Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
Texto Completo: | https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/2991 |
Resumo: | The assay was performed in two stages, the first being to evaluate the efficacy and acaricide and pulicida and the second to assess the influence of the bath on the efficacy of a formulation containing the combination of fipronil 6.01% with permethrin 44.88%. Were used 36 dogs of Beagle breed and each layer was composed of 18 dogs divided into three groups. Each group consisted of six dogs. In the first phase, the dogs were divided into a control group and two treated. The control group received no treatment while the other two were treated, a group treated with a commercial formulation of fipronil and the other with a formulation of permethrin with fipronil. Dogs of the second were divided into 3 groups, one control group and two treated. The control group received no treatment while the other two received the same treatment with the formulation of permethrin with fipronil, differing from them only the presence or absence of the bath. The dogs of the control and treated groups of both stages were infested with 50 pairs of C. felis and 25 couples of R. sanguineus. The first step to tick infestations were performed on days -2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 and fleas on days -2 +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 +40 +47 +54. These days, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 evaluations were performed for ticks and days, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, +42 , +49, +56 for fleas.In the second stage for tick infestations were performed on days 0, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 and fleas on days, 0, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 , +40, +47 +54. These days, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 ratings for ticks and the days were accomplished, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, + 42, 49, 56 for fleas. The baths were always a day after assessment of parasite load, ie, on days +8, +15, +22, +29, +36, +43 and +50. The effectiveness of association permethrin with fipronil against ticks was greater than 90% for 28 days, greater than the commercial formulation, which was effective for 14 days. The influence of the bath on the acaricide efficacy was observed only from day +28, with efficiency higher in the group without bath than the group with bath. The combination tested, for fleas, was greater than 95% for 42 days, the commercial formulation is equivalent, no influence was observed in the bath pulicida efficacy of the tested combination. |
id |
UFRRJ-1_964775d85f081a94133e46bcffc7adb2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:jspui/2991 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRRJ-1 |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Coumendouros, Katherina06.846.627-79Coumendouros, Katherina |Martins, Isabella Vilhena FreireFernandes, Julio IsraelAzevedo, Tha?s Ribeiro Correia000.711.190-76http://lattes.cnpq.br/7598715411120108Lambert, Monique Moraes2019-10-23T19:10:59Z2014-02-27LAMBERT, Monique Moraes. Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho. 2014. 35 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Ci?ncias Veterin?rias, Parasitologia Veterin?ria). Instituto de Veterin?ria, Departamento de Parasitologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, 2014.https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/2991The assay was performed in two stages, the first being to evaluate the efficacy and acaricide and pulicida and the second to assess the influence of the bath on the efficacy of a formulation containing the combination of fipronil 6.01% with permethrin 44.88%. Were used 36 dogs of Beagle breed and each layer was composed of 18 dogs divided into three groups. Each group consisted of six dogs. In the first phase, the dogs were divided into a control group and two treated. The control group received no treatment while the other two were treated, a group treated with a commercial formulation of fipronil and the other with a formulation of permethrin with fipronil. Dogs of the second were divided into 3 groups, one control group and two treated. The control group received no treatment while the other two received the same treatment with the formulation of permethrin with fipronil, differing from them only the presence or absence of the bath. The dogs of the control and treated groups of both stages were infested with 50 pairs of C. felis and 25 couples of R. sanguineus. The first step to tick infestations were performed on days -2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 and fleas on days -2 +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 +40 +47 +54. These days, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 evaluations were performed for ticks and days, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, +42 , +49, +56 for fleas.In the second stage for tick infestations were performed on days 0, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 and fleas on days, 0, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 , +40, +47 +54. These days, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 ratings for ticks and the days were accomplished, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, + 42, 49, 56 for fleas. The baths were always a day after assessment of parasite load, ie, on days +8, +15, +22, +29, +36, +43 and +50. The effectiveness of association permethrin with fipronil against ticks was greater than 90% for 28 days, greater than the commercial formulation, which was effective for 14 days. The influence of the bath on the acaricide efficacy was observed only from day +28, with efficiency higher in the group without bath than the group with bath. The combination tested, for fleas, was greater than 95% for 42 days, the commercial formulation is equivalent, no influence was observed in the bath pulicida efficacy of the tested combination.O ensaio foi realizado em duas etapas distintas:, sendo a primeira para avaliar a efic?cia carrapaticida e pulicida e a segunda para avaliar a influ?ncia do banho na efic?cia de uma formula??o contendo a associa??o de fipronil 6,01% com permetrina 44,88%.Foram utilizados 36 c?es da ra?a beagle, onde cada fase foi composta por 18 c?es divididos em tr?s grupos. Cada grupo era composto por seis c?es. Os c?es da primeira fase foram divididos em um grupo controle e dois tratados. O grupo controle n?o recebeu nenhum tratamento, enquanto que os outros dois receberam tratamento, sendo um grupo tratado com uma formula??o comercial de fipronil e o outro com uma formula??o de fipronil com permetrina.Os c?es da segunda foram divididos em 3 grupos, sendo um grupo controle e dois tratados.O grupo controle n?o recebeu nenhum tratamento, enquanto que os outros dois receberam o mesmo tratamento com a formula??o de fipronil com permetrina, diferindo entre eles apenas a aus?ncia ou presen?a do banho. Os c?es dos grupos controle e tratados de ambas as etapas foram infestados com 50 casais de C. felis felise 25 casais de R. sanguineus. Na primeira etapa as infesta??es para carrapatos foram realizadas nos dias, -2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 e parapulgas nos dias, -2+5, +12, +19, +26, +33,+40,+47+54. Nos dias,+2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 foram realizadas as avalia??es para carrapatos e nos dias, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35,+42,+49,+56 para pulgas. Na segunda etapa as infesta??es as s infesta??es para carrapatos foram realizadas nos dias, 0, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 e para pulgas nos dias, 0,+5, +12, +19, +26, +33,+40,+47+54. Nos dias,+2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 foram realizadas as avalia??es para carrapatos e nos dias,,+2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35,+42,+49,+56 para pulgas. Os banhos ocorreram sempre um dia ap?s avalia??o da carga parasit?ria, ou seja, nos dias +8, +15, +22, +29, +36, +43 e +50. A efic?cia da associa??o fipronil com permetrina contra carrapato foi superior a 90% por 28 dias, sendo superior a formula??o comercial, a qual foi eficaz por 14 dias. A influencia do banho na efic?cia carrapaticida s? foi observada a partir do dia +28, sendo a efic?cia no grupo sem banho superior ao grupo com banho. Para pulgas a associa??o testada foi superior a 95% por 42 dias, sendo equivalente a formula??o comercial, n?o foi observada influencia do banho na efic?cia pulicida da associa??o testada.Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2019-10-23T19:10:59Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2014 - Monique Moraes Lambert.pdf: 1344336 bytes, checksum: 7e31e90c9ddc50d742b143f63b41fdc0 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-10-23T19:10:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2014 - Monique Moraes Lambert.pdf: 1344336 bytes, checksum: 7e31e90c9ddc50d742b143f63b41fdc0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-02-27CNPqapplication/pdfhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/11018/2014%20-%20Monique%20Moraes%20Lambert.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/16684/2014%20-%20Monique%20Moraes%20Lambert.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/23006/2014%20-%20Monique%20Moraes%20Lambert.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/29386/2014%20-%20Monique%20Moraes%20Lambert.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/35762/2014%20-%20Monique%20Moraes%20Lambert.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/42160/2014%20-%20Monique%20Moraes%20Lambert.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/48540/2014%20-%20Monique%20Moraes%20Lambert.pdf.jpghttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/54990/2014%20-%20Monique%20Moraes%20Lambert.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Veterin?riasUFRRJBrasilInstituto de Veterin?riafenilpirazolpulgacarrapatobanhopiretroidesphenylpyrazolepyrethroidsfleatickbathMedicina Veterin?riaFipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banhoFipronil and permethrin spot-on control of Ctenocephalides felis felis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus in dogs: efficacy and influence of the bathinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJTHUMBNAIL2014 - Monique Moraes Lambert.pdf.jpg2014 - Monique Moraes Lambert.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3688http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2991/18/2014+-+Monique+Moraes+Lambert.pdf.jpg9cc7878d5ac9cdc667a0d646a58c224cMD518TEXT2014 - Monique Moraes Lambert.pdf.txt2014 - Monique Moraes Lambert.pdf.txttext/plain94452http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2991/17/2014+-+Monique+Moraes+Lambert.pdf.txt7c39972a8f445cc923700ac455e14a04MD517ORIGINAL2014 - Monique Moraes Lambert.pdf2014 - Monique Moraes Lambert.pdfapplication/pdf1344336http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2991/2/2014+-+Monique+Moraes+Lambert.pdf7e31e90c9ddc50d742b143f63b41fdc0MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2991/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51jspui/29912022-12-15 16:45:49.192oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://tede.ufrrj.br/PUBhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/oai/requestbibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.bropendoar:2022-12-15T18:45:49Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Fipronil and permethrin spot-on control of Ctenocephalides felis felis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus in dogs: efficacy and influence of the bath |
title |
Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho |
spellingShingle |
Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho Lambert, Monique Moraes fenilpirazol pulga carrapato banho piretroides phenylpyrazole pyrethroids flea tick bath Medicina Veterin?ria |
title_short |
Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho |
title_full |
Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho |
title_fullStr |
Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho |
title_sort |
Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho |
author |
Lambert, Monique Moraes |
author_facet |
Lambert, Monique Moraes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Coumendouros, Katherina |
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
06.846.627-79 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Coumendouros, Katherina | |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Isabella Vilhena Freire |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Julio Israel |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Azevedo, Tha?s Ribeiro Correia |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
000.711.190-76 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7598715411120108 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lambert, Monique Moraes |
contributor_str_mv |
Coumendouros, Katherina Coumendouros, Katherina | Martins, Isabella Vilhena Freire Fernandes, Julio Israel Azevedo, Tha?s Ribeiro Correia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
fenilpirazol pulga carrapato banho piretroides |
topic |
fenilpirazol pulga carrapato banho piretroides phenylpyrazole pyrethroids flea tick bath Medicina Veterin?ria |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
phenylpyrazole pyrethroids flea tick bath |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
Medicina Veterin?ria |
description |
The assay was performed in two stages, the first being to evaluate the efficacy and acaricide and pulicida and the second to assess the influence of the bath on the efficacy of a formulation containing the combination of fipronil 6.01% with permethrin 44.88%. Were used 36 dogs of Beagle breed and each layer was composed of 18 dogs divided into three groups. Each group consisted of six dogs. In the first phase, the dogs were divided into a control group and two treated. The control group received no treatment while the other two were treated, a group treated with a commercial formulation of fipronil and the other with a formulation of permethrin with fipronil. Dogs of the second were divided into 3 groups, one control group and two treated. The control group received no treatment while the other two received the same treatment with the formulation of permethrin with fipronil, differing from them only the presence or absence of the bath. The dogs of the control and treated groups of both stages were infested with 50 pairs of C. felis and 25 couples of R. sanguineus. The first step to tick infestations were performed on days -2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 and fleas on days -2 +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 +40 +47 +54. These days, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 evaluations were performed for ticks and days, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, +42 , +49, +56 for fleas.In the second stage for tick infestations were performed on days 0, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 and fleas on days, 0, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33 , +40, +47 +54. These days, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35 ratings for ticks and the days were accomplished, +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, + 42, 49, 56 for fleas. The baths were always a day after assessment of parasite load, ie, on days +8, +15, +22, +29, +36, +43 and +50. The effectiveness of association permethrin with fipronil against ticks was greater than 90% for 28 days, greater than the commercial formulation, which was effective for 14 days. The influence of the bath on the acaricide efficacy was observed only from day +28, with efficiency higher in the group without bath than the group with bath. The combination tested, for fleas, was greater than 95% for 42 days, the commercial formulation is equivalent, no influence was observed in the bath pulicida efficacy of the tested combination. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014-02-27 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-23T19:10:59Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
LAMBERT, Monique Moraes. Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho. 2014. 35 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Ci?ncias Veterin?rias, Parasitologia Veterin?ria). Instituto de Veterin?ria, Departamento de Parasitologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, 2014. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/2991 |
identifier_str_mv |
LAMBERT, Monique Moraes. Fipronil e Permetrina spot-on no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis e Rhipicephalus sanguineus em c?es: efic?cia e influ?ncia do banho. 2014. 35 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado em Ci?ncias Veterin?rias, Parasitologia Veterin?ria). Instituto de Veterin?ria, Departamento de Parasitologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, 2014. |
url |
https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/2991 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Veterin?rias |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRRJ |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Veterin?ria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) instacron:UFRRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRRJ |
institution |
UFRRJ |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2991/18/2014+-+Monique+Moraes+Lambert.pdf.jpg http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2991/17/2014+-+Monique+Moraes+Lambert.pdf.txt http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2991/2/2014+-+Monique+Moraes+Lambert.pdf http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2991/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
9cc7878d5ac9cdc667a0d646a58c224c 7c39972a8f445cc923700ac455e14a04 7e31e90c9ddc50d742b143f63b41fdc0 7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.br |
_version_ |
1797220066553495552 |