Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bini, Rodrigo Rico
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Carpes, Felipe Pivetta, Diefenthaeler, Fernando
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to compare the force applied to the pedal when cycling with the knees almost touching the bicycle frame (adduction position) compared to the position usually adopted by cyclists (reference position) and a position of the knees away from the bicycle frame (abduction position). Six cyclists were evaluated. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2MAX) was defined, and then the three different knee positions on the frontal plane were assessed. Three minutes of cycling in the reference position, adduction position and abduction position were conducted, using oxygen uptake (VO2) at which the cyclists had achieved the second ventilatory threshold. An instrumented two-dimensional pedal was used to measure the forces applied to the right pedal. The average VO2 and power output did not differ between the adduction (50.4±6.9 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 263±29 W), abduction (50.8±5.9 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 250±46 W) and reference position (50.4±5.9 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 246±47 W). Pedaling cadence increased significantly during adduction (94±8 rpm) and abduction (95±5 rpm) compared to the reference position (89±8 rpm). The force results indicated no differences in the effective force or effectiveness index between the reference, adduction and abduction positions. Resultant force increased during adduction (284.5±44.5 N) compared to the reference position (246.9±39.2 N). The results indicate that the cyclists were able to generate higher resultant force during cycling with the knees close to the bicycle frame, but were unable to effectively transmit this force to the movement.
id UFSC-16_61e58323062a966c3c38cccb40be15dd
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/10100
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary studyEfeitos da posição dos joelhos no plano frontal sobre as forças aplicadas no ciclismo: estudo preliminarThe purpose of this study was to compare the force applied to the pedal when cycling with the knees almost touching the bicycle frame (adduction position) compared to the position usually adopted by cyclists (reference position) and a position of the knees away from the bicycle frame (abduction position). Six cyclists were evaluated. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2MAX) was defined, and then the three different knee positions on the frontal plane were assessed. Three minutes of cycling in the reference position, adduction position and abduction position were conducted, using oxygen uptake (VO2) at which the cyclists had achieved the second ventilatory threshold. An instrumented two-dimensional pedal was used to measure the forces applied to the right pedal. The average VO2 and power output did not differ between the adduction (50.4±6.9 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 263±29 W), abduction (50.8±5.9 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 250±46 W) and reference position (50.4±5.9 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 246±47 W). Pedaling cadence increased significantly during adduction (94±8 rpm) and abduction (95±5 rpm) compared to the reference position (89±8 rpm). The force results indicated no differences in the effective force or effectiveness index between the reference, adduction and abduction positions. Resultant force increased during adduction (284.5±44.5 N) compared to the reference position (246.9±39.2 N). The results indicate that the cyclists were able to generate higher resultant force during cycling with the knees close to the bicycle frame, but were unable to effectively transmit this force to the movement.O objetivo foi comparar a força aplicada no pedal de ciclistas, pedalando com os joelhos tangenciando o quadro da bicicleta (posição de Adução), com a posição prefe¬rida (posição de Referência), e a posição com os joelhos afastados do quadro da bicicleta (posição de Abdução). Seis ciclistas foram avaliados. Foi determinado o consumo máximo de oxigênio (VO2Máx), sendo posteriormente os ciclistas avaliados em três situações: Posição de Referência; Posição de Adução; Posição de Abdução. O VO2 referente ao segundo limiar ventilatório foi utilizado para normalização da carga de trabalho. A medição da força apli¬cada foi realizada por um pedal instrumentado. O VO2 e a potência produzida não diferiram entre as posições de Adução (50,4 ± 6,9 ml.kg-1.min-1 e 263 ± 29 W), Abdução (50,8 ± 5,9 ml.kg-1.min-1 e 250 ± 46 W) e a posição de Referência (50,4 ± 5,9 ml.kg-1.min-1 e 246 ± 47 W). A cadência de pedalada aumentou significativamente nas posições de Adução (94 ± 8 rpm) e Abdução (95 ± 5 rpm), comparadas à Posição de Referência (89 ± 8 rpm). Não foram observadas diferenças para a força efetiva e índice de efetividade entre as posições de Referência, Adução e Abdução. A força resultante apresentou aumento na Posição de Adução (284,5 ± 44,5 N) quando comparada à Posição de Referência (246,9 ± 39,2 N). Estes resultados indicam que os ciclistas avaliados foram capazes de aplicar mais força no pedal na posição de Adução, no entanto, não foram capazes de direcionar esta força de forma mais efetiva para o movimento.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Avaliado por ParesExperimentalapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2009v11n2p14210.1590/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2009); 142-149Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 11 n. 2 (2009); 142-1491980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142/9366https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142/16475Bini, Rodrigo RicoCarpes, Felipe PivettaDiefenthaeler, Fernandoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-01-22T10:23:25Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/10100Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2020-01-22T10:23:25Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary study
Efeitos da posição dos joelhos no plano frontal sobre as forças aplicadas no ciclismo: estudo preliminar
title Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary study
spellingShingle Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary study
Bini, Rodrigo Rico
title_short Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary study
title_full Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary study
title_fullStr Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary study
title_sort Effects of knee frontal plane position on pedal forces during cycling: A preliminary study
author Bini, Rodrigo Rico
author_facet Bini, Rodrigo Rico
Carpes, Felipe Pivetta
Diefenthaeler, Fernando
author_role author
author2 Carpes, Felipe Pivetta
Diefenthaeler, Fernando
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bini, Rodrigo Rico
Carpes, Felipe Pivetta
Diefenthaeler, Fernando
description The purpose of this study was to compare the force applied to the pedal when cycling with the knees almost touching the bicycle frame (adduction position) compared to the position usually adopted by cyclists (reference position) and a position of the knees away from the bicycle frame (abduction position). Six cyclists were evaluated. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2MAX) was defined, and then the three different knee positions on the frontal plane were assessed. Three minutes of cycling in the reference position, adduction position and abduction position were conducted, using oxygen uptake (VO2) at which the cyclists had achieved the second ventilatory threshold. An instrumented two-dimensional pedal was used to measure the forces applied to the right pedal. The average VO2 and power output did not differ between the adduction (50.4±6.9 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 263±29 W), abduction (50.8±5.9 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 250±46 W) and reference position (50.4±5.9 ml.kg-1.min-1 and 246±47 W). Pedaling cadence increased significantly during adduction (94±8 rpm) and abduction (95±5 rpm) compared to the reference position (89±8 rpm). The force results indicated no differences in the effective force or effectiveness index between the reference, adduction and abduction positions. Resultant force increased during adduction (284.5±44.5 N) compared to the reference position (246.9±39.2 N). The results indicate that the cyclists were able to generate higher resultant force during cycling with the knees close to the bicycle frame, but were unable to effectively transmit this force to the movement.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares",
Avaliado por Pares
Experimental
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142
10.1590/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142/9366
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2009v11n2p142/16475
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2009); 142-149
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 11 n. 2 (2009); 142-149
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435121373282304