The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of Tocantins

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neves de Sousa, Diego
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esa/article/view/esa29-2_06_inclusao
Resumo: This article sought to analyze how the different segments of family farming were included in public rural development policies, created since the 1990s, in the context of the state of Tocantins. The research is of a qualitative nature, in which semi-structured interviews were used. Among the results, it is postulated that the agrarian reform settlers were those family farmers who most benefited from public policies, while the quilombolas and the indigenous people were the most neglected, even though the mediators realized that the State tried to give equal voice to the different social segments.
id UFRRJ-4_767a9c090894d53ed438bcea1fc69dbe
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1732
network_acronym_str UFRRJ-4
network_name_str Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of TocantinsLa inclusión de diferentes segmentos de la agricultura familiar en las políticas públicas de desarrollo rural en el contexto del estado de TocantinsA inclusão dos diferentes segmentos da agricultura familiar nas políticas públicas de desenvolvimento rural no contexto do estado do Tocantinsinclusão produtivaagricultores familiaresextensão ruralmediadoresproductive inclusionfamily farmersrural extensionmediatorsinclusión productivaagricultores familiaresextensión ruralmediadoresThis article sought to analyze how the different segments of family farming were included in public rural development policies, created since the 1990s, in the context of the state of Tocantins. The research is of a qualitative nature, in which semi-structured interviews were used. Among the results, it is postulated that the agrarian reform settlers were those family farmers who most benefited from public policies, while the quilombolas and the indigenous people were the most neglected, even though the mediators realized that the State tried to give equal voice to the different social segments.Este artículo buscó analizar cómo los diferentes segmentos de la agricultura familiar fueron incluidos en las políticas públicas de desarrollo rural, creadas desde la década de 1990, en el contexto del estado de Tocantins. La investigación es cualitativa, en la que utilizamos entrevistas semiestructuradas. Entre los resultados, postulamos que los pobladores de la reforma agraria fueron los públicos de agricultura familiar que más se beneficiaron de las políticas públicas, mientras que los quilombolas y los indígenas fueron los más desatendidos, aunque los mediadores se dieron cuenta de que el Estado pretendía dar una voz equitativa diferentes segmentos sociales.Este artigo buscou analisar como se deu a inclusão dos diferentes segmentos da agricultura familiar nas políticas públicas de desenvolvimento rural, criadas desde a década de 1990, no contexto do estado do Tocantins. A pesquisa é qualitativa, na qual utilizamos entrevistas semiestruturadas. Dentre os resultados, postulamos que os assentados de reforma agrária foram os públicos da agricultura familiar que mais se beneficiaram das políticas públicas, enquanto os quilombolas e os indígenas foram os mais preteridos, ainda que os mediadores percebessem que o Estado tentou dar voz de modo equitativo aos diferentes segmentos sociais.Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (CPDA/UFRRJ)2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esa/article/view/esa29-2_06_inclusao10.36920/esa-v29n2-6Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura; Vol. 29 No. 2: Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (June to September 2021); 378-403Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura; Vol. 29 Núm. 2: Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (junio a septiembre de 2021); 378-403Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura; v. 29 n. 2: Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (junho a setembro de 2021); 378-4032526-775210.36920/esa-v29n2reponame:Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJporhttps://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esa/article/view/esa29-2_06_inclusao/esa29-2_06_pdfhttps://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esa/article/view/esa29-2_06_inclusao/esa29-2_06_htmlCopyright (c) 2021 Diego Neves de Sousahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeves de Sousa, Diego2021-09-02T19:19:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1732Revistahttps://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esaPUBhttps://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esa/oaiestudoscpda@gmail.com||2526-77521413-0580opendoar:2021-09-02T19:19:06Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of Tocantins
La inclusión de diferentes segmentos de la agricultura familiar en las políticas públicas de desarrollo rural en el contexto del estado de Tocantins
A inclusão dos diferentes segmentos da agricultura familiar nas políticas públicas de desenvolvimento rural no contexto do estado do Tocantins
title The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of Tocantins
spellingShingle The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of Tocantins
Neves de Sousa, Diego
inclusão produtiva
agricultores familiares
extensão rural
mediadores
productive inclusion
family farmers
rural extension
mediators
inclusión productiva
agricultores familiares
extensión rural
mediadores
title_short The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of Tocantins
title_full The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of Tocantins
title_fullStr The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of Tocantins
title_full_unstemmed The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of Tocantins
title_sort The inclusion of different segments of family farming in public policies for rural development in the context of the state of Tocantins
author Neves de Sousa, Diego
author_facet Neves de Sousa, Diego
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neves de Sousa, Diego
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv inclusão produtiva
agricultores familiares
extensão rural
mediadores
productive inclusion
family farmers
rural extension
mediators
inclusión productiva
agricultores familiares
extensión rural
mediadores
topic inclusão produtiva
agricultores familiares
extensão rural
mediadores
productive inclusion
family farmers
rural extension
mediators
inclusión productiva
agricultores familiares
extensión rural
mediadores
description This article sought to analyze how the different segments of family farming were included in public rural development policies, created since the 1990s, in the context of the state of Tocantins. The research is of a qualitative nature, in which semi-structured interviews were used. Among the results, it is postulated that the agrarian reform settlers were those family farmers who most benefited from public policies, while the quilombolas and the indigenous people were the most neglected, even though the mediators realized that the State tried to give equal voice to the different social segments.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esa/article/view/esa29-2_06_inclusao
10.36920/esa-v29n2-6
url https://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esa/article/view/esa29-2_06_inclusao
identifier_str_mv 10.36920/esa-v29n2-6
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esa/article/view/esa29-2_06_inclusao/esa29-2_06_pdf
https://revistaesa.com/ojs/index.php/esa/article/view/esa29-2_06_inclusao/esa29-2_06_html
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Diego Neves de Sousa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Diego Neves de Sousa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (CPDA/UFRRJ)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (CPDA/UFRRJ)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura; Vol. 29 No. 2: Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (June to September 2021); 378-403
Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura; Vol. 29 Núm. 2: Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (junio a septiembre de 2021); 378-403
Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura; v. 29 n. 2: Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (junho a setembro de 2021); 378-403
2526-7752
10.36920/esa-v29n2
reponame:Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (Online)
collection Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura (Online) - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv estudoscpda@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797077446027116544

Registros relacionados