengineering materials. These results demonstrate that the “flock & sink” technique could be used for restoration of eutrophic watersengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNORIGINALRemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdfRemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdfapplication/pdf2967040https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/1/RemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdfc502d79a9229a138193a39dfeb38daa0MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8914https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/2/license_rdf4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbefMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81484https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/3/license.txte9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9MD53TEXTRemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdf.txtRemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain50827https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/4/RemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdf.txt609bffef5a4e3eb2f362596b29b3acdcMD54THUMBNAILRemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdf.jpgRemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1694https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/5/RemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdf.jpg44be43264d18eb8a7e6f28908b870790MD55123456789/308552020-12-13 05:01:14.223oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/opendoar:2020-12-13T08:01:14Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters
title Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters
spellingShingle Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters
Becker, Vanessa
Bentonite
Lanthanum-modified bentonite
Flocculation
Microcystin
Polyaluminium chloride
Chitosan
Aluminium sulphate
title_short Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters
title_full Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters
title_fullStr Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters
title_full_unstemmed Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters
title_sort Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters
author Becker, Vanessa
author_facet Becker, Vanessa
Lucena-Silva, Daniely de
Molozzi, Joseline
Severiano, Juliana dos Santos
Barbosa, Jose Etham de Lucena
author_role author
author2 Lucena-Silva, Daniely de
Molozzi, Joseline
Severiano, Juliana dos Santos
Barbosa, Jose Etham de Lucena
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Becker, Vanessa
Lucena-Silva, Daniely de
Molozzi, Joseline
Severiano, Juliana dos Santos
Barbosa, Jose Etham de Lucena
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bentonite
Lanthanum-modified bentonite
Flocculation
Microcystin
Polyaluminium chloride
Chitosan
Aluminium sulphate
topic Bentonite
Lanthanum-modified bentonite
Flocculation
Microcystin
Polyaluminium chloride
Chitosan
Aluminium sulphate
description Geoengineering techniques have been used to control phosphorus and cyanobacteria in lakes promising greater and quicker chemical and ecological recovery. Techniques that use coagulants and clays to remove particulates and dissolved phosphorus from the water column have received great. In this study, bench-scale “flock & sink” assays were carried out to evaluate the efficiency of the coagulants aluminium sulphate (SUL), polyaluminium chloride (PAC) and chitosan (CHI), alone and combined with natural bentonite clays (BEN) and lanthanum-modified bentonite (LMB), to remove of phosphorus from a eutrophic reservoir in a semi-arid region of Brazil. In addition, the study seeks to assess the effects on the cyanobacteria density and the intra- and extracellular concentrations of cyanotoxins after the application of these geoengineering materials. The SUL and PAC coagulants effectively reduced the total phosphorus (TP), reactive soluble phosphorus (SRP), turbidity, chlorophyll-a, cyanobacteria density and intracellular microcystin, whereas CHI showed a low removal efficiency. Lanthanum-modified bentonite proved to be more effective than BEN; however, the application of the coagulants only was sufficient to successfully remove phosphorus and cyanobacteria from the water column. In addition, the efficiency of the “flock & sink” technique in cell removal varied among the cyanobacteria species. Small colonial species such as Aphanocapsa delicatissima, Merismopedia glauca and Merismopedia tenuissima were removed regardless of the treatment used, including those with CHI and BEN. As for the filamentous cyanobacteria, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, Geitlerinema amphibium, Planktothrix agardhii and Pseudanabaena catenata, removal was achieved only using PAC, SUL and LMB alone or when combined. The intracellular concentrations of saxitoxin and cylindrospermopsin and the extracellular fraction of these cyanotoxins and of microcystin were not influenced by the application of coagulants and clays. This indicates that cell lysis did not occur with the addition of the geoengineering materials. These results demonstrate that the “flock & sink” technique could be used for restoration of eutrophic waters
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-04-30
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-12-07T13:31:26Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2020-12-07T13:31:26Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv LUCENA-SILVA, Daniely de; MOLOZZI, Joseline; SEVERIANO, Juliana dos Santos; BECKER, Vanessa; BARBOSA, José Etham de Lucena. Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters. Water Research, [S.L.], v. 159, p. 262-273, ago. 2019. Elsevier BV. Disponível em <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135419303744?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em 20 out 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.057.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/30855
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0043-1354
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.057
identifier_str_mv LUCENA-SILVA, Daniely de; MOLOZZI, Joseline; SEVERIANO, Juliana dos Santos; BECKER, Vanessa; BARBOSA, José Etham de Lucena. Removal efficiency of phosphorus, cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins by the “flock & sink” mitigation technique in semi-arid eutrophic waters. Water Research, [S.L.], v. 159, p. 262-273, ago. 2019. Elsevier BV. Disponível em <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135419303744?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em 20 out 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.057.
0043-1354
10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.057
url https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/30855
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier BV
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier BV
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRN
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/1/RemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdf
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/3/license.txt
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/4/RemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/30855/5/RemovalEfficiencyOfPhosphorus_Becker_2019.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c502d79a9229a138193a39dfeb38daa0
4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbef
e9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9
609bffef5a4e3eb2f362596b29b3acdc
44be43264d18eb8a7e6f28908b870790
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797776932591370240